--------- for Washington us contact us tab click on mayor and council send emails to contact all council members at once and we will discuss your topic uh salute to the flag please I pledge allegiance To the flag of the
United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Sue, roll call, please. [clears throat] >> Councilman Casio >> here. >> Councilman Sears >> here.
>> Councilman Alman >> here. >> Councilwoman BZ. >> Council President to Santa. >> Let the record also reflect the attendance of Mayor Kamari, Township Administrator D. Carlo, Township of Attorney Bailey, and Township of Clerk Lowski. Payment of
bills. Resolution 25349. Authorized payment of bills November 7th through November 25, 2005. Do I have a motion? >> Some move. >> Second. >> Okay. Any discussion? >> I just had a couple of quick questions.
>> Okay, Mr. Roman. Um just uh to the council uh on page two and I'm looking at the uh purchase order listing by PO number. H2 is the contribution to the ambulance corps. Uh,
and I'm just wondering, uh, do we want to till we understand the situation? Uh, not only with regard to the incident that happened a couple of what is it going on a couple of months now, uh, do
we want to withhold funding at this point or do we want to continue with the contribution? I mean, I'm I am inclined to hold the funding until we understand uh what the issue was and you know what
the resolution is. >> Okay. >> Mr. Sears, any comment? >> Um I'm kind of in agreement with Mr. Alman. We still haven't received a a update on the um event that went on a
couple months ago. >> So, [clears throat] you want to withhold that? But yes, pending the uh the outcome of the uh >> review >> update. >> Okay. >> So that that would be one. Uh on page >> Wait, Mike, one second. Um Mr. Mayor, do
you have a comment regarding any update that you would like to give or Mr. D. Carlo? >> Uh I I do not I didn't know it would be a topic for this evening, so I didn't come prepared to discuss it. >> Okay. Okay. Mr. Roman, your second uh >> question
>> on page four and I think it again is on page six, excuse me, page nine. My apologies. There are soft costs uh there uh charges against
ordinances from 2018 and 2019. [clears throat] I was under the impression that uh we had cleaned up uh or cleared out all of those old ordinances. They were I for
lack of a better term reallocated uh into the Bethany or the DPW project. And I'm just wondering, you know, we're still charging these old ordinances. Um, do we know how much we're going to
continue to charge? Because I'd rather see those funds uh put back into the general uh capital fund. >> Mr. Sears, any comment? >> No. >> Mr. D Carlo.
>> Yes, sir. Mr. Omen, they were cleaned up. If you look, the the uh purchase order was encumbered in June, and that was so we could make uh repairs to place in a new door onto the new building and zoning uh department so it would swing in um in a feasible way and to allow
better, you know, interaction with the uh with the residents. It's one of those half doors that has a counter, you know, you open the top. >> So, that was closed out, I believe, in our most recent closing. And then ordinance 1917. I'll have to double check, but that was a payment. We have a
yearly payment to Phoenix Advisors um for their um work with the listing of ordinances as it pertains to our two bond um when we or when we I'm sorry, borrowed money for bonds. We had the two bonds.
We had one band and two bonds. So, I actually looked into that today. There's an annual fee of $1,600 and then there were some associated costs. So, I don't know the actual balance of ordinance 1917, but I can check into it, but I'm pretty confident ordinance uh 18-06 has
been closed out when we did it a couple weeks ago. >> Okay. Uh and the last question is um on page six,
excuse me, going back the third charge down to uh Celian Sun. Uh is this uh does this exhaust the uh amount planned for that work or is
there additional funds available? Was there contingency on this >> specific to that work? >> Yes. No, that's the entire bill. >> That's the entire bill, >> right? But it did not exhaust the funding in ordinance 25-22. There's still a balance there.
>> Okay. And that uh at some point we'll receive the accounting of the expenses as well as the source of funds. This would be part of that. >> Yes. I give you the quarterly um review of all accounts including the trust, the grant, the current and the capital. So
this was a new ordinance. So it was uh created after the third quarter review. So you'll get it and you know you can always have it earlier but you would get it as part of my fourth quarter review. >> Okay. Um so we had spoken at one point uh after I
guess goes back two meetings about uh a I guess a summary or a report a schedule uh for the DPW similar to the ESB. >> Yes. Would would this be included in that? >> Yes, it will. Okay.
>> Yeah. Just looking for a free moment. >> Okay. Thank you. That's >> um M I have a question for you. If you can we ask them to withhold the line item on the payment bills, but it seems like Mr. Alman and Mr. Sears wants to
withhold the uh ambulance core contribution. Is that possible to do or you have to authorize everything? Well, the res take a look at the resolution. >> Sue, would it be possible to revise this resolution to subline
item? >> Well, can they approve the bill list and have that particular check number and item just, you know, everything but check number one, two, three, and the amount of whatever. And then this way, I'll make sure that finance knows tomorrow to hold off that check. not send out that check.
>> Yes. And >> can we do that? >> Yes. [clears throat] >> Okay. So, we can just authorize the whole thing and then hold. >> Mr. Mayor, are you are you okay with that? >> From what I heard of it, yes. Yes. Okay. >> All right. So, let's All right. Um, Mr. Man, if you need to pull out that check
number so we know for sure. >> All right. >> I'll mark it down. >> Um, check number. I have a PO number. >> All right. We'll appeal number >> 25-
0 032 in the amount of $10,000. >> I'm sorry. That was two >> check 46145 for the uh ambulance core cont. The ambulance core.
>> So I would just suggest making a motion with that information to be withheld. that check being withheld and you can approve everything else and then we'll make sure that that check does not go out. So, I uh make a motion to approve the resolution as written uh and amend
it to uh hold back uh payment of check 46145 in the amount of $10,000 to the ambulance corp pending uh review and resolution of the open issue. >> With regard to response time,
>> I'll second that motion. We'll call soon when you get a chance. >> Councilman Cassium, >> yes. >> Councilman Sears, >> yes. >> Councilman Alman, >> yes. >> And Councilwoman BZ is not here yet. And council president is not here yet. We
will be joining us shortly. >> All right. So, the motion passes. Okay. Wonderful. Okay. Your PSA PSA for December uh December 25th. December [laughter] 2nd, 2025. My mind's on Christmas already. I'm sorry. All leaves are replaced at the curb no later than
December 7th. Please visit the DPW web page and our Facebook page for weekly updates during leaf collection. The Washington Township Christmas tree sale is back located at Memorial Field Pavilion on Pasak Road. Also available wreaths, grave blankets, and roping. The
township's annual holiday tree lighting ceremony will be held on Friday, December 5th from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at Finity Place. Please be advised that the restrooms at Memorial and Clarkfield are now closed for the winter season. Facilities will reopen in the spring
once the weather conditions allow. We appreciate your understanding as these seasonal closures help protect our infrastructure during the colder weather months. Uh Washington Township Police have observed an increase in illegal electric and gas powered dirt bike dirt
bikes around the township and have issued a zero tolerance if someone is caught riding one of these vehicles. Not only will the operator receive a traffic summon, but depending on the circumstances, the bike may be impounded. Friendly reminder, please
curb your dogs and pick up their waste when necessary. Please do not throw your pet waste baggage in your neighbors garbage cans, bodies of water, or in wooded areas. Our next council meeting is scheduled to be held on Monday, December 15th, 2025
at 700 p.m. Um, and now we're going to read the reports of the administrator, mayor, and council. Uh, Mr. Carlo, >> excuse me. May I just make a quick comment on the PSA? Sure. Most of you already know it, but uh when it says the Washington Township Christmas tree sale is back, that's hosted by the fire
department. So, just want to make sure everyone knows that. >> Thank you. Thank you, >> Mr. Carlin. >> Thank you, council vice president, and good evening, everyone. This is my council response from township council meeting November 10th, 2025. First question was a followup from a
question asked of me by council president Denna and it was regarding the 2025 road program and the storm water improvements we made on Bergen Avenue. Council President Denna requested to know if the existing storm water pipes on Bergen Avenue will be filled in to
prevent collapsing once the new storm mortar pipes are installed in the street. I spoke with township engineer Glenn Beckmeer Jr. Glenn advised that doing so would be very costly and that there is no plan to perform that work. Glenn clarified that the corrugated metal stormwater piping is not
collapsing. The corrugated metal pipe has an asphalt liner that is collapsing and that was that is what is causing the blockage. Glenn indicates that the existing piping will act as an overflow and we should not fill that in. Councilman Omen inquired if the township
code for leaf collection 415 requires residents to place their leaves in a biodegradable bag or barrels if the home is on a county road. The township code does not mandate placing leaves in a barrel or biodegradable bag if on a county road. The code does indicate that
residents may not use a plastic bag. A resident wishes to use a bag shall be a biodegradable bag. The verbiage in our social media post and in the PSA is a request of residents, not a mandate. DPW Superintendent Bill Lawler advised that
DPW mostly uses the leaf vacuum on the county roads and some residents use biodegradable bags and some use barrels. I included a copy of the ordinance for the council's review. Councilman Olman requested that the funding sources and related expenses for
the new DPW building construction be placed on the website much like it is for the emergency services building. The administration has no object objection to providing this information. It will take some time to create the document and catch up to current. I will also provide ledger details to the council
pertaining to the expenses on a periodic basis. At this point, I am only expecting payments being made to the construction company, engineer, and architect. Councilman Olman inquired about the fire emergency in Hillsdale, where several Hillsdale firefighters were injured.
He's requesting to know if there was an equipment failure that may need to be addressed with Washington Township volunteer firefighters for any failure on the part of the water company. I spoke with Hillsdale Township Administrator Michael Cassali and Washington Township Fire Department
director uh Bill Bilius. I'm happy to report that the volunteer firefighters involved in the incident are all okay. The incident occurred prior to the arrival of the Washington Township Fire Department. There was no failure on the part of the water company nor an equipment failure associated with the
Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department. Updates. An update on the reassessment. The current residential entry rate is 67%. Phone calls for an interior inspection have slowed down. Sales analysis and
preliminary values are in process. ASI anticipates value letters to be mailed out at the end of the year, beginning of next. The 2024 audit has been completed by Sup Clooney Company. Mayor Calamary, the finance department, Alex Bice from
Lurch, Vincy Bliss, and myself met with John Swisser and Wayne Miller on November 13, 2025 to conduct the exit interview for the audit. Mr. Swisser will be presenting to the council at the December 15, 2025 council meeting on the
2024 audit. However, I will steal from his thunder, advise the council and residencies evening that there are zero recommendations in the 2024 audit report. This is an incredibly proud moment and the mayor and I commend our employees for this achievement. Over the last several years, we have improved
from having seven documented rent documented recommendations in the audit down to zero. The township has received a New Jersey DOT grant award for the resurfacing of Ridgewood Boulevard North for 2026. The grant award amount is for $237,528.
Leaf collection. As of this date, all equipment and vehicles used for leaf collection is in good working order. DPW superintendent reports that the DPW is on schedule with the pickup. Residents are kindly reminded that the leaves should be placed curbside and not in the roadway. There are three zones in the
DPW conducts collection according to zones. The streets immediately surrounding the tool scrolls are uh attempted to be done daily by the leaf vacuum. Please understand that the leaf collection is a tremendous undertaking and DPW does an excellent job. Oftentimes working extended days,
holidays, and weekends in order to keep up. There's only so much that that can be done and they have 10 full-time members. The DPW does not make a habit of collecting outside of the recurrent from I'm sorry, the DPW does not make a habit of collecting outside of the current zone as it causes delays. Once
the three zones are completed, the rotation begins again in zone one. So, it may be a couple of weeks before your second pile is picked up. If you have identified an unsafe condition caused by a leaf pile, please call the police non-emergency line to report the unsafe
condition at 201641140. An update on leaf collection is put on Facebook and the website at the beginning of each week. It tells the residents what has been completed and where DPW [clears throat] will be heading that week. Also very important, please don't pile leaves
within 10 ft of a storm drain. It's against code and you may be summoned um if by as a landscaper or as a resident if you block the storm drain, therefore causing pooling in the roadway. [clears throat] Escrow project update.
Miss Apar has completed the review and accounting corrections of several older escrow accounts that resulted in transferring a total of $85,85456 to our revenue account for police outside billing. These funds will lapse to fund balance. The money was for
outstanding admin and equipment fees due to the township from work performed prior to 2018. Mayor Calamari and I are pleased to announce that the township has been awarded $80,74 from the Bergen County Open Space Municipal Park Improvement Grant. The
project is for park improvements at Memorial Field and Clarkfield. The memorial field ADA component includes ADA seating, two ADA parking spaces, and an access ramp for mobility devices that will serve all members of the Township of Washington community because persons
with disabilities or families and caregivers will now have much greater barrier-free access and accommodations at this public facility. The Clark Field ADA improvements component will provide for the installation of a barrierfree ADA compliant playground equipment and
rubber safety servicing for more inclusive recreational experience. The total project is estimated to cost approximately $200,000. This grant comes with requirement of a 50% match in fund. In order to pay for the balance of the 50% match, the township has applied for
funding assistance with the Division of Community Affairs Local Recreation Improvement Grant. grant has not yet been awarded. There's a possibility that administration will ask the council to fund the remaining balance through the capital projects in the 2026 budget if we are not awarded that a grant from the
DCA. This evening, the council will have before them a resolution affirming that Renova will be awarded as a contractor to conduct a remedial invest remedial excavation at 450 Pasque Road. As an additional reminder, township funds are
not paying for the excavation. This will be paid for by the sellers escrow. The next step will be demolition of the two structures. This will be paid for by the use of an awarded grant. Next update council that you don't have. I just updated it from what was written. Uh an
update on the 2025 road program. On December 4th and December 5th, contractor will be making catchbas repairs around the township. On December 8th and December 9th, we plan on uh resurfacing Salem and Carriage, weather depending. Unfortunately, Bergen and
Fern will not be uh resurfaced this year. The funding is approved and it'll be resurfaced first thing in April when the weather permits. Uh this is done this is due to um the storm water piping repair that was made at the end of Fern
and on Bergen. And if we don't allow time for the soil to settle, we'll end up with sink holes and a very crappy resurfacing job. So in order to uh do [clears throat] it correctly, Fern and Bergen will be resurfaced in April. Lastly, uh council will have a
resolution in front of them this evening uh for our application to the Bergen County Community Development Block Grant for approximately $19,600. The project is for ADA improvements to the library creating accessibility to a picnic table and cardio area. There is
no match required. And council vice president, thank you. That's my I'm sorry, council president. >> I'm here. Thanks. >> Sorry, I'm late. Everyone, >> can I ask >> just go ahead and start question or two quick questions? Um for the reassessment,
are we on schedule? Uh and will the reassessed values be used in the generation of 2026 tax bills? >> Yes. >> So yes to both questions and the last question it was yes. That's my understanding.
>> Do we know which quarter Mr. Kala? >> I don't sir. I don't. >> Okay. And just the last uh or the next question on the escrow project. >> Yes. >> Um do you have an idea of uh what percent have been reconciled and
completed versus how much is remaining? >> I don't if you remember we reviewed 2,300 approximately escrow accounts. Many of them a good three four 500 of them were just you know a clerical thing where they had to be closed out and made inactive. And then we were focusing on
um the accounts where we believe there was accounting corrections where the township was going to be due money. So that's where our focus is now. And this project that I just um read the good proactive news on uh took several months to to just really get to the bottom of
the accounting and therefore transferring that 85,000. Once that's done, we're going to start moving into other ones. So it is a very slow process. Um, so the ratio of completion wouldn't be that good. Um, other than, you know, the fact that the ones we did
just reconcile, you know, converted $85,000 over to township month fines. >> Is is there a um a thought that these reconciliations will result in the township having to pay out?
>> Yes, there's so accounts, you know, Violia and there was United Water before that. So they set up escrow um projects instead of paying out of the to pay the police departments out of the trust for the side job and the
administrative fees. So there is a small balance that was left. Um I think you know again I don't like to throw out numbers unless I'm uh accurate but I believe it's under $10,000 but it was their money in the beginning. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> You're welcome. So has that money been refunded to >> No, not yet.
>> Not yet. >> Any other questions for Mr. Carl? Can you speak up? >> Report of the mayor. >> Yes. Thank you, Mike. Good evening, everyone. Um, I participated in the funds management meeting with our banking institution. It was a very
positive meeting. The administrator will have more details about it in a future report. Recreation news. The 2025 2026 basketball program has completed their team selections. Practices will be starting soon and their season will start in January. The lacrosse program
registration will open in early January. If you are interested in volunteering to coach for either team, please contact the superintendent of recreation, Dan Scudiaryi. A background check for all volunteers 18 years of age and older is required. As a reminder, teen at the
Westwood Recreation Center is now open. Teen Center is available to all Westwood and Township residents in grades 6 through 8 on Friday nights from 7:30 to 10:00 p.m. at the Westwood Community Center at no cost. Basketball, volleyball, ping pong, billiards, air
hockey, and Xbox on a big screen are just some of the available activities. Parents must fill out a registration form at the teen center on any Friday night or during business hours at the Westwood Community Center. Refreshments are available throughout the evening for a nominal fee.
Fire department news for the month of November. The department responded to multiple fire and CO alarm calls. They also responded to two calls where there was a burning odor, one with smoke in a garage. One of the calls turned out to be a burnt out garage door opener. The
department started their Christmas tree fundraiser sales at Memorial Field this past weekend. They appreciate the support they received from the community. The department also held their annual election of officers. The following people will comprise the 2026
board of fire officers. Chief Frank Iello, Deputy Chief Chris Campo, Battalion Chief Christopher Meyer, Captain Ty Stutzer, First Lieutenant Keith Mahoney, Second Lieutenant Scott Mayer, Third Lieutenant Tim Mayor, and
Fourth Lieutenant Orion Groomberg. I would like to recognize Chief Zack Myos after two great years of service to the chief position. It has been a pleasure working with him. Another member I would like to recognize this evening is ex-chief James Aone who on the November
25th has actively served our department for 50 years. >> DPW news. The crews have all been involved in leaf collection. On average, two loader crews have been out and occasionally a third. Additionally, the leaf vacuum has been servicing the county roads and when needed the side
streets. Approximately 1,500 cubic yards of leaves have already been collected uh during the month of November. All the equipment has been performing above average. Holiday decorations have been placed in front of town hall and await the tree lighting ceremony.
Public affairs. The department continued preparations for the annual township tree lighting ceremony scheduled for this Friday, December 5th, from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Following arrangements have been confirmed. DJ services, a professional face painter, pony rides,
bounce houses, risers have been secured for the school choir, who will be performing holiday music throughout the evening. Members from the guitars for veterans program will also be there playing music. Hot dogs have been generously donated by Fresh Grosser. Starbucks has confirmed a donation of
hot coffee for the attendees. Ambulance Corps will be sponsoring and providing donuts. All logistical component components are on track and preparations are proceeding smoothly to ensure another successful and well attended community event. Zoning office. There were a total of 32
zoning applications reviewed for the month of November. Library. November at the library was booming with activity. Programs included a teen block party, senior chair yoga, an adult felting program, a visit from the Bergen Zoo, an apple pie making
class for our storytime children with seniors at the Chelsea Jurassic geodess, and so much more. They would like to say thank you for the outstanding response to their annual Thanksgiving pie and cake fundraiser. Municipal Alliance. In November, the
alliance sponsored a presentation to all ninth graders on vaping as well as an assembly to grades 9 through 12 on cyber bullying. Both presentations were met with a great response among the students, teachers, and parents. Lastly, municipal court. 204 total traffic
tickets were issued in October with 137 from the township police department and 67 from the state police. The court collected $4,580.34 in revenue to the township. Thank you. That completes my report. Thank you, Mike. >> Thank you, Mr. Report of the Council,
Mr. Sears. >> Thank you, Council President. Um, I start out with the um 2026 uh Montlair State Technical uh uh assistance. I applied for two grants uh
this week. one to review the canopy within the township and the second one is to review carbon monoxide at the intersections. So um they were put in uh yesterday and hopefully we will uh get
those two grants. They are through technical assistance with Monontlair State um uh seniors. Uh sustainable New Jersey I applied for three grants. Uh the first grant is uh native plants. Uh
we uh submitted a plan to um plant native plants throughout the parks. Uh that was uh accepted. Uh we also applied for a tree grant uh to uh install more trees around the parks. That was
accepted. and I upgraded our EV charging station uh to make sure that when the new building is built, we will uh get the monies for the charging station. So, those three grants were u applied and
all accepted. Uh as commander of the VFW post, I handed out uh 15 frozen turkeys to veterans in the township in in any type of medical or assistant grants. Uh our donations to the veterans home in
Pamis is really low this year because we were denied access from the shopping center to sell poppies. So uh you may see a fundraising letter to go out to help uh booster our donations to the veterans home. Thank you council president.
>> Thank you Mr. Sears Mr. Cask. >> Yeah. Uh mine's going to be real short. I attended the League of Municipalities as Mr. Sears did. Um, Miss Wakowski, the mayor, the administrator, and uh, Mike and Daisy. Uh, I know we go down there,
we learn a lot of new things that we didn't know, even though I've been on the council for quite a long time. Seems like forever. Um, you know, you always pick up new things and we always introduce ourselves to new vendors to find out better products that we can offer the town. And, uh, Sue and I, uh,
we were on a seminar with, um, how government works. was supposed to work for you and it was still enlightening. Um, I want to congratulate Mr. Sears, Mayor Kamari, and Daisy for their victory um in the uh past election. I
wasn't here for the last um meeting, and I want to congratulate Mike for running. It's nice to everyone um put your hat out there in the ring uh to do public service and we do appreciate it. Uh with that, I'm going to wish everyone a very merry Christmas early. Please be safe
out there. You know, we have some weather events coming up, so please drive carefully. Be aware of what's around you. If you don't need to go out when it's bad, don't go out. >> And that concludes my report. >> Thank you, Mr. Cass. Mr. Alman. >> Uh, no report at this time. >> Thank you, Mr. Alman. >> Thank you.
>> I would just a quick report. I want to congratulate the new uh fire officers board. They do a wonderful job for our township uh volunteering their time um at all hours of the day and every day, including holidays. Um I want to congratulate Mr. Zakone on his 50 years
of service to the fire department. It's an incredible feat. Um, God bless him on everything he does. Um, I'm still waiting to hear from the mayor about the meeting with the ambulance corps. We still have not met on that. So, I I know I have residents that would like a report on that. So, if you could just
let me know when we can meet uh Peter on that. Okay, that's all I have. Thank you everyone. Motion to uh open the public portion of the meeting. Do I have a motion? >> So move. >> Second. >> All in favor? >> I
>> I. >> So, we're going to limit the comments to anything that is not on the agenda. I know everybody is here for the next thing on the agenda, which is the Bethany uh lease agreement. So, if it's if it's the Bethany lease agreement, I'd like you to wait until it's that time.
But anything else that's not anything other than the Bethany lease agreement which you'll get your chance to speak during that public uh comment period if you'd like to come up now. Um would anybody else like to come up now about anything else? I see one hand in the back. Mr. Caro,
>> good evening. Good evening. Joe Derso, 12 Viola Terrace. Uh, something popped up on your agenda that caught my eye. Um, as I was here at the last meeting, um, the bank building next door, you have a resolution on this uh, agenda
tonight to possibly lease. You're going to a lease with the bank to to park trucks or park equipment. Where was there a discussion anywhere? out cuz I kind of looked like why all of a sudden I I'll I'll just ask my questions and I'll sit down. But
>> you don't have to sit down. I I guess if the if that's your is that your only question at this time, Mr. Dao? >> That's my one concern because like everybody else is sitting here. You know, my my statement is and I was here at the last meeting. All you're doing is
disrupting neighborhoods. You you are you're all of a sudden I know listen there's plans for the bank. I get it. more more housing, whatever. But in the interim, you guys are looking to possibly lease over there. You know, I have neighbors, you know, uh I see one of them here with me tonight. He's
directly across like I am. Maybe it doesn't affect us as much as my neighbors closer, but how much more are you putting on the residents of this this town? Bethany, my the bank property 450. I I just heard the administrator say you got grants. So
I guess you're going to maybe I'm heard of wronging but you're putting I guess 450 is going to be a parking lot. It sounds like you got additional parking. I mean >> no those were 28A ramps at Memorial. Correct. >> Carlo. >> Yes. I didn't say anything about parking at 450 past road.
>> So that's probably the eventual plans for that property. I guess >> at this at this time the council is not aware of any plans at 450 other than the soil remediation and the demolition of the two structures. Okay. That is all we are is on our plate right now. >> The way I look at it is
>> Joe, can I just make a quick comment? Sure. That's not 100% correct, Mike. When we went to the grant, we outlined uh a nature trail for that. >> Oh, excuse the nature the passive trail. Yeah, the passive nature. So, so >> my biggest concern is when I see in the
resolution on on So, you're planning on possibly going into I guess you're going to discuss it maybe or table it or whatever. you're going to go in with a temporary lease possibly to put equipment or whatever down there. Is that because you don't have enough room
over at your next agenda at Bethany or is the parking at the church going away? You know, there's a lot of stuff scattered in this town. I mean, go back to the swim club. You had trucks down there. Now, I know you can't park there. Again, another neighborhood disrupted. My my point is, and I asked this to the
mayor last week or two weeks ago, why are you not trying to do I'm not even saying shared service. I know that's an evil word sometimes with these towns. Home home rule matters in this town, but Pamis Westwood Pete had said Westwood didn't get back to him. [clears throat]
Pamis right down the road. It's it's a huge yard. I mean, maybe there could be something there instead of disrupting neighborhoods. I mean, for two years, if this might go on, then the development of the bank. Bethy's going to be I know I'm not supposed to talk about it. They're going to be disrupted for two
years probably. I don't know what's going on with the swim club. I mean, that's that's the next uh barrier. And I don't know whether you're continuing with with um with the church parking, but you're scattering all our equipment all over town. My next question is, and again, the plans are going up for the
DPW building, which is great. They deserve it for years. has been going on since I was involved years ago. >> What is the where are the men going to actually work? Are they going to be working down at Bethany? Are they going to stay here? Where is their housing for them?
>> They currently are Mr. Carl. Are the DPW currently housed in the basement of this building? >> Isn't that where their break room is? >> Will they continue to be housed here? >> Yes. >> Okay. So, they're going to be here. So there's no tempor and there's no temporary structures planned to go up at
the bank or at Bethany for them to work. >> With all due respect to you, council president and Mr. Derso, I will be answering all questions pertaining to the Bethany lease agreement at public hearing. But if Mr. Derso's finished with these questions, I can certainly answer what you just No, that's why I
said I get it. There's a lot of people here. But my concern, my immediate concern, I mentioned the word I always do, nimi. Nobody wants it in their backyard. I just feel that and I I know you don't have a lot of options in this town. I think your main option really if you're spending this much money to
improve or alter Bethany to go lease a parking lot for a temporary uh you bought property which is great. Sometimes buying property is fantastic. Maybe we should have bought Charlie Brown so it could have been the perfect police and municipal complex. This could have been all DPW where what it always
was. But I mean, you got to have a plan. And I think contacting a big a big hub like Pamis might be an idea. I mean, the mayor has said he didn't contact him. Maybe you should reach out. It could alleviate some pressure for all of us. Our trucks are scattered all over the
place. And it's closer than going to Westwood because Westwood's clear across close to Rivervale. So, it's just my opinion, but I'm very concerned about that parking lot and the noise that's going to go on. just you're pushing it closer to us just as much as the people around by Bethany don't want it. I don't
want it. And I really wish you'd seriously consider uh contacting Pamis or Westwood again because they could be your better options. So that's first. Thank you, >> Mr. Paul. You want to add [applause] >> Good evening, Mr. Derome. Thank you for
your comment. I think it's very important that I uh very quickly correct the the misbelief that what's may be happening at Valley Bank. So this evening there's not necessarily a lease agreement. I think maybe a an agreement is is a better word for it. It is a
zerocost agreement with Valley Bank for our employees to park there during construction. So essentially we're going to be displacing our employees, putting them farther away from the building. So there'll be ample parking for residents that come to the
building to conduct business here. So we're going to need to, you know, vacate as many spots as we can here at Town Hall. So we've made an agreement at zero cost with Valley National Bank that we're very appreciative of. They've given us the last row in the rear of the
lot for our passenger vehicles. Specifically states in the agreement that it's free. It specifically states in the agreement that there will be no storage of construction equipment or construction vehicles. Um, very specific. So, please
>> just it's just regular cars. >> It's employee parking. >> Okay. >> Yep. So, thank you for allowing me to correct that. And then also 450 Pasc Road, we did receive an open space grant and the condition of that is a deed restriction that it must be used for
passive recreation. So, the council was given a very preliminary plan. Um, you know, essentially there probably will be some parking there. It won't be all made of parking lot, but a grant will pay for the de demolition and removal of the two structures that are there. And then eventually, I'm sure the mayor and council will come to some type of
agreement as to uh what the ultimate plan will be there, but it has to be recreationally um related. So, thank you. Hopefully that answered all your questions, Mr. Anybody else like to come up for non Bethany related question in the public
comment period? Seeing no one motion to close the public comment period. So move >> second. >> All in favor? >> I >> I. >> Ordinances adoption second reading ordinance number 25-25 an ordinance authorizing entry into a lease agreement
with Bethany Church. Resolution number 25-350 authorizing second reading and opening a public hearing for ordinance 25-25. Do I have a motion? >> So move. >> Second. >> Would anybody like to come up and discuss the ordinance 25-25 at this
time? >> You call a roll call on it. >> I I can't call it until >> Oh, I thought you called it just to open the public hearing. >> No, I did. No, you did. You need to do your roll call. >> I do need to I usually we usually do it. All right. Roll call, please. Councilman Cassio. Councilman Seers. Yes. Councilman Alman.
>> Yes. >> Councilwoman Bles. >> Council President. >> Yes. Would anybody like to come up and address uh resolution number 25-350, ordinance number 25-25 at this time? >> You're all here for it. >> This is for Bethany. This is for the
Bethany lease. If you just come up, state your name. You don't have to give your address. John Ruters. R E U T E R S H an >> Thank you, Mr. >> I'm going to talk for the record about
putting DPW equipment in operations at Bethany Community Center. >> Thank you. >> You have not been transparent or direct about this. It was begun in closed session. A limited and without public
comment, a limited number of residents were then contacted and it was presented as a done deed. A done deal. You did $57,000 or more worth of improvements to Bethany, their property, without having
a lease. So, they own those improvements. The residents have major safety and environmental concerns which are not being addressed. You're giving all this money to Bethany, but you do not insist that the trucks go
in and out via Pascak Road because Bethany says they don't want that. So instead, you're putting people on Woodfield Road and the bike path at risk. You have storage spaces for less money at Our Lady of Good Council, and
there are no plans at this time for that church to close. You promise us that the Bethany lease, should you ever get one, will only go for 18 months and won't go over. But you also say you have way too
much equipment for the new DPW once it's built. And you say you have no plan for what to do about it. You tried to vote this in at a previous meeting without a legal quorum. And it took the Pasc press to
force you to start over. At the last meeting, you said Valley Bank on Pasc Road was out of the question for storage. Tonight, we hear that employees can park there uh during the DPW construction
for free. And even if it goes beyond the time promised us, it would then be only a little more than half the monthly cost of Bethany. They have a lot of space. Why not use some of that for the trucks? And now a serious liability issue. There
have been kids playing in the Bethany proposed storage area. You put kids in trucks and heavy equipment together and you are putting enormous taxpayer dollars at risk for the lawsuit when the kids climb on the
trucks and jump or fall and get injured. And Bethany will say it's our problem. Kids are kids. They will find a way in. I am against this. I am against how you are going about
this. Vote down this Bethany DPW use. Vote it down once and for all tonight. [applause] Who would like to come up? Anybody else?
Mr. Jones. 7:49 >> Kevin Janos J an OS Z Good evening everybody I'm here to discuss the proposal for the temporary DPW storage yard at Bethany at the last council meeting residents reached out to Bethany
Church directly. We were told that they requested an immediate meeting with the mayor. Um mayor did this take place and can you discuss what occurred in that meeting? Um, Mike, are you going to announce what we agreed on?
>> Oh, I thought Mr. Deplo was going to make the ann the the mayor and the administrator will address everybody's questions at the end of the comment period. >> Okay. Um, so we learned also in the last meeting that the lease has not been signed. So,
is it true that the lease has still not been signed at this point? >> I to my knowledge, Mr. Johnson, it has not been signed. Okay, >> the resolution hasn't been passed, so it shouldn't be signed. >> So, I guess my big question would be,
you know, how was a new driveway and fence installed to the tune of $57,000 before a lease is signed? How does that work get authorized? Is is there a separate agreement for that? How does that come about?
>> I'm writing your questions. >> Okay. Um, this would be a a question for the town attorney. Does the town have the authority to perform work on private property before a lease is signed, a
public vote is held, or a public input is obtained? >> So, all these you can't answer. I guess you just take them down. >> I I don't I don't have the answer to that, Mr. Jonno. So, I can't answer it. I If I could, I would answer you, but I
>> Can the town attorney answer? They >> can. She wanted me to wait. >> Mr. Chair, I'd be happy to write down all the legal questions. That's how the chair intends to. >> So, she'll answer at the end, Mr. >> Yeah. No, that's fine. >> Thank you.
>> Okay. So, the site is um roughly 50 ft from the mukquas brook which feeds our lake. >> There's ladies and gentlemen, we got to keep we can't hear them up here when you're >> There's significant risk of runoff
during heavy rain. hydraul hydraulic fluid, engine oil, road salt. Um, so my next question, which I guess you'll write down, are you 100% certain the town can place a storage yard this close to a brook? Did anybody reach out to NJD
for guidance? Were any special environmental permits required? So with that question being out there, you know, there has been, I think, several formal complaints that have been filed to the NJD regarding potential repairing and buffer
violations. The D has authority to inspect, issue violations or fines or hall work. Yesterday, I also spoke with Bergen County Health Services, the Environmental Health Division. They enforced the New Jersey Water Pollution
Control Act. They explained to me that they cannot do anything until something happens there. I guess the storage of vehicles and equipment. But if this gets voted yes and the storage does happen there, I will file a formal complaint
and they will conduct a water pollution inspection. So I guess my last question, this would be for the town attorney as well. you know, what is the town's liability if required permits were not obtained or if these agencies determine the site is
unsuitable. So, I guess in closing, I'll say that given the environmental concerns, potential liability, and unresolved questions, I respectfully request that the c the council consider adjourning this vote for a future meeting. This
pause will allow for proper environmental assessment, clarification of legal obligations, consideration of alternative sites, and very honestly, like I don't even think we've been given a vehicle and equipment list, which I think would be the first thing that you
do in this situation. Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. [applause] >> Who would like to come up next? If anyone Good evening. >> Good evening, Anna Matteo. >> Good evening, Mr. Matteo.
>> If all of these concerns don't matter much for the third time that we're here, I do want to raise awareness of the safety with uh pedestrians and children.
When DPW trucks are present on a daily basis, especially in a residential neighborhood such as Woodfield Road, their visibility becomes a major safety concern. These vehicles are significantly larger than regular
passenger cars and often have reduced sight lines, meaning drivers cannot easily see pedestrians, children, or pets who may be walking or playing nearby. During inclement weather, these
risks increase dramatically. Rain, snow, fog, and low light conditions make it harder for both drivers and pedestrians to see each other. Large DPW trucks require longer stopping
distances and have wider turning radiuses, [clears throat] which can be hazardous on narrow residential streets like where it's going to be placed, which is a very narrow corner. Children are especially vulnerable. They
are smaller. They move unpredictably and may not understand the danger of being near heavy equipment. A child approaching or crossing near a parked or moving DPW vehicle may be completely outside the driver's field vision of
vision. Daily visibility of these trucks [clears throat] combined with their increased activity during storms raises legitimate concerns for resident safety, walkability, and neighborhood quality of life.
I we ask that you please reconsider for the safety of all pedestrians, including children. We have a large walkway. Everyone [clears throat] here knows the amount of people that walk. I am extremely
concerned for the visibility of these vehicles when they drive when they get out in and out of the driveway. It is very concerning. And if this doesn't shake your heart a little bit, I hope it can
for our children and our elders that are walking by every single day. Winter winter is very long by the way. >> Could the record reflect that Miss has arrived at 7:55? >> Would anybody else like to come up this
time to address the council? >> Mr. Dersa. Oh, sorry. This gentleman, you're next. >> Anthony Fante. [clears throat] Good evening, Mr. >> I'm the current president of Washington Lake Association, and I've had a bunch of members reach
out to me >> with pretty grave concerns about any leakage from these vehicles as far as diesel goes, oil spills leaking into the brook, leaking into the lake. Do you have any provisions in place as to
what's going to be done as far as inspec inspections of the vehicles? Is there going to be a certain person in charge that's going to inspect these vehicles every night before they leave in the morning when they show up? Because at
night, if a hose is broken, 60 to 90 gallons of diesel fuel is going to wind up in the lake. So, we're just really concerned about any of that. >> Whoever has their cell phone, please silence it. No sir. >> Happening. Um,
so provisions if, god forbid, something does happen and winds up in the lake, are we going to have something in writing that the town is going to be 100% responsible to clean this up? >> So, those are my questions. >> Concerns. >> Yeah.
>> The administration will answer at the end. >> At the end. Okay. >> [applause] >> Darc 12 Biola terrorists. Not often you get to speak twice, but under these circumstances, we're allowed. So again, I feel the pain for these people as much as and thank you for your clarification
on even though some people don't agree. I it's my it's my area. I'm trying to protect my air. These people are trying to protect their areas. Just want to refresh some memories here going back a few years. You've done you've already done a lot of improvements whether it's
legal or not at Bethany. You opened up that area there. You concealed it with a black tarp which is a hazard in my opinion because you can get kids riding along that path and a truck coming out and and they they can't even see the truck moving. So that's you should make
it I I I know it's for aesthetic reasons maybe to so people don't see in but that's kind of dangerous. My other thing is obviously nobody wants this and obviously you have to make a decision. Again I'll bring it up again. I've already said it. You need to contact
other towns. Paramis would be a great choice to start. But my main concern is a few years ago I have pictures. I think I've shared them all on social media sites and with you. This town allowed Verizon, I believe, for months to store
all their trucks, all their poles, all their equipments, port Johns down at Sherry Field. So, why wasn't Sherry Field considered? And if you're going in partnership somehow with a lease with with Bethany, why don't you put a couple fields down there instead of instead of
a DPW and stick the DPW temporarily down at Sherry Fields and when you lose the fields for a year and a half, maybe you guys can put a temporary field at Bethany instead of a DPW. That's my suggestion because you've already done it once before. You had Verizon there.
Pete, you probably remember. I don't know whether you were the mayor or not, but they were there for some time and I get it. I'll get the thing wetlands and and and and all that stuff. But you know what? You can store your trucks down there. You can do whatever you want to do down there. And if you need another field for the kids, so be it. Maybe make
a makeshift field and maybe go into a a m mutual agreement with Bethany for that property. But a DPW in their neighborhood is horrible. Parking trucks in my neighborhood is horrible. Nobody wants it. Again, there's I mean, there's people down there by Sherry Field. It's
closer to Westwood. It's the people behind it aren't going to complain. It's a cemetery. So, think about it. That's another option. You know, you're a lot of people are here. They're very upset. I really wish you guys would think about that and think about going to Pramis.
[applause] >> Would anybody else like to come up at this time? You're good. And I saw your hand come up in the back. You're next. >> My name is Michael Gorean. Guru R O I A
N. Uh I am not a resident. Uh my son is and my granddaughters are my daughter-in-law. uh you know public hearing I I do I come from Stanford, Connecticut incidentally
which is a much larger community evidently you guys only have fewer than 10,000 people we have going on 140,000 but I've been in Stanford for over 72 years and I've seen it grow from virtually nothing to what it is today
and I've seen it done uh over the objections of a lot a lot of single family homeowners and I have a lot of sympathy for the people that have come forward uh to speak on this proposal. I and and from what I've
gathered from looking at your meetings on uh the internet uh it's a council that listens and congratulations for that. You have a lovely uh community. There's been the civility here that I'm not accustomed to. At our hearings, it
gets pretty animated and it can can get pretty ugly. And there's certainly enough in this proposal for people to get ugly about. And frankly, if it were me, I would be ugly. And here's an a warning. I may get ugly before I get
away from the podium. There frankly is so many so many wrongheaded things about this proposal that I come away feeling like a mosquito in a nudist camp. You know [clears throat] what needs to be done
and addressed, but you just don't know where to start. And that's what I feel like at this podium. I know a lot of the issues have been brought up. Some of the issues haven't been given a good enough explanation. I'm only going to address
one concern. I'm a grandfather that was with my granddaughters from infancy through they're nine, seven and nine years old now. I strolled those streets. I spent a lot of time with them three times a week. And a lot of that time was
spent on that pathway that's between is it Cleveland Road and uh >> Woodfield >> Woodfield. that that is a lovely lovely spot and I don't know whether it's owing to your concern and oversight of that
but it's gotten better over the years. It is the closest thing that I've seen in this community to what you might call a nature preserve. We sat there for hours and and just enjoyed what was there. vernal ponds,
wildlife, a a beautiful natural setting with a bridge over a clean stream of water into a lovely lake in the distance. Now, we're having a proposal that's going to put trucks right the perimeter of that
lot is the edge of vernal ponds, seasonal ponds. When that stream is in a anywhere close to swelling, all of that area right up to that fence that you've
erected is water. And the only thing really that likes to grow there is skunk cabbage. And frankly, if the the make the the the asphalt that's crumbling in that lot at present at that perimeter weren't there, you'd
probably have skunk cabbage. The notion that putting that kind of vehicle in those kind of numbers that close to that body of water in those vernal ponds is not going to contaminate that area is absurd.
I own a car that leaks oil. It leaks other things. It brings in things from the street. It's going to happen. It's a fact of life. >> One minute, sir. >> One minute. One one thing I want to and
I I beg you not to uh not to ruin it, which you're doing. And you're ruining it for cyclists, pedestrians, people with strollers, the elderly taking a walk, pedestrians, pedestrians that are trying to get from the east side of
Washington Township to the west side of Washington Township. There's no alternate route that doesn't put them in danger, especially the children. They're going to the library. They're going to Dunkin Donuts. Maybe somebody would even think about coming to town hall from on
the other side. Yeah, that might happen. There's Washington school. >> Yes, >> there's a lot a lot of traffic on that path. Has here's my question. Has any one of you sat at that riverside for any
length of time in the last five years? >> Yes. >> Do you know how many people use that? >> Numerous. >> It is a connector between what is identified on Google maps as east
township of Washington and West Township of Washington. It is a vital connector and you're disturbing it. [applause] Thank you. And I I gave you ample warning. I I didn't mean to raise my
voice, but growing up in Stanford, you learn how to raise your voice. [laughter] [applause and cheering] >> Just >> you go ahead. Um that path is as beautiful as it is because of Councilman Sears. He has put so much work with the
green team and I have also volunteered alongside the green team to get it to what it is today. So thank you. [applause] Yes, she's next. She had her hand up next. Good evening.
>> Good evening. Cynthia Clark, CL A R K. This is a re a reiteration of my previous comments from previous meetings so that they are connected to ordinance 2525. The township of Washington performed leasehold improvements on Bethany property before entering into a
lease with Bethany. in effect gifting to Bethany almost $58,000 in taxpayer funds in the form of goods and services which Bethany now owns in their entirety. At a previous meeting, this body stated that no plans had been made for housing DPW
equipment after the 18-month period anticipated in the proposed lease and that no extensions had been anticipated by that proposed lease. It is conceivable then that the town may have to enter into a new monthby-month lease with Bethany after this 18 in this
initial 18-month lease period at a higher lease rate which would reflect the then market rate for leases. At an earlier meeting on this subject, Mayor Calamari offered to go back to Bethany during negotiations and ask if
the DPW could use Bethy's Pascac Road entrance for our DPW equipment. We now find out that Bethany made it clear from the outset of negotiations that using the Pascac Road entrance was not negotiable and was a non-starter. This
is a very troubling dichotomy. What steps has this body taken to insulate the lake association and its members from any liability stemming from lake contamination along with covering the cost of remediation of that
contamination that may result from oil and other kinds of st substance leakage coming from DPW equipment stored at Bethany. As a previous speaker mentioned, kids now play in the fenced in area intended
to be used by the township's DPW. Heavy equipment is a magnet for kids. If you have any doubt of that, just look at West Berlin, New Jersey's Diggerland. It's an amusement park which is entirely devoted to allowing kids to explore and
use heavy equipment, and it is a money maker. Dy D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Dgerland is an amusement park where kids are under close supervision. This on the other hand is a catastrophe waiting to happen. It also places an
unfair security burden on our DPW workers who work tirelessly on our behalf. They should be able to leave their equipment with the same level of monitoring that
they do now, not having to take all these extra steps before they go off duty to try and avoid the unavoidable, which is kids trying to start these vehicles. It's simply unfair to our workers.
Now, I'm going to ask for a yes or no question to this. It doesn't require a legal response. It shouldn't require it to be pushed off to the end. If you don't want to, you don't want to. My questions are as follows. Yes or no. Were the Knights of Columbus approached
about using their parking lot? Was the owner of the empty lot on Pasc Road and Washington Avenue approached about using their lot? Was the fire department and ambulance corps approached about using their parking lot? Was OLGC approached about extending
the town's current lease for the period of construction of the new DPW building? Was the Valley Bank approached about using their excess property? Was Pamis or any other neighboring town approached about using or leasing property from
them? All of these properties are on main roads and would not, as the gentleman before me said, ruin neighborhoods. And Mr. Sears, since you are so invested and have invested so much
>> in impro improving this property, >> I urge you to stay consistent with your values and ethics and vote no >> on this resolution. Thank you. [applause] >> Thank you. Would anybody else like to
come up at the time? Hi, I'm Jeff Rogers. Um, I'm on the board of the Lake Association and I'm very concerned about the environmental impact of the the trucks. >> My questions are where will the brine and the salt trucks be stored? Will they
be there at night? Um, will the salt be stored there? And I I know that's been addressed before. Um, also as you know and everyone's been bringing up, it's very close to wetlands, environmental area with
wildlife, turtles, frogs, which are very sensitive to pollution. They will die in a minute. That waterway, as you probably know, is is our drinking water. We're miles away from the reservoir. And uh I just want you to take that into consideration when when you do your
vote. And that's it. very simple. Everything has been pretty much asked. SO, [applause] >> UH, Oleg Vineker from 10 Viola Terrace. >> Good evening, Mr. Vineker. >> Thank you. Um, so I I understand that u there's a lot
of people here that don't want uh the equipment to be stored in their neighborhood and I understand nobody wants it in their neighborhood and I don't want it in mine. Right. I just want the council to realize that uh and I heard a number of people already came up here. Why don't we put it at the
bank's property? Right. Uh it's not going to destroy anybody's neighborhood. Well, it's going to destroy mine. And I want the council to consider that that property is probably or most likely is going to be redeveloped. So the neighborhood that I live in is going to endure
demolition, construction for months or maybe even years, right? So I don't want an additional x number of months of noise and construction vehicles being stored there. So, I understand it's a difficult situation where to put it and
nobody wants it in their backyard and I just want to uh say that I don't want it in mine. Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. President. [applause] >> Would anybody else like to come up at this time in the back?
Judy Kuma, GUMA. >> Good evening, Mr. Guma. >> How are you? 289 Woodfield Road. Uh, >> Mr. D. Carlo, uh, there was not, uh, clarification at the last meeting. Can you define the operations of the DPW
equipment and vehicles and related activities? >> He's going to answer all your questions at the end. >> Okay. >> When do you plan on addressing that? Right now, there is no solid plan for the location of the
trucks that cannot be stored due to the lack of space upon the completion of the new DPW. Will it be proactively or reactively like we are all in these same seats 18 months from now with the
same situation? I would like to uh reference one of the statements in one of the articles. The ordinance states that the Bethany property is well suited in quotes for the temporary operations of the DPW with the
least impact to residents. Now think of that least impact to residents. So you guys have heard everyone here three meetings. You've gotten letters. You've gotten calls. You've gotten emails. You've gotten
posts. So it's not a new concept. I invite the mayor administrator and the council come hang out in my driveway, 289 Woodfield Road. It's the white fence parallel with all
of this. And you observe. Look at the kids. Look at the elderly and look at the trucks. I will provide donuts, especially with this cold, slick weather. I will provide hot chocolate. And what I noticed this morning, I'm
outside all different hours of the day. >> And I've seen you outside in my vest. >> Right. Well, stop in one day. Okay. [laughter] So, I did see I did see a truck today coming from the Brook area going straight out. It was slick. Um, and it
was the same time as school time. The neighbor across the street, she's this big. She's 8 years old. She goes to George school. Think about these issues. As council members,
this is not about Woodfield Road. My sister lives on Stratford. All my friends live on Cleveland and Oxford and Devon. It's not about that. But again, did you ever try making the turn
on Woodfield? Try try it with a large large truck with icy roads, even rain like today. Try that. So, you're the council. You represent Washington Township residents.
Put yourself in our shoes. And before you vote, think about all these critical issues and concerns. Think about the unanswered questions that we're going to walk out of here. I'm sure.
Think about the what if scenarios. Think about if it was your home or your child. My children are grown up, but I feel for the people that walk here. How would you feel about the decrease in home value if you wanted to sell your
home in these 18 months? And think about that statement. Is Bethany the best alternative with the least impact to the residents and think about what you heard tonight.
All major issues. And with that in mind, I cannot >> cannot fathom >> how in your mind and in your heart >> that you could possibly vote yes. Thank you. >> Thank you. [applause]
>> Would anybody else like to come up at this time? Matthew Shaup JC OB 286 foot roll. My neighbor just spoke. I've been here the past two times. I open my garage. My 9-year-old that she
was just mentioned is facing the gate that you have right in front. I'm tired of complaining about the safety people he has spoke last two weeks. Yeah. I I I I really feel like you picked the worst street in the whole town. You have a high school down the
block. You have a library. You have 10 to 20 pe kids that ride a bike at every 10 minutes. Yeah, I'm really concerned about the safety, but at the same time, you said that this whole thing is for 12 months. What happens after 12 months?
Beth is getting five grand revenue every month. What if Bethany sells it to Mercedes or Tesla? They're all looking for spots to park their car. This just opens up avenue for other people to come in there. Okay.
>> Yeah. I mean, I I don't want to keep I've been I've been here two times. My third time. >> We We just We We had this discussion before, but >> they cannot lease the property out to any >> Can we have I know I know you sent me a letter in writing that this is for like this is for 12 months. Well, I can't
send you a letter, but attorney stated that they would have to go in front of the zoning board for a use change >> because Bethany would still want revenue after this. >> Yeah, but they they're not allowed to have multiple uses on their property after this. >> Well, is that a correct statement? >> I mean, that's might be son gives
>> the town. >> Yeah, the town. Yeah, we're the municipality has different um I don't know how you want to say it >> standards. >> Standards they do. They can't just rent out their property to to make revenue there. Okay. I really hope you guys take
the whole safety concern. We've been here for three weeks now. >> Yep. >> You know, thank you so much. >> Thank you very much. >> Anybody else like to come up at this time? >> Good evening. >> Good evening, Carol Zane.
For the past few weeks, you have listened to our questions and our concerns of having a temporary DPW site at the Bethany Community Center on Woodfield Road. This situation could
lead to many unnecessary hazards for the children, for joggers, cyclists, young parents with baby strollers, and senior citizens that enjoy this beautiful area around our neighborhood while also being
quite unsightly. This proposal is not only potentially dangerous to the many residents who enjoy this bucolic area, but it opens up a Pandora's box to potential problems.
Runoff from salt, grime, fuel from DPW vehicles into the brook endangering our waterways and our wildlife also. maybe then we will have to incur additional expenses
if contaminants go into our lake. Is it right that the lake association, because they're the lake, that they would have to um have the brunt of a financial problem
with 200 and some odd lake members. When this is really being imposed by the town and we have thousands of residents, you're not really thinking about what this could possibly do. This could ruin
our area totally. Mr. Sears, you have worked very hard with the green team. I always read the newsletter that comes out. All of the parks, the improvements, the trees, everything beautiful.
Why would you allow something like this to happen? And I totally understand and I sympathize with all of you. You were turned down in many locations. You didn't get the swim club. You didn't get Charlie Browns. But when we asked you
what other places did you look into, and you said to us there were many places we looked, you didn't tell us which ones. You're disrupting a neighborhood. You're disrupting our quality of life, our home
values. And God forbid a life could be lost. This is not worth taking. I don't understand why we are not looking at more fiscally responsible alternatives.
What is wrong with OLGC? Like I have asked you from over two weeks ago. Our 2year lease ending with them this month was $64,000. That's a far cry from what we're paying
Bethany. Why are we putting ourselves in a situation that if something happens at Bethany, a life is lost, people's quality of life is disrupted. Why are we putting
ourselves in that situation? It's not you're not showing that you're concerned about the citizens. Instead, it seems more like you're protecting Bethany. Bethany is the one profiting beautifully. If an accident
happens on their property on that lot, do you think who's liable? Is Bethany liable or is the township liable? It's it's just there are so many questions. There aren't any answers. I
don't understand how you could really consider this one alternative. I really don't. I say let's take the loss. You went ahead. This whole thing was messed from the very beginning. You went into
something. You were excited. You went whole and you went and you did construction without a signed lease. None of us could do something on our homes without a permit. Okay, you went, you put up a curb, you put up a gate,
and the worst thing of all is I think we are setting a precedence for what Bethany might want to do in the future with their land. you say it's not zoned, but if you set a precedence and they turn around legally, can they say,
"Well, we did it with the township." So, if Tesla wants to come and use our land, or if uh local landscapers want to rent from us, we can use that money. We're opening up a a really bad situation. And
I am imploring you, let's take the loss on what was put there. It would be so much better. Take it down. Take the curb away, the rolling gate away. Put those trees back there blocking the resident's
view from a parking lot. They didn't buy their homes for a parking lot. Do that and it would be the best $58,000 we ever spent. and forget the rest of this. >> Yeah. [applause]
>> Anybody else like to come up at this time? >> Good evening. >> Good evening. Michelle and Ryan McCory, 238 Woodfield. >> Um, I made him stay for a whole hour, so I had to come up here. Um, but I don't have anything new to say that hasn't been so eloquently said by everybody
here. Um, but these are the people that you're risking. Okay? He's 9 years old. He goes to Washington. He's going to ride his bike around with all of his friends. Why would you take that chance? Every parent in this room worries about their kids. That's natural. That's life. You are increasing worry unnecessarily
by having these big trucks drive around. Now I have to have all this extra worry about, you know, are they going to get hit? Your drivers are are smart. I'm sure they don't want to do anything, you know, to hurt anybody else, but you're putting them in a bad situation. Accidents happen. Whether they're careful as children or your drivers are
careful, accidents are going to happen. And I don't I can't even fathom how you could think this is a good idea. Okay? So, I'm just up here. I'm going to sit back down. I'm going to implore you to vote no on this. This is a dumb idea. And if you don't see it, I mean, look at
who you're look at who you're risking. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. [applause] ANYBODY else like to come up at this time? >> Seeing no one motion to close the public comment period of this >> almost lost out. Got to raise your hand quick.
>> How are you? My name is Glenn Bartlett. I live on Cleveland. >> Good evening, Mr. Bartlett. >> Good evening. So, guess I'll start with a question. U I just need to understand why there's zero transparency for the lease and um I think that it would be only fair for
people to have the ability to review it. And uh just my main question is is there a lease? Is it a fully executed lease? And when is the start date? Besides that, I just wanted to point out that this is no longer a community issue. It's truly an environmental
issue. And I personally h have gone forward and retained uh legal counsel to represent myself and any other residents that would like to join in doing a cease and desist and an injunctive relief against Bethany for the potential environmental concerns that could happen. And I would just like to
encourage all the council to be able to be very careful because in the proceeding of everything that happened, I'm sure it'll be very closely looked at into what is a regulation and what is properly passed and what is not. Uh besides that I essentially would like to
say that if you hear of a legal process that is in the process of happening there this also to add before I say this part is uh the attorney that is representing myself will be working directly with D and
we'll Part: 2
deciding on a new building. It was acknowledged by administration and council the town hall would not be big enough to support the storage of equipment and our entire DPW fleet as well as resident parking, employee parking, and police department vehicles.
I can assure the public that administration and council work collaboratively to solve this problem simultaneously while designing the building. It was also acknowledged by administration and council that if the building was to be built at town hall, we would need a location to temporarily
relocate DPW operations and equipment/vehicle storage. Mayor Calamary and I along with our engineers personally visited all vacant township owned properties on multiple occasions. None of the township owned properties were suitable for storing equipment,
sustaining temporary operations, nor suitable for a permanent DPW building or DPW yard. Each parcel of township owned property was either too small in a flood zone or restricted by let wetlands or a riparian zone. Mayor Calamary and I
vetted the suitability of purchasing privately owned property within the township for a permanent location of DPW and/or temporary. Several properties were brought to discussion with the council in closed sessions. Several close session discussions occurred concerning this
topic. I understand that that may give the perception of non-transparency. However, please understand appreciate it was a necessity because it involved negotiations. The council ultimately decided that the costs associated with the land purchases and site improvements would be too
costly. Mayor Calamari and I visited both Sherry Field and the property known as the swim club on Lid Boulevard North to evaluate the possibility of temporary operations and storage. Both properties are owned by the township. Sherryfield was
purchased with money funded by the Green Acres Program and the Swim Club was purchased with assistance from the Bergen County Open Space Land Acquisition Grant. Both properties have restricted uses limited to recreation. Several months ago, I personally conferred with the Division of Community
Affairs, known as DCA, to ensure this information was accurate. The DCA explained that it was a possibility to request a permit through the Division of Community Affairs for temporary relief of that restriction. However, other barriers to suitability exist, such as a
riparian zone along the MSP sink hook at Cherry Field. We would also be unable to expand the size of the parking lot at Cherry Field because it would involve removing vegetation within the wetlands. The current size of the parking lot would not allow for recreation use and
DPW needs without significant interruption and inconvenience to the recreational programs. The swim club has a suitably sized parking lot. However, it is expected that remedial excavation of contaminated soil will begin in 2026 and the site will be unavailable for our
use. The remedial work at the swim club cannot be done at the township's leisure as we are guided by a schedule set by the New Jersey D. As a reminder to the public, we have already been awarded an $83,000 grant to cover the costs associated with the remedial investigation and applied for a grant to
cover up to 75% of the remediation work. In the spring of 2025, Mayor Calamari and I met with our counterparts and colleagues of several neighboring communities seeking a possible shared service to store equipment and vehicles along with moderate operations. We thank our neighboring towns for their
willingness to assist. However, it was determined that their spaces were either not big enough in a flood zone exposing our equipment to possible damage and or exceeded the reasonable proximity to our town leading towards lost work hours. A statement was made at the township that the I'm sorry, a statement was made that
the township should engage in shared services with other municipalities in order to reduce our number of vehicles or consider reducing our fleet altogether. I can assure you that every piece of equipment and or vehicle in our DPW fleet is needed and used to continue providing the services for the township
residents. The township of Washington engages in numerous shared service agreements in order to save taxpayer money. As we exhausted the different options such as purchasing private property, assessing township owned property and recreational fields, and shared service agreements with
neighboring towns, it was then decided to pursue the leasing of privately owned space in the township. Currently, the township leases space at Our Lady of Good Council, OLGC, on Ridgel Road. The lease is approximately $2,700 a month and expired the end of November 2025.
space is not big enough to support all of our equipment located currently at OOLGc and at town hall. The option to continue leasing from OLGC was not feasible due to the space need to satisfy the needs of DPW. The only space available that was considered suitable
for our needs taking in consideration proximity was Bethany Community Center. This was brought to the attention of the council. Mayor Calamary began the process of speaking with Bethany Community Center representatives on the possibility of a lease. Again, please understand that these conversations were
considered confidential as it involved negotiations. The information was then brought to the council. Council ultimately grants or denies the approval of a lease agreement and or contract. The council votes in favor of the agreement or contract. This act gives the mayor the authority to sign the agreement.
Throughout the discussions with Bethany community center representatives, it was understood by both parties that the safety of the public, considerations to their residents, and possible environmental impacts were of high importance. Since the inception of idea to lease Bethne Community Center, the township has worked with our available
professionals to judge the feasibility of the site. This included Beckmeer Engineering, Boswell Engineering, New Jersey D, our own employees in the building department, zoning department, and police department. Township acknowledges that the leasing of the rear lot of the Bethany Community Center
comes with challenges, concerns, questions, and displeasure. I'm certainly not conveying that this is the perfect option. However, it is the best option considering all the more than reasonable approaches the township took to look for alternatives. The following is information from DPW
Superintendent William Lawler regarding the intended use of the leasing area if approved by council this evening. Truck vehicle equipment storage. The DPW does not have any hazardous materials to store there. Picking up vehicles for the
day's task between 7 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. Dropping vehicles off at the end of the workday at approximately 3 p.m. Possible exchange of vehicles or equipment as needed throughout the day. From March through October, the primary vehicles used by the DPW will be four 350 uh
pickup trucks, one with an enclosed landscape trailer, daily use of a sanitation truck, one week a month. There will be more sanitation trucks for household debris collection, and an occasional Ford F450 and/or F550. November starts leaf collection during
which there will be more sanitation trucks and daily use, approximately five, as well as frontend loaders. 7 am pickup, 3 pm drop off, and the leaf vac trailer. The exchange of leaves from the leaf vacuum to the garbage truck. End of December through mid-March, the
sanitation trucks will not be used except on an occasional basis. In the event of snow, the DPW will need to pick up plow trucks that will be at Bethany. This is not meant to be an all-inclusive list, and there may be some intended use not listed.
There are 25 DPW related vehicles in our fleet. In addition to landscape trailers, two light towers, and a sign board. Not all the DPW vehicles will be stored at Bethany. Some will still remain at Town Hall parked near our old ambulance building. There are only 10 full-time DPW employees, so obviously
the number of fleet vehicles in storage does not indicate that all of them will be driven through the rear access driveway daily. There will be no storage of salt, brine, hazardous materials, changing of oil, or mechanical work involving hazardous
materials in the leased area. The DPW will be utilizing salt storage to Bergen County Road Department in Pamis. Any small maintenance issues are intended to be performed at the old ambulance corpse building, which will be storing DPW tools, small equipment, etc. There's no
public access permitted to the least area. Bethany Community Center employees and her guests are not permitted to use the rear access driveway. There'll be no debris collected by the garbage trucks left in the least area. DPW does not collect household garbage such as kitchen garbage. DPW employees will
continue to take their breaks and lunchtime at Town Hall. There is no electricity within the least area. There'll be no parking lot lights on outside of the time they are already programmed by Bethany Community Center. The gates will be locked when not in use. There should be limited noise at the
location as DPW operations are Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. absent weather emergencies. There should be no smells associated with the DPW occupying the least area. I do not see the likelihood of rodents outside the natural habitat of wildlife in the area. If necessary, we will
certainly take measures to contract with our pest control service to include the leased area. The lease is for 18 months for for a monthly fee of $5,800 for 1.25 acres of space. The lease does allow for three two-month
extensions past the 18-month agreement. That amount of time is for unforeseen circumstances that may delay construction, such as, god forbid, another epidemic like CO 19. That epidemic had delay implications on the construction of emergency service
building. There is little to no reason to believe that construction will take longer than 18 months. The contractor has 365 days to substantially complete the construction from the notice to proceed which was given on November 4th, 2025.
The time frame has already been negatively impacted by the failure to pass the ordinance at the November 10, 2025 meeting. The contractor was scheduled to conduct site preparation and foundation digging the week of November 24th, 2025. contractor will be unable to begin until the township has
secured a place to store the vehicles and equipment. The township is required under the lease agreement to restore the area back to its original state. This means removing the gate on Woodfield Road, the pavement driveway, the wind screening on the fence, and planting grass seed on any disturbed areas. The
township will most likely leave the constructed fence in place for Bethy's use after determination of the lease. The cost to construct the fence was approximately $18,000. And we use Bergen Fence. Bergen Fence holds the state contract for the service, which means the township
received best pricing. The cost to install a permanent fence was similar to the cost to rent a fence. However, in addition, we received two gates in a pedestrian access door. A permanently installed fence will also hold up from being knocked over, more secure, and becoming disjointed. The wind screening
was approximately $3,500. The intended purpose of the windscreen was to hide the view of our materials, equipment, and vehicles, hoping it would be more aesthetically pleasing than looking at DPW materials. Our only color options were black or green. The rear access driveway cost
approximately $38,000. This was the lowest price obtained from reputable contractors. The original sketch shown to the council for the rear access driveway indicated the use of large gravel rocks, much like you would see at a residential construction site. Council President Desenna made the positive
recommendation of using asphalt rather gravel rocks because asphalt would eliminate possible mud and dirt being brought out to the roadway. Asphalt asphalt also mean a better product that would hold up more efficiently than the gravel. All purchasing laws were filed when encumbering the funds to conduct
the work of the fence and the access driveway to include statemandated documents, certificates of insurance, and approved funding sources. Both encumbrances were below the bid threshold. Multiple quotes were obtained were required and the fence work was done under state contract. The
Msquapsync brook is a C1 waterway with 300 foot riparian zone and a 25- ft wetlands area. There will be no vegetative disturbance within the area. There will be zero structures constructed. The use is temporary and the parking lot is pre-existing. There are no zoning implications assing with
the I'm sorry. There are no zoning implications associated with the least area that the town is required to take into account. The township is temporarily utilizing this area for a governmental function in order to improve our infrastructure. Becca Meyer
Engineering and Bodwell Engineering were consulted with it with in order to assure compliance with the township's tier A stormwater general permit and New Jersey D regulations. There was no need to conduct an environmental study. However, environmental constraints were
established. There's no need to confer with NJ DOT as the streets are local streets to be driven by DPW vehicles that operate on our local streets daily as they do now. There's no need to conduct soil borings. There is no reason to believe that there will be sinkholes or any type of devastation to the
roadways. The compensation of Woodfield and Devon roads is the same as Hudson and Manhattan Avenues. The administration and council agree that the Woodfield area is a beautiful neighborhood that attracts child activities and exercising. There's no reason to believe that wildlife will be affected in any way due to the township
occupying the space. The Brook and Path will still be accessible with no impact to exercising, bike riding, children playing or fishing. The township DPW and green team do a fabulous job maintaining the path area and the waterway in that area as well. Storm water management is
an incredibly important topic. I am the township's municipal storm water coordinator, which means it's my responsibility to ensure that the township complies with our tier eight storm water permit regulations, facility inspections, training, reporting, and updating of our storm water pollution
prevention plan, and our storm water management plan. In order to assist me with these requirements, the township contracts with Aqualis, formerly known as storm water compliance solutions. DPW employees participate in mandatory yearly storm water management training
and DPW conducts and completes monthly storm water facility inspections at our DPW locations currently which are town hall and Our Lady of Good Counsel. There are three different inspections documented. These documents are then reviewed by me. If the lease agreements
authorized, we will add these inspections at Bethany. These inspections are identified as the New Jersey D form 9, municipal maintenance yard and other ancillary operations form. Best management practices inspection log, storm water permit
compliance log. Please note that storm water management at Bethany is no less or more important than storm water management everywhere in the township. All township storm drains drain into the Msquabs brook, including the three storm drains that are currently located in the DPW yard at town hall. The area to be
leased at Bethany has zero storm drains. However, we will have hay bales, fabric socks, and a spill kit on premises. The hay bales and fabric socks are used to control sedimentation. It allows surface water to pro appropriately filter
through while containing any sediment in the storm water. If there's a spill of any kind, the township will follow the guidelines provided in the storm water pollution prevention plan for cleanup. If the lease agreement is authorized, the township will take before and after photos of the area in order to protect
our interest. The township has already conferred with our insurance company and will be covered appropriately. The safety of pedestrians is of top concern. [clears throat] I've had several meetings with DPW Superintendent William Lauder to discuss safety when pursuing the feasibility of a lease at
Bethany Community Center to include most recently the concerns brought to our attention by the residents. I've also had several meetings with the entire DPW staff to convey the concerns from the residents regarding the increased activity of the trucks, speed, and pedestrian safety in the area. On
Thursday, November 20th, 2025, all DPW employees were required to watch the public hearing portion of the November 10th, 2025 council meeting. All DPW employees heard each concern brought up by the residents. Full-time DPW employees are required to have a valid
CDL license. There are 10 full-time employees. Each full-time DPW employee is required to take online driver safety training every year. The township intends on installing signage at the access driveway requiring a stop by DPW employees before exiting across the sidewalk. There will [clears throat]
also be signs at each side of the access driveway indicating the vehicle crossing the pedestrians on the sidewalk. DPW employees will be directed to avoid driving Woodfield Road or Devon Road as a cutthrough to other township streets and will be required to take the direct route to Pasquek Road. The township will
keep extremely close attention to this concern, maintain safety to a high regard. Mayor Carol Murray and I met with representatives of Bethany Community Center on Monday, November 24, 2025. Mayor Carol again requested the use of the front entrance at Bethany. Unfortunately, Bethany denied the use of
the front entrance for our department vehicles. However, employees may use the front gate in their personal vehicles when coming and leaving work. Over the last several months, the mayor and I have had several conversations with the council regarding the need to lease and/or purchase space for the temporary storage and moderate operations of the
DPW while constructing a new DPW building. Many of those conversations did take place in close session because it involved negotiating. I totally understand, appreciate, and respect that residents feel that gave the perception of a lack of transparency. I can assure you these discussions were conducted
this way due to our meeting formalities and not to hide information from the public. I can personally describe administration's conversations with the council to be collaborative, constructive, and having a positive exchange of ideas in order to address the pros and cons of purchasing or
leasing any of the locations discussed. The council was informed that I intended on meeting personally with the homeowners on Oxford, Devon, and Woodfield in the immediate area route that will be driven by DPW employees to where an anticipated rear access driveway would be constructed.
Additionally, council members requested that the township send certified letters to the property owners within 200 ft of the Bethany Community Center. The council had the opportunity to review the letter prior to it being mailed. The list was obtained from our tax assessor and 37 certified letters were sent out
on September 26, 2025. Some addresses that received letters were also addresses that I personally visited along with my administrative assistant. In September, prior to certified mailing, we visited 17 homes over the course of several days, going back to homes where there was no answer. I was
not able to speak to each homeowner in person. However, I left my business card and some I spoke to over the phone. We created an Excel spreadsheet that was given to the council. The spreadsheet indicated the addresses visited and any concerns or feedback given to me and my assistant. Everyone we visited with were
pleasant and seemed understanding. Although I did not leave any Although I did not leave any documents with any of the residents, I did have with me a draft plan showing the location of the intended rear access driveway. I advised each resident I spoke with about the fencing, gates, rear access driveway,
wind screening, and most importantly that this was temporary. I chose to make this notification personally in order to assure consistency and what was being told to the residents. My message has never changed from what was said individually to what I've said publicly.
Some of the residents clearly expressed concerns regarding deterioration of the roadway, additional traffic, traffic accidents, speeding, children on bikes, walkers, removal of the driveway/gates upon completion of the DPW building, and asked why the front entrance could not
be used, rather a rear access driveway. These concerns were shared with the mayor and council. On October 6, 2025, the council voted unanimously to pass resolution 25-327 authorizing entry into a lease agreement with Bethany. The lease agreement was
then sent to Bethany for their signature and approval. Within a few days, it was determined that the lease agreement involving the township was also need to be passed by ordinance, not just resolution. On October 20th, 2025, the council voted unanimously to introduce ordinance 25-23,
a first reading of an ordinance authorizing entry into a lease agreement with Bethany with a second reading/public hearing scheduled for November 10th, 2025. After receiving full endorsement from the council to the lease by resolution, I move forward with scheduling and
completing the site work given time constraints and urgency based on existing contractual obligations and winter months approaching. I respect the resident's concerns and questions regarding why the site improvements were completed prior to the lease agreement being authorized by the ordinance. At
the time, it was the most prudent measure to take in order to satisfy the best interests of all aspects of the entire DPW construction project. I understand that the construction of the rear access driveway and installation of the fence was needed only if the township entered into the lease
agreement. However, the lease agreement was not required for the work to be performed. There were properly funded capital ordinances in place to pay for these improvements. These funded ordinances were discussed and approved during open discussion, not close session. Based on the unanimous passage
of resolution 25327 and the unanimous introduction of the first reading of ordinance 25-23, I reasonably and responsibly believed that the unchanged lease agreement ordinance will be passed unanimously by the council on November 10th, 2025.
My responsibility as township administrators to carry out the policies and implementations of the mayor and council. Our intentions to make site improvements were known to the governing body. Bethany Community Center approved of entering onto the property to make the site improvements prior to the commencement date of the agreement. On
November 10th, 2025, only three council members were present for the second vote on ordinance 25-23. The ordinance did not pass. It was necessary to reintroduce the lease agreement ordinance. The rereading and reintroduction of ordinance 25-25
lease agreement with Bethany was held on November 17th, 2025. Ordinance 25-25 was successfully reintroduced and the second rereading will be held this evening. For all intents and purposes, Bethany believed in good faith there was a signed lease
agreement with the township based on the October 6th, 2025 resolution 25-327 allowing the site improvements. Formally, the mayor is under unable to sign the agreement until authorized by ordinance. Since the inception of negotiations between Bethany and Mayor
Calamary, the use of the front entrance by DPW work vehicles was never to be permitted. This evening, the council will have before them for approval resolution 25-356 authorizing entry into a non-exclusive revocable license with Valley National
Bank. This agreement will allow our employees to park their personal passenger style vehicles in the last row of parking spots in the rear lot of Valley National Bank at no cost to the township during the construction period. The township is prohibited from parking
or storing construction vehicles in the Valley lot. This is for passenger vehicles only and is being done to allow more parking spaces at town hall for our residents. In light of the outline above, Mayor Kalamari and I respectfully request the passing of ordinance 25-25
authorizing entry into the lease agreement with Bethany. Is imperative that the township have this location to immediately relocate vehicles and equipment as preventing any further delay of construction at Town Hall. I'll now read a uh a letter authored by Glenn
Beckmeer. He's our township engineer. Mr. Beckmeer is a professional engineer. He's a professional planner. He's a certified municipal engineer, a certified plug lane manager, and a certified public works manager. Dear Mayor Calamary, there are two
primary concerns associated with the temporary department of public works DPW yard plan for the Bethany property. Environmental considerations and storm water controls related to the adjacent waterway. Environmental considerations. Our initial meeting with the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protection to discuss the potential use of this location occurred over a year ago. During that meeting, we described all ongoing activities at the existing DPW yard. The NJD identified which activities would be permitted at the
Bethany site and which would not. For example, the storage of road salt was specifically prohibited. The current use of the Bethany and that use will remain unchanged with the primary function being the temporary storage of vehicles. Since the initial meeting, we have held multiple follow-up
meetings with the NJP to outline and discuss the activities the township has undertaken full regulatory compliance. Parallel to the Bethany parking lot is the Msquapsync Brook administrative code 7 col 9B surface
water quality. Mquapsync brook is classified as FW2 NTC1 water body. All activities have taken place outside of the water and not within the stream channel itself. Regulatory protections fall under the
New Jersey Administrative Code 713 Flood Hazard Area Control Act. These rules impose restrictions on activities occurring within the 300 foot repairing buffer associated with the brook. All activities that have been performed by the townful under the permit by rule.
The permit by rule section of the New Jersey administrative code 7 col13 flood hazard area control act rules is a act that describes certain activities that when followed are automatically permitted when the permit by rule section of the New Jersey administrative
code 713 flood hazard area control act rules are followed under no special permitting or permission permissions are required. The addition of the temporary driveway to connect the existing parking lot to Woodfield Road falls under permit by rule eight. The addition of the
temporary security fencing falls under permit by rule 11. No disturbance has occurred with any regulated freshwater wetlands. If such disturbance had taken place, requirements under New Jersey state water wetlands protection act rules
would have applied. The storm water pollution prevention plan will be updated if the lease is authorized to reflect the temporary relocation of the Department of Public Works yard to the Bethany parking lot. As part of this update, all necessary spill prevention materials such as spill
kits will be relocated to the temporary site to ensure immediate availability if needed. A review of the site indicates that the temporary DPW yard planned for the Bethany property lacks any existing storm water management infrastructure. As an existing parking lot, the area
already experiences sedimentation associated with such usementation impacts. Several erosion and sediment control measures will be implemented. These include the installation of hay bells, filter fabric, and fabric socks to minimize the amount of sedimentation.
In addition, enhanced street cleaning procedures will be put in place to further prevent tracking or migration of sediment site. The township mailed notification letters to all residents within a 200t radius of the proposed temporary improvements on September 26, 2025. In addition to the required not
the township also elected to provide notice to certain residents located outside of the 200t radius whose properties lie along the anticipated travel route for township vehicles. These supplemental notifications were provided as a courtesy to those who may be affected by this temporary situation.
Overall, the use of this site is strictly temporary. Any areas disturbed at the Bethany property will be restored to their original condition and any temporary improvements will remain other than the fence. Please contact his office should you have any questions or comments. Both of my letter and Mr. Beck
Miner's letter uh we have full intent to place on our website homepage uh by tomorrow morning. Uh there was a few outside of my few questions outside of my response. Um one I do know that specific address of where we may have
decided to purchase have been asked, but because they were set in close session, I certainly do not feel comfortable um releasing that information. I don't know if it would be any type of violation. If it's not and I can release those violation, those addresses, I certainly would. But I can assure you multiple
properties within were considered for purchase. Uh all the appropriate insurance is in if this uh lease takes effect. There were no permits required outside of a road opening permit that was obtained by the contractor that conducted the access driveway curb cut
which is sun. And the start date of the lease will obviously be determined based on this evening. and council president that is my response to all the questions concerns from the >> Thank you Mr. Darl.
>> So before we proceed uh one of the residents asked for a motion to table ordinance number 25-25. Does anybody have any interest in tableing the ordinance? Seeing none we'll continue motion to adopt ordinance number 25-25
at second reading by title. Do I have a motion? So moved. >> Second. >> Roll call. >> Councilman Casio. >> Recuse. >> Councilman Sears. >> Yes.
>> Councilman Alman. >> Yes. [snorts] >> Councilwoman BZ. >> Yes. We count the president to set him. >> No. >> Good. >> Yes. >> Good. Good. [clears throat] >> And thank you everyone.
>> Election day, November 3rd, 2026. believe we're remembering November. >> Thank you everyone for me. It's not finished. It's my property. >> If we take a fivem minute break everyone, we take a fivem minute recess.
number 25-35 of an authorized 2025 transfer of appropriations $74,22320. Do I have a motion? Uh so moved. >> Any discussion? >> Just one. Um the 4,000 for the fire
department. What What's What's going on there since it's a brand new building, relatively brand new? Nothing. Let I have to look at the uh the uh ledger that I gave you.
Nothing neglectful. Nothing like I can attribute to something that was improperly built. Let me try and get the uh the ledger for it. Pretty sure I gave it to you. I didn't think off the top of my head
what the what the big expense but it it was basically utilizing the balances of all the other accounts. So when we did over encumber the sub account for the maintenance of the building, we eventually ran out of money in the
control because we had to utilize the balances of the other items within the control. But I'm trying to get to the uh the specific ledger. There's like a 100 pages of vehicle >> prepares this way. generator maintenance
OEM replacement by page. >> It's page one. >> Oh, here we are. >> You guys got so far deep. >> So, the uh the contracts for whale and knives that was accounted for. >> The exterminator fees that was accounted for. The kitchen suppression was
accounted for. Um we did have to do some HVAC stuff that was not accounted for. Um, and I sent all of the maintenance agreements to Whale and Ice for them to review from us. And there were actually
um under the maintenance. He sent me a whole report and it showed me what was covered and what wasn't. And then things weren't uh covered. We moved a um thermostat to help reduce energy use. It was in an office. Um, actually, if you
remember from our tour, it was right outside the kitchen and it was the one room that we couldn't get in. Um, so there was a lot of um, when it says OEM replacement parts, it's obviously something to do with the manufacturer. Had nothing to do with actually the office of emergency management. Um, the
generator maintenance contract that was accounted for. There was sprinkler um, things that were were un uh, anticipated. Elevator service we accounted for. There was JCT solutions.
Um that is the vendor that we use for like the key fobs and the door access system. That was an unintended expense. Something was broken, but again it was outside of the warranty. That was almost $1,000. The low bank test was accounted
for. Um so we didn't go over by $4,000. we went over by a little bit and then the rest getting up to the 4,000 is for anything that may happen in the last month. >> Okay. >> So hopefully that answers your >> your question. You're welcome. >> Roll call. >> I have a question.
>> Oh, sorry, Mr. >> On the U vehicle maintenance $21,000 unexpected police vehicle repairs. What are they? >> So I gave sir, I gave you the um the
ledger for the police vehicle repairs. I don't know them, you know, individually. Right now, that control line is over by about 8 to 9,000. So, we asked for 21,000 to make sure we can get through the end of the year. It's quite common
in December when we have these garbage trucks running, you know, hours and hours every day to to keep up with the leave sometimes six days a week going down Route 80. And I could tell you one garbage truck. the garbage trucks are okay about the police vehicles,
>> right? But it's the same control line. So that's why I'm trying to explain to you why I asked for 21,000 in case DPW vehicles go down. I want to have enough in the control. >> So the 8,000 shortage is from DPW vehicles, not police vehicles. >> Uh no, mostly the overage of the $8,000
was from police. I just I'd have to go through the ledger like I just did with Mr. Holman um to see. I do know from talking with uh Captain Pakora the last few days there has been a lot of repairs un unexpected repairs needed to the what
we would call the outside job cars like I call them the side job cars but it would be the the cars that are not in their regular fleet in their first line fleet would be the vehicles that are used um for the outside jobs. So again, I' I'd have to go through specifically and look. I'm sorry I don't know off the
top of my head, but as you can see, there was a couple of expensive repairs in September. One for $1,600 for car 41, $2,600 for car 45. And their vehicle maintenance line is a lot less than the DPW. I know DPW starts off with like 90
in their in their line for repairs. I don't remember off the top of my head what the police do, but it's a lot less. And then uh you know then there's the fire department that's also with >> on on the $10,000 for electricity. Are we making any attempts to put um motion
switches in the emergency uh service building or some kind of light u reduction? So, I have not uh specifically done anything to put in any type of motion sensors, but I do know when we were
talking about this a few years ago, it's all LED low energy lighting. >> That was in the >> Yeah, >> that I'm talking about >> I mean, most of it we're not, again, we're not over by 10,000, but um you know, we should be out of obviously the
heat of the summer where the electricity is really being used. Um, you know, I can attest that every time I go to the the building, the ESB building, of course, it's um [clears throat] a big building, the temperatures are very low, very appropriate. You know, the energy
use seems, you know, very reasonable. The lights are off and everything. Um, but that that increase in electricity killed us. >> That's what I was going to mention. Also, >> it killed us. And if you remember during budget time, it was it was hard, you know, to kind of estimate. That's why if you look like 90% of this is all our
utility stuff, water, gas, electricity, things that were hard to, you know, estimate. Um, you know, obviously nothing was used, nothing is here because of frivolous spending. And I know you're not accusing that. I'm just saying that, um, you know, the elections we all knew about, the vehicle
maintenance, we just talked about, um, the UCCC that was for the stipens for the, uh, you know, for the, uh, inspectors, the water. again. I just I couldn't believe it. >> Service Gas and Electric, they're offering um a lot of grants to do energy
efficiencies like what Mr. Cummings wanted. >> Yes. >> We can talk to the grant writer to see if he can look into getting some type of grant to apply that to the emergency service building. We certainly can, but
if you remember, we had um I forget the name of the company, but they were uh specifically contracted with with PSCG and they came and did a run through of this building, the ESB. Let's just say it was about 6 months ago and they said there was nowhere to go. You know, there
was there was nothing, you know, to improve. Um but we can, you know, certainly still look into it again. But >> I mean, >> you know, USB is big, but it was built >> built pretty energy efficient. >> Um, and even here, you know, I was hoping there'd be something new.
>> Mr. did a lot of work on the mechanicals and stuff in this building. So, >> yeah, >> I believe they're all they're all like within five, seven years old in this building. >> Yeah. And then, if you remember, we remember we uh met the one individual, I think, at the league, Mr. series last year and we met with them and uh pretty
much like no one was interested when they hear how recent either the ESP building was built, you know, they know that it's would be a waste of time to come because there's not going to be >> any improvements, but doesn't mean we still can't try. >> Thank you. >> You're welcome. Any other questions?
Anybody? >> Roll call, please. >> Councilman Casio, >> yes. >> Councilman Sears, >> yes. >> Councilman Omen, >> yes. >> Counciloman, >> yes. Council president to settle. >> Yes. >> Resolution's consent agenda. The following items have been determined to have unanimous consent to the council
and will be enacted in one motion. Should any item require independent consideration, any council member may have such item removed from the consent agenda. >> Would anybody like any um resolutions removed from the consent agenda? >> Uh I'd like uh 357.
>> 357. Any others? >> No. Okay. Resolution number 25-352 authorized refund of of tax overpayment quarter 4 to Core Logic various blocks and lots in the amount not to exceed $15,55069.
Resolution number 25-353 authorize refund the remaining balance of performance guarantee and engineering escrow block 3404 lot 4 in the amount not to exceed $7,776. Resolution number 25-354 authorized refund of tax overpayment
quarter 4 785 Washington Avenue block 2202 lot 11 in the amount not to exceed $3,56565. Resolution number 25-355 authorize the endorsement and filing of a 2026 2027 BCC DBG application the amount of
$19,600 for ADA improvements to the library. Resolution number 25-356 authorize entry into the entry into and the mayor to execute a non-exclusive revocable license with Valley National Bank. Do I have a motion to approve consent agenda
resolutions as presented? >> So move second. >> Roll call. >> Councilman Casio. >> Yes. >> Councilman Sears. >> Yes. >> Councilman Omen. >> Yes. >> Councilwoman BZ. Yes. >> Council President. >> Yes. Resolution number 25-357
authorized the award of a non-fair and open public contract for soil excavation and backfilling at 450 Pasc Road to Reneua Environmental Company in the amount not to exceed $28,9604. Do I have a motion? >> So move second.
>> Discussion. >> Yeah, I have a couple of questions. Um, does this contract encompass the remediation of all known environmental issues at the site? >> Yes, sir.
>> And then who is managing the work? Is it the administration, our engineers, Liscoco? >> Liscoco. >> Liscoco has oversight. >> Yes. >> All right. So when I looked at Renova
and then looked at GWS and there was another one that you provided uh SNH there were sort of um things that were not included or
included in one. So for instance uh the markout of utilities was in GWS and there's no reference to it in Renova. Um there's
a discussion of certified is it DGA clean fill and that's not referenced in Renova. uh portable toilet erosion control.
So, you know, those were in these other um contracts that we're not awarding but not in Renova. So, if they were needed in
those contracts, are they needed for Renova to complete the work? So, oh, did you want me to give the I'll try and give a good stab at your question? You know, answer it almost in a roundabout way. So, um, Liscoco is the
one that obtained these quotes and made the recommendation to us on the lowest most responsible price. So, I wouldn't be able to specifically tell you that understandably good good points. Um, I can tell you that the uh the utilities
have been already um terminated there. So, I don't know if maybe that that wasn't needed. Um, the excavation is kind of behind the house. So, like on the west like the west south end of it. So, I guess the best way to answer you
is I I'm trusting that when Liscoco made its recommendation to us um it was all-encompassing of the work that needs to be done there. So, we are not uh just so you understand why it's coming before you, we are not creating a purchase order. We're not
paying for this. It's being paid out of the escrow. But, you know, in speaking with Miss Bailey and our QPA, we thought it was most responsible to bring a resolution before the council so we had documentation of how this process uh was made. So, speaking with
Miss Bailey, it sounds like we're still responsible for, you know, um, adhering to the requirements of local public contract law. Um, so that's why it actually came before you. I know that goes a little beyond what you you asked.
Um, I I can't specifically say, you know, don't worry about it. I think it's okay, but I can tell you that, you know, Lisco is managing it and I I have full faith that, you know, they made their recommendation based on what's needed at the site. >> So, how much money is available?
>> I think the the escrow was 250, Miss Bailey. >> That's right. >> It was 250. And I think the billing, you know, again, I don't like throwing out numbers, but I think the billing up to this point was maybe say $20,000 or less. Even less. I I also don't want to
throw out but that sounds like the ball. Yeah. >> So, and then um and and their is it Mr. Zach? Their their attorney is well aware of all these costs um as well. And I think this whole project, you know, is not only $28,000. There was
Did I send you the email that had the or the breakdown of the entire cost? Obviously, Liscoco is is charging as well. So I think the whole >> But that's all coming out of the escro. >> All coming out of the escro. The township's not paying.
>> We're not paying Well, we did pay it already, but it's coming out of the escrow. >> It's the It's the money. Sellers money. >> It's sellers money now. >> I'm Sue. I'm certainly not blaming you. I just don't remember if I sent you just the attachments or if you got the email that went along with it,
>> but I'm sure if I did, >> yeah, I want again. Don't hold me to it, but I think the whole >> the whole excavation and and remediation there is is roughly like 83 or $84,000. But Renovo specifically is getting paid
uh the 28,964 cents >> and if they exceed >> it comes out of the escrow. >> It comes it comes out of the escrow. Yeah. Oh, here we go. There is a budget sheet. Don't you don't have the me email but you do have the uh the budget sheet
which lists the five tasks and at the bottom it's total of $83,457 66 right there. >> Oh yeah it's landscape it's going the opposite right. >> So the subcontractor is under test two
>> and it's the six lines labeled as subcontractor. So, >> okay. So, I can see >> we're paying >> Renova or >> we're not paying >> we're not paying >> we're not exchanging any money. >> Renova is getting 28.
>> Yes. >> Of 83. >> Okay. >> That's how I understand. >> Yeah, that is correct. >> Yeah. >> If I could ask Mr. Almond a question. Mike, are you seeing a difference in the two contracts that one is not doing
something and the other one is? >> I I don't know that they're I don't know enough about it, >> but I just looked I was reading them, you know, thing, you know, they talk about certified DGA, which is like some
I believe the aggregate that they're supposed >> that's great at aggregate. Yes. and the two that didn't win make specific reference to it and the Renova doesn't >> so you know I you know I don't know if
that's good bad or indifferent >> well at the end of the day's got to get us the response action outcome letter from D so until we have that from the LSRP which is Lis >> nobody's getting paid >> well if we're dealing with Lisco again my question is dealing with Liso is you
know he does certain things and all of a sudden you get another bill, he needs another certain amount of money. So, I mean, my fear is is that one is giving us something and the other is not. >> It's a total of 83,000. >> I don't want to to come back. >> It's a big It's a bigger number than
what's in the resolution. >> As long as that bigger number is covered by the escrow, >> it is. >> It's fine. >> Luckily, the council and the foresight didn't ask for the escrow for this. We'd be out another $84,000. >> It's a good turn. Did you spend it all?
>> Any other questions, Mike? >> Hey, that was me. I sent you those messages. >> No. >> Roll call. >> Is that one of those secret service? >> Council, >> yes. >> Councilman Sears, >> yes. >> Councilman Alman, >> yes. >> Counciloman Buzz, >> yes. >> Council President,
>> yes. >> Motion to adjourn to the conference agenda. >> So move. Second. >> All in favor? >> I. Next meeting of the township council will be on Monday, December 15, 2025, beginning at 7 PM. All right. Conference agenda, December
2nd, 2025. Uh, under council ordinances and legislation, the towing resolution followup. >> You want to do anything on this one? >> So, this was discussed the last meeting. >> This was discussed at the last meeting. Mike had some questions about the free
towing provided in the ordinance to the mun to the township of Washington. He didn't understand uh if that was contractually required by the state or is that something that they give us as a perk? >> I remember it kind of being like a a
perk from what I >> Well, Mike had asked is it required to be in the language by the state or is it you know >> it's not required. It isn't required and I think Mike also asked the councilman also asked me to take a look at the all of the ordinances comprehensively to see
if there were any other instances where private parties were required to wave fees and costs and there are no such ordinances. So, um, I think that certainly if the council wants to revisit this issue, I know that the
clerk had talked to me about somebody else wanting to revisit another issue. So, I would I would think that, you know, we I can certainly put a list together of, you know, at the council's direction, but I do believe that there's a time constraint on this particular
amendment in terms of licensing these particularities. >> Yeah. So, that that's That's my only comment on that. But >> I'm okay with I'm okay with moving forward with the perk because it's not like Mr. D. Carlo said, it's not for any of our larger trucks.
It's only for vehicles that we've ever used this. Correct. >> I pretty conf. >> It's not for the dump trucks or anything of that. It's only for like a police car or something like that. >> So, and that's just in town, I think.
>> That's just in town. Yeah. I'm I'm okay with leaving it the way it is. >> Mess. >> Yes. Agreed. >> Mr. Sears. >> Yes. >> Mr. Cassio. >> Sure. >> Mr. Alman? >> No. >> All right.
>> So, we have a resolution here. >> No, I'll put the resolution on for next meeting. I didn't bring it with me tonight. Get that. >> So, we'll put this on for the 15th then. >> Let me just make a comment. have the right date or any of that stuff. >> And like like Miss Bailey had said too
is that um one of the officers said that there are some changes that he would like to look at next year before before we do the renewal or in the ordinance itself, tighten it up a little bit. So at that time if there is something else you want to change, >> okay? >> You know, we could do all one lump sum instead of doing it in peace meal.
>> Recreation fees, men's softball. Um Mr. Scaderi asked that, Miss Peter, that the uh the men's softball fee be raised to $95. >> Um yes. Uh I believe right now it's $80. U he didn't put that in his email, but I seem to recall that from our
conversation. Um right now, um we we put the request in high so we don't have to come to the council for every $5 increment, but uh for this coming year it would be $85 instead of the 80 because the men's softball uh would like us to purchase new bases is my
understanding. And so it might even drop back down uh because we that's a one-time purchase obviously. So the you know this next year's rate the 2026 rate will be $85. Uh >> I thought Mr. Mr. could there asked for 95 >> 95 that's to put in so we don't have to
come to you for every $5. >> Yeah. >> I just saw men's software to be changed for $95. >> I understand how you came up with that but >> All right. I'm I'm okay with it. Everybody else okay with that? >> Good. >> Okay. So, >> we'll have to change the ordinance. >> We'll have to change the ordinance for the 15th.
>> What is the amount that you want? >> 95 >> maximum note. >> Yeah. They're all in there that way now. Yeah. Thank you. uh miscellaneous 2025 Sindai meeting 2026 reorg meeting date. Sue would say >> I I would just like to know when you
would like to have a reorgbe. We have not traditionally done it on January 1. >> I I do not want to have it on January one. >> Okay, that's fine. >> Everybody okay with that? I I'd like to make that decision. >> You can have it. I'm not going to be there. That's up to you. >> I would make it Can we make it the following month? Monday month Monday.
>> We do January 5th, I think, is the next day. Would you be a regular a regular we were meeting like we've always done? >> Always done. Yeah, that's fine. >> But I don't like making that decision that >> that's fine. Make it to the next fifth. >> Everybody's good with the fifth. >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Motion
to the uh fees for wreck. >> It's only a men's softball. >> No, I understand that. But is it worth since we're putting a cushion on those on men's softball to put a cushion on the other ones? >> They all have cushions, right? Yeah. I mean, we might be getting close on some
because it's been years, but yeah, we tried, especially on the $5 one typically doesn't go. >> Yeah, we have we did put cushion. >> Perfect. >> All right. >> Resolution number 25-358, affordable housing litigation, personal personnel, police department. The township council
anticipates that an open session will not be necessary after the close session. Motion to enter into close session. >> So move second. >> All in favor? >> Thank you, everyone. Let's wait for Ricky to come down.