Um, I'd like to call the meeting to order of the CR committee for Thursday, March 5th at 7:01 uh p.m. Could I have a roll call, please? And I should note before we do the roll call, we are all remote because
of the incoming weather. We have made this a remote only meeting. So, thank you. Um, so, uh, let's just I don't know what order we are on everybody's screen, so just go
ahead and get started. >> Emily Fine, >> Mike said, present. >> Molina Thomas, present. >> Veronica Cal present. That's our committee. And we also have with us um
Anna Wilkins from North County Land Trust and Colbert Streer is on. Um I assume Kobe that you're representing the conserva as you're here as conservation agent. Well, maybe he's not there.
>> He's muted. >> Okay. Well, anyway, that's who's present here. and of course tcam. >> I'm just generally interested. That's all. >> Okay. Thank you. Um the the meeting is
being recorded on uh by Zoom and it will be uploaded to YouTube by TCAM. Is there anybody else who's recording the meeting? All right. Hearing none. I have no an unanticipated topics.
Um, does anybody else have anything that should be added to the agenda? >> Um, possibly the uh what is that document called? The habitat management plan we had received.
>> Oh, I wrote it as conservation management plan. >> Oh, okay. >> Under 2.1 the subcommittee updates. I wrote conservation management plan. That should be habitat management plan. >> I'm sorry. So, let's note that as an
update on the agenda 2.1, the first dash there is habitat management plan. >> I don't know if those are the same things though. Selena, is there also a conservation management plan? I was thinking of the plan that the subcommittee had been working on.
>> Yeah. No, the the plan is a habitat management >> habitat management plan. So just note that that word should be changed from conservation to habitat. Anything does that take care of it, Selena? >> Yes.
>> Okay. Anybody else have anything? All right. Um moving on to 1.4. Um the uh Emily wrote our minutes as she has been faithfully doing for February
12th, which was our last um meeting. So I know that they were late getting out to everybody this afternoon, but um if did we did people have time to review them? And >> I did.
>> You did? And if so, is there a motion to accept them? Uh, Selena Thomas, make a motion to accept the minutes from February 12th, 2026. >> And is there a second? >> Mike P said second.
>> Thank you. Um, any further any discussion of the minutes? Is there anything that anybody wanted to have changed or clarified or anything? I didn't have anything. >> Anybody else?
All right. Hearing none, we'll do a roll call vote. Um, pretty much going in the same order that we did. So, starting with you, Emily. >> Uh, Emily Fine, yes. >> Mike Pot said, yes.
>> Elena Thomas, yes. >> And Veronica Cal, yes. So, the minutes for February 12th are accepted. and I will get them down to the town clerk's office to be stamped in and posted on the website. They've been very good
about, you know, the clerk's office has been very good about accepting our minutes and getting them posted. So, if you look under agenda and minutes on the town web page and you go to uh CR committee, you should see all of the
minutes for our meetings. I think they're all there. Um so okay uh that takes us to meeting business which is the subcommittee updates. So 2.1 um the habitat management plan which is
written conservation management plan. What um so I'll turn that to you Selena to talk about. >> Okay. Um we got an updated version of it from LEC approximately February 19th.
Okay. >> Um, I believe it went to the entire committee. I didn't know if we I had reviewed it to make sure all the changes we requested got in there and they have. So, I didn't
know if we wanted to look at it again or if anybody has any comments. Any anybody have anything that they want to >> and I can bring it up and share it if people want to see it here.
>> Yeah, why don't you why don't you do that? That would be a good >> and and maybe just point out the changes, Selena, so that people at home can note. >> Okay. Can you see
the habitat management plan? >> Uh, we can see the plan. If you could make it a little bit bigger, that might be helpful. >> How's that? >> You'll have that. Yes, that's good. That is good for me. That's good. How about
everybody else? >> Okay. >> Okay. So, um, our list of changes from the previous one on page one,
the management area location, um, he fixed the date of the map. Also, in the management details, um, he put that there's nesting throughout the area, not just on the sandy slope.
That's good. >> On page two, um, the signs, he updated it to keep unauthorized people off slopes. In the first wash, he
>> added uh cutting every two weeks or as needed. >> Right. Okay. During the growing season. All right. >> Age three. Um,
the upper flats included the conservation commission must be consulted. >> Thank you for putting that in there. Yes, >> you fixed the typo. This now does say
existing instead of exiting. Um, in the wood pile, he updated it to invasive bittersweet. All right, page four. Trees can be cut in consultation with conservation commission.
And then number eight, um the summary report was submitted by the permit holder. >> Okay. >> And then on the map, he added the box around the well location.
Um, it's a 75 by 75 foot box because that was what we had initially been told by the water department. They have since made it smaller, but I didn't think we needed to update this map to make the
box smaller. >> I would agree with that. >> So, those were all the changes we had requested. Everything else is the same. So, I think this is ready to go unless anybody
thought of anything else that needed to be adjusted. >> Did LEC draw draw this map? >> Yes. Um they drew the map with uh Emily had given them a handdrawn map she had
that listed all the different locations. >> Yep. >> So he took that and he put it onto this uh satellite view of the area. >> Okay.
Thank you. Um, any other questions? >> All right. Anything else about the habitat management plan, Selena, or are we good to go? >> I think we're good to go. >> I would agree with that.
So, all right. Um moving on to the next um bullet under that it's grant funding for the survey and letter of agreement with NRWA. Um I did uh talk to Marissa at NRWA
about a week and a half ago and um the uh Marian there was no application needed. She was taking the um work that we had done three years ago when we were asking for funding and she said that
they can just take that forward and so she had agreed to um fund the survey. So um I just want to I don't have a letter yet. I I'm going to work with Kieran next week to put together some sort of
agreement with them. they would like the um surveyor to build them directly. So um that's all I have to say on that. Um and then uh that's
>> So you're going to what? Write a formal letter of >> of I'm going to consult with Kieran on the best way to do that, our interim town administrator. um to uh make sure I I want to just make sure that everything is as it needs to
be. The it's it's a little complicated in in the way that the land is owned by the town, but the lease is held by TESA and the funding for this is coming from NRWA. So um but NRWA
is more concerned that the they felt that the drop out any middleman and for funding the survey that the surveyor could just send them directly the bills and they would pay it. But I just need to make
sure that everything's as it should be. And I'd like to have something in writing. Everything that I have is verbal at this point for this current round of things. So, um
so that's where that stands. Um the uh um Anna sent to me a lovely budget which I did not get updated, but you'll be getting that sometime next week. it it um like a really good way to keep tabs
on where we are with the funding for the CR and the projects that need to be done and who the responsible party is for everything. So, um yeah,
she sent it to me yesterday and I really thought I was going to get it done, but I didn't. So, that's where we are with that. So, timelinewise, that's the next bullet on Does anybody else have anything grant-wise? Um, the the grant
for um conservation um help is due April 2nd. So, I'm going to I want to put the BDR in for that um request funding for the BDR from that at least. So, um, it
might be, we can talk about this later, but it might be worth meeting next week, Thursday, if people are available. >> Can you just repeat that? I'm having trouble keeping up with you here. >> Oh, I'm sorry. >> Grant for conservation help
>> from DCR. >> And that's Cryan. I forget the the official name of the um funding source. Do you remember, Anna? Do you know what it is? It's a uh conservation help grant.
>> I'll I'll find it in previous things, but that's due when? >> Um April 2nd. I believe it's a rolling grant, but it said they wanted applications in by April 2nd, the last time I read it. >> And you conservation assistant
conservation BDR Yes, Emily. That's right. Go ahead, Anna. What were you saying? >> The conservation assistance grant. >> Yes, that one. >> Conservation assistance.
>> I just want to let you guys know that the phone is me because I have an unstable connection. So, I'm putting the audio through my phone, >> but it won't
Oh, you better say that again. But what? >> All right, we won't like my phone. >> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. I actually might hang up and use
it through my Zoom app on my phone >> because I can't unmute on the phone. >> Okay. Do you wanna Do you want to do that and come back in?
>> Yes. >> Say that one more time, Veronica. >> Do you want to go ahead and go out and come back in on your phone app? >> Um I The answer is yes.
>> I think so. You know, it's working okay now. It's just sort of a backup plan for me in case I so I should do that. I'll go out and then I'll join on my phone. >> Okay. I think that might be better.
There's a delay when you talk, Anna. So, we'll just wait for her for a minute. While we're waiting, should I um I should say that um the form for the Mass Historical um Commission has been sent
and I put myself as the contact person. So, if they have any questions that supposedly they get back to you relatively soon for an initial conversation. So, if I have any questions that they uh ask that I can't
answer, uh I'll just email everyone and we'll figure it out. >> That sounds good. Thank you, Mike. >> Yeah. >> So, um this might be for Anna, but maybe you too, Selena. Do we need to get
letters of support? Should we start collecting those? Um, do you think >> I have absolutely no idea >> it it any it always seems to be a good
idea. Um, it's just a quest just something I thought of. Uh, let me find out more. Anna might know better. >> Yeah, >> that would be to present to at town meeting. Um, more at the for
eea for the CR. >> Oh, >> I don't know. >> I don't know if that's really advantageous or not. I don't ever remember collecting them for the land trust when we did CRS, but Anna would
know better than me. Um, so while Anna's coming back in, um, on the timeline, what I really wanted to get done today was to go through the CR
um, you know, page by page. >> That's 2.2. >> Yes. So, Anna, um, can you hear us? Okay. Yes, I can. Can you hear me? Okay. >> Yes. Yes. >> Better.
>> This is actually better. Yes. >> Good. >> Um, do we need letters of support for a CR? >> Uh, not. No. No, we don't >> need them. Um,
we obviously will need the the signatures of the Com um and the select board, but >> Okay. >> Yeah. No letters of support needed. >> All right. And Mike reported um that he
has filed with the Mass Historic Association. >> Congratulations, Mike. So, >> all right. So, our next thing is the timeline and what and that goes um hand inand with 2.2.
What I would like to get done today is reviewing the CR, seeing where we are, and hopefully having it ready to go to um Miss Deianne and EOEA for a first
pass. I may need to run it by um town council. And again, that's something that I can check with uh Kieran before we submit it. So meeting again on the 12th might be a good idea just because
we're kind of rolling along right now. So which is good. Um anybody else have anything before we start going through this page by page. So I um I guess Selena the best way
might be to project it and we can just go over it. Um, I sent it to everybody this afternoon, so it should be in your email, but if Selena presents it, it might be just um looking at it and we
can ask questions as we go. They want it with the track changes in place to review. So, um, >> Selena, it might be good just to show the simple markup instead of all of the
markup. if you can. I don't know if you can. >> I don't know if I can either. >> Oh, yeah. Because it's the dox file, not the word file, >> right? >> Is that the one that I sent? >> Yeah.
>> Yeah. >> I I added NCT to the title of it so I would know the difference. >> Okay. But yeah, it's got Anna's edits in here.
Um, all right. So, Anna, do you want to walk us through this while Selena's projecting? >> Sure, happy to. >> Um, so,
>> uh, let's see. Hang on a second. Basically um there I if folks are familiar with conservation restrictions this first part uh the basically
uh right before the section one purposes is the actual uh deed portion like the the the easement portion of it that uh encumbers the deed. So that basically
here you have to make sure that um all of the um deed references, book and page numbers, uh the subdivision plan, uh all of that stuff. You just we just have to
double check and make sure all of those are correct. Okay. Um which I didn't do with I just assumed they were correct. I didn't double check those. Um, so section one, the purposes.
This is probably the most important part of a conservation restriction because uh the purposes really lays out why you're protecting the land and what the um the conservation values of the
restriction are. Throughout the document, you'll see it referenced basically saying as long as things aren't compromising the purposes of the conservation restriction. So under the section one, it's really about what are
we protecting, why are we protecting it, what makes it special. So now you see the subheadings wildlife and habitat protection. Um this is where we are listing the um the
um state listed species. I might actually add into that section A that these are um special concern or whatever. Um you know if they're I don't know that they're
are any of them endangered or are they just all special concern? I uh Blandings I believe is threatened. >> Threatened. Okay. So I might put something in there about how any NHSP
um you know lists them as threatened and um spotted turtle is no longer it was taken off of the endangered species list due to pressure from developers.
So, if there are any special designations, I might add that into this one, which I didn't. Um, nearby natural areas, that's sort of like adjacent areas. Um I believe
uh I don't see the reference. Did I have it somewhere else? I think isn't there uh WMA land or or fish and wildlife land adjacent? >> There is fish and wildlife land
adjacent. Yes. >> Yeah. So I I would say um so yeah on the second one scenic landscape preservation I I did add that um there are hundreds of acres of adjacent
conservation land. Um but I think here in nearby natural areas we should list exactly what those are. So what is it? Um, do you know uh fish and wildlife? Is it
this? Sorry, you probably can't hear me when I put my phone like that. >> No, I can't hear you. >> Now you can hear me. Can you hear me? Okay, now. >> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Um, so in nearby natural airs, um,
uh, uh, uh, uh, I would say something like, um, premises is contiguous with um, is it a specific wildlife management
area? Is it called Squanakook wildlife management area? No, it's just property that they own. I believe it's across the Squan Cookook. Um or the river there. >> Okay. With
um land um >> you could say the headarters of the Squanakook River. >> Yeah. managed by department of fish and
game. Yes. Um we actually talk about so I added under the next uh do we have you know it would yeah
well yeah I I'll let's skip that for a second. Okay. So, scenic landscape I added I Wordsmith did a little bit um but it was per it was fine. Flood plane protection. Um I don't think I changed
anything there. Water quality protection. I I added the fact that it contains zone one and zone two wellhead protection. I also added um that it was it protected the wetland resource area
of the headarters of the Squanakook River. Okay. Um furtherance of government policy. This is where you list where like all of the studies and reports that it's areas that
it's called out in. And so and that all looked good to me. So the next one, letter G. Um these were highlighted and again I don't really know um
what the details are here. So if someone knows that um >> I don't know if that permit has been issued yet. Is that the one that Tesa is trying to obtain? Yeah, I think that's the habitat management um plan that we
worked on. So, there isn't a permit yet. >> Okay, great. So, we'll just keep that uh >> Yeah. >> highlighted. >> So, letter eight. >> Oh, can I just ask a question?
>> Yeah. Um, can so to get the habitat management plan accepted, do we now are we at the point where we can now
send our habitat management plan to Christian and and get it accepted so that part G can be filled in. Is that what we do? Yeah. So, I believe that we send it to
Misty Anne. Um, and then it has to go to uh Misa or Meepa. I forget the exact initials. Um, and they are the ones who actually issue the permit, I believe.
>> Okay. But it has to first be okayed by Miss Deianne. >> I believe so. Yes. >> So, is that something we can do right right away like tomorrow? >> Yeah. So, um I will talk with uh Dan at
LEC um after this meeting, let him know that we all thought the plan was ready to go and he will move it into the next step. >> Okay. Um, and while just this is coming
from select board thing, do we need to vote to accept the plan? Would that be helpful as our committee? >> Yeah. >> Um, I would say it can't hurt. I I agree. I move that we accept the habitat
management plan as edited. >> Is there a second? >> Selena Tom. >> Selena Thomas second. >> And it was Emily Fine that made the motion. >> Yeah. >> Um, anything further? Any comments?
All right. Hearing none, roll call vote. Um, beginning with our normal line. >> Okay. Emily Fine, yes. >> Mike Pot said, yes. >> Selena Thomas, yes. >> And Veronica Cal, yes.
Just so that we have that on record so that um Selena can >> take that if anybody questions it. So, >> thank you. >> All right. So, back down to to G.
>> While we're on the a tangent briefly, um I just went and I looked And the Blandings turtle is listed as threatened. The wood turtle is listed as special concern. >> Right. >> And yeah, I did not see the spotted
turtle in the list. >> No, it's not. >> All right. So, back to G. All right. So, and and I should say um before we go. So, we are in
G, right? So the next one, H. So this was part of the MISA template which I have a problem with and so just maybe bring attention to it with Miss Anne. Uh their template has the BA baseline
document report and survey kind of explanation under the section called purposes which doesn't make any sense to me. the baseline documentation in the EA
um template is its own section that goes at the pretty near the end of the document. So I did that because the baseline documentation report and survey is not a purpose. Um it's not an ecological feature of the
land. It's a a document that documents the condition of the land. So, I didn't take it out, but I did move it because I think it confuses things. Um, >> so when when this goes to Miss Deianne, we should just note that.
>> Yeah, just let her know I remove I didn't remove it or or we didn't remove it from the document. We just moved it out of the purposes section because it doesn't belong there to be frank. But, you know, I don't think that
they'll have a big issue with that. If they do, I don't know what to say about that. So, the second um so the second piece is the the area described as the Tesa Soccer Complex.
It's um now letter I guess H, right? Um, I would recommend just moving that sentence to the end of letter G so that it's with the
Misa piece >> because it's not a purpose um of the it's not a a purpose of the CR >> of the CR, right?
It's we're not and and as far as our current sketches, the CR doesn't cover the soccer fields either. So that's just a piece that you know and maybe
Miss Deianne or EA will say it doesn't belong in there at all. I don't know. But um >> so putting it a under the MISA endangered species act, >> right? Because it's talking about the
management permit number and >> you know I mean I think that's maybe where it might fit. I don't know where else it would fit. That's all I'm saying. >> All right. So I'm I'm good with that
suggestion. I think that sounds good. >> And they can let us know if they want things differently, >> right? Yeah. >> We do need to note when we send this off to um Miss Deianne anyway that we've moved
the BDR piece to be consistent with the EOEA template. >> Yeah. And I think in the one in the one that I sent you, the word document that I sent you, um I did put a note
um a comment that said this needs its own section. >> It might be if you click that square, it might be there. The one to the left there. Does that What happens if you click that, Selena? >> This thing? >> Yeah. >> No, it's not there. Um the comments are
over on this side >> over there. Okay. >> All right. >> Yeah. >> So is that comment in there? >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> All right. >> Good. So, and maybe add a comment moved
to um section below or you know. >> Mhm. >> Um so then um this is a little bit different than the the next section is a
little bit different than um EA but um they go through definitions in this version. Um, so those looked fine to me. I didn't I don't think I made any
>> I don't think we did either to any of this. >> Yeah. >> Oh, passive recreation. We add >> Yeah, there's some Right. So then section three um is the prohibited uses and reserved rights.
This is kind of the the the pieces that if you're holding a conservation restriction, you need to pay attention to. Um, so the things you're not allowed to do and the things you are allowed to do. Typically what happens is the prohibited uses comes
first and it's basically they tell you you can't do anything and then in the reserved rights they sort of say except you can do this when this is the case or you know you kind of
claw back some of your or or reserve some of those rights that were prohibited in the previous ones. That's typically how it's done. In this MISAC CR, they do it a little bit differently. They actually
in the prohibited uses they go into some of the exceptions which typically I would see in the reserved rights section, but they've combined them into the prohibited use section. I don't think it's I mean I think it might just
be a different way of doing things. So, um I didn't get too, um been out of shape about it. Um so, you'll see. Let's see.
Um obviously, you can't build anything. No constructing, no mining, dredging, lom, whatever changes in topography. So you can't, you know, >> move stuff around, >> make hills or
um divots or whatever. Um no storing like dumping of stuff. So of course like DPW can't come in and start, you know, storing sand for the winter or, you know, brush from the brush dump or
whatever. It can't become a brush dump, that sort of thing. Um, I did have a question on the storage of waste or hazardous materials or other substances. um
which you know I'm not sure if the town well will need to store chlorine or other additives on their site and I don't know if make that clear that that's
>> we can consult with water on that but I think the chlorine things like that get added at the treatment plant. >> Okay, great. This would be pumping the water and directing it to the treatment plant down. >> So, there's no like pre-treatment or
anything like that. Okay. >> I don't believe so, but that's something to check. We can check with water. >> So, I did put that in my comments, that question in my comments. Um, and it's
just a question. >> Yep. Um so again it says no removing, cutting, pruning, destroying vegetation except for um except as allowed in writing by the grantee and division to remove
hazards to users or for habitat maintenance. So again this is where they say you can't do it except you can do it sometimes, >> right? Um >> we actually added the or
>> habitat mansion. Yeah. >> Which was great. >> Amazing. >> So let's see. Applying or using fertil fertilizers, fungicides, herbicides, pesticides in any quantity. Now um that I think
let me just look in the reserve rights. Yeah. So in the reserve rights um there is allowances for that. So they kind of it's weird because they kind of do both >> in this CR template which is one of the
reasons why I was like I don't it's confusing but it's fine. It's fine. Um so the exception for that um the chemical application again is down
below in the permitted uses or the reserved rights. The next one is one that I would talk to Misty Ann about. So the the so six planting, releasing, cultivating,
maintaining or engaging in any other activity that would introduce plants or animal species that pose a substantial risk of being invasive or are otherwise dimeral to the native plant and animal community. Um, and then they talk about
the prohibitive plant list. So, I'm curious about that word cultivating and maintaining. Um, and my question as someone who would be enforcing this is if you guys don't
take action on invasive plants, does that constitute a violation of the conservation restriction? Would could someone claim that you're cultivating and maintaining invasive plants by not doing any
>> by not doing anything >> right? And so in that case then we're we have to enforce you to do invasive plant management. I it's just a little >> Japanese notweed thing all of that.
>> Yeah. I mean, if that's the intent of this CR is to make the grant tour control their invasive plants on the site, then I mean that's kind of how it
reads to me. >> So, I did write a note on that is in action. Should we should we eliminate the words the word maintaining? >> Yeah, I don't Yeah, I mean
I can just delete maintaining and see what Miss Deianne says. Um I mean even cultivating um means like you're letting it go to
seed, right? No, if cultivating is not a passive activity, it would be us finding the seeds and planting them. >> Okay. Yeah.
>> And then watering, fertilizing. That's cultivating. I I would agree with removing maintaining. Okay. All right. So that was another thing that I
um looked at. Um so again we came down to um X is um or 10 Roman numeral 10 um is the motorized vehicles one.
Um, >> so this is where it's saying you can't use any of those except the police, fire, other governmental agents and carrying out their lawful duties, which I'm assuming includes the water department
folks. Um, and except for motorized. I took out wheelchairs and scooters cuz that's awfully specific and I just did it to equipment used by physically challenged parties because
>> I think that's a good idea. >> Yeah. If they have otherwise it's too specific because you don't know, >> right? And then somebody has a >> has something that's different than that and then you know you're you can't
you're telling them they can't use it. It's not a wheelchair or a scooter. Not that it would necessarily get to that point, but um you know, you never you always think about these things. >> So, this was one of the things that um
came up in the meeting with Miss Deianne. >> Yeah. and she said something to the effect uh um that we should not call out anything specifically, but instead just say um
except as in compliance with the ADA or something to that effect. Yeah. I uh Okay. Yeah. whatever she whatever she
recommended. I I was looking back at um some of the other language and it's pretty that's been recommended recently um through EA and it's it doesn't mention
ADA um specifically um but it does say physically um you know either physically disabled or physically
like I think that piece is important because people can have lots of different kinds of disabilities, >> right, >> that are supported through ADA. Um,
and can and I think the loophole was that you're that people with um, you know, basically the the concern was, and I don't know if it's a legitimate
one, but the concern was that someone with say PTSD D could say, "I'm disabled." Or could use, you know, could be legitimately disabled, but take their ATV out there
and there's nothing you could do because they're um you can't um ask them what their disability is. Um >> is ATV. >> Yeah. Your support ATV. Yeah. Exactly.
And I mean it's it's true that there you know there are some people who who might require help assistance with a vehicle but um there's all sorts of Yeah. And I guess
in in some ADA things there's there's certain like well I don't know let me let me just make sure that there's not anything else but I'm pretty sure that the that we want to
not call out ADA specifically because it encompasses a broad thing. But if Miss Deianne has a different um information on that then >> um I'll want to hear it. >> Hang on just a second. Yes. What?
>> Where's that? >> He like he has a meeting so he might be in his in his study. >> Okay. Got it. Thank you. >> Yep. Sorry about that. No problem. Can
we go back to um nine there? I um are and it's talking about animal waste. People people walk their dogs back there >> and um attend to not clean up after
their dogs. >> So um is that what they are referring to there? Will we need signage? >> Uh yeah, basically this is saying
that I mean yeah I I think >> it's basically saying that you you you can't permit that sort of behavior. So, if it's already against like if if
there's a curb law curbing your dog kind of um law on the books anyway, um you're set. Um it's basically saying like you you can't be like, "Yeah, this is
um we're going to set up a dog poop uh you know, area where we're permitting people to let their dogs poop here. Um so, but it's not necessarily
requiring you to clean it up." Um, >> I I think signage would help. I do. >> Yeah. I mean, you can put the signage and then if pe if there are repeat offenders, you know, that's a a land use
um policy issue um that the town will have to, you know, take a look at. >> Okay. But you know, signs only
work on honest people, right? True. Um, yeah, but that's a good question. All right, so the next Let's see. There's not really anything that I added.
Um, oh, I guess I did um just make if we go back I I missed this comment of mine to um six vi. I just made a comment just to to
because they have this calling out invasive species piece that um in the baseline documentation typically there's you know a inventory of species and it's usually
pretty general like it goes to like habitat type but it might be it might be worthwhile to have the baseline kind of talk about specifically the invasives that are on
the property and approximately where they are. Um because that's you know a piece of information on the current um current status. So, I just made that note. Um, maybe
have a in invasive species inventory, an observation in the baseline. Okay. Is everybody still with me on this? >> Are we still good? >> Yes. >> Okay. So, we're >> everybody else? >> Yeah.
>> Yep. >> Okay. Good. So, we're still in the prohibited things. We can't destroy stone walls or historical stone monuments. can't be subdivided or conveyed um or st
used as a requirement for um developing any other parcel in town. Um you guys added hunting, uh trespassing on the sandy slopes, you added uh removing the wildlife,
and those might all be from Miss Anne, I don't know. or >> I think those were from things that we thought would be a good idea. >> Yeah. >> To restrict. >> That's what I think. >> Okay, great. So, >> is there a note on there on that,
Selena? Can you click and see? >> There is not a note. It's just >> not a note. >> It's just added. >> Yeah, we just added it in. >> Yeah. Everything that's green is stuff that we did. Everything that's purple is what Anna did.
>> Uhuh. >> Um and then the these yellow highlights are where there's a note. >> Yeah. >> So, yeah, we just added >> All right. >> Okay. So, this should be B.
Adjust indent. that. So the so now we're going into the reserve rights. All right. So we just got through all the stuff that we can't do and now we're going into the things that we are saying we need to be able to do.
The first one um well written. I think it's covers it covers it very simply um about the um the use of the area um as described in the deed and outlined in
the towns and town bylaw section for groundwater protection district. Um, and again, we'll have to add exhibit for that. That pretty much that's like kind of a cart blanch um permission for the
water department to do what they got what they got to do. And I don't know, you know, if me, you know, if Miss Deianne understands what that means. Um
>> you can just go to our bylaws and see it. I mean this is it was actually Dave that um Dave Vant who suggested this or >> because we had started listing it all out I believe >> um and um he said you already have it in
the bylaws just just go to that and that way if the bylaw changes >> then it's there. >> Yeah. Yeah. I think that's great. Yeah. It's very it's it's it's a great thing. I'm just I I'm just calling attention to
it to maybe whether you know the maybe we make sure that this that the town bylaw section is an exhibit in the baseline documentation.
>> That's an idea. add an exhibit for well. Okay. So, and um because that's the document that's going to be, you know, that Col's going to grab off the shelf anytime there's anything going on.
>> Okay. So, um and same with us. We're going to go to the baseline first. Um So that's fine and as long as Miss Deianne
and the state understand what that means. >> Okay, >> that's then that's great. Uh, okay. Let's see the next one. uh erection and maintenance of sight
perous non-inclusing wildlife friendly fences. Okay, so this is about fencing that you can put fencing up if you won't want to with the written permission of North County Land Trust and the division. Basically,
you're re retaining the right to put temporary permanent boundary monuments um and signage as long as it doesn't identify the location and existence of any state listed species.
Um so non-commercial passive recreation uses are they are listed walking trails similar whatever. Uh and then that actually goes there is another section within
this under um legal remedies of the grantee B or C under access. Sorry, that's further down page nine on my piece.
um access is called out again. Um and that's typically um in this part of the document it's about
um the grant's right to access the property. So it kind of explains when do we get to monitor, when do we get to enter the property for um to
remedy situations, things like that. But in addition, it referenced public access in another paragraph. It said the granter also grants to the public the right to. And then so I I
took this section from the EA standard language um and added you added this in. >> I added this in because there was a placeholder and you'll see where I deleted it at the
end of that section. It basically said the granter also grants to the public the right to. And so I was like, well, if you're talking about public access, this is like the public access section that's typically in the EA model suggested language.
So >> we should read through that and make sure we >> okay so it says public so subject to the provisions of this conservation restriction the grantor hereby grants access to the premises to the general
public but only for daytime use and only as described in paragraph 3b10. uh provided that such agreement by grtor is subject to the grtor's reserved right to establish reasonable rules, regulations, and restrictions on such
permitted recreational use by the general public for the protection of the purposes and the conservation values again. So, it's referencing the purposes and conservation values. first section that I said was important because
basically that allows you to put together policies, rules, and regulations that limit what the public's allowed to do because it's protecting those resources. So you again, if you're saying like you can't walk on the
slopes, you know, that's because you're protecting those purposes, right? So, you want to make sure that um you've got everything up there that you want. Um
granter has the right to control limit by posting reasonable or where was I? Sorry, hang on. Yeah. Granter has the right to control, limit or prohibit it prohibit by posting and other reasonable means activities or
uses of the premises not authorized in paragraph 2E and I think 3B10 is might not be right. So paragraph 2E again >> passive recreation >> is the passive recreation. Right.
>> So the 3B10 >> I think that might be wrong. >> Yeah. What were you >> trying to which section >> were you trying to call out >> as described?
the only described in I think that's 2e the same >> I think so because it's basically access to do >> for the general public >> to do
let's see two that's to e passive recreation, right? >> Yeah. >> Does that make sense? >> Um, hang on. I'm looking for that.
That's the That's the >> That's under definitions. >> Yes. >> So, you're going to that def definition, >> right? >> Okay. 2 B 2 E
>> 2 E 2 E passive. Okay. Okay. Okay. Yes. Yeah. That should be two. >> I didn't see that it was there twice when I >> Okay. >> Put that in there. All right.
2 E. Okay. So the grantee may require the grtor to post the premises against any use by the public that results in material impairment of the conservation values. This grant of public access to the premises is solely for the purposes
described in section 17 C of chapter 21 of Massachusetts general laws and the granter and grantee here to express their intent to benefit from the es exculpation from liability to the extent provided in such sections.
So that's um legal ease for as public use. You can't sue us if you get hurt. But um that's something that the town council is going to want to um look at, I'm sure.
>> Okay. But that's the standard land language out of the EA um template. Okay. So, I think it's going to be fine. I didn't look up section 17 C of chapter 21, but I think that's the one where it
says uh it is public use of land for recreation, conservation, scientific, educational, and other purposes. Land owners liability limited. >> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Good. Uh, okay. So, now that we looked at that, that sounds pretty good to everybody. You're all good with that language? >> I am. >> Great. >> Okay. So, then we're going to scroll back up.
Do the areas that we are allowing things reserve rights. So, we can make fences. We can have a well, we can do boundary marking and not notice marking.
We can do um non-commercial passive recreational uses. Um so with permission right to remove or control hazardous trees, poison ivy, um oriental bittersweet, maybe we should
say invasive bittersweet here. >> Yeah, that's a good idea. or oriental is >> um or other invasive. I It's interesting that they call out bittersweet and then just say other invasives,
>> right? >> I I mean somebody has it out for bittersweet. guess whoever wrote this I I you know I think um um I I think we could just get rid of or
oriental bittersweet other and just have it say or control hazard trees poison ivy invasive or exotic species you know we don't need it to say insect infestation diseases other types of past methods, blah blah blah, all of
these things. So that basically again um if you remember above it said you can't use any chemicals and now it's saying you can with the prior with the written permission. Um >> the next one prior permission the right
to restore maintain enhance or otherwise manage biotic communities and habitats. So this is where and then it says where the CMP requires habitat restoration maintenance or enhancement of rare species habitat. No written permission shall be required from the grantee.
Um right because they're saying basically the management plan is your written permission. >> So all habitat restoration maintenance um shall be done in accordance with written permission from the division and
applicable CMP requirements. I think the last sentence under the attachment. Did I do that one? >> Yes, >> I think so. Yeah. >> No, it says
>> Oh, actually it's >> Ronnie Veronica. >> Was it me? >> I I think that's redundant, but I think it's we we can leave it in. I think we put that in there because that's what we had to do when we did the
habitat management before. >> Okay. >> We had to have >> and they had wanted a plan, >> you know, for for that, which is pretty much what um Selena went over with the
habitat management >> plan, >> right? So is I'm I thought that the the CMP was the habitat management plan. Is that right or is that not right?
>> I think it is. Um, let me So, the conservation restriction is granted. There's your conservation management plan, CMP. >> Yeah. Conservation and management
permit. So they call it that and >> but it's the same document >> I think so. >> So let's just make a note to ask Miss Anne if
they're saying the same things. Um we want it to make sense. That's what we want. We don't want people to read uh a sentence and and not know what it's talking about.
Um that would be counterproductive. So, I'm going to make a note in my thing. Um um are these two
stanzas sentences saying the same thing? Is the CMP the same as the habitat >> management plan? >> Management plan.
And if so, maybe we put that in the definitions, right? Yeah, we probably should call that out somehow. definitions, passive recreation. So, I mean, it does say here
um conservation and management permit. Where is it? Up here. So maybe the um CMP is is the permit that you get when you file the habitat management plan.
>> Okay. >> So then we should say Yeah, cuz it's conservation and management permit. That's the CMP, >> right? So maybe we say habitat management.
>> I think this is redundant because the CMP is what you get from filing the habitat management plan. >> Okay. All habitat maintenance or enhancement of rare
species habitat. It's written permission of the division or applicable CMP requirements which typically require habitat management plans. Um
and the and the plan the this habitat management plan should be in the baseline but probably not attached to the CR. >> Okay. >> Um because the plan is going to change over time.
Um, part of habitat management plan is part of or should be a an ex exhibit in or a a appendix in the baseline
>> BDR appendex. >> That's going to be an expensive baseline. Um, we need to talk about who does baselines because that's going to have to be procured, I think.
>> Yeah. Yeah. There's a number of people who will do them. >> So, are we okay with removing this habitat management must be done under the direction of NHGSP? >> Yeah, I think we're good removing that line.
>> Yes. Okay. and not part of the CR. So the habitat management plan is part of the BDR perhaps an appendix and not part CR. >> Right. >> Okay. And so we'll remove that blue line.
>> Yep. Yep. >> Six. Okay. Great. And then you have trails. The next one is a reserve right the marking clearing or maintaining of foot paths and woods
roads existing and shown on the plan. So the survey plan I don't think you guys have the trails on the survey plan.
We do not >> existing and shown on the plan. So if you're not planning to have it on the plan, >> take that out. Yep. >> Yeah, I would take that out and say um existing
as described in the BDRS. Okay. Of course, they have to be special and add an S on it. What does that stand for? I wonder >> survey it ends >> survey >> because they because you're you're it's not like a plot plan survey but you're
surveying the land ahead of time >> so or for current conditions. >> It's a current conditions survey. >> Okay. >> Anyway, so um it's baseline documentation report and survey.
Uh I'll So the other the next one you're um I wrote out uh conservation and management permit again here because
by the time I got this far in reading it, I've had really I was like had to remind myself what the CMP was again. So I just wrote it out again in this for myself. And I think whoever's reading
this in the future will thank me. Um, so conservation management permit as the CMP may be subsequently amended and duly recorded with the Middle Sex County Registry of Deeds with reference to the CMP and this conservation restriction.
All right. So that's again a little redundant but um but I guess it's not because it's talking about um or is the CMP that's not even a complete sentence. What is that even saying? All actions
and activities required or authorized by the CMP. Is there a verb there? All actions and activities required or authorized by the CMP as the CMP may subsequently
may be subsequently amended and duly recorded with the registry of deeds with reference to the CMP. And this >> because maybe it's because at the is because the CMB um all actions I think
they're saying all actions and activities in the CMP and it notes that the CMP can be amended. >> Okay. >> And so anything that in that amendment would also be a um allowed use
reserved right or whatever. >> Okay. Is there a missing word or am I really is it just getting really late? I think it all actions. So this is let's go to the top here. Reserved rights for the premises. They reserve the right to
conduct or permit all actions and activities required or authorized by the conservation and management permit. The as could be a since the CMP may be subsequently amended and recorded.
>> Oh, I see. >> That's what I read. I don't know that as is the right word, but that's the word that they used. >> All right. I'm going to put since there. >> Okay. >> Because that makes it make sense in my mind. And I was just like, I don't know. Again,
>> because that's what I think they're saying though. >> I I agree with you. I agree that that's what they're saying. I just was like >> that having the as there is more legally.
>> Yep. >> And what about the word and at the end of that? >> It's because >> this one the >> now we're going to nine. Is there a nine? >> Yeah. And I think nine used to be the
last one. So that's why the and was there >> like and this is the final thing but then they added another thing >> right >> can take out the and >> okay so we can delete the and and the
semicolon. Uh the semicolon I think they keep because the each of these >> Oh yeah, everybody else is telling me. Yeah, you're right. It is. It should be that the >> um what is this 10? It's this should be
10. Oh, the formatting is really messed up. Oh, no. That's nine. That's eight. That's nine. Got it. I'm sorry. I put the I on the wrong side in my mind. >> Um >> but they put a period at the end of this one. >> Right. So where where there should
probably be a semicolon and a and at the end of nine, >> right? Yeah. >> You know, >> I mean this is this was what they gave us. So >> yeah,
>> I know it's all good. >> Uh okay. So any work undertaken in conjunction with the reserve rights mentioned above paragraph 3B uh shall seek to minimize disturbance to
the premises upon completion any disturb. Yeah. Okay. So that just basically um so in the EA um both so I think here's the thing um
this So nine to me should be its own section afterwards. Um, or maybe nine should actually be 10 and 10 be nine because basically you want this the last
statement to say if you do any of these actions, you're going to have to leave it as >> undisturbed and and in a better situation.
um if if you're if you do if you do um if you do any work. So um in the EA I believe this is actually
another it's not within the reserved rights. It's its own thing saying if you do any of this work, you got to make it sure it's you clean up after yourself and make it nice. Um
it's more of a directive rather than a a >> reserved right. >> Right. So, this is why I'm like I, you know, it it's just can like I I want it to
be as clear and understandable as possible for future generations. Um suppose we could make um archaeological investigations nine. >> Yep. >> And we could um pull that out and just
make it a paragraph. >> Yep. >> Right. With a and mesh it with the paragraph >> at the bottom there >> before Roman numeral 2 before additional provisions.
>> Yeah. And why is that Roman numeral 2? That should be Roman numeral >> four. >> Yeah, >> that's a typo then. >> Yep. >> Let me just check and make sure the next
one is five. >> So there um the things are not updating correctly. >> Yeah. Yeah. Because then general provisions goes back to one. Yeah. This is um
huh the foreign I'm adding needs some >> yeah the format >> help but um so do we want this paragraph before the one that exists or do we want it after >> let's see so the last paragraph the
exercise of any rights to be in compliance with the then current zoning Uh, why would you put then? I think we should take out then. Shall be in compliance with the current zoning
bylaws. >> Yeah. Otherwise, it's like, well, we're going back to former bylaws, right? Take out the then. Yeah. >> But I I agree though that what is nine should come down and be a paragraph before that.
and all other applicable federal, state, county, local bylaws, laws, bylaws, rules, regulations, including but not limited to the Mass Historic Commission regulations, local wetlands conservation commission bylaws and regulations, the inclusion of any reserved right in paragraph 3B requiring a permit from
does not apply. Uh, that is the standard language. Um, and I think it can go on either side of it. What do you guys think?
Before or after? Probably before. >> Yeah. Works. >> I like where it is right now. >> Okay. They're going to have to thank us for fixing their template. I'm sure they will.
Yeah. Okay. Okay. All right. All right. We are at 8:30, you guys. So, >> yeah. You >> Well, we're getting close. >> We're getting close. Who can Do you want all want to press on? We're We're pretty
close. >> Yeah, I think we should. What do you guys think? >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Let's finish that and table everything else. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> All right. We got good flow. Additional
pro provisions. Um so these basically a lot of it has to do with communications. It has to do with um some of the legal stuff. um a lot of this very standard um
legal ease stuff, but basically so notice and approval um this talks about how if y'all want to do something um you've got to give us um not less than 60 days prior to you doing
it. >> Uh written notice, right? Um, you know, the this is um, practically speaking, what ends up happening is that you email us and maybe the division and it has
something to do with like, oh, there's a hazard tree and we want to take it down. It's not going to take that long to get that process through, but legally you want to define all of those things in case uh people are not
communicating well. And that's where lawy that's the place that lawyers always go is what happens when every when the hits the fan and everybody's being poorly behaved. So, um, just so you know that it it's
like the the the day-to-day practical way the things work doesn't necessarily follow that 60-day timeline, but we all want it in writing that um, you
know, you can't just spring major work on us and we need time to process things. Right. Right. Um okay. So that talks about um
it it really so the the notice in writing it does it it's it's very clear in here what needs to be in that notice. Um, and this, um,
is just something for town employees and, um, TASA folks or or the the volunteers to really be aware of. You know, the notice shall describe the nature, scope, design, location,
timetable, MISA tracking number or CMP number if applicable, um, and other material aspects. So again, like um that is that right there can can is an
outline for the um request for approval. Um, you know, I don't know if internally the town wants to make a template or something that goes
into the baseline that just says this is the form that we use to make requests or whatever >> idea, >> you know, um, just to make sure that, um,
the required things are in there. Um but that's that's what that says. Um and it also says that permission or rejection of the plan will you know will
come at a reasonable time and will um will not be unreasonably withheld. Permission will not be unreasonably withheld. That is
um hopefully everybody's on the same page about all of that. Okay. Okay. So, legal remedies. Um so, this is talking about how we have the right to enforce the conservation restriction and
if it costs a lot of money for us to enforce it. um the town or the the grtor will reimburse us some of those expenses. Um, so it is
it behooves the grtor to take care of things so that the grantee doesn't have to um be orary about it and legal about it.
non-waver. Um, so it basically says we can enforce the stuff or we don't have to enforce the stuff, but if we don't enforce the stuff, that doesn't mean that we can't enforce the stuff. If that makes sense.
>> Okay. Um, so the and the um, so the the the disclaimer of liability means that like if there's hazardous
waste on there, um, the grantee I we're we're not liable. The the land owner is still liable for hazardous waste or like other hazards that are on the property. Um, our role is enforcing the conservation restriction. it's not managing the property or being liable
for anything that might happen um in that regard, >> right? Um and then the acts beyond the granch's control. If um something terrible happens that's beyond your control, we
can't and we can't you know say that you're in un you know that causes you to be out of compliance with the CR. We can't go after you for that because you know it was a natural thing.
Like basically say you had a forest and there was a forest fire and now you don't have a forest but the CR requires you to have a forest. We can't say um you know you're in violation. We're going to take you to court. All right. The next one we already went
over access. >> Yes. >> Um so that looks good. Extinguishment. So this means basically >> and that but wait a minute that access thing >> is just about um North County Land Trust
having access. >> Yeah, that first part. Yeah. >> Okay. >> And then public access got added. >> Well, there was a So originally >> uh sentence. So yeah, Hannah just
expanded it >> to include the actual info. >> Okay. Yeah. >> So isn't that public access? Oh, I see. We scrolled way down there earlier. That's what we looked at. Okay. Okay.
>> Yeah. Okay. Extinguishment. This is talking about um if there are, you know, in the crazy, you know, I if Yeah. just the legal
process of extinguishing the conservation restriction should it need to be extinguished. So there's um again, this is standard language in all conservation restrictions here in
Massachusetts. It's basically um has to go through uh legal review and the secretary of EA, the division of um fisheries and
wildlife, the NE and HSP um you know, it's basically like if the law forces us to have to extinguish it, it's got to um go through this huge process.
Um and then if there's any proceeds where that goes um uh public access action uh what is this? Oh yeah, this is if if like the federal government comes taking the land for
eminent domain. Um this is the process for that. Okay, assignability. This section um talks about so the running the burden running the burden makes it permanent,
right? Running the burden means that it it go it stays with the deed. It stays with the land. like you can't transfer it out or extinguish it because you know the the town
uh or TASA legally buys the land or whatever. Um so that's important. Um okay. Oh
my phone batteries got 10% so we got to go quick. >> Yeah. The rest of this the run of um execution of instrument saying that we can we are authorized to do this. Um the running the benefit
um is basically um yeah that the conservation restriction can um
cannot be given away to somebody else unless it's compliant with article 97. Okay. Um transfers again like if if the
grantor does sell it, this is the protocol for that. Um and then a stoppple certificate if you uh at any time you can request an estoppel certificate and we have to give it to you within 30 days. just basically
um a legal uh document saying that you are in compliant with this conservation restriction. Okay. >> Non- merger uh the town can't um hold the conservation restriction on the land
that they own. So we couldn't like say North County Land Trust doesn't want to hold the CR anymore. We can't give the CR to you guys. That's the non- merger amendment. You can amend it, but there's a process and that's the dis that's the process for
amending the CR. Don't amend the CR. It's a pain in the butt. And then the effective date. As soon as this gets um recorded in the registry of deeds, it is effective. And if you violate the terms of this an
hour after it gets recorded, we can hold you your feet to the fire about it. So, um, these are the addresses. I I put in select board andor town administrator. You guys can I I don't know if that's
good for >> Yeah, I think that's fine. And then I just put executive director although you know that's for official notices but um >> Right. I I think actually the grantor would be the select board.
>> Okay. >> Yeah. So you would so we can just take out andor town administrator. >> Yeah I'll confirm that. That's >> yeah this is where all of the notices and demands would go to. So >> um
and let's see I don't think there's a So the only other thing down below um is the is where I put the baseline documentation report and survey language from uh from the purposes or the notes
but the permitted uses or something >> or purposes. Yeah, I guess it was there. So, I just looked at the EA model and this is where it was in their model. So, I put it there. >> Okay. And then
there's no homestead, so you don't have to um do anything with that. Pre-existing public rights. So, basically, uh if there's ex pre-existing public rights,
this doesn't extinguish it. Um, let's see. Um, I So, this this is kind of interesting. The town doesn't have any leans or loans or anything out on the property. Is that correct?
>> That is correct. >> Okay. So, we don't we can delete that. Paragraph um three after subordination. >> Do you see that? >> Yeah. Um
do we delete all of subordination like >> Oh, I thought I did delete subordination. You can Oh, yeah. Maybe I didn't delete subordination. >> You can delete the word subordination.
which I guess I didn't do accidentally. And then um paragraph 3 underneath you can delete. And then yeah, just make sure that the exhibits are listed and the signature pages are
right. to check the exhibit list, >> description of the premises, reduced copy of recorded plans. Um, I don't know if the TASA expansion plan
needs to be in there. Uh, it probably doesn't if it's an excluded um if the CR doesn't cover that area. Yeah. >> And I would
So yeah, I think those are good. I think >> I think those are good. Um, what about the habitat management plan? I think we Isn't that part of the BDR? Not
>> Yeah, I think Oh, yeah. That's right. >> I would I would ask um Misty if she thinks it should be recorded. Sometimes like I have seen some fish and
wildlife plans where they do put like forest management like best management practices or other guidelines and stuff within their CRS which I think is
not useful because sometimes those things change and >> but >> I think unless we want to include it we don't ask her about it. We just leave it out and then she brings it up. We can
>> Okay, that sounds fine with me. >> As long as it's like like the baseline is going to be um very important. >> Yes. >> Um so um yeah. >> Okay.
>> And I think we did it. I think so too. Um because the rest is just signature pages. >> Yeah. Right. >> All right. >> Um so where do we go with this then? We
make these edits, get these um answers and meet next week Thursday perhaps to uh finalize and get it out to Miss Deianne. I think we could probably uh yeah, we could probably meet next week for the table discussion. I think we can
probably via email. Um just review it one last time before it goes to Miss Deianne. Um >> I don't know if we I think it has to be an open meeting. >> Yeah, we always do email.
Well, we could email the document and everybody can review it and then at the next meeting we just if anybody noticed any edits or anything that needed to >> Right. >> We can do that. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Let's do that because
um Yeah, I think that that works. >> Who is distributing the document? So, I just made all the edits on the fly to this document. So, I can send this >> to the group.
>> Okay, that sounds good. >> And and we have to finish this exhibit list. >> Um I will go through Oh, yeah. the on at the very you mean at the the very first paragraph
>> you had said we we needed to check the exhibit list >> right to make sure >> at the very end. >> Yes. Just to compare it against what we have anywhere we have exhibit in the CR itself. Now see this says a reduced copy of
which is attached here too is exhibit A. Um >> right >> you know so to look at exhibit A and and see exhibit A is a description of the premises the reduced copy of the recorded plan is B. Exhibit B. So just
to make sure those things are um and then there's an exhibit C. That's the taste expansion plan. So if we aren't including that, oh no, we might want to include it because in that very first paragraph, >> we were excluding the area defined as So
I think we want to keep that as exhibit C. >> But I think later on we called it the TAS soccer complex instead of >> Oh yeah, right here. The TA Soccer Complex. >> Are we good then? Are we consistent with
that? >> Yes. Yes. Okay. >> So that is exhibit C. >> Yeah. So exhibit C will be the TEASA soccer complex.
>> Yeah. >> I the other the other kind of like crosschecking that needs to happen is anytime that um the CR refers to itself, you know. Yeah. So,
>> you know, included in, you know, like paragraph 3B, like make sure that paragraph 3B is the right one. >> Um, I think that's going to be most productive after like all the other formatting has been
accepted and done. I agree. So, um, I used to be a tech writer and I am good at checking all those little pieces, but I do agree that making sure they all match correctly.
I'll do a quick pass through before I send it out. Um, but we're going to need to do that again once comes back with any changes and whatnot. So, >> yeah, >> I'll make sure it's good now and then we'll double check it before
it gets all the changes accepted. Like once once all the changes are accepted, we'll make sure all the things point to the right place still. >> Great. >> Okay. >> Um are are you guys good with me um uh
running Well, I'll I asked for a um agenda item on the select board meeting this coming Tuesday, the 10th. Um I I I would like to ask that this go to um town council just to have him look at it.
>> Yeah. >> Um and I think I'd rather do it now whe rather than to wait for Miss Deianne. I think >> Yeah, I think that's fine. Um >> just so he knows what we're doing and has some idea of what
>> and I'm going to send this to my lands committee as well. >> Okay. So when Selena sends me that, I will uh go to the select board first and then send to Adam
for review. All right. And >> I have lots of charging codes in front of me. None of them are for my cell phone. >> Okay. >> All right. So, I will do a quick check like to make sure the exhibit list is
all complete and things point to the right place and then I'll send this out probably tomorrow morningish. >> Great. Okay. Um I am um All right. So, this is great.
Um discussion of pres I'm moving on to 2.3 discussion of presentation and presentation plan for boards and committees. I'll move that to next the next meeting. Um and we can think more about that.
>> Um and then discuss agenda and the next meeting. >> So March 12th at 7 o'clock. >> Yeah. Let me just check and make sure that I don't have another meeting that day because I seem to have a million meetings.
112 I am good. So if you guys are all good too. Let's do 700 p.m. next week and on that we'll be reviewing the CR and then hopefully after that we're ready to soldier on with Miss Deianne. Do we do
mistanne and eea at the same time or is it mistanne and then eea? I thought Dan said do them both at the same time but that seems kind of
it could it could be not good. >> Yeah. I mean it I think if Miss Deianne can do a if she's not going to take forever to look at it
>> because we will have some time um when they first receive RCR it'll be a little bit of time before they OEA looks at it. >> Right. So, well, now I'm like I'm talking to myself
talking myself through this. It might be good to um at least get a a number, get our CR and Q with Ee >> with Eea. Yeah. So,
>> we could submit that. Um, do you want me to submit it or do you want the concom to submit it? Maybe that's a question for Colby. >> No, the concom wouldn't be submitting it. It's the um the select board. >> The select board would be submitting it.
And are you're good with that? >> Okay. So, I found the email from Dan. He said that we send the draft to Miss Anne, update it based on feedback, and then send it to E.
>> Okay. >> All right. That kind of makes sense so that we don't have two conflicting sets of changes, right? >> But at at the same time, but the habitat management plan has to be sent to Miss Deianne first, right?
>> Because she she won't accept the CR until she sees what the habitat management plan is. And we have a conservation management permit, right, that we can >> I think we can um I'll check with Dan,
but I think we can send her the habitat management plan and the CR, but I I will double check with Dan. >> Okay. Okay. So, um
I thought earlier after we went over that the habitat management plan, we decided that it's ready to go to Miss Deian. >> Yes. >> Yep. >> So, >> are you going to do that like tomorrow or >> Yeah. I'm going to have Dan >> Okay.
>> get it out the door. >> Okay. >> I'll tell him that it's ready to go. Um, and I'll find out from him any timeline stuff concerning it. Like I don't know the exact steps.
Okay. All right. So, I have three things on the agenda for next week. Reviewing the CR. Um, last look before we send it out to Miss Deianne. Review the budget and funding sources. I'll put that table
together and um discuss uh what committees we want to go forward with to show what we're doing and um what that presentation would look like. Does that make sense? >> Yeah.
>> Yes. >> Okay. >> I move we adjourn >> at 8:57. Is there a second? Belina Thomas second. >> Um, all right. All those in favor,
beginning with Emily. Yes. >> Emily Fine. Yes. >> Mike Quad. Yes. >> Elena Thomas. Yes. >> And Veronica Cal. Yes.