I just want to feel bad not knowing that. >> Okay. >> Uh welcome everybody to this special planning board meeting on March 3rd, 2026. Madam Secretary, can you please call the
role? >> Mr. Magarell, Mr. Day >> here, >> Mrs. Parker >> here. >> Mr. Lily >> here. >> Mr. Kimmood >> here. >> Mr. Fresky. >> Township manager Sullivan >> here. >> Deputy Mayor Mackoy
>> present. >> Mayor Tambbor >> here. >> Vice Chair Heinman. Chair Pearson >> here. >> Board attorney Mera >> here. >> This is zoning officer Miss Meech >> here. >> Um can if if you can can you please join
me for the pledge of allegiance by standing up. I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
>> Thank you. >> Madam Secretary, can you please read this open public meetings act statement? The notice requirements of the open public's meeting act have been satisfied with respect to this meeting of the township of Verona planning board which is being held in the ballroom of the
Verona community center located at 880 Bloomfield Avenue, Verona. Specifically, the time and date were included in the annual notice of meetings. This information along with the meeting agenda was posted in the municipal building and on the legal notices web page of the township website and sent to the official newspapers of the township,
the Veronus Cedar Grove Times and the Star Ledger at least 48 hours preceding the start time of this meeting. The agenda and public handouts for this meeting can be viewed online at the township's website. Instructions on how to comment will be provided at the appropriate time. Those wishing to speak
during any public comment period should only provide their name and municipality. Street addresses are not required. Please be advised that should a member of the public choose to state their street address, it will not be redacted from this recording.
>> Uh, thank you. Um, thank you. Um, at this time I can open to public participation or anything not on the agenda. But seeing that there are no current members of the public here, we
can reread a statement should they re-enter. So, I will now close public participation. Um, has everybody received a copy of the February 19th special meeting meeting minutes?
Are there any comments on those minutes? Bes I I did whisper a couple things to Dee about just stating memorializations were on there and they looked to be like new new resolutions, but they weren't. So, she's going to fix that if anybody
objects to that. Otherwise, can I get a motion to move and approve the meeting minutes from February 19th, 2026? >> So moved. >> Mr. Day makes the motion. Can I get a second? >> Second.
>> Second by Mr. Lily. All members that were present at the meeting uh that vote to approve hand up please something. Anyone not approve? Anyone
>> abain? >> Abstain. >> That would be all members in favor I and against nay verbally. >> Okay. Well, we also have um an abstension by
Mr. Kamoodi. So, please note that >> um moving on to resolutions. Uh there are four resolutions. Um uh resolution 202610 finding 420
Bloomfield Avenue redevelopment plan not inconsistent with the master plan with um uh board recommendations. Can I get a motion to memorialize to approve that memorialization resolution?
>> I'll move that. >> Mr. Kamudi makes the motion. Can I get a second? I'll second it. Uh, roll call vote, please. Mr. Day, >> I don't believe I can vote on this one.
>> If he couldn't vote on Oh, I'm sorry. Yes, he apologize. >> Voted in favor. >> Apologize. >> Mrs. Parker, >> yes. >> Mr. Lily, >> yes. >> Mr. Kimuti, >> yes. Township Manor Joe Sullivan. >> Yes.
>> Deputy Mayor Mackoy. >> Yes. >> Mayor Tim Burrow, >> yes. >> Uh, Chair Pearson, >> yes. >> Uh, the motion passes. Um, next, memorialization of resolution uh, 2026-11 finding that 8.85 Bloomfield
Avenue redevelopment plan not inconsistent with the master plan. Can I get Oh, along with the uh board recommendations for the town council. >> Madame Chair, can I make a statement here real quick? >> Yes. >> Okay. Uh I did a little research on the
conditions that we put on this. Uh can we change the MV 17 rating to a lower rating at this point or is it too late? >> Too late. >> Okay. >> We can amend it. >> Recommendation. Um, can I get a motion
to pass to approve this resolution, please? So moved. >> And can I get a second, please? >> Second. >> Second by Mr. Lily.
Um, moved by Miss Parker. Roll call vote. >> Mrs. Parker. >> Yes. Mr. Lily. Yes. >> Um and Mr. Kamoodi is >> um Township Manager Sullivan.
>> Yes. >> Deputy Mayor Makavoy. >> Yes. >> Mayor Timborro. >> I chair. >> Yes. Uh the motion passes. Resolution 202612 finding amendment to the standards in the town center mixed use
zone not inconsistent with the master plan. Um, I'll make that motion to uh approve the resolution. Can I get a second? >> Second. >> Ms. Parker seconds. Can we get a roll
call vote, please? >> Mrs. Parker, >> yes. >> Mr. Lily, >> yes. >> Mr. Kimi, >> yes. >> Township manager Joe Sullivan. >> Yes. >> Deputy Mayor Mackoy. >> Yes. >> Mayor Tambbero,
>> yes. and Chair Pearson. >> Yes. Motion passes. And finally, resolution 202613 finding amendments to articles 19 affordable housing and article 21 development fees not
inconsistent with the master plan. Can I get a motion to Oh, with with all of the tweaks that the board had suggested for the council, can I get a motion to approve? >> So moved. The mayor makes the motion.
Can I get a second? >> Second it. >> Uh, Mr. Okay. Deputy mayor gets the second. Can I get a roll call vote, please? >> Mrs. Parker? >> Yes. >> Mr. Lily? >> Yes. >> Mr. Kimoody?
>> Yes. >> Township manager Sullivan? >> Yes. >> Deputy Mayor Mackoy? >> Yes. >> Mayor Timuro? >> Yes. >> Chair Pearson? >> Yes. The motion passes. Um, we have no, believe it or not, consistency
determinations kind of don't, uh, on the agenda tonight, but I do want to ask a couple of questions before we get into this. Um, Jamie, um, our affordable
housing attorney, Jamie, I have a couple of questions before we give it over to Dan. What were you told by the courts in regard to 251 and a half Groove Avenue, please? >> So, where we're at now, it's it's more
um global than just 251, but 251 is our timing issue. So, because this the deadline requires everything be accomplished by the March 15th deadline. And after tonight, uh if the plan is adopted by this board tonight, that will be uh the final action that will come
from this planning board outside of 251. And then it will be returned to the municipal township council and after the 9th meeting on the 9th, all that will be left from the township council site as well is 251. So after tonight, I'll be
provided the resolution uh by your council as I said to the township and I will upload that on the docket in our pending action and I'll update the court and then the court will have everything it needs where it's then in a position to issue an extension of the March 15 deadline and I've been working with uh
the planner on because it it all deals with one there's an exception or an extension exception in the statutory scheme that for extreme extreme weather events and the 251 hat property the way it's situated and the way it's
essentially functioning as a vacant property now uh she was unable to obtain access or get on the site due to snowstorm >> right >> had during the process and then there's also an exception allowing for where you have a continuing conflict and while we
have settled with all challengers in in principle not obtaining the 15th eight in essence in itself is a continuing conflict because it would be a failure by letter
to have complied with the letter of the law. So those it's those two uh bases and then the corporate issue extension on that. I've spoken with the planner and we'll >> my question is what do you expect that extension to grant us in terms of you
know days 30 that's exactly what I was saying is I I spoke with the planner and it's we're extending to May 15 date and the reason how many May 15th and the reason we're selecting the May 15th date >> okay >> is just due to uh meeting schedules as
they stand now and knowing that uh certainly people have children school age spring break coming up time and that we want to make sure that April 30 would be the other logical choice, but that cuts us short of potential meeting time if
needed. >> Okay. So, >> yay. >> I didn't think it was that exciting. Love municipal land. >> Sam, when do you think you'll have the
uh the study on uh area need of redevelopment prepared for this board? >> So I I intend to have that for the March meeting. >> Okay.
>> So that might proceed our consistent I'm sorry. an area in need of redevelopment study might will most definitely precede the hearing for 383 Bloomfield. We could maybe ask them to come a little behind
the schedule. Um so that will be on our agenda as well. Once that's done, what's the time frame that you see for turning out a a redevelopment plan on the same property? So, we just wrapped
up and my goal is we've started the re we've started the red weapon plan. So, my goal is let's see um uh let me just get on. So, March 26th is the um >> regular planning board meeting.
>> Correct. So the following meeting we can have um that get designated. >> Um well the council will have to hear that plan. They have a meeting >> they have a meeting on March on April
6th. >> Correct. So, we can uh do that and I think we can also get get the um >> you're saying that we could hear this at the April 23rd meeting >> for consistency. >> For consistency. Yes.
>> Back to the council for their May 4th meeting and be >> Yes. Because what matters for us is sequential order, not necessarily dates on the council. So, we can designate and introduce the same >> same date. same date as long I just need sequential order. So I need the
resolution adopted first to designate then an introduction on the ordinance introducing the plan >> and and my goal is to get everything done from my end way like attending meetings and all because as um my nephew's getting married so I can't miss
that. >> Are you going to be around for the April meeting? >> Yes, I will. April 1. >> What time are you when are you leaving? um April 30th and then I'll be back on the 13th. >> So, she won't be able to um come to the
council meeting on May 4th at the adoption date. >> But I can come I can well I can come remotely. >> You could zoom in. >> Yeah, I've done that for my other towns. >> Okay. >> So, >> um I'm just trying to keep it so that
it's doable. Now the other I'm sorry the other question I have is once that property is cleaned up in terms of you know compliance with uh fair share and
comports to the plan uh that we're going to be hearing about in a minute. Do we have to do this over again and readdopt the housing element? Yeah. No, no, it's in the housing element. Everything, all our mechanisms are within it as it's amended now.
>> Okay. >> And so that's, you know, and that's part of it is the township is obviously already pre-committed to these uh factors and and mechanisms to implement through the settlements that were reached with the parties. >> Okay.
Any questions about the upcoming more he same hect but we don't have to have a special meeting unless you make us have a special meeting. That's the hope and that's why we're doing 15 days is that that I could point to a schedule because this was the exact schedule that
we got over that can point to a schedule that doesn't require a special meeting. >> And it it appears that we would comport with their May 15th with that one. >> Yes. >> Okay. And then obviously if something comes up or happens and requires it, we would, you know, we would be forced to,
you know, you know, for a weather event or, you know, something happens and, you know, if you get hit with a storm in the afternoon. >> Yeah. But >> that but that nobody can control. But but at least to the extent what we can control, >> we'll cross that bridge. >> We have a schedule that doesn't require or rely upon special meetings because
obviously those are more difficult >> obviously to accomplish than your standard regular meetings. >> Thank you. >> And uh may I interject? Yeah. >> Um so Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Mr. O'Sullivan, um typically if you recall when we introduce these red plans at the
first reading when you introduce it, I do a presentation. So what I was thinking is the first presentation I will be in person. I can definitely um do the presentation for the second reading. I'm usually I sit in the audience in case there's a question. So
that I'll do remotely. Okay. >> Does that sound good? >> Makes sense to me. I guess >> I'm sorry. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Bark. Um, >> and if there's a weather event, we'll do Zoom.
>> Um, yeah. Well, they can. Thank you, Jamie. Um, all right. At this time, I'm going to turn over the hearing to our affordable housing planning consultant. uh the new title that you've been given. Um
Mr. Dan Howin and Dan, I want to thank you very much for all the work that you've done on this. It it wasn't easy and the tight scheduling and all the it's just not fair and it's not easy and we thank you. >> Thank you. I appreciate that. It's been >> And it was a baby born to Jan in the
interim. >> Yeah. >> Well, we I had my favorite last year when all this was going crazy. >> Yeah. Not another one. Uh, thank you everybody. Um, uh, I'm going to try to keep this a little bit shorter than last time because I'm a
little under the weather. Uh, and I think you've all heard heard the spiel a few times, but um, just to, you know, keep things kosher. As everybody knows, the state had assigned us uh, a obligation to create 155 affordable housing units over the next 10 years.
And because Verona is a largely built out municipality, um we were able to reduce that um to uh or we were able to reduce that based on the the lack of vacant land. Um we adopted a plan in June for the fourth
round housing obligation that uh had addressed what is effectively um 83 units which is the RDP plus the portion of the uh unmet need that I explained uh
what that was in the previous meeting. Effectively we had a plan for 83 uh affordable housing units over the next 10 years. um between June and August uh the plan was challenged by uh three de uh four four parties that's ANR Skyline
who are the owner uh and developer of 885 Bloomfield Avenue DMH2 um which is the uh developer of 176 Bloomfield Avenue. uh JMF properties and interested develop or I guess a uh uh uh
what do you call a purchaser of uh 251 grove um 251 and a half grove and fair share housing center which is a nonprofit that uh basically sued every town in the state to uh have uh some say over their affordable housing plan um
over uh the course of the months um between uh August 21st and December 22nd we had had several mediation sessions with those parties excluding DMH2 who was able to settle with the town and recuse themselves and as a result we had to update the plan. Um rather than
planning for 83 units we now have a plan that addresses or that has to address uh 89 units. So uh not a substantial um increase uh for 885 Boomfield Avenue. The number of units on uh that our plan
addresses on that site went up from the u minimum of 19 units that our plan had stated in June uh because we were in the middle of discussions with them up to 28 units of which uh three townhouse units will be for low-income families and uh
one townhouse with three uh bedrooms for special needs uh uh individuals will also be provided um for 251 and a half. The plan had previously um permitted up to 165 assisted living beds. Uh it will now uh
provide for 84 family afford family town houses of which 17 uh will be affordable. Uh DMH2 will be unchanged from the previous plan. Um and a couple of other things were changed uh partially due to
the the settlement negotiations and also uh due to just some changes of circumstances. um 420 Bloomfield Avenue, also known as the Richfield Regency property, uh went up from the minimum of 45 units that we had uh accounted for in
the June plan to min uh to 65 units of which 10 will be affordable. A new uh property came into the plan 21-25 uh Grove Avenue, which is before the zoning board, seeking, I believe, 12 total units, of which two will be
affordable. Um and um our plan will continue to uh to include the reszoning uh or I guess amendments to the zoning for the TCMU zone. Uh I'm sorry, the TC uh town center zone. uh simply um
continuing to say that we're going to eliminate the 50% split requirement that half of the floor area in any development in the TC any mixeduse development has to be non-residential to now uh allowing for two residential units over one uh uh or two residential stories over one story of
non-residential. Um and uh we now have uh a uh sliding density scale whereas previously our ordinance was uh not specific on density. Um and letting the density be dictated by the bulk.
Um we had to change the TCMU overlay zone to simply uh eliminate the 15% set aside uh for rental units. Now any development that takes place there must set aside 20% of the units um uh for affordable which is allows for up to 14
units because the zone only allows for 70 total units to be constructed in that um overlay zone. Um we have uh and let me just uh double check my math on this. Uh we have my computer just did something crazy. uh
seven surplus units from the uh going toward our RDP which will be available to us to carry into the fifth round. So when we come into round five, hopefully we'll have a smaller number because there'll be less vacant land uh and the seven units will pay off greatly.
Um I'm trying not to destroy my voice. So uh I think uh I'll just leave it with uh virtually everything else is the same. Uh I was here last week discussing the amendments to the affordable housing and development fee ordinances uh in in
town. Um which uh will be adopted by the council next week. Um and um you know I think I think I'm going to leave it at at that and and just open up for any questions. Um, I I do want to also say that Dan has
already adopted or like drafted into articles 19 and 21 the suggestions that this uh body made um for review by the council. So, thank you for doing that and getting that done so quickly >> and bouncing it back,
>> of course. >> Um, does anybody have any questions? Yes. I don't have any questions, Dan. Just two little com. I mean, first, thank you for putting this all together. I enjoyed reading this 300page document
and the uh just two little typos. Actually, on the second page of the 280 something page document, um after me, it says class one with a number, which should be a Roman numeral just to
be consistent. And after Jesse, there's a random P. Jesse Lily, P. Oh, okay. If you can just strike out the >> out the P. >> Um, I mean, that's it. >> Professional. >> That's all. Sure.
>> But everything else I I've heard the spiel so many times at this point. I've been involved in it that I don't have any questions. >> Great. Thank you. I I think I I I think I had had a co-pilot help me put this together, so that's why that one is a one. Okay. Thank you. Any
other questions or comments? Seeing none, um can >> So obviously tonight you're you're we're asking you to adopt the the plan which will amend your housing plan and your master plan >> and it will right this becomes this is part
of the master plan. This is one of the elements of the master plan. Sam, did you have any comments you wanted to make before we No. >> Okay. Um, I I guess
I will if there are no further comments, I will entertain a motion to adopt um the first amendment to the fourth round housing element and fair share plan. amending the housing element and fair share plan previously adopted by
the planning board of the township of Verona by resolution uh on July 19th, 2025. So this would be an action taken tonight. >> I'll move that >> Mr. Kamudi makes the motion. Can I get a
second? >> Second. >> I get a second from Jim Day, I think. Right. Okay. Okay. Um, >> who is >> No, no, no. I didn't know I didn't know if Jesse maybe said it. I'm sorry.
>> Okay. Sorry. Can I get a roll call? >> I That's right. >> Mr. Day. >> Yes. >> Mrs. Barker. >> Yes. >> Mr. Lily. >> Yes. >> Mr. Kimoodi. >> Yes.
>> Township manager Joe Sullivan. >> Yes. Deputy Mayor Makavoy. >> Yes. >> Mayor Tambboro. >> Yes. >> Chair Pearson. >> Yes. The motion passes. This will be uh immediately sent to the town council.
The clerk. Um what? No. >> Now we have to do a motion to pass the resolution. >> Sorry. Now we need a motion to pass the resolution in front of you. Um resolution 202614. Uh this is entitled resolution adopting
the first amendment to the fourth round housing element and fair share plan. Amending the housing element and fair share plan previously adopted by the planning board of the township of Verona by resolution um June 19th uh 2025-10
back on June 19th of 2025. >> I move the resolution. >> Go ahead, Greg. >> Um Mr. Mayor, I just wanted to um say that um I want to thank Jamie for supplementing a resolution that I drafted and substantially supplementing
it with all of the details with regard to the litigation and the uh um you know the status of of where we are and where we stand. So, uh Jamie, thank you for the professional job and for turning it around uh very quickly.
>> Yes. Um, and Greg, thank you for your unbelievable timeliness on all of this stuff. So, um, I think that the motion was made by the mayor. >> It was. >> Okay. Can I get a second?
I'll second it. >> Second. Um, so the mayor uh makes the motion. I second. Can we get a roll call for this resolution? Mr. Day. >> Yes. >> Mrs. Parker. >> Yes.
>> Mr. Lily. >> Yes. >> Mr. Kimoodi. >> Yes. >> Township manager Joe Sullivan. >> Yes. >> Deputy Mayor Mackoy. >> Yes. >> Mayor Tambbero. >> Yes. >> And Chair Pearson. >> Yes. Motion passes. The resolution passes. And now
>> motion to adjurnn. >> Wait a minute. Wait a minute. One second. Now, we are going to send this signed resolution over to the township clerk and you will Okay, last thing. Um, I just asked Mr. Misara, who I warmly
refer to as Greg, um, if we could move forward with a 700 p.m. start time prior to amending our, uh, bylaws. And he says yes. Well, there should be a motion to amend the bylaws
>> and then we can actually >> draft it into the bylaws after the fact when we have a little more time. Does anybody have an objection to that? >> Does that include the end time as well or just >> Yes. >> Okay. So the motion I would make a
motion if there are no objections to kicking off the beginning and the start time and noticing for all this of our planning board meetings at 700 p.m. Also amending our bylaws the same as
well amending our bylaws to state that we will hear no new testimony past 10 p.m. and testimony shall cut off at 10:30 p.m. >> Um, >> and what what happens if we have something important that we
>> I believe that a vote a two I I I think you would need a majority vote. It's written into the bylaws in such a way that I think a majority vote would alleviate the time constraint. Somebody would have to make a motion. >> You can alter that now as well. You
could say it has to be unanimous by voting members. You could say it has to be 75% or a majority. You could make that make that amended. >> Does anybody have a thought on that? >> I would have a 2/3. >> 2/3. I think that's what it was in the
bylaws. Okay. So, um >> the Sorry, >> if I if I could just point a discussion. >> Sure. >> I don't have any problem changing the time of the meeting. I do have an issue with moving it and then changing the bylaws after. So, I I have no problem
with moving our intention and the changing the bylaws, but I just want to make sure that we're not noticing our meeting change until the bylaws have been approved. >> Well, the bylaws the bylaws are being approved tonight, >> but I it's just a matter >> I'm not going to amend the bylaws until I see a redlinined copy in front of me
so I can make sure the changes we can't. >> It's just the one change. I no it's a well it's a couple changes in time but I I would like to see a document in front of me redlined as specifically what I'm voting on in order to amend the bylaws of the body. That's that's my
preference. I I don't think it is right to do it otherwise. I don't have a problem with us stating our intention tonight. But I think we absolutely need to see and all agree on the bylaws before we uh we move that. But we have >> strike the motion. Greg,
>> that's just my opinion. So >> Greg, um, what do you think I should do here? >> Well, somebody else can appine and and you know, you have a discussion. Was was it even moved? >> I did. I did make a motion. No one moved it. >> Then there's discussion >> and I make a discussion and then you can
have discussion on it. >> Uh, I just want to clarify >> the only portion of the bylaws that would be amended >> at this point >> would be the hours, >> right? We're not suggesting that you change any others. So I understand the may be's point as well, but you know the
resolution is the memorializ memorialization of the action. >> I believe the only other thing that would actually need to be changed in our bylaws is that a reorganization meeting would happen in December instead of July. >> Well, there's other things >> I mean January. Yeah, >> there's other things that people want to
change for this issue. this issue alone >> the bylaws would be changed effective on the vote on the vote the memorialization would simply be just that so you know I mean the mayor has voiced his
opinion and it's up to you madam chair to >> does anybody want to run over the mayor's opinion no I mean the bottom line is we do have a copy of the bylaws They just >> I don't
>> I'm sorry. >> I said I don't have one in front of me. I don't either. >> In order to So, I don't think we should be voting on amending bylaws until we can see them in front of us to know exactly what we are amending and how we're amending. >> Okay. But >> as as somebody who works as a parliamentarian, that is my professional
opinion to do it that way. But that's >> Mr. Mayor, that's not has nothing to do with parliamentary procedure. You agree that the procedure is correct. It's your preference that you want to see it in front of you. No, as as somebody who works with organizations and corporations amending bylaws, I would
never advise a corporation to change its bylaws without seeing the actual textual changes in a hard, >> but that's different than being a parliamentarian. That's your opinion. Has nothing to do with what's permitted. It's clearly permitted. I don't want anybody to get the impression that it's not.
>> I understand. I I disagree that we should do it, right? >> But it's clearly permitted. >> That's I mean, that's your opinion. I I would have to research that, but I've never found that. >> Okay. >> What do you >> What do you got? >> I want to
>> I will not have struck this mo this move because it sounds like there's a majority, but I will say the 730 and I do like the caps at the end, but the 7:30 is comes from someone who is, you know, works beyond 9 to5 and
occasionally comes from New York City. It's a little bit of a tight fromight. It's tight for me. I don't I would like to hear from anyone else on the on the board. I know we don't have a full uh
attendance, but uh that's my concern. I'm just going to bring it up as a concern. I I don't want to I don't want to vote against it because I can make that work, but it's it's a bit of a hardship. Anyone
else want to put their two cents in? >> Yeah, I mean I I I was hoping we were going to vote for the 7 o'clock. I mean, we've had a couple meetings at 7 o'clock. I think you get more people to attend. When I was on the school board, 7:00 was usually a better time. The odd time at 7:30, you know, usually you don't get as much of a crowd. People
don't want to stay out as late. So, I think 7 o'clock would be a good start time. So, >> thank you. I mean, >> and I work hours. I travel a lot, but yeah, I mean, I try to do whatever I can make it when I can. these town council meetings and most committee meetings start at 7:00. So most meetings in town,
but for the land use boards pretty much start at 7:00 p.m. So I I was just sort of looking to to get in line with the general, you know, hour of
participation. I I actually agree with you that earlier is better for the public, too. Um, >> but any any Jack? >> So, if we wait till we have a hard copy of this in front of us, it's really just waiting for one more meeting.
>> Okay. Correct. So, we have it ready at the next meeting. We can read it. And >> can we do that at the next meeting? >> The bylaws are they're available. I mean, they're somewhere. >> Yeah. You sent them to me like >> Yeah. >> Could you do us a favor? Can can you
send them Dee? Can you send them out? >> We'll put them on the drive. >> Yeah, just with whatever Sam send, when are you going to have that um area need of redevelopment for us to consider to read to
>> Next week? >> Sorry. >> Next week. >> Okay. Um so like Monday. >> No, I'm thinking around by 12 on the 12th. So that is two weeks split.
>> Okay, that's plenty. All right. So DD if you want to just wait and send it out with that. Um, and also whatever documents come in from brief uh review
agents, whether it's the police department or the Verona Environmental Commission for 383 Bloomfield Avenue, they can all get sent out with the bylaws and SANS investigation report. Sound good? So, we will uh table that
motion right now. And um we can adjourn. >> I have a question. >> Sure. We're not going to adjourn. >> Um no, it's it's for Greg. Um Greg, I had given DDL a notice because originally we had planned to have this raw weapon investigation for tonight,
but because of the weather, we did it. She she will need to renotice again, right? For uh >> to be safe, I would say yes. >> Okay, that's fine. >> To be safe, right? >> Yeah. DVD, I'll send you the notice
again. Okay, >> I'm done. >> See, because that's a special notice. So, I don't think carrying would work, >> right? >> Does it have to be right? >> This one only has to be one notice, right? >> No, two. >> I'll give you I'll send you an email
with all the property. >> 26. Don't we need to have one in by Friday? I'm sorry. >> The notice could all be on the >> and it's on the border of Cedar Road, >> but we still have to do two consecutive weeks in.
>> All right. I'll give you the dates the 12 >> and then 10 days prior is the second notice. >> Jamie, you still need the special notice to the property. >> Right. And that still has to go by
motion to adjurnn. Readjured. >> Thank you everybody. Second. Second. I