28, 2026. If you would please stand and join with me as we pledge allegiance to the flag. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you. Uh, may we have roll call, please? >> Chairman Taylor, >> here. >> Vice Chairwoman Van Deven >> here. Member Beckles >> here. Member Green
>> here. Alternative member Rosel >> here. >> Very well. We have a full for quum tonight, so we'll be able to uh conduct business. Uh first up is the approval of the minutes from our December 8th, 2025 minute minutes. Are
there any corrections or addition anyone saw that need to be added to the minutes? All right. Do I have a motion then about the minutes? A motion to approve the minutes. >> Okay, I have a motion. >> Second. >> And a second. No other further
discussion. All those in favor say I. >> I. >> Any opposed? None seen. Very well. Now we'll move on to a little speech. Um, all persons who anticipate speaking on a
public item, a public hearing item, must fill out an oath card to be heard on that agenda item and sign the oath contained their own. These cards are located at a table near the entrance to the council chamber or may be obtained from the recording secretary. This
meeting will be conducted in accordance with procedures adopted in resolution number 24-1997. Those speaking in favor of a request will be heard first. Those opposed will be heard second and those who wish to make a public comment on the item may
speak third. The applicant may make a cross make a brief rebuttal if necessary. A representative for either side for or against may cross-examine a witness. Anyone who speaks is considered a
witness. If you have photographs, sketches, or documents that you desire for the commission to consider, you must submit as evidence and they will be retained by the city. Um, so everyone understands, if you plan to speak tonight, you filled out an oath
card and turned it in. Very good. Thank you. All right. Uh, staff, have the agenda items been properly advertised for tonight? >> Yes, chair. Very good. Have any of the
members had direct contact with the public regarding this item? >> No. >> And I see none. None seen. Uh we have no consent or old business. under new business. Uh just in case
anybody didn't hit the word, uh item 8C, which was an appeal, has been withdrawn per the applicant. So that will not be heard tonight. Correct, staff? >> That is correct. >> Very good. All right, staff. So I guess
we're up to variance number one- 2026 for 2010 Logan Drive. if you would pre please enlighten us. >> Thank you chair. For the variance request is for land development regulations chapter 28 section 28-304
single family medium density to allow the lot width to be less than the required 75 ft and to allow the interior sideyard setback to be less than the required 10 ft for a primary structure for property located in the R1B zoning district at 2010 Logan Drive as
submitted by American Ecosystems contractors. authorized applicant for Andy the Builder LLC owner. And then just to start as usual, the powers of the BAA LDR section 34-226 states that the board shall grant a variance request when in the opinion of
the board of adjustments and appeals owing to special conditions, the literal enforcement of such ordinance or regulations would do manifest injustice to or impose an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant. In order to authorize any variance to the provisions of such ordinance, the board must
consider the following criteria. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other land, structures, or building in the same zoning. That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. That granting the variance
requested will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. The literal interpretation of the provisions of the ordinance would deprive the applicant rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district
under the terms of the ordinance. The variance granted is the minimum variance that would make possible the reasonable use of the land building or structure and the granting of the variance will preserve the spirit of the ordinance or remain in harmony with its general purpose and intent. Also in granting the variance the public safety and welfare
must be assured and in no case shall granting of a variance result in a change of use which would not be permitted in that zone. So with that, the applicant is requesting a variance to the land development regulation section 28-304C to allow a lot width of 50 ft where the
75 ft is required and to reduce the interior sideyard setbacks to 5T on each side where 10 ft is required as depicted on the submitted concept plan. And I will say that the concept plan had been updated. you each have a copy that was received after the agenda, the staff
report and agenda had been completed and published. Um, so that is the concept plan that we will be referring to tonight for any decisions that was the most upto-date submitted by the applicant. So, um, as depicted on the submitted
concept plan, the applica proposes to construct a 48 foot by 50 foot single family dwelling with a 34.97 foot front yard setback and 5-ft interior sideyard setbacks. The subject
property is a vacant residential lot within the Whispering Hills Golf Estates subdivision, originally platted in 1926. The lot has an existing width of approximately 50 feet and does not meet the current minimum lot width requirement of the R1B zoning district.
Pursuant to LDR section 28-5 within the single fam within the R1B zoning district, no dwelling shall be erected on a lot that does not abut a public street for at least 65 ft except that a minimum street abutment of 25 ft may be permitted for irregularly shaped lots
provided that the minimum lot width is met at the building line. Given the subject given the configuration of the subject property, the application of this standard would require the primary structure to be placed in approximate 92 foot front set yard setback in order to meet the 75 foot lot minimum lot width
requirement at the building line. The requested variance to allow a reduced lot width would permit reasonable development of an existing platted lot that predates current zoning standards. However, the redist requested interior sideyard setbacks of five feet on each side represent a substantial reduction
from the required 10-ft interior sideyard setback. The requested reduction exceeds what's necessary to come up accommodated development of the lot and does not reflect the minimum relief necessary to allow reasonable use of the property. So, with that, staff have broken up into two separate
requests and motions. Staff are recommending approval of the variance request to allow a reduced lot width from 75 ft to 50 ft. The literal interpretation of the provisions of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and
special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. However, staff are recommending denial of the variance request to reduce the required interior set sideyard setbacks from 10 feet to 5t. The variance is not the minimum variance that would make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or
structure. And granting the variance would not will would occur would confer upon the applicant special privileges denied by um ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district. And with that, if needed,
oh that's it because you have the updated plot plan in front. So with that, I'm finished and available for any questions you may have. Okay, staff. Um, the house, as I'm looking on page 21,
which has a blue outline of the property line, I see that there is a house to the, as I look at it to the left. >> Mhm. >> And I don't see anything but trees. I assume that's a backyard,
whatever, for the other lots beside it. So, there's not a physical structure very close to that part. Is that correct >> on that? Yes. on that side to the right as you would look at it. Um that is the backyard of that property and the the one to the left is that single family
home you see there. >> I was unable to find building permits for that one. So I'm unsure on the current setback for that property if that was going to be the next question. >> All right, that was my question. Anybody else have a question for staff?
All right, seeing no other questions for staff at this time, uh, do we have any cards signed up to speak? >> Clayton Hume. >> Very good, sir. If you would please come up and give us your name and address for the record, please. >> Clayton Hume. I'm with American
Ecosystems contractors and uh we're a custom home builder and working with this investor, we just feel like that variance just makes sense there in that area because the lots are so big on both sides. And if we had to keep the minimum
setbacks before, like she said, it's going to be like a 90 foot driveway back and they'll have like less than 20 ft for a backyard. It just makes, you know, a lot better sense to move it up. plenty of room on both sides of the property if you did need to go through there and do anything. You know, there's nothing
going to impede that. So, I just ask you give the variance so we can get another good family settled in Titusville in a good house. >> Okay. So, you're saying with the variance that they they said the length from the front the 92 feet was that it
90. So the the 92 feet would be if we had to apply the 75 foot width at the building line and the 10- foot interior sideyard setbacks, then you're looking at like a 92 94 foot front yard driveway up until because the house would have to
be at that front building line. >> Yeah. And like you said, there would be any backyard left over after that. >> No, you want to have kids, you got to let them lose their dogs. You know, they want to run. You can't let them run loose in, you know, big front yard like that and this.
>> All right, I'll answer my question. Anybody else have anything to say >> or questions? I see your light on, sir. Do you have a question? >> Uh, no. I turn that. >> Have you talked to anyone um in building department or about possibly modifying
the design, making it a longer house in just modifying it? any other way to try to fit fit it to the design as opposed to to squeeze it >> probably make the house smaller but the investor wants a three >> I say smaller I said narrower and longer
>> yeah it's just u with all the setbacks and that irregular shaped lot there's only so much you can do within that space and have a you know marketable home uh right now most of the buyers for new homes are looking at the three two
bedroomedroom room model and um this is uh just a small request. I mean the fact that it's might be backed up on this property line. The neighbors on each side, they're looking at 30 40 feet
from their property lines from their houses are when they come out of their house to get in their car to leave. They're not going to see these people cuz if we position the house here, when they look this way, they're looking at the woods. Or look this way, they're looking at the woods. And the neighbors
would have the same privacy that way. And still you would have, you know, a usable space in the backyard for living space. >> Okay. Did that answer your questions? >> Any other questions? >> All right. Well, thank you, sir. >> Thanks.
>> Good to see you. Do we have any other cards? >> Is it Mike Watch? >> Is that the last name? >> Mike. >> Welcome, sir. If you please say your name and your address for the record, sir. >> Hey, how you doing? Uh, I'm Mike Natali. I live at 2012. Uh, I've been there for
about 7 years now. Uh, before I bought the house, the property used to be part of mine before I bought it. Um, what I've noticed is just a convenience thing that we took pictures over the last six, seven years of the
property. Uh, behind the property that he's building on, the fence behind them, the water builds up so big back there, it goes halfway up the fence and the guy only has the fence there for three years or so.
my property is raised higher than that property. So, if they pour dirt or whatever it is now, it's already coming on my property. It's going to make more of a problem because there's no drainage. Um, if you would like, I'd like give you
guys the photos if you'd like to see them. >> If you're willing to leave them here for >> Oh, they're yours. I've paid for them. They're dated, timestamped, everything like that. >> Very good, sir. But you can look at that first picture
and uh you can see the water line always hits heavy back there. The mosquitoes are horrible. Uh I know the property was 30 40 grand. They uh switched hands at one point. Um but we did not buy the property
because of the building restrictions and of course the flooding. The flooding was the biggest thing. um if it's coming onto our properties, uh then that's going to create a bigger problem and it's going to be even worse for the neighbor behind them because
they already have issues with flooding. And they just redid the roads back there, but the flooding is horrible back there. Even me as 6'2, if I went standing in there, it's above my knees. And I don't think you want to put a
house there in my opinion to let your kids and animals roam around if it's a pond. >> Okay, sir. So, you're speaking in favor of this under the plan that they presented to put the house at the front part of the lot. Is that correct?
>> If No, sir. If you watch uh the pictures in there, there's a fence because I cleared my whole lot. Um, so there's a fence there and it runs up my property already before they
build. So if they build on that property and switch the zoning, the water is going to start pushing more and more on the property. And there's other pictures in there you'll see of the water line. >> Can you um tell us which house you are
in proximity to this property? Um, if you're facing the property, I'm to the left. >> The one to the right >> is fine because they got a long enough distance, but the neighbor behind him already has, if you look at his fence,
you'll see the water lines about midway. And then you have my property, which it runs up, and then you have the back neighbor over there. >> So, you are not you're against this? Oh, absolutely. >> Yes, sir. >> I just to try to make sure we understand what you're
>> you're again. Any questions other questions for this? >> So, >> are you questioning the the width shortening the width side the side setbacks >> if >> or are you also against the length of
it? I'm against both because if you put something there and it's already a pond, it's already pushing on my property. It's more than a quarter on my property. If you look at that one picture that's in there and that's after it rained and it was sitting there for a week, two weeks
sitting on the property and it's pushing its way. >> So, if you fill in, you build something on it, it's going to start pushing it more. And besides me, I'm thinking about the neighbor behind us because if you already put that fence in two, three years ago and he spent all that money
and you know how much money it is to put in a fence and it's already coming up halfway on the fence. If you put something else there, that poor guy back there, I don't know about his insurance, but uh the flood insurance you didn't need to be in that area. That's a flood
zone. Now, if you go ahead and do that, >> thank you. Do you have flood insurance at this time? >> Um, I'm not I don't think I do. No, sir. >> Okay, sir. >> Um, because it wasn't required when I bought my house. >> All right.
>> Um, >> he's not in the flood zone. >> You're not in a flood zone. >> Correct. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. Uh, any other questions? >> You Sorry.
>> I I did have a question. So you're you're So if they weren't to get the variance and build anyway, you would be against that because no matter how they build, it's your thought that they're going to raise the level of the property, change the drainage, and more water is going to come to your property. >> Right. Correct. And there has to be some
kind of drainage put in there because no matter what besides my property is the two, three people that are behind me, they're going to get that. They're already getting it because if you look at their fence and you take a picture of it, you'll see it's running in the
middle of the fence and it's going to make it harder for them, too. It's not just me. >> No, I I was just clarifying. So, it it's not so much about the variances that you're worried about. It's the building in general. >> Yes, sir. >> Yeah. So, the varian just going to make
it a little easier for them for what they want, >> but they may build a house anyway. So, that >> Well, yes, that's at your discretion. >> Okay. That's absolutely clarify. >> Any other questions? Thank you, sir. >> Thank you, guys.
>> Do we have any other cards to speak? >> No, sir. >> Does the applicant wish to make any rebuttals? >> Clayton, >> do you wish to make any rebuttal or speak back to what this last person said
>> about this lot. >> Yes, sir. >> Um, yeah, I I get the um concern about flooding, but you know, you you and I know that we've been here for 30, 40 years. That amount of flooding we got last year was very uh
irregular. We don't have that kind of flooding problems around here. But what we were going to do is put in some filtration sand back there and remove there is some muck at the back of the property that I found, you know, after we got through the Brazilian peppers and
and all the cut zoo and all the garbage that was back there. I noticed that and I said, "Well, you know, to make this usable anyway, we're going to have to come in there and put some filtration sand and that'll allow it to soak and saturate." I mean that I I seen when he
was talking about the water on the fence and it's it was up a little ways but that was after 15 inch rain that we got you know so it's it's not usual that I know of but the um you know now you can see it that that all the peppers
got removed. I had to do that so they could do the proper survey. And um yeah, I don't think it's going to be an issue at all. I can I can put slight swells in when I put the yard in or what have you like I did at Ramblin Acres and
it'll lay in there. You know how low that lot was that I built out there. Um it's it's all on how you lay out the lot. The water's going to lay in the places where you design it to lay that way. But we're going to make sure our clients have good usable usable space to
live in. We want them to be, you know, happy there. So they get ready to build bigger will be the guy they call. Well, thank you, sir. >> Thank you, sir. Any other questions? Okay. No other questions. Thank you.
All right. You said that was our last card, Clark. >> Yes, sir. >> Okay. Then we will close at this time to the public hearing and bring it back to uh the committee for discussion or questions of staff. Well staff does
this issue ring any bells in your department? I mean it's not in a flood zone as we understand. >> Yeah, it's not I mean without the variances there is still ample area to develop a house. um it would be further back in the property into I guess maybe
what seems to be a more concerned area. Um with the approval of the lot with without the setback reduction um the applicant would be able to bring it back a little more forward because
instead of needing to meet a 75 ft foot width, they'd have to meet the 50 with 10 foot setbacks. Um, so it' be a little bit further more and then if both were to be approved, it would be as shown on your site plan. But as far as the flooding portion of anything, it's not a
flood zone. So it wasn't anything that was explored or >> anyone else have a question? >> No comments from any other um staff departments on the application either. >> Okay. Any other questions, staff?
>> Okay. Any discussion amongst ourselves as to is that the flood zone thing? >> I would say looking at the soils in the vicinity of the subject property, the only viable place to build would be towards the front or towards Logan
Drive. The back corner shows that it's uh more than likely a collected basin of longstanding um drainage issues, but the city of Ty will look at that, I'm sure, in the permitting part of it all. So, um, >> and just for Mr. Green, you're looking
at page 25 on your packet, just in case the other board members want to take a peek. Is that correct? The soul the soils map. >> Help me out here. Al says, "Yes, indeed it is 25." >> Just in case anyone wanted to see what Mr. I was looking at
That is the soil makeup. What we're looking at, not a flood zone or anything, just a soil makeup, but it can be indicative of what's wet and what's not. >> Okay. All right. >> I'm curious as to whether it floods. Was
that a one-time situation after the 15 inch flood rain or is it like that all the time? >> No. >> Or after every rain? >> It's not. >> It was an anomaly. >> Can I ask um Can I ask the applicant
that question? >> Yes, you may. >> You can ask the >> I mean, not the applicant, but the um >> this gentleman the >> Yes. >> Yes, ma'am. You need to come up to the podium at the
microphone. Sorry. >> Uh those pictures are the last seven years. They're all written down. Um it was just because we were sending it to family when they were concerned with whether or if we were like, "Oh my
god, look how high the water's coming up. and even other neighbors were here to speak. They just didn't know to fill out the card. >> I'm just wondering, have you gone anywhere else to seek answers to
>> this flooding besides here? Have you? >> No, it's actually the first time I'm ever doing this. Um, so sorry if I'm not up to protocol, but uh >> this is the very first time I'm doing this. That's why it was just convenient. We had the pictures from the last seven
years >> to show >> how bad it gets back there and it stays there >> and it's for weeks. It's not like it goes. >> So your issue is it feels just going to get worse. >> Correct. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. >> Yes, ma'am. I see your dates on here going back to
22, 23, and 24, and then 25. And that's what your notes you put on the back of here. Correct. >> Yes. Well, my wife >> wrote them down. Yes.
>> Your representative. Yes, sir. >> Yes, sir. I was just being honest. >> All right. Thank you, sir. >> Thank you. >> All right. >> I'm sorry. I can't just talk. >> Is it too late to pull out a card and
speak? >> Uh, yes, sir. The public discussion has been closed on it. That's um so I'll bring it back to the board. What is a recommendation or a motion?
>> Asking for a motion. >> Motion or what? Whatever. I mean, I'm sorry. Next. Well, I don't have a motion here, but I'll I'm leaning towards approval of both uh both various requests at this
time. >> I'm concerned about the side setbacks being small. >> Aren't there >> I'm sorry. Turn your mic on. Uh are are there easements or anything in the back that would
>> what would be the rear yard set back >> 25 ft >> 25 ft >> but there are to answer Miss Vandy Steven's question there are no easements notated on the property that would impede on it but all that would just be restrictions to where the building could
be um but there is no drainage easement or anything like that that I was able to find. >> Thank you. And then of course if you did build back there, you would definitely have to fill it in. >> He's asking for a 5-ft setback on the
>> sides >> on the sides. His neighbor on one side is clearly over 10, probably closer to 20. That's a guesstimate v looking at the visuals. And um I see with this lot width, I
understand the complications, but uh again, I'm going to lean I'm going to lean towards approval of these requests. >> Okay. Staff broke it down into two different portions. So, we will have to uh
do I have a motion on the first back up page here. >> Um >> uh >> page 12. Page 12, I believe. >> Yes, page 12. All right. So, the first
part, the staff had recommended approval. Do we have a uh motion on that uh recommendation? Can we include both motions, both responses, >> both parts of it, or do I need to
address them separately? >> I guess if they are the same recommendation for both, you could do conclude them together, but if you are going to >> Okay. Um, >> with uh regard to variance number 2026
at 210 Logan Drive, I will agree with the staff for an approval of the variance request to allow reduced w lot width from 75 ft to 50 ft. >> It's a motion. >> Okay. So, I have a motion on that part.
Is there a second? >> Second. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? >> Roll call, please. >> Chairman Taylor, >> yes. >> Vice Chairwoman Van Deeven, >> yes.
>> Member Beckles, >> yes. >> Member Green, >> yes. >> Alternative member Rothell, >> yes. Okay. So the first first part of the motion was broken down by staff has been approved from the 75 ft to the 50 ft for the front yard.
All right. The second part addresses s side yard setbacks from 10 feet to 5t. Is there a recommendation or a motion from >> I'll put a motion in agree with staff
again for a denial of the variance request to reduce the required interior side yard setbacks from 10 ft to 5 ft. The variance is not the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure. And granting the variance requested will
not confer upon the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district. >> Okay, we have a motion. Do I have a second? >> Second.
>> We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion amongst ourselves? All right, seeing none, have a roll call, please. >> Member Beckals, >> yes.
>> Member Green, >> no. >> Alternate member Rothell, >> no. >> Chairman Taylor, >> yes. >> Vice Chairwoman Van Deven, >> yes.
>> Okay. Well, that on this board it takes a vote vote of four or four five in order to pass and this denial. Okay, we recommended.
So, all right, go to counselor. Now, >> there must be um four affirmative votes in order to grant a variance. Um but you have three votes which is a majority in favor to deny which would be appropriate as denial. >> Okay. So the setback part is denied.
That correct? >> That's correct. >> Okay. So the setback stay in place 10 ft on either side but the uh 75 foot has been shrunk down to 50. So you can have that
be on that part of the lot. All right, thank you very much. And now we'll go to our next item which is on page >> 32 >> 32 >> 30 Okay, 32.
>> Well, okay. Uh this this is a request for variance number 2-2026 21108 Melinda. Is that what you pronounce that? Melinda. >> Melinda. Yes. >> Uh okay. Staff, if you will enlighten us
on this, please. >> Thank you. The applicant is requesting a variance to the LDR section 28-302C to allow an interior sideyard stepback of 13 feet 8 in where 15 ft is required for property located within the rural
residential zoning district. The subject property contains a single family dwelling constructed in 1957 and is an unplatted rectangular shaped lot consisting of approximately 0.54 acres with 100 ft of frontage along the Linda Lane. While the lot meets the minimum
lot area requirement of 21,780 ft for the RR zoning district, it does not meet the minimum lot width of requirement of 125 ft for a single family dwelling. In 1993, the property was reszoned from R1B to RR, rending
rendering the lot non-conforming with respect to the current RR lot with standards. The applicant is proposing to construct an addition along the east interior sideyard of the dwelling in an area previously occupied by a block carport. The far former carport has been
removed and the survey submitted does not reflect the current layout of the house. As a result, the concept plan does not clearly represent the variance request. The applicant states that the existing structure now maintains an approximate 26 foot 8 in interior sideyard setback, but without an updated
survey, staff cannot verify this information. Based on the applicant's representation, the proposed addition would extend 12 feet 8 in resulting in an approximate 13 foot 8 inch interior sideyard setback. All other applicable development standards of the RR zoning
district would be met. The property has a non-conforming lot and the requested variance is not necessarily to allow reasonable use of the property. The removal of the carport building brought the the removing of the carport brought the building into greater conformance with the setback and the proposed addition appears to be a
self-created hardship. There are alternative design options that exist that would allow improvements to the resident without encroaching into the required interior sideyard setback. So with that, staff would recommend denial of the variance to allow an inter interior sideyard setback of 13t 8 in
instead of the required minimum of 15 ft. The requested variance is not the minimum variance that would make reasonable possible use of the land, building or structure, and alternate design options exist that would allow improvements to the resident without encroaching into the required interior setback. And then for you guys, if you'd
like to see on page 40, you'll have the plot plan um discuss that kind of concept plan to show at least the area of where the addition is being proposed and sketched out. There is a drawing, a construction drawing of the addition on
page 45 of your packet to show how it would extend off that side. And then on 58, um, because the survey is not up to date, so 58, there is a picture that has been provided by the applicant to show kind of that current sideyard area
without that block carport there anymore. And with that, that's all I have. If you guys have any other questions for me. >> You said 58. That's that's to the right side. I thought the carport was over on the other side.
>> No. So there was actually um so if we go back to sorry page um 39 or 40 whichever of this you have a screen porch on one side and then on the right if you're looking at the
picture there was actually a that was a block carport that is included in the main 52 feet width of the house. It was actually a carport included in that. There's a screen porch on the left and there was a block carport. So if you scroll to
goodness, let me see. So 58 um page 60 or um 61 you can see in 2019 um where the carport was kind of dilapidated. There was a block carport
that was there. Um you can see where that was on that side of the house. that has since been taken down. But the survey reflects that carport and that's what had that 13t sideyard setback that's shown on the survey.
>> What page is that on >> that? The the survey was page um >> on what page >> what page >> 40 for the survey >> back to 40. >> So 58 is existing conditions. a picture of existing conditions. The survey shows
that block carport that was shown on page 60 from 2019 that has >> that is no longer there. >> That is no longer there. >> Okay. >> All right. And just to confirm, this was part of
our resoning in 1993 that moved this from what previously was an R1B to an RR. Yes, that is correct. >> Was there a reason given? >> I was unable to find any. It looks like it was pulled into the administrative resoning where certain ones I couldn't
find a a planning application where it was requested. It was just reszoned in in 93. >> Had a lot of that done in 93 unfortunately. U resoning. Um, does anyone else have any questions for
staff this presentation? >> Okay, then we'll open it up to the public and we have a card, please. >> John Marorrow. >> Yes, sir. Welcome. Please give us your name and address for the record, sir.
>> John Marorrow, 21108 Melinda Lane. Uh, that's about what it is. We have 26 foot 8 in and we need 12 foot eight out of it which would knock it down a foot
approximately and that's about it. There's a complete fence the whole length of the that side of the house and all the neighbors on that side of the house have a 10-ft variance where ours is a 15.
That's about it. How long have you lived there, sir? >> Oh, me eight years. About eight years. All right. Any other questions? This would be a professionally installed unit you want to put on your garage.
>> Yes. Well, no, it's not a garage. It'll be a master bedroom and bath. >> Oh, okay. you're you're adding on to the house physically. Okay. All right. >> Yeah, those those drawings are on 45. They do have construction drawings in the packet that show the addition. >> Confused by those drawings. >> Yep. You can see what that
>> Okay, that's okay. That's what's added on. All right. >> They're sideways. So, >> I had fixed that and it reverted back again. >> Let's see if this will turn it. No. No. Rotate pages 7-day free trial.
Don't want to do that. Uh all right. Uh anyone else have a question about this edition on this house? >> Okay. Thank you, sir. >> Do we have any other cards? >> Uh Rebecca Marorrow.
>> Rebecca Marorrow 21108 Melinda Lane. >> Yes, ma'am. Um I really don't have a lot to add. I think the one thing came to my mind was that we are just at five or 0.54
of the half acre. So and the I think with that new ruling in the 90s was over a half acre. So we're barely over that. And that original footprint with that carport there
is pretty much what we just want to add on. This is pretty much the same space. >> All right. Thank you very much. >> Thank you. >> Looks like a nice master bedroom or primary bedroom. Yes.
>> Yes. All right. >> All right. Seeing no other cards, we'll close it to the public hearing. Um, I have not personally been to this particular house or this property, but I have seen other properties around it,
especially uh what we call West Circle, which is to the east. Um, and as stated earlier, this was an administrative done. I guess just because it was 04 of an acre, they said,
"Okay, now you're RR." But this subdivision was laid out for an RR subdivision and I I which I disagree with that uh what did you
let me get back to my re what you said here. What was staff's recommendation? What page was that on? Um, >> you recommended denial. Okay. But on what page was that? Uh, >> 34. >> 34. All right. I back it up. Thank you.
Um, I am tending to set that the original purpose of that subdivision and that lot was for an RR setting. the way the house was built. U I would have
not restricting it to what they said 12.6 whatever just setting it at 10 foot myself. I would say just put 10 foot restrictions on it back to the R setting for this house and not worry about a it's three inches too much or three and
whatever the final design comes out to be down to that. Let's just stick with the 10 ft with my position. Anyone else have a thought or comment that they would like to add?
Uh this is a layup. I would uh lean heavily towards approving uh the application for this variance. >> All right. Do I have a motion? >> Motion to approve variance number 2-2026
at 21108 Melinda Lane. >> We have a motion. Do I have a second, please? >> I second it. >> Very good. Any further discussion? May I have roll call, please? >> Member Beckles? >> Yes.
>> Member Green? >> Yes. >> Alternate member Rothell? >> Yes. Chairman Taylor. >> Yes. >> Vice Chairwoman Van Deven. >> Yes. >> Very good. You've been approved, sir. >> Thank you. >> Thank you.
All right. Um, next up we have Wait a minute. Back up. Back up. Back up. There we go. New business. All right. We uh got rid of one. No, that's No, that's still the wrong place. Yeah, it would have been the appeal on
>> the bill appeal has been withdrawn. >> That has been withdrawn. >> That is correct. Uh do we have any petitions or requests from the public at this time? >> And I don't see anybody that says anything. We do have our um semiannual
report to be turned in. Did anybody look that over to see if it uh meant what you remembered, what we planned to submit to uh city council? When would that be submitted, please? Do you have a date on that? >> M. >> It's the first February meeting in
whatever. >> So, what is that? February the >> um calendar blank blank blank. Um >> they meet the second Tuesday, right? >> Right. >> Okay. That be 10th. >> That would be the 10th, I believe.
>> Yeah. Okay. It's bucko night. It's good night for me not to be at home. U yeah, it's just a report that uh for those new to the board, it's just a report that's turned in semiannually to the city council. There's really no presentation
or from our board. >> This is from our board. Yes. >> All right. So, you're taking care of that? >> Uh the staff does. They turn it in. I mean >> I will be there but if there's a question but typically city council okay unless somebody
objects to something we did strenuously strenuously in the last six months uh so otherwise no it's not anything you have to attend >> I did I was not aware of it >> no >> chairman >> yeah this goes on every >> every semianual right twice a year we
turn in a report just and just like it was shown there what happened it's kind of a footprint Uh, anything else that needs to be brought up? Everybody doing all right? Everybody got warm clothes for the next couple of days? >> Staff, anything on the agenda for next
month at this time? >> Yes, there is. >> All right. >> Thank you very much. >> So, we are looking at a meeting and that will be on February >> February 24th. No, 25th. >> 20 what? >> 25th. >> 20.
>> Oh, yeah. This Wednesday 25th. >> That's what I got right here. All right. Everybody gonna be here. No, no plans to leave town. I have no idea. I don't either. Well, um I wish everybody a warm time. I wish I could
say I'll be warm, but I'm traveling and I'm going to go where it's even colder. So, I will take a big coat for sure. >> Where are you going? >> Alabama and see my mama. >> Now he's bragging. >> Staff, do you have anything else to add? >> No, chair. >> Councelor,
>> nothing at this time. >> All right. Anyone else make a talk? All right. So, at that case, we'll call the meeting to adjourn.