Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. I would like to call the July 2, 2025 planning is only meeting to order. Could we stand for the place flag, please? To the flag
of the stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Very well done. All righty. Roll call, please. Chairman Eton, Vice
Chairman Childs, Secretary Grant, here. Member FA here. Member Grod, member Scully here, member Gellen here, alternate member Finler, alternate member Rogers. It looks like we do have a quorum by a very slim margin, but we do have a
quorum. Could I get uh approval or corrections to the uh minutes for May 21st, 2020, 20 2025 regular meeting and the June 4th, 2025 special workshop, please?
I'll make a motion to approve the minutes as written. I'll second. All in favor say I. Oppose. Eyes have it. Councelor, could you read the minute uh the rules
for speak, please? Sure. Tonight's notice provides that all persons who anticipate speaking on any public hearing item must fill out an oath card to be heard on that agenda item and sign the oath contained thereon. These cards are located on the table near the
entrance to the council chamber or may be obtained from the recording secretary. This meeting will be conducted in accordance to the procedures adopted in resolution number 24-997. Those speaking in favor of a request will be heard first. Those opposed will
be heard second. And those who wish to make a public comment on the item will speak third. The applicant may make a brief rebuttal if necessary. A representative from either side for or against may cross-examine a witness. Anyone who speaks is considered a
witness. If you have photographs, sketches, or documents that you desire for the commission to consider, they must be submitted into evidence and will be retained by the city. Please submit such exhibits to the recording secretary. Thank you counselor. I now open the
floor to uh petitions request from the public present. Going once twice and now close. Mr. Galindo, how have you been, sir? Very good. Thank you, sir. Good. Good.
take over if you don't mind. Sure thing. Uh this is item 9A, resoning number 2, 2025, Brooks Landing Dog Park. This item begins on page 11 of 108 of tonight's agenda packet. The applicant is requesting an amendment
to the plan development PD ordinance and associated master plan of the Brooks Landing subdivision to accommodate a request by the subdivision residents to add a fenced dog park recreational amenity. The property is located approximately 1500 ft east of US Highway
1 on the north side of JJ Road. A new dog park amenity is proposed within buffer landscape tract I of the current master plan. In 2019, the city council approved comprehensive plan amendment number one 2018 Brooks Landing, which replaced the
planned unit development and conservation future land use designations with the residential 2 future land use designation and replace the planned unit development zoning PUDS and open space and recreation zoning to the planned development PD zoning with a
maximum of 143 single family residential units, common open space, and associated infrastructure. The Brooks Landing Subdivision PD Ordinance number 24, 2019, exhibit A, section 1.6, requires that a playground
and/or 30x30 foot pavilion will be included within tract I across the street from the pavilion in tract E. A playground has been constructed within tract I and the proposed dog park will be adjacent to the playground. An amendment to the PD ordinance is
requested to permit a dog park. The proposed dog park is an additional recreational amenity which has the potential to introduce nuisances such as noise and odor. The city's code of ordinances section 5-4, animals creating nuisances prohibited, states, "Any person that owns, keeps, or harbors any
animal which is found to have done any of the following acts shall be deemed in violation of the section and shall be punished as provided in section 5-7. The following are the offenses that are deemed to create a nuisance. One, any animal or bird which a frequently and
for continued duration howls, barks, meows, squawks, or makes other sounds. B endangers or injures the safety or health of humans. C annoys or disturbs a reasonable person of normal sensitivities across residential real property boundaries. And D by its own
condition or the condition of its confinement creates obnoxious odors. The dog park is proposed to be located adjacent to lot one of the Brooks Landing subdivision which is currently developed with an existing single family residence. If any of the surrounding
property owners experience nuisances related to noise or odor, these can be addressed by the city through the issuance of code enforcement violations. A residential subdivision and associated open space or recreational amenities, including the requested dog park, are consistent with the residential 2 future
land use designation. Um, I'll point out page number 34 is an aerial in red is uh the buffer tract is outlined and the proposed dog park is in the top right uh would be located in the
top right corner of that. Um the page before that, page 33, gives you more of a close-up view and a concept of where the dog park fencing would be uh is being proposed. And so it's exist adjacent to the existing
playground and it's uh about 24 ft away from the neighboring single family residence to the west. And with that, happy to answer any questions. Any questions for staff? I see none. Is there any cards?
I have no cards. Okay. Bring it back to the uh to the board. Anyone like to make a statement? motion. Anyone?
So, so I move that we approve the resoning uh number 2-2025 the Brooks Lenny Dog Park. We recommend approval. Second. I have a a motion a second. A motion by
Mr. FA and a second by Mr. Scully. Discussions. Roll call, please. Member Scully, yes. Member Gillan, yes. Secretary Grant, yes. Member FA, yes. Passes.
Thank you, sir. And city council will hear this on July 22nd. Yes, sir. Proceed, Mr. uh Glenda. Good evening. Uh Christy Anderson, senior planner. Mr. Gindo,
apologies, ma'am. This is a a request for annexation, smallcale comprehensive plan, map amendment, and reszoning SSA number 2-2025 located at 5320 South Washington Avenue. This begins on page 49 of your packets.
The applicant, uh, Michael Woziac, professional Watuniac. Thank you. Um, on behalf of the owner, Camco Automotive, Inc. is requesting a voluntary annexation and small-scale comprehensive plan map amendment with
reszoning on approximately 4.52 acres of land to construct an overflow parking lot for the existing automotive sales business to the south. The subject property is located within unincorporated Bvoulevard County and is currently vacant. The property is an
existing enclave and is contiguous with the city's jurisdictional boundary. The subject property is situated between the Florida East Coast Railway Railway and South Washington Avenue. The subject property has a Bvard County future land use designation of community commercial
and a zone BU1 general retail commercial. The request intends to change the future land use designation to the city's commercial highintensity future land use category and the community commercial zoning district. The uh community commercial zoning
district is consistent with the proposed commercial highintensity uh future land use category. The applicant has submitted a binding concept plan limiting the future development to an overflow parking lot for the display of vehicles. A consent plan is usually
submitted to help alleviate concerns about intensity and impacts on the surrounding areas. Although a binding concept plan was submitted with the request, staff does not believe that a parking lot is the highest and best use for the property. Therefore, the analysis within the staff report does
consider the maximum allowable buildout potential. City utilities are available and adjacent to serve the property and the preliminary concurrency assessment found adequate capacity to serve the development. Staff makes the following recommendations. Staff recommends
approval of the annexation of the 4.52 acre parcel located at 5320 South Washington Avenue having Bard County parcel ID 22-35-26-0000-511. Staff recommends approval of the comprehensive plan future land use small-cale map amendment from the Bvard
County Community Future Land use category to the city of Titusville commercial highintensity future land use category. And staff recommends approval of the resoning from the Bvard County BU1 general retail commercial zoning district to the city of Titusville
Community Commercial Zoning District without the binding concept plan. And I'd be happy to take any questions that you have from staff at this time. Are we Are you This requires three motions or one
It will require three I'm sorry. It will require three separate motions. One for annexation, one for the future land use, and one for the zoning. Okay. um applicant doesn't have any problems with you um not accepting their um
bonding contract. No, sorry. We haven't um heard any uh feedback back from the applicant in and you know um not supporting that. It this does not, you know, prevent them from doing what they want to do. But we just felt like limiting the property to solely the um
parking lot was probably not the highest and best use. and if they had any, you know, plans for the property in the future, they would have to come back here and make a request to amend that concept plan. Okay. Any more questions for staff? Yeah, Mr. F. Thank you. So,
the um without the annexation Tennessee, could he still use the property in his this desired manner? That that is correct. It it would be an allowable use within the zoning district now. Uh the binding concept plan would just limit future development to this parking lot
only. Anyone else? Okay. Any cards? No cards. No cards. Mr. applicant, are you the applicant? I am, sir. We just Anything you want to say? Yep.
Yes, sir. I'm Michael with Engineer Permits, Inc. Um I work with Camco, the parks group. Uh they're they're just looking for some clean parking and right now that particular north side is Bvard County. The south side where they've been
currently operating is uh your city of Titusville. Right. So they no I've asked them and they have no intention of building any structures and they understand that they will have to come back if Mr. Parks one day changes his mind.
Any questions for the applicant? Anyone? Thank you, sir. just a little cocktail knowledge I have and I I think I forward it to you. Um, somebody's tried to scam us and send a and I I shared it with you. I just figured I'd let you know.
It's the first time in my 20 years I've seen this. We actually got an email and it looked very official from the city of Titusville like we owed $4,600 or so. And it even, you know, spelled out, you know, city of Titusville and it made it look like it was a legit invoice.
But then if you really look closely on when they they wanted a money transfer, not pay online and that's when you see they double teed Titusville. It is first time in 20 years I've seen that type of scam and I believe your IT department's looking into it. That's correct. It was
forwarded to our IT department. Crazy world. It is. Thank you, sir. I'll bring it back to the board. Um any discussions? Anybody care to make a motion?
We need three motions, but you don't have to do them all at once. You can do them one at a time. So, I make a motion that we approve the annexation of the 4.52 plus acre parcel located at 5320 South
Washington Avenue. Do I have a second? Second. Thank you, Mr. Scully. Discussion. Vote. Roll call. Secretary Grant. Yes. Member FA. Yes. Member Scully. Yes.
Member Gillan. Yes. Motion passes. Second, please. You on a roll. I make another motion to approve the comprehensive plan future land use smallcale map amendment for
from the Bvard County community commercial future land use category to the city of Titusville commercial highintensity future land use category for the 4.52 acre parcel located at 5320 South Washington Avenue having
Bvoulevard County parcel ID 22-35-226-00-5 511 second motion by Miss Gellen, second by Mr. Scully. Discussion. Roll call vote, please. Member FA, yes.
Member Gellen, yes. Member Scully, yes. Secretary Grant, yes. Motion passes. Might as well keep going. All right. I'd like to make a motion to approve the reszoning without the concept plan from
the Bvard County BU-1 general retail commercial district, I'm sorry, retail commercial zoning district to the city of Titusville Community Commercial Zoning District for the 4.52 acre parcel located at 5320 South
Washington Avenue having Bard County parcel ID 22-35-26-00-511. one. Second. I have a motion by Miss Gellen and a second by Mr. Scully. Discussion hearing none. Roll call. Member Gellen.
Yes. Secretary Grant. Yes. Member FA? Yes. Member Scully? Yes. Motion passes. And this would be heard by the council on the 22nd. That is correct. Thank you. Is Mr. Gendo or Okay, we got to keep you
guessing. Um, I'll take the next item. This is item 9C, uh, fence permit ordinance. This begins on page 101 of 108. As the code is currently written, applicants are compelled to demonstrate or approve the proposed fence work is
below 50% in order to avoid permitting. The 50% rule has proven to be difficult to administer as is as it is often subjective and misleading. On April 22nd, the city council approved advisability to amend the fence permit regulations. A proposed ordinance
allowing for the replacement of permit fences permitted fences without requiring a new permit is presented for review and approval. Um, so an outline of what's included with this agenda item. On page 103 is a memo kind of outlining where this is coming from and
the changes. Page 105 is a list of other jurisdictions and their fence requirements. And page 106 is the ordinance with the proposed um language changes. So just if you allow me to give you a little context on this item, the uh building department administers fence
permits. And currently the policy states that if you're improving your fence, if there's uh damage to your fence and you want to repair it, anything up to 50% within two years, you're allowed to repair without a permit. And uh the building according to the building department that's been very challenging
to implement because tracking of uh repairs over two-year period for each property and also justification on what exactly constitutes 50% of a fence. Is it the linear feat? Do post count more than the uh like the support count more
than the actual fencing the privacy part of it? Um and so this issue was brought to city council's attention in April and council approved advisability to allow us to make some changes. The changes that are proposed um the intent is to increase some flexibility for property
owners to repair their fences and also to make it easier to administer. And so whereas the current code allows up to 50% within two years no permit, the proposed language would make that up to 100%. So, as long as your fence was previously permitted, if you'd like to
repair up to 100% of it, you may do so without a permit. The moment that you change material types or locations, anything that's different from what you were permitted, you'd have to get a new uh building permit. So, that's the intent of the change. And then I'll just walk you through the that language
change on page 106 or I'm sorry, the 106 is the beginning of the ordinance. The actual language is on 107. So, subsection C, uh, the new new proposed language. It shall be unlawful to construct any new fence or wall
without first obtaining a permit from the building department. Any repair or replacement of a permitted fence structure shall not require a new permit from the building department. If a record of an approved permit exists for the original fence with no changes to linear feet, materials, height, or
placement of the fence, any alteration to a permitted fence structure, whether a permit record exists or not, shall require a permit from the building department. Alteration shall include, but are not limited to change in fence material, change in linear feet, change in fence height, or change in placement
of the fence. And then the existing code language is stricken. And if you follow to the bottom of page 107, there's another change in in section 34-346, non-conforming structures, adding a new subsection C that says, "Notwithstanding
the above, any repair or replacement of a permitted fence structure shall not require a permit from the building department if a record of an approved permit exists for the original fence with no changes to linear feet, materials, height, or placement of the fence. Any alteration to a permitted
fence structure, whether a permit record exists or not, shall require a permit from the building department. Alterations shall include but are not limited to change in fence material, change in linear feet, change in fence height, or change in placement of the fence. And with that, I'll take any questions. I like this one. This was
this is real good. Real good. Uh questions for staff. And since we have no audience, no cards, anyone like to make a motion? I move that we approve the fence permit ordinance uh changes as
they were presented. I second. I have a motion by uh Mr. Fas and a second by Miss Gellen. discussions. I think this is one of the um most common sense ones that we've read so
far. I agree. I wonder if Chad GPT did it. Roll call, please. Member Scully, yes. Secretary Grant, yes. Member Gellen, yes. Member FA, yes. Motion passes. All righty then. That's got to be record
time. That's got to be reckoned. Do we get paid? Do we get paid now? Just asking. Oh man. And since we have no audience, there's no petitions or requests from the public present. City staff, you got anything to report?
I do have one quick report just to let you know that the uh update on the EAR, the evaluation and appraisal report. So, if you remember, PNC had a workshop on June 4th about the EAR process and where we're at and um we received uh comments from the commission, comments from the
public, and the consultant is um making changes to present to city council. They'll be making that presentation to council on July 22nd. Um so, this um this month at the 5:30 p.m. uh presentation meeting. So, just wanted to keep everyone aware in case you wanted
to follow that project. Um that's the next presentation of that project. Thank you, sir. Sure. Now comes the sad Now comes the sad part, city attorney. Well, thanks for making my last meeting so enjoyable with your brevity to it.
Yes, it's been a pleasure almost 12 years working for the city of Titusville and I'm honored to say goodbye to you guys last because it's been such a pleasure working with the planning and zoning commission. Thank you. Now we have to
train someone else, right? Y that's bad. Have a good evening, guys. Thanks. Any reports from uh the board? I don't I don't have anything. to make an announcement on that, but let me Yeah, it's Friday at the Chain of
Lakes. Thanks, Chelsea. Very good. Okay. All right. Well, that looks like about it. Uh, I just wish everyone a safe and happy fort, please. Please. And remember, there's some crazy people out there. That's why we have these gentlemen over here. Thank you.
And with that meeting,