Council member Gomez here. Council member Vargas here. President Spanelli here. Please stand for the pledge of allegiance. To the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Public notice of this meeting pursuant to the open. I apologize for not being as excited as saboter kids when they say sorry little little lesser.
Go ahead. Public notice of this meeting pursuant to the open public's meeting act has been given on December 11, 2024 and is amended by the city clerk in the following manner. Posting written notice on the official Bolton board in the lobby of city hall providing written notice to the offices of the daily journal press of Atlantic City and the
vinand voice filing written notice in the office of the city clerk of the city of Vin. Chain a motion that the minutes of the premeating conference and regular meeting of June 17th and the work session of July 8th, 2025 be approved as submitted. So move. Second.
Any discussion by council? Roll call. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. Yes. President Spanelli. Yes. I believe ready for presentation. Uh yes.
Who's that? Uh You want you ready to or Hans. Hans, you want to go first? Hans, you want to go first or would you like it? Okay. Way you can get back to the beach. I'll be a little late for dinner.
I'll be a little late for dinner. Good evening, council. Um, my name is Hans Lampart. I'm president of Eastern Pacific Development. I'm an affordable housing developer here located right here in Vinland. Most of you know me and
uh the projects that I that I've built. Um, and so what we're proposing is a veterans senior housing project of 28 units. Um, I think I've sent these. Would would you like a copy?
This. Okay. Yeah, we all have. Okay. Um, yeah. So, it's 28 units um of uh veterans housing. Um it comes So I'm doing this with Soldier On and two other um um
veterans groups and they're bringing services and they're bringing also um vouchers, rental assistance and so that's the uh um that that's the um reason for this project. So, the uh uh
the VASOS, not the hospital, but the VA facility, um they have a wait, you know, they I don't know how many units they have. I think it's 70 or 80. Um and they have a huge waiting list. And so that's kind of what we're hoping to do is help. Um
are they one story? No, they're two stories. Two stories. Yes. Yes. Yes, sir. Yeah. And there's a there's a common community, you know, building um where
the services will be provided to each of the of the residents. That is a a a veteran preferred, right? Yes. Absolutely. So, if we can't fill it with veterans, which I'm sure we probably can, uh then
senior citizens would get it's age restricted. Okay. Any questions from council? Nothing. You're good. Oh, thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Okay.
Sure. Okay. Great. I look forward to it. Thank you. You can have your easel back. Thank you very much. You got to be careful. rental fee when it comes probably be high. Lou needs needs to get paid.
Mr. Magazoo. Mr. President, members of council, um Lou Magazoo representing Cahian on two proposals uh we're going to uh bring before your attention. The first one I'm going to reference is a map that you have uh
that is uh we we call it the landings at Cedar Branch. Uh that location that's property is presently owned uh by the estate of Albert Atavio. It's located between Landis Avenue and Maple Avenue. With me tonight on behalf of Khovnian is there general
counsel Ryan Benson uh Mr. Joseph uh Leavowski who's the land acquisition manager, Michael Gallagher who's the entertain entertainment entitlements manager, and Jason Schuler who's our engineer. Uh the purpose is uh to
discuss uh project that uh we're looking to do 89 uh single family homes all market rate. The zone originally sets a minimum lot size of 100,000 square ft. Uh Khanian uh is proposing 70 by 160
which is 11,200 square ft. See, we're going to be seeking uh a variance. We had originally the plan the company typically would like to do resoning. However, both your city attorney and the city planner indicate that's not the preference of the city. They would prefer that we go uh for a variance. Uh
the main reason we're here tonight is because uh although a sewer main is available in adjacent and Landis Avenue, the project site is only partially in the sewer service area as designated by the state, we would request an amendment to the water quality uh plan such that
the entire property would become part of the sewer service area. We understand that we'd have to go with land sewage authority and deal with them. We also understand we'd have to go before uh the uh zoning uh board for the variance. But before we go through that process, we wanted to get the council council's
temperature as to the concept of the um uh the extension of the sewer service area. Um we have also some boards to give you a sense of the kind of homes we're talking about uh just in terms of the visual. Joe, if we could just show them and then
And I think uh you know what if if you can you Yeah, that's the site. If you uh if you'd like, we can also have the young man put the put them up on the on the on the video if you want. Good. And that's right in front of us. So Okay, you're good. Okay. The site plan's up, so go ahead.
So these are Joe, I'll let you maybe come up here and describe the the homes and I'll at this community will be offering our latest generation of um of home designs. Uh the first uh the board uh there is
showing our 40 foot wide um twostory homes. Uh each homes have each of the homes have a twocar garage, three to four bedrooms um and uh they will be built on on a basement. Uh we will also
be offering one of our uh 50 foot wide homes. Again, these are sort of our latest generation of uh home designs both in terms of floor plans and um and elevations. And each of the homes will have uh option of three separate
elevation types with varying materials um stone and additional masonry in the upgraded elevations to provide for a more varied streetscape. And so when two people two customers uh purchase the um the same model, it will look like two
different homes from a streetscape perspective. So yeah, in the um we're we're looking at uh high fives uh high to high fives to mid sixes. Um in as far as the initial u
base price, we expect uh with upgrades to get uh to get to the high sixes and hopefully if the market continues u seven. Excuse sir, for the record, could you say your name? Yes, my name is Joseph Liponowski.
Thank you. So I I know initially when we've met this was 55 and older active 55. What was the reason for changing? There was I think and I was not involved in those very early conversations but I understand that that was a conse um
consequence of discussions with the with the town that it would be that the market would be a better play there. Joe, you were involved in those in those meetings. Yeah, I was uh in the in the discussions uh where what it really um came down to was our typical uh age restricted homes are 40 foot wide. We
put them on 55 foot lots. That's kind of the the um uh the program that we have up and down the state. Uh but the city uh thought that our lot widths were uh too uh too narrow and um you know for
for wider lots like we're proposing here uh we uh transition to um to market rate homes. Also as you're as you're aware Mr. President, other members may not be aware. There's also discussions with another project that Kavnia is working
on that's going to have about 350 over 55 that will take a good part of the market also. So I think those two elements together are the reason why you've got this change uh that we would be moving forward with. What was the city asking you to for the
uh act of 55? What was the lot size they were asking for? They were asking for 60 foot wide lots instead of the the difference uh yeah it it seems kind of trivial but in um you know when we look at the balance between the the
the number of homes and the infrastructure costs associated uh with uh developing that property it it did make a it did make a significant difference in the number of homes that we lost. we were sort of on the edge in in it being a feasible community for us,
but when we had to go with bigger lots, we lost the density and uh it did make it um viable for us. There's also storm water man and we got an engineer here also to answer some engineering questions if you have them because one of the other implications ever evolving ever more difficult storm
water management rules from the state of New Jersey eats up more and more land. So as a consequence, you lose you lose more and and I think that's another reason why we looked at the market because of what the parcel allowed. I have Mr. Schulo here though who's our engineer if you want to have him ask any questions.
No, I mean I think the the the biggest concern I mean lot size is is probably still going to be an issue. I guess is going to be. But that being said is uh when you have single family homes, you tend to have families where active
adults tend to be one or two people and it's a bigger bigger drain on the sewer system. So the infrastructure gets a little bit more stressed out. So that would be a concern that I would have, you know, it's up to planning first of all. Correct.
Uh you know, to make those changes or not and uh we'll where where it goes and you know planning does its thing and then they let us know before we correct before we can go to that point we though we just need some indication not necessarily tonight but
we want to bring before council so council could give us some direction with respect to the sewer service air extension because if we're not going to get that it makes no sense to even go before the planning process. If there's at least an openness to that, then we would go through the process. And of course, we to your point, planning would set lots of parameters that we would
have to live with. Go ahead, Rich. service area lots and so I think that the real question is whether planning is going to allow
for those lots and if so then council could certainly consider extending the service area I don't know if you can give any kind of indication of your willingness to extend the sewer
service area and include 70 foot lots when it's not considered at this point. Now, this is again we're talking about the Datavia property, not not the second one. Yes. Um the uh the thought would be uh again
to present to council, have council consider it uh and then frankly working contemporaneously with planning on the issues that Mr. Tanetta raises. Um but it just doesn't make sense to go through the expense of the process and the dialogue if in fact council says we're
not interested. Now I want to be clear most of that air much of that area is already covered. It's near the shop. Unfortunately it's not all of it is because of the sewer service area of the state. There's not a there's also no question that land would have capacity
to do it. U but had the map been just slightly different we wouldn't even be here as to this site. the other site's a different story, but as to this site, we're we're we're in the proximity already of uh of the area. It's just an extension that we're looking for. I unfortunately I I think and I will
speak for myself. 70 foot lots 90 downtown, I believe, right? If we were to build in the in the center city 65 in center city so you're you're looking at 70 in the
residential area. That's a question. Sure. I see cedar branch automatically. I'm thinking of water. This property will be able to uh Mr. Schulo is the engineer. I'll have him speak to that.
Evening everybody. So for the record, Jason Shulo S I l professional engineering planner um consultant for KHOP. That concept plan that's on the board now. You'll see in the bottom left corner of our Cedar branch runs through um that we can't
develop because of flood hazard area and the soils near that and up into generally the middle of the site where there's a little bit of a crust they're pretty good deep seasonal high it rises a good amount when you go to the northern end maple um there's a wetland ditch that runs along a road in that portion it's a little bit hairier but we
can do basement with um uh what were they calling them the uh English basement yeah so like half in half out not quite walk out but just a slightly elevated um basement level um done it in other places and it works pretty pretty well. So, it'll help us with soil important
like four foot high basement kind of things generally. So, the garage will still be at normal level and then just step up. It's not quite a split level. It will be basement down half in pretty interesting. Um but it gives us an opportunity to do a different type of home, you know, a lot of different types
of homes on the same site. So, it gives some variety. Um when we looked at the sewer to talk about that and that that one that's on the screen now, the yellow is the sewer service area. That's the limit of it. You'll see it's on the east side. We have a little bit the neighborhood across the creek is fully
serviced. Um there's because of the depth of the main that's in land is we can just run a gravity sewer straight up through the site. It's not complicated. It's just not service area currently. So when I talked to the folks at LSA and they were kind enough to share some
information, the the main is older but it's been in service for quite a while. Said we have to evaluate the pump station. We anticipate major issues if any but if an upgrade would be needed, we would we would handle that as the developer. So, um yeah, this is unusual in that we'd have to do the when I say
not unusual anymore, the water quality management plan amendment adds a lot of time and cost, but otherwise it's a pretty straightforward development process. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Any questions, Liz? The only other point I would make about the lot sizes and and and just in the
context of just to get some sense of the extension. We would have to come back with planning anyway with respect to what they would agree to. So this is just to move the ball down the field to frankly see whether it pencils it out because the next thing that would happen if council and I'm not looking for
resolution tonight but if council was finish if council was open to the concept generally because of the of the fact the proximity of what's already there u we would then still have to work with planning as to what they would approve or what they could recommend and then frankly we have to see whether the
numbers work from our perspective. So, at least to be able to move the ball down the field, just the concept of council considering it um deliberating on it, not necessarily making a decision tonight, and then uh uh making some recommendation that would say subject to
planning planning department's recommendations. There could be the opportunity to extend philosophically. No, I think you've sat in this seat, council considers everything. Yep. We don't know what plan he's going to come back with. Sure.
All right. And quite frankly, we have those discussions when they come back with, you know, with what they have because we talked to Ryan and Kathy as well. So, I don't think we really commit to yes or no. I understand. I'm not and I wasn't looking for specific commitment, but rather background as work in terms moving forward. Do you want to add
something? Want to just just point out that um the sewer service area extension isn't specific to this project. Anything that would get developed on the site would likely need it. So, it's to kind of pave the way for whatever would come on this site, if not us. So, I feel like, you
know, the investment by Kah to do it would obviously be one support, but I think it's going to have to be done at some point no matter what. Well, the sewer extension really is isn't us. That's the LSA. Well, we need a resolution. They'll need a resolution. My thinking is the resolution will come
after you know what the project's going to be. I mean, we're not going to put a resolution out and change it and then the project doesn't go. So, I would say to you go go present your plan and then when
you come back you know like I said we consider everything we don't shut shut anything off in that conversation we had all right uh anything else we had we appreciate that now let me just discuss if I may the second the second project
which is um which is located um between Antsbridge Road and Pennsylvania Avenue. Um you would know it as where the um uh Fair View Manor is. Uh it's
131 uh.5 acres. Uh there's a discussion this is this uh this is different than what I presented in that there is no uh uh adjacent sewer service area. Uh this would be the same type of request though uh that council would consider an
extension subject to uh a project that would be would be determined. Uh we have uh I think you've got is that Joe? Yeah. Joe, why don't you just come and speak to that? Just this just the outline of what that project would look like.
And we're talking about something that would be kind of executive homes um that would complement the golf course about 140 single family uh homes market rate. Um there's u uh again there would have
to be significant zoning variances that would have to be obtained by the uh zoning board. Uh but before we even go down that road, uh there was just again a sense of wanting to present before council about the need for uh the sewer service extension for the same kind of
reasons. Uh these houses are larger and would have higher price points. Uh Joe, if you want to speak to uh some of the design of the homes. Yeah. Uh these are as as mentioned a
notch of an upgrade in that uh these are all 50 foot wide homes um on 80 by 125 ft lots similar twostory twocar garage four bedroomedroom homes. So we expect that
um we'll have three elevations per uh per model. So feel free to u Ryan to just give a flavor. Again, some of these are our siding uh elevations, but this same model will come with two two
additional uh options with additional masonry, whether it's um stone at the base or full uh full stone. And again, latest uh latest generation of our 50oot homes, 2,00 to
about 3,300 uh square foot. And we expect to build these all um on basement. Unlike the other property, we don't expect that uh we'll need to have the raised basement here, but um that remains that remains
to be seen. Price point, we're in the um in the mid7s, mid to high sevens, uh possibly into the eights with uh options uh and upgrades. Could be uh uh as I said, executive homes that would uh complement uh the
upcoming golf course, I suspect. uh and I'm not a uh qualified expert on on evaluation, but my sense is that the number would even be north of that once the project would be completed. I'm going to sense that your direction would be the same that you'll want us to sit
down with planning, kind of have a more formalized plan, and then come back to council to talk about the for both projects about the request for the extension. And again, I I know just in talking with you as well as with Kathy and Ryan, lot size is always an issue
there as well. And um you know, we just kind of have to wait until that all happens before we can actually even do consideration on talking about extension. I I don't I I think if a project is going to go forward, we would
be fine with this sewer extension, but I can't sit down and tell you that. So I understand and part of part of the other reason I wanted to come here is because as things were continuing to move forward dialogue with planning. I wanted to make sure the governing body heard it from us as opposed to on the street uh
just to get a flavor of what the project is, who the proponents are, uh what the concepts are and then uh we'll continue to dialogue with planning and make determinations and then come back once we have once there's a meeting of the minds uh if there is between us and
planning as to what they're comfortable with. This is kind of the first step. Yeah, I we understand. And again, we consider it. We always like having development. There's no doubt about that. Uh and uh once again, we would consider it once planning lets us know
what what they want to do. And if they if you don't like what they're they want to do, then it's not going to matter. So, uh really they're going to have the first step. uh their recommendations, I will tell you probably 99% of the time go through with us. Uh so that being
said, you know, you're going to know where you're sitting. Yep. Well, we appreciate that. I know Kathy's recommendations go 99%. Where's she's not here. Okay. All right. Well, listen, thank you very much, Phil. You're lucky she throws on that. Thank you for the She has in the past. Thank you for the opportunity and we
will follow up after we meet with planning. Thank you. You got it. Is there anyone from the public who would like to speak? Come to your to the podium and state your name. Okay. Anyone else?
See no one. We will close that portion. Mr. Mr. President, I present ordinance number 2025-45, ordinance of the city of Vinland in the county of Carmelan, New Jersey, appropriating $4 million even from the electric utilities capital improvement fund to provide for certain improvements
in connection with the implementation of the municipal landfill non-condemnation redevelopment plan, which is ready for a continued public hearing. Jar entertains a motion that ordinance number 2025-45 be taken up for continued public hearing and open to the public for discussion. So move
second. Dr. Arthur, yes. Council member Gomez, yes. Council member Vargas, yes. President Spanel, yes. Is there anyone in the audience who wish to be heard on witness number 2025-45? No one gains motion to public hearing ordinance number 2025-45 be closed.
Move. Second. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Council member Vargas. Yes. President Spanelli. Yes. Chair entertains a motion that ordinance number 2025-45 be taken up for final reading and adopted according to law. Second.
Any discussion by council? See none. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. Yes. President Spanelli. Yes. Ordinance number 2025-45. Ordinance of the city of Ireland in the county of Karland, New Jersey,
appropriating $4 million even from the electric utilities capital improvement fund to provide for certain improvements in connection with the implementation of the municipal landfill non-condation redevelopment plan with a vote of 4A. This ordinance is hereby adopted. Mr. Francetta, please submit ordinance
number 2025-45 to the mayor for his approval and disapproval. Yes. Thank you. I present ordinance number 2025-48 which is ready for first reading entertains motion that ordinance number 2025-48 be taking up the first reading
move second Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. Yes. President Spanelli. Yes. Ordinance number 2025-48. An ordinance to amend and supplement ordinance number eight which establish
the classification and compensation plans for the city of Research Aid. Chair entertains a motion at ordinance number 2025-48 be passed or first reading that a public hearing be held on Tuesday, August 19th, 2025 at 5:30 p.m.
second. Discussion by council. See none. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. Yes. President Spanelli. Yes. Present ordinance number 2025-49 which is ready for first reading. J enterains motion that or wdness number
2025-49 be taken up for first reading. So move. Second. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. Yes. President Spanel. Yes. Ordinance number 2025-49, an ordinance to amend and supplement ordinance number eight, which establish
classification and compensation plans for the city of Vland telephone operator. Chair entertains a motion ordinance number 2025-49 be passed at first reading that a public hearing be held on Tuesday, August 19th, 2025, 5:30 p.m. Second
discussion by council. None. Dr. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. President Spanell. Yes. I present ordinance number 2025-50 which is ready for first reading.
Entertain's motion ordinance number 2025-50 be taken up for first reading. Second. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. President Spanelli. Yes. Ordinance number 2025-50, an ordinance
amending ordinance 92-83 as amended, chapter 224, article one of the code of the city of Ireland entitled animal control. Chair entertains a motion that ordinance number 2025-50 be passed for first reading that a public hearing be held on
Tuesday, August 19th, 2025 at 5:30 p.m. Second. Discussion by council. Seeing none, Dr. Arthur, yes. Council member Gomez, yes. Counciloman Vargas. Yes. President Spanelli. Yes. Present ordinance number 2025-51
which is ready for a first reading. Entertains a motion ordinance number 2025-51 be taken up for first reading. Second. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council Vargas. President Spanelli. Yes. Ordinance number 2025-51.
Ordinance amending ordinance 84 as amended chapter 320 of the code of the city of Vinland entitled drainage systems to include therein land grading requirements contains a motion ordinance number 2025-51 be passed for first reading that the public hearing be held on Tuesday August
19th 2025 5:30 p.m. Second discussion by councel none. I believe the gentleman would like to speak Ramo. Hello evening. My name is Raone Morrow
Jr. I'm talking about this uh ordinance here. Um firstly I want to uh thank you guys for I guess uh just bringing this up to address uh hand grading and the effects that it could have with storm water runoff. Um the events of North
Planefield in upper New Jersey is events uh or is is a is a showing of what water can do to a town or uh property or even lives. um without proper water management um you know we wouldn't have like cities
and and u landscapes that we do in like Europe and and North America and whatn not um all because of just managing water. So uh firstly thank you for that. Um the ordinance as it reads um I do have a few issues when it comes to that.
Um, part of it is because there seems to be a little bit of a gray area in the definitions of what what is considered disruption or disturbances. Um, part of the disturbances that it outlines is uh particularly uh clearing and tree
removal. Um if if a property owner of a larger property that has like a forested area um happens to be removing uh dead dead debris, trees that fell during a storm,
etc., etc. Um the way as it reads seems like they would also have to take that into consideration about uh how much of like tree removal they can do to to maintain their property. Um, so I feel as though the way it's reading um,
according in this ordinance so far um, seems like there's a little bit of conflicting uh, verbiage when it's property m when is it property maintenance and when is it like changing and altering your land grading and disturbing the soil and the flow of
storm water. Um then there seems to be a um a conflict where uh what constitutes a requirement for a permit and what is exempt. Um it appears as though you need
a permit for anything over 500 square feet of uh groundwork um or grading. Um, and you don't need a permit if you're making improvement that results in a
minimum uh minimum improved surface uh impermeable area. So the way as it reads to my understanding is if you were to put a sidewalk in and it was let's say a thousand square feet uh normally
for a properly uh sidewalk that's placed you would have to grade it, level it and make sure the foundation of the sidewalk's right so that way you don't create a tripping hazard or anything like that. So in doing that you're altering the according to the ordinance you're altering the landscape underneath
the sidewalk. So, if you were to put in a thousand square feet of sidewalk, don't need a permit. However, if you were to uh alter any dirt, which is part of the the work required uh over 500 square feet, you are going to require a permit. And so, it seems like there's a
little bit of conflict right there. If you're like another example would be if you're trying to install a patio or a walkway and a patio. Um normally those type of projects you need to take account the foundation. um if you put in a thousand square feet of um
imperous area, apparently that's doesn't require a permit. However, if you set the foundation for that same project, now you need a permit. So, it seems to be a little bit of conflict in there. Um there also seems to be uh I I noticed the the fee scheduling seems to be a
little bit disproportional to um smaller, medium, and large size residential properties. um seems fair for commercial and large developments like we heard earlier um because they're going to have the capital and the funds from banks to address those type of
concerns. However, when you have a let's say city center property that you're going to install a French drain system, um you may only have to run 20 ft of French drain system in order to remedy a water issue. However, a property that's much bigger, you're going to have to run
a lot more line for the same type of of work. That will now incur at minimum um $1,150 according to the scheduling fee. And you're going to have to incur the costs of surveyors, engineers, all for
something that is to this day not really a big issue. um at least not not that it's not a big issue, but it just doesn't seem like it's fair um given that um you're talking about you need a permit for 500
square ft of work. However, the lowest um scheduled uh fee for uh permit uh I guess getting a permit is considered less than 5,000 ft of disturbance is $300 plus $100
application fee plus $750 for the review. Review is important. I I agree. However, there's a big difference between reviewing a project that's like 500 square feet and reviewing a commercial property like we saw before that's going to probably be over 50,000 square feet. Um, for that to be all the
same price seems pretty unfair for the average citizen. Seems pretty fair for a big-time developer who has the capital and the funds. Um, and there's just a few more um I I appear to be ran out of time, but there appears to be a few more
uh kind of conflicts in there um that I think just needs to be revised before it's like a finished product. That's all. Bobby, could could we have this gentleman speak to our engineers about the verbiage in this?
Yes. My suggestion is that my suggestion is that we obtain a copy of the tape. I'll send it over to engineering and planning so they can review the questions uh and get some
answers. If they feel that there's merit to some of the issues, they'll certainly discuss that. And if we have to do a new ordinance, we'll do a new ordinance. But they feel that their the ordinance in and of itself as it sits is is valid,
then please come back during the public hearing. Um, and you can express those same concerns and we'll have the engineer here to address those for you. This is really the first reading and so the hearing process is where all of this would be discussed, but I'm
glad you brought it to our attention now so we can in fact bring it to our engineer, let him take a look. concerns and if he feels that there's merit to it, then what we'll do is amend it. Sounds good. Great. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you very much. What else will speak on this issue now? Okay. Thank you. All right. Let's move on. We uh I think we need a vote. Uh no, I thought Did you Oh, no. You do have a call roll. Uh Dr. Arthur, yes. Council member Gomez,
yes. Council member Vargas. President Spanelis, I present ordinance number 2025-52, which is ready for first reading. Entertains a motion ordinance number 2025-52 be taken up for first reading.
So move. Dr. Arthur, yes. Council member Gomez, yes. Council member Vargas, yes. President Spanelli, yes. Ordinance number 2025-52. An ordinance to amend and supplement ordinance number eight which establishes classification and compensation plans
for the city of Ireland radio technician. Jan entertains a motion that ordinance number 2025-52 be passed with first reading and that a public hearing be held on Tuesday August 19th 2025 at 5:30 p.m. second have any discussion.
I spoke to Luch Matana today. He called me about this and he said this would actually save the city a lot of money. have to get every service. Dr. Arthur, yes.
Council member Gomez, yes. Council member Vargas, yes. President Spanelli, yes. Present ordinance number 2025-53, which is ready for first reading. Chair entertains a motion that ordinance number 2025-53 be taken up for first
reading. Dr. Arthur, yes. Council member Gomez, yes. Council member Vargas, President Spanella, yes. Ordinance number 2025-53. Ordinance amending ordinance 2004-25 as amended entitled an ordinance adopting
the center city redevelopment plan consistent with resolution 5203 of the planning board of the city of Vinland so as to amend block 3018 block 10 544 East Wood Street consistent with resolution 6658 of the planning boards motion
ordinance number 2025-53 be passed for first reading that a public hearing be held on Tuesday August 19th 2025 at 5:30 move. Second discussion by council. Seeing none, Dr. Arthur, yes. Council member Gomez, yes. Council member Vargas,
yes. President Spel, yes. Present ordinance number 2025-54, which is ready for first reading. Chair contains a motion that ordinance number 2025-54 be taken up for first reading. Second. Dr. Arthur.
Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. Yes. President Spanella. Yes. Ordinance number 2025-54, ordinance amending ordinance 2004-25 as amended entitled an ordinance adopting the center city redevelopment plan
consistent with resolution 5203 of the planning board of the city of so as to amend block 3806 lot 912 South 3rd Street consistent with resolution 67 excuse me 6721 of the planning boards
motion ordinance number 2025-54 for first reading that a public hearing be held on August 19th, 2025, 5:30 p.m. Second by council. Seeing none, Dr. Arthur, yes. Council member Gomez, yes. Council member Vargas,
President Cornell, yes. Present resolution 2025-321, a resolution recognizing Jacob Havshan upon retiring from public service effective August 1, 2025. Chair entertains a motion that resolution number 2025-321
be adopted according to the law. Move. Second discussion. See none. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. President Finelli. Yes. Read it to you. No.
Okay. City Council's approved that the following matters listed in the consent agenda are considered to be routine and non-controversial and be adopted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a council member so requests in which case the item shall be removed and considered
with an individual vote. All matters on the consent agenda have been presented to city council during neither the work session or the premeating conference and appear on the consent agenda without objection. Their titles will not be individually read into the record but will be properly memorialized in the meeting minutes.
Chair entertains a motion to approve all items on the consent agenda. Second. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. President Spanelli. Yes. Members have the privilege of the floor.
Dr. Arthur. Councilman. Nothing's familiar. Dr. Arthur. Yes. Council member Gomez. Yes. Council member Vargas. President Spanelli. Yes. Good night everyone.