Okay, you're on. >> You're welcome. This is a regularly scheduled meeting for which the date and time location is set forth in the annual notice of meetings adopted by the Waldorf Planning Board at the reorganization meeting of January 2026.
In accordance with the open public meetings act said annual notice has been filed with the burough clerk. A copy posted in the vestibule of the Waldwick administration building and copies transmitted within 7 days after adoption to the official newspapers of the burrow
as designated by the governing body to it the Bergen record and the Ridgewood news. Uh secretary please call the role. >> Mente >> here. >> Mayor Jano >> here. >> Mr. here. >> Mr. Roent,
Mr. Fing >> here, >> Mr. Gui, >> Mr. >> Here, >> Miss Sarah >> here. >> Mr. Panilly, >> Mr. Sh >> here, >> Mr. Schultz.
>> If everyone would please rise for a moment of silence and the pledge, please. to the flag of the United States of America to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you. >> Put a new chair on the agenda. Oh, I know you keep saying you're getting one. >> Welcome everyone. It's February already, so only six weeks till spring. We're
happy about that, but not so much. Um, at this time, we'd like to invite anyone in the audience that has business that is not on the agenda. If they'd like to come up, please do so. Seeing none,
uh, all board members have, uh, the printed copies of the, uh, January 7 minutes and motion to accept as, uh, printed, please. Motion by Tom, second by John.
All in favor? >> I. >> Any opposed? Thank you. Motion carries. Unanimous. We have a resolution for Terzi and R Suzki sub25-5
32 Herav. All members have copies >> of the resolution. Motion to dispense with the reading. Motion John, second Matt, uh, secretary to Oh, and motion to
accept is written. Motion by >> Katie and Katie, I went blank. >> And Paul, secretary, please call. >> Missi, >> yes. >> Mayor Geno, >> yes. >> Mr. Bort, >> yes. >> Mr.
>> yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. Sarah Dre. >> Yes. >> Mr. Sh. >> Yes. >> Thank you. >> Uh we have an application for the uh major soil moving permit to Razi Narski
SM26-1. >> Good evening members of board. For the record, Bruce Whitaker from Perman McDonald. Whitaker representing the applicant. Um as stated, this is an application for soil movement for the construction of a single family home. Um the quantities are under a thousand
cubic yards but over 500. Um the purpose of the soil movement is merely to make the improvements that you've re previously heard about when you granted the subdivision approval. I have our engineer of record here uh to testify and give you the quantities and walk us
through it. Uh we can stipulate that we have the letter of January the 21st um and we can meet any of the conditions that are set forth in that bal report. have come in testimony about
>> I do. Thomas G. Sterns the third s e a r ns 144 jewel street Garfield New Jersey. >> Mr. Sterns Mr. You're a licensed engineer in this in the state of New Jersey. Correct. >> Yes, I am. >> And you've been previously qualified by this board in that field and as an
expert witness. Correct. >> Yes, I have. >> I would ask that he be so qualified again this evening and then we can complete the testimony. >> All right. Gentlemen of the board, as you know, Mr. CS appears before you as an engineer in that capacity will be
testifying. As such, he is an expert witness. expert witnesses are very much the same as lay witnesses and excepting one important aspect and that is they can give opinion testimony to the extent that you find
Mr. Stern's opinions, if he gives any, to be well supported and in line with your understanding of the facts. You're absolutely entitled to accept his opinions. However, you are similarly entitled to reject his opinions if you
find their variance with your own analysis. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. Sterns. You were engaged by the applicant for purposes of preparing the subdivision application uh and the subdivision plaque that's been approved and also for purposes of filing
a soil movement application. Is that correct? >> That is correct. Yes. >> You provided to the town as well as the engineer your soil movement calculations. >> We did. Yes. They're dated January 12th, 2026. Is it correct to say that the soil movement application uh and the
quantities are basically for the improvements that have already been testified to at the prior meeting uh as to what's contemplated for this property, namely modifications to driveway and installation of a new home. >> That is correct. Yes. >> So, what I'd like you to do is referencing this plan and on the board
is a plan that is the same plan that was submitted with the um with the application >> and revised >> original. Did we didn't have these calculations with the original application? >> No, this is with just with soil >> movements. Just so
>> you have a plan up here this evening. Give us the date of the plan, entitlement, and the last revision. >> Sure. This is my minor subdivision site plan. It's uh revised 1126 and that was in conjunction with the uh soil moving calculations
12, 2026. So the changes to the plan were we um we included cross-sections uh that correspond with the soil moving calculations. You can see them at the top and bottom of the uh you do me a
favor and mark that today. Please >> if I may, mine is dated January 15, 2026. And you don't have >> January 15th. >> January 12th. >> So a move in calculations is January
12th. The permit was dated the 15th. >> And the plans that we have last revision date is January 12th. >> I have 112 here. >> So what do you have? >> 112. >> 112. Yeah.
>> 115. >> 112. Okay. >> Unanimously they have 12. >> That's the subdivision plan. >> The subdivision plan. Yes. >> This the soil erosion sediment control plan has a date of January 15th. I think you might have the other plan.
>> Okay. I don't have >> I have a I have an extra copy. That's okay. >> Okay. >> All right. Sure. >> All right. So, uh, as I was saying, so the, uh, changes to that plan were we, uh, and there's sections for the so moving on the top and the bottom. We
also, uh, adjusted the driveway on the, uh, on our orderly lot. So, lot proposed lot nine is the lot to the north, the where the existing dwelling is, and that has an existing driveway. So, originally, we had that driveway up to the property line. um in the back. So we
you could see we shifted it we uh adjusted it so it's currently 3 ft off the property line. >> So that obviousates the need for various things. >> That's correct. Yes. Um in addition to that we have our soil movement numbers here. So we have uh the
total cut from the calculations was uh 616 cubic yards. We have our fill at 61 cubic yards. So total soil movement was 677 cubic yards and then the net soil exported from the
site be 554 cubic yards. So in addition to that um your engineer requested that we show the proposed stone volume. So in other words uh stone that's uh surrounding the sebage pits under the foundation under
the driveway. Uh so we did a calculation of that. I submitted that to Mr. Guinness and that result is 77 cubic yards. So that would be uh an import onto the site of that of that stone with
the use of construction. Um so one of the other items that Mr. McInness mentioned was that we didn't have any trees on this on the plan. Uh originally we did locate the trees but they never got to the plan. So, so we
had to return to the site in the snow to uh to get the trees. So, we did I did indicate them on another plan for Mr. McGinness that will be submitted to the board at a later time for approval and that shows um and the the key in showing
trees was uh which trees are to be removed basically. So we have uh approximately four trees to be removed as a result of the uh proposed dwelling construction. >> What's the date of that plan? We'll mark it as A2. >> So that plan is dated 2326
>> and that was submitted to Mavis. >> And you are familiar with the ordinances in the Burough Wick as it pertains to soil movement? >> Yes, I am. And the purpose behind these ordinances to make sure that from a engineering perspective the soil being
moved will follow the format of the ordinances and prevent any erosion or any adverse conditions to surrounding properties. Correct. >> That is correct. >> Is it correct to say that what this plan shows and the submission made that uh it will follow the mandates of the ordinance? >> Yes, it will.
>> No adverse impact to surrounding properties. >> No. We also submitted a soil erosion control plan uh that's uh observed and inspected by Bergen County and that provides additional soil protection to the neighbors >> and we can meet all the conditions set
forth in the most recent uh correspondence and report from Boswell Engineering. >> Yes, we can. >> That's all I have. >> Thank you board members. Any questions? >> Yeah. Um I'm related because you said
You said 77 yards for the stone. Does that include also the the bed for the um the tracking pad stone? >> Uh that doesn't include that. No. >> And also you have down there 61 cubic feet of fill. Does this include that 77
or is that not >> that does not? No. >> So this is filled here and then you got 77 of stone. Uh but then on your application you have zero billantity being >> that's as far as soil goes but right I'm
testifying now that the uh the stone will be brought in imported >> so it question is the stone the only material that will be imported on the site >> that's correct yes >> okay >> you want to make sure that you cover all the
>> have trucks you know 77 cubic yards or you say tons of cubic yards >> not cubic yards >> that's that's 100 that's at least five trucks or four trucks the most trying to get a lot more into the road >> so I will revise my calculations to include the tracking bed
>> okay I'll include that thank you >> thank you anyone else question about the trees so you're removing four trees and are you replanting or no >> um >> trees will either be replaced or payment in lie of >> okay
>> whatever what the ordinance requires >> can I chime in so the tree ordinance um there is a exclusion where if the trees are in a way of the structure to be uh built then those trees are excluded one
does not have to replant those >> correct want to point out where these trees are >> yeah sure so u they're they're not in the footprint of the dwelling they're but they're uh in the seage pit area the driveway area. Uh, also the rear patio
area and the grading. >> Thank you. >> Anyone else? >> Madam Chair, I have one quick question. >> Uh, there's a wooden shed, a wood shed in the upper leftand corner. Is that
remaining or is that going to be still last meeting? Yes. The deck won't be put up there. You supposed to have a deck maybe. >> This ticket get constructed on the existing home. >> Not here. >> No. Will it Will it be?
>> Yes. >> Yes. That's why it's Yes. They had a permit for didn't move ahead. >> Okay. >> Anyone in the audience have questions? >> None. Any comments from the board? >> Sediment control plan. Going out
>> not on the sediment control plan but in the application so moving application that was included. >> Yeah, we said the route would be to to be determined. We would follow and always we check with the police department before we have to do that. >> We coordinated with Jim. It shouldn't be
a problem just getting the light trucks >> and that's the only way to accept that >> have to go. That's the quickest >> and the the route has to be >> right. >> The uh the route has to be approved by
the police. So the police have have the jurisdiction on on that uh stance of the of the application. >> Presumably if you were to go out, you'd need the Allenale police as well. >> Easier to jurisiction. I believe there's a uh a tonnage
required on a hopper or two in Allenale. So, >> yeah, right there on the line. >> Yep. >> All right. Comments from the public. >> Anything else? >> I don't think so. Got all the numbers. Um
>> the properly updated documents. got the documents and I have the um I got the report from Jimmy a while back. >> Very good. >> We can have a motion for the attorney to
draw up a resolution. Tom and John. Thank you. >> Secretary, please call the role. >> Mente. >> Yes. >> Mayor Dano. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. Fing. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. >> Yes. >> Mr. Sh. >> Yes. Thank you very much. Have a nice
evening. >> Thank you. >> Thank you for coming back. >> We are up to old business. Any old business? >> I just take one in case they call me. >> New business. Mayor, anything you'd like to report to us?
>> Not yet. I'll talk to everybody at the next meeting. >> Very good. Uh when do the finance uh >> financial disclosure forms? >> Yes. >> Not yet. >> April 30th. >> They're due April 30th. You probably
will get them end of March, beginning of April. >> Very good. >> Other than that, I think we're good. Ready to adjourn. Motion. John and Matt. Thank you very much. Short and sweet. Sorry.