Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the board of education of the town of Westfield in the county of Union, New Jersey at 6:30 p.m. On the evening of Tuesday, February 10th, 2026, in cafeteria B of Westfield High School, 550 Dorian Road, Westfield, New Jersey.
The board will move immediately into private session to discuss matters rendered confidential by state and federal law, including harassment, intimidation, and bullying incidents. The public portion of the meeting will resume at 7 p.m. The purpose of the meeting is to transact the regular business of the board, and to transact
any other business to come properly before the board. This is to advise the general public and to instruct that it be recorded in the minutes that in compliance with chapter 231 of the public laws of 1975 entitled the open public meetings act the Westfield school board on Thursday February 5th 2026
caused to be posted at the office of the board of education located at 302 Elm Street Westfield New Jersey and delivered to the Westfield leader nj.com the Westfield library town clerk of Westfield tap into Westfield district website and patch.com a meeting notice
setting forth the time, date, and location of this meeting. Patty, may I have a roll call, please? >> Rob Bonaccio >> here. >> Kent Simons >> here. >> Brendan Gallagghan >> here. >> Charles Galinus >> here. >> Leila Morelli >> here. >> Sonel Patel here. >> Kristen Sonic Schmeltz.
>> Julie Steinberg >> here. >> Mary Wickens >> here. Uh Mary, would you lead us in a flag salute, please? I'd like to make a motion that the board approve the following resolution. Be it resolved that the board of education move into private session for the
purpose of discussing matters rendered confidential by state and federal law, including harassment, intimidation, and bullying incidents. And be it further resolved that any discussion held by the board which need not remain confidential, and the results of the discussion will be made public as soon as practicable. May I have a second, please?
CJ, there's a second. Uh, just do by hand vote. All in favor, please raise your hands. Any opposed? Any abstensions? We are in executive session. Right. >> And they took out the drapes. >> By the way, this is the SIP report and I
deleted three paragraphs. >> I texted I was like, "No, no, no. This is how long it is. Delete with the deletion or is I texted him. I was like, "I hope you don't care, but can I make this shorter?"
>> Oh, wait. I'm All right, the board is back from executive session. Um, let us start with any announcements. Mer, do you have an announcement? >> Sorry. >> No problem. >> Yes, I do.
Okay. Westfield Public Schools is excited to welcome our newest learners. Registration for kindergarten and grade 1 for the 2026 2027 school year is now open. Families can find detailed instructions, required documents, and
registration forms on the district website under student registration. We look forward to welcoming our newest members to the Westfield Public Schools community. >> Very nice, Kent. Thank you. Edison and Roosevelt Intermediate Schools are proud
to announce that 11 students have been accepted into the Central Jersey Music Edi Educators Association Region Band and Orchestra. That's a mouthful. This outstanding accomplishment places these students among the top young musicians in central New Jersey as they were selected from a highly competitive pool
of more than 500 student musicians. The selected students will proudly represent Edison and Roosevelt schools as they rehearse with their respective CJMEA ensembles and prepare for a culminating performance this March. Thank you.
>> Nothing better. Uh Sonel, >> Westfield Public Schools is proud to announce that Music for All has named the district a recipient of the 2026 advocacy in action award in the elementary excellence category. This prestigious national recognition honors outstanding music education programs and
Westfield was selected for its innovative Wild Symphony Children's Concert Initiative. The advocacy and action awards celebrate educators, administrators, families, and community members who champion music education as an essential part of a well-rounded education. As part of this honor,
Westfield's program will be featured in Music for All's Advocacy in Action Archive, serving as a model for music educators across the country. Uh Ila, >> the Westfield High School boys winter
track team claimed its fifth consecutive sectional championship, defeating Wong Hills 48 to 38 at the NJSIAA North 2 Group 4 sectional championship. With this victory, the Blue Devils tied Rididgewood for the second longest
sectional title streak in New Jersey history. Congratulations to our student athletes and coaches on an incredible achievement and a remarkable championship run. >> Julie >> Westfield Public Schools will be closed on Monday, February 16th and Tuesday,
February 17th in observance of President's Day and the Lunar New Year. District offices will be closed on February 16th only. >> You got the fun one. Uh all right. Uh with uh nothing on there. Uh so with the announcements
done, we'll move to a report by district administration, Dr. Gonzalez. I'm sorry, I have too many tabs open. Give me one second as I pull everything up. Okay, it's been a long day today.
Um, before we get started uh with our report and presentations, I did want to address the security incident that took place um earlier today at the high school. Um and for those who are not aware uh suspicious writing uh on a table was discovered and reported by
students uh to their teacher. Um the school implemented our safety and security protocols to assess the situation in consultation with our security professionals as well as our partners in law enforcement. um with led to a shelter in place at the high school
and ultimately a lockdown um in order to allow our Westfield Police Department to conduct a thorough investigation and sweep of the entire school building with officers from uh Westfield and other municipalities using K9 and technological resources at their
disposal. Because this remains a police matter, I cannot share any additional details at this time, but I am relieved to report that the lockdown was cleared uh and lifted without incident. Students and staff remained safe throughout the entire experience with students being
dismissed at approximately 2:50 p.m. As a precaution, our elementary schools and intermediate schools were placed in a shelter in place with instruction continuing while the investigation was underway at the high school. having a front row seat to the entire
experience as I was at the high school. Actually meeting with Ben um when this all went down. I do want to emphasize uh a number of important points. First and foremost, today reinforces why we consistently ask for full cooperation
with safety expectations. Wearing student IDs, taking drills seriously, practicing regularly and following directions immediately, even when it's inconvenient, are not optional. They are essential in emergencies. Seconds matter, and
compliance keeps people safe. Second, we take safety and security with the utmost seriousness. The the lives of our students and staff are not something to be joked with, um not something to be tested. Beyond the disruption to instruction, we must be mindful of the
physical, emotional, and medical impact that an extended lockdown can have on students and staff. I also want to commend our students and staff for their calm and responsible response today and thank the Westfield first responders and neighboring
municipalities for their swift action and the resources they use to deploy to ensure the health and safety of our community. I also want to thank our families and community members who supported our response. By not flooding our school phone lines and by not coming
to the area around the school and by cooperating that way, you allow law enforcement and school personnel to do their jobs to keep our schools running, but also to ensure that if emergency access was necessary, the the streets would not be congested. After events
such as this, counseling supports will be available for any student and staff member who needs them, and we will have a visible police presence at our schools in the coming days as an added precaution. Finally, we will continue to cooperate fully with law enforcement and support
the investigation. If a perpetrator is identified, we are prepared to impose the strongest possible disciplinary action under our policies and to cooperate with law enforcement if criminal charges are contemplated. During emergency situations, our first
priority is to maintain safety of our schools. We strive to communicate with families, providing them information whenever appropriate and when possible. Sometimes it's not immediate because we're in the middle of managing the the crisis, but when we are able to do so, we get that word out. Our commitment
remains clear that safety and well-being of our students and staff will always come first. So, I want to thank everyone for their support and understanding of our efforts to keep our schools safe and secure. Now, this was not planned. We move on to the
student safety um data system summary report. So that is a mandated uh department of education report that we complete every year and and we do that in two cycles. Um most recently the report that is uh on this uh agenda this
evening is for the first half of the school year September through the end of December 2025. Um, it's a an attachment on this agenda under the notes for the record. And the report details incidents of violence, vandalism, weapons, substance abuse, and confirmed HIV cases
while also tracking student removals, the use of restrain or seclusion, and anti-bullying training and programs. The administration uses these summaries um to evaluate and enhance our ongoing safety and prevention initiatives.
Beyond those two reports, I'd like to now invite Patty Ramos and Matt Bolton uh up to the podium as we kick off the next in our series of presentations regarding the upcoming uh 202627 uh budget development. So this evening
our presentation is going to highlight uh a little more detail than we had the last time. Uh really trying to provide an overview for everyone who's watching as well as the uh board members in attendance uh an overview of what is in
the preliminary budget that we are currently drafting. So, I want to make sure it's clear to our media partners as well as the board of education. This is not a final budget. This is a budget at this moment in time that represents the submissions of our school and department
personnel and administrators. We are presenting so that the board and the community is aware of all the proposals that we are contemplating for this upcoming school year. So, we're going to provide highlights of all that work as well as go into details regarding the
fiscal impact that even this proposal would have in order to then engage in a full board discussion about the key decision points that will allow us to move further. So, for the next two slides, Patty's going to walk us through the uh fiscal
aspects of the budget as it is currently developed. Then, Dr. Bolton, myself and Patty will go into the highlights of what makes up these slides before we then engage into the further discussion about where to go from there. So Patty, >> um, so this first slide you've seen
before, the projected expenditures pie chart. What has changed is salary and benefits. It was just at 80% last year. Now it's almost at 83% and that's a direct reflection of the increase in health benefits for our staff and also our contracted salaries that aren't
settling at the 2%. Everything else went down slightly around that, but again this always highlights the majority of our budget is salary and benefits. So when anything has to be made that's going to change anything, that's the biggest amount of money that we spend in
the district is our people. The next slide here is our projected revenues. And again, there's a very large blue blue part of this. That's our local tax levy is 91.6. Again, went up by about 1% from last year estimated
right now. The state aid number that we're using here is frozen from last year. We still won't have that number until uh March. And the everything else we left the same extraordinary aid, our tuition, student activity fees. As you can see, that's a small amount of the
pie. Our interest is still budgeting about 2% of the entire revenue source. I don't increase that number because that's based on bank interest rates. We can't lock into anything else. We can't if I don't make that number, I have to make it up somewhere else. So, if I
budget the same amount, like a steady amount, I know I'm going to get that. If I get anything else, I can put it into reserves at year end. But if I fall short on it and I budget too much, so if I try to plug my budget to make it work this year and increase interest revenue and something happens next year, we'll
fall short and we'll be even in a worse situation that you see some other districts in. So we tried to keep everything very flat and level and and not make any changes, drastic changes on the revenue side. And now we're going to go into curriculum.
>> Hi everyone. So, uh, thank you for allowing me a few moments to present on the budget submissions of the curriculum instruction office. Last, uh, meeting I talked to you a little bit about what we were doing with resources and funds from this past year's budget. And now, I'd like to talk a little bit about
projections for for next year. Um, so fundamental to the work that we're doing underneath the strategic plan is ensuring that every student in this district has a consistent, coherent, and viable curriculum and and that that translate into learning experiences in
their classrooms. So the the the root of that is our rewriting, complete overhaul of all of our curriculum documents, which takes years because there's so many curriculum documents. Um, so we will continue to invest in rewriting and that's done by teams of teachers and
administrators most typically over the summer so they can really immerse themselves in that work. If if you know any teachers, ask them how curriculum writing goes after school, it's not it's not a great experience. But if we can immerse them in it over the summer and give them, you know, a number of days to
actually build those those documents, it results in a much richer um product. So, we're going to continue to do that in um all of our high school science courses, um our intermediate v visual and performing arts courses, our intermediate school health program,
intermediate intermediate and high school world language courses, high school humanities courses, and all of our social studies AP offerings. Now, that's just stage one. Those are the public facing documents in in a in an understanding by design model. There's also stage two and stage three. And
that's where the really the rubber meets the road in providing curriculum being a true resource to our teachers. The work we're doing there and ha have been doing over the past two years is creating documents that serve teachers through having clear and coherent instructional
plans and clear assessments across grade levels and courses. So that work's going to continue. We're going to continue to do that work in a number of disciplines that have already um have already submitted and been board approved with stage one documents. So those are K
through8 language arts, K through8 math, K through8 social studies, um and a number of teched courses. Next slide. So we are also really excited and as I said the first time I presented last month, these are the
things that get everybody excited is new courses and new programs. However, these are also the things that cost money. So these are the things that involve additional staffing. And what I will say is the things that I'm going to speak about tonight. We are ready as a department to launch next year. We have
done the research. We have surveyed the students. We have run pilots. Um we have written the curriculum and had the curriculum presented to SIP, our curriculum instruction program committee of the board. So we're ready to go if these things are able to be included in the budget. But we also recognize as a
department that we can't do everything in in every year. So, the C new courses that we're interested in launching next year, money mindset part two. Money mindset was a course I talked about last last month. That's the sixth grade elective that we're running. It was um
really well received by our sixth graders. So, we're building a second part for seventh grade. When we talk to seventh graders about money mindset, they say, "How come the sixth graders get to have that course and I don't?" So, we're going to provide them the course. Uh American Sign Language, a ASL
at uh Westfield High School. That's that's in line with a number of key goals within our strategic plan, specifically our inclusivity uh initiative and objectives. This provides a more diversified uh approach to our world language offerings. Um and there's
significant interest in this course. Elementary gifted program redesign. We have invested many months, a ton of energy and um a a ton of work into redesigning our gifted program at the elementary school. What we're proposing
is to redesign this program to launch a new program next year um which would include bringing our gifted students back to their home schools. So no longer would gifted students be bus to Edison from their elementary schools. It creates a more efficient model. Um and then the following year, the subsequent
year, we would work to redesign and implement a change at the intermediate schools. AP macro at the high school. Um, AP AP uh, economics is a course that's offered widely in many other communities. Um, we
have not had it at Westfield High School and our kids are extremely interested in taking the course. So, we're going to provide it. The something that's not up there, but should be. We're also launching over this summer a summer online asynchronous financial literacy course. That is something that's been
requested by the community for multiple years. Uh, financial literacy is a state requirement. It's a semester course and um while students are interested in it, it also blocks them out of taking other semester electives that they'd like to take. So, if they can take that course
over the summer and throughout the year in an asynchronous online way, we're going to provide them. And we're looking at resources right now. We've run a pilot for that course. Um the the cost will be zero dollars to families to run that course.
curricular resources. We are also um to ensure that all of these new programs and new curriculum um translate into excellent classroom experiences. We are also purchasing resources and we're budgeting for new resources. We in the
curriculum instruction office, we budget for classroom libraries at each of our elementary schools. We budget for new programs such as or extensions of programs. We run the foundation's early literacy program in grades K through three. We're going to be launching a
pilot for grades four through five. Um there's resources that need to be purchased to run those programs. Uh any new course or new program requires resources. So textbooks textbooks are expensive. We have to budget for them. Assessment instrument
instruments and assessment platforms. We're going to continue to expand our use of diagnostic and screening assessments. Um, our teched programs continue to expand and also in line with the expansion of our referendum, building a new teched space, we need new
teched tools. So, this next year we're budgeting for anything from um robotics kits to CNC routing machines to these are not just um hammers and screwdrivers. These are pretty advanced pieces of technology that cost a lot of money that we need to provide our
students so that they can have an excellent tech tech education. Um, and visual and performing arts supplies. The curriculum office provides a significant amount of supplies for the visual and performing arts program. Anything from panels for the art show to new
instruments to the rental of trucks to ship band instruments back and forth to contests. So lots of that lots of those funds come from the office of curriculum instruction. And finally a always a focus and a central point to the work that we do is
ensuring that we have high quality job embedded sustained professional learning for our teachers. So we provide professional learning through both in district programs and workshops and through bringing in highquality experts into our district and sending teachers
outside to conferences and workshops outside of the district. Um we hope to continue to do that. Just this year we offered teachers professional development in teaching in the age of artificial intelligence. We um budgeted money funds to provide for staff wellness. Um we continue to work with
NJTSS and the grants um that we have with Ruckers University for our foundational literacy instructional strategies and assessment tools. Um and we are also highly invested this year and continuing into next year and subsequent years in continuing to
develop our teachers ability to provide small groupoup instruction in the classroom. We also provide teachers when we run new AP courses like AP macroeconomics. Those teachers need very specific professional learning experiences offered by the college board and they they're provided
through AP summer institutes. Um we always provide any new AP teacher with AP workshops so that they're prepared to teach the course. Um we're developing a new Westfield Teacher Academy where our expert teachers can share their wealth of knowledge and experience with their
colleagues. That's another thing that we're budgeting for next year. And you'll hear in a little bit when Dr. Gonzalez talks about some of the technology platforms that we're interested in launching next year. We are also budgeting for um a technology professional development platform where
we can upload our own internal videos because there is a ton of professional development that happens on a cycle. So when a teacher retires and a new teacher is hired, the learning that happened with those specific programs that I just shared, that new teacher needs to be
trained in all of those new programs. So if we have our own internal mechanism to do that um then it it it just helps us and creates a more efficient system. So that those are the things that we're budgeting for from the office of curriculum instruction. Thank you. >> Moving on to personnel. Um as Dr. Bolton
mentioned through professional development through curriculum writing we see that there's a human resource element associated uh with that. This particular side is really focusing on more specifically the actual positions. So the budget as we have developed it uh
include all the salaries and benefits associated with all the staff who are employed in the school district. So those salaries and benefits are for the full-time staff. They're for the stipens that are paid to individuals. They pay for lunch aids. They pay for substitute
teachers. All of that is also factored into the uh the current budget as we've developed it. We also identify that as enrollment increases, our needs may also increase as well. So when we look at the increased enrollment at our our schools,
especially in our elementary schools, we note that there may be a need for an additional special education teacher or social worker in order to ensure compliance with uh students um individualized education uh plans as well as an additional assistant principal at the elementary level,
specifically at Jefferson. When we researched and asked around neighboring districts, typically when schools, elementary schools reach around 500 students or more, that's when you'll see uh an assistant principal added. In our case over at Franklin, we have over 500
students. We have an assistant principal. Well, at Jefferson, as of I think January's enrollment, we are at 499. So, we're at the point now where we believe that it would be prudent for us to be able to ensure that we have appropriate administrative support, which is why we've currently built that
into the the budget uh as it's presented. What you also see is in addition to our existing staff, so the majority of what you are hearing about are those things that are currently in place, our current administrative team, our current uh office and and um clerical support as well as all of the
custodial maintenance and technology personnel in addition to the instructional staff, certificated uh and education specialists. So, we have a ton of folks already in there, but we also see opportunities for us to continue to expand offerings. As mentioned, we have
an interest in expanding our money mindsets course to seventh grade. In order to do that, not only do we have to write the program, but we need a teacher to deliver it. So, that's why we we've added that as a potential uh enhancement. We also see in order to take our existing gifted uh program that
is housed at uh Edison School and in order to create an elementary program that is homebased, school-based, we would need to hire two additional teachers in order to help uh provide the delivery of services along with our existing enrichment teachers and our
existing uh gifted and talented teacher. So, we see that as an additional need as well. We also uh have listed a an additional part-time security uh officer at the elementary schools. We currently have four part-time uh security officers
who supplement the work of our law enforcement throughout the district. We have school resource officers already in place at the each intermediate school and the high school. So, this would be a school-based, school employed security officer with law enforcement background who would
assist in providing uh security oversight at our elementary schools and also provide assistance in afterchool events when necessary. And last but not least, we've heard on on several occasions uh requests for an additional swim coach to support our swim team at
the high school. So that stipen was also included as part of the budget as it's currently been developed. So beyond uh personnel, another aspect of what we have to do uh in order to ensure that our schools are well equipped is uh make an investment in our
facilities. So Patty, >> right? So our base budget includes um custodial maintenance supplies and materials as usual. Um, our third grade classroom furniture was in the base budget as it we're trying to do each year. First grade, second grade, we're at third grade now. And then the
groundskeepers that we had added a few years ago are still maintained in there to maintain our athletic facilities and school property. Now, what's included in our capital reserve projects for next year, which is outside of the cap because that's the money that we've already put away in our savings account
that we'll be doing. Um, so we'll have no impact to the the tax levy for next year. uh McKinley uh boiler replacement tank and pumps Lincoln. Um that changed today. That's going to be happening now. Um but it was scheduled for this summer because we knew we were having some
issues with it and both decided to die. So uh we're we're currently working on that right now. Um Edison is replace expand fencing at the JV and varsity baseball fields. We've done work over at the high school fields. So, now we're
going to move over to Edison with the fencing over there. Uh, at Edison, we're looking to replace about 17 uh classroom floors. They're old asbestous floors. We did them at the high school. We have one area left at the high school that we're going to do this summer. And then all I'm not saying all the flooring is new,
but all the asbestous flooring is gone at the high school. Um, Edison, we're going to replace the Edison and Roosevelt, these are combined really. We're going to be replacing the auditorium um system lighting boards because they they're just they're they're old enough that they're not
working anymore. Now, I know if you ask Rob, he had ones from when he was in high school that worked, you know, for 30 years, may still be working, but the newer technology doesn't uh doesn't work anymore. Um doesn't last as long as the good old stuff did. So, we're looking at
replacing that as part of Cap Reserve. Last but not least, uh included in the budget and and I do want to just underscore everything that we've talked about up to this point represents uh a budget that continues to maintain the work that we're doing. It allows us to
build upon that work and advance it to the next level, whether it be stage one documents turning into stage two and three curriculum documents or being able to implement courses that have been developed. Um so what we are looking at is again being able to continue to provide our schools with the resources
and the environment to deliver the the education system that we've been uh developing over the past several years. Now when you look at technology technology has become an opportunity for us to identify tools and resources to assist us in all of the above. It helps
us to be able to deliver curriculum. It helps us to be able to manage our curriculum. Helps us to be able to deliver assessment. that helps us to be able to analyze and uh assessment and manage our uh data. So in order to do the instructional side of our work, we
have technological resources available to us and those are included in this budget as well. We've also identified within um our budget the opportunity to identify other platforms that could help us be more effective and efficient in how we um deliver services around
everything from human resource management, recruitment, retention and and managing applications to managing our student information, our human resource information and our budget systems. all through technology platforms that we've invested in over
the years and or that we're looking to introduce this coming year. And in doing so, that allows us to be more effective and efficient in how we use our time and allow us to then reinvest that time into developing programs or being more uh deliberate in how we implement these
programs. The other items that you see there listed include uh reference to security upgrades that are constantly being examined. Uh if you look around our schools, you see everything from card readers to uh cameras in our system. What you don't see is the
backend software that is used to manage all of that. That's also included in this budget. Uh we're also looking at software that allows us to be more effective in managing all of the technology platforms through a single sign on uh software system. That system
would allow us to make it easier to manage all of the different uh platforms that we have. but also monitor those platforms uh for usage to ensure that we are getting appropriate return on our investment. If we're able to see that uh software that we have invested in is not
being used then allows us to course correct or make decisions whether or not it's necessary for us to continue. So that software again allows us an efficiency but it also allows us an opportunity to monitor implementation as well. And then the last item I I want to highlight, it is part of our security
upgrade, but it is something that I think is uh um emblematic of where we see ourselves uh in the technological, you know, educational realm today, which is looking at digital hall pass solutions. Uh secondary schools are are now increasingly looking at options to
make it easier to track where students are in the course of the day. And when we think about uh times where we have to investigate vandalism, when we have to find out where students were in a particular at a particular moment in time, when there's movement in the hall, especially in a building this large,
when you have 1,800 students, having the ability to be able to use Turnstyle, our our um student uh check-in system to get in and out of the school, as well as uh a digital hall pass solution really gives the administration the peace of
mind to be able to know where students are, when they are and when situations uh arise that require us to be able to investigate and look further, we now have additional resources at our disposal. All of those things are built into the existing budget and are things
that would be beneficial to us in order to continue to reinforce the the work along the lines of curriculum uh as well as safety, security, and facilities management. Now we move on to the next slide. Uh, and I'm gonna turn it over to Patty to
deliver this news. >> Thanks a lot, Ray. So now, how much does it cost? Now this slide you've seen over the years. Obviously, it's a lot larger this year. And again, a big piece of that, as I've been saying since the beginning of the
year, is health benefits. We are not alone in this situation. It's happening across the state. I've reached out to numerous other BAS that were all in the same boat around the same percentages. Um, so what's happening I want to explain a little bit about the health benefits too because I'm getting
questions even in my own town like well why don't you just change the health benefits? Why don't you charge more for the health benefits? The state controls under chapter 44 the base level of plans that we have to offer to new employees coming in. It also controls how much we can charge the employees for those
benefits. What it doesn't control is how much the insurance companies can raise the the cost of those premiums every year. So districts are seeing anywhere from I I think the lowest I've heard is about 14% to over 30% for an increase for next year, which is unheard of um in
in education. So we're all struggling to deal with that with our hands kind of tied that we can't open negotiations and negotiate with the groups and come up with a different plan. These are the plans that are mandated and the costs that are mandated to us. We can't charge the employees more. So I think that
gives a little bit better background on this and where we're at and what's driving a larger portion of this. So the proposed tax increase for the base is 6.57 and the additional spending proposal would be a 1.06. That's what doesn't fit
within the cap with the health benefit adjustment. the health benefit adjustment is so large because of state health benefits going up by over 30% next year. What I want to also highlight is every time if I make changes to the this budget, so if I reduce what's in that
1.06, it changes the base number. So this slide it's says preliminary, it means preliminary. It's going to keep changing depending on what comes in. If state aid changes, if we make changes to our budget, even for the additional, if I take off additional staff that are in
that red portion, if they have health benefits, it changes my whole cap. So, everything keeps adjusting. So, you will see different versions of this as we move along. So again, I I want to update uh or I want just want to piggyback on what
Patty just shared because it's absolutely critical to understand. Everything that we discussed in the previous slides is represented here that represents everything that we have as an administrative team looked at and
reviewed and thought would be viable for the upcoming year. it doesn't represent everything that the administrators ask for. So there are additional courses that people would love to run or additional staff that people would love to have, but we recognized that we are
in a very um tight situation as a state and as a community. So we felt it was necessary to really pair down those requests to things that we believe would be beneficial for us moving forward. that does not mean that there is still
not room for discussion, which is why we continue to underscore the the fact that this is preliminary. So, I'm going to ask Patty to join me up again here because again, we we are being uh as transparent as possible, as upfront as possible to make sure that people know
exactly what we're facing and what we are up against because these are not easy conversations to have with a board, let alone with a community. When we were presenting our budget, our referendum last year, a $225 million bond referendum was nothing to sneeze at. We
wanted to make sure every community member and every taxpayer understood how that was going to impact them as well as how it's going to benefit them. So, in this slide, Patty will break down again how we in our current state version of
the budget see the impact based upon the the current known variables. So, I I just got the ratable information from the town towards the end of last week. And what the ratable information is, it's the total taxable amount of the
of the township of Westfield. So, everyone's tax assessed property all added together. And what that comes up with then is how much you you're able to calculate the average from the average assessed value of that which the township gave me was 834,534.
you're able to come up with what portion of the budget you would see an average house be charged or go up by. So for the tax impact at cap at the cap right now your taxes would be about $12,534
which is an annual tax increase of about $69 from last year. The additional spending proposal would be another um $136 the way it stands right now. but which ends up being a $745 tax increase to the
average person in Westfield. Again, as Ray said, that's for the budget in total that was presented tonight. We obviously have different scenarios and things we have to discuss after we go over this and I also broke it down by month. You've seen this slide before. We do it every year. It's just this year it's
it's a little bit more because of what we're facing as a district in the state. So this is where we have to start making decisions as as a board and an administration. So when we look at the base budget, the base budget includes
all of the above. And what doesn't fit into that blue portion of that um prior slide are eight existing teachers as well as the additional staff mentioned.
So it includes all the facility uh and maintenance supplies, all the technology platforms and subscriptions. It includes all the curriculum work stipens. It includes the continuation of extracurricular activities and offerings as well as supports and services. That's
all included in the base budget at the adjusted cap. So what we have to decide is what if any we will prioritize moving into the next year. And I want to make sure it's clear that people understand
as Dr. Bolton had mentioned we are ready to go. So if we put a hold on something then it is just that we will hold it until we are ready as the district to be able to fund it responsibly and sustainably moving forward. We don't
want to put something in place that we then have to cut in in the coming years ahead. So when we get to that point when we are ready we will be able to implement these things. So, as a board of education, we're we're now
at the point where I'm going to turn the questions to you and ask uh President Bonacio to, you know, facilitate the discussion. But really, we have we have uh a few questions at hand. The first is
are we as a board and uh administration going to present a budget for adoption in March that consists of uh revenues that make use of the tax levy cap and
all adjusted waiverss. So that's that full blue portion. If the answer is yes, then the next question is, do we wish to also introduce an additional funding proposal
in order to maintain the current teachers as well as add additional staff. And it could be any combination of those, but understanding that as it is currently presented, the base budget does not include eight current teachers.
In addition, if the base budget is the only budget that we have, so we decide not to go to an additional funding proposal, then the administration would then need to go back to figure out how we can find
the funds necessary to maintain those eight teachers. So you saw additional furniture being proposed. You saw impro improvements that we would look to uh include. We would need to see what would have to be done to adjust that base budget as it's
currently presented in order to make room for those eight teachers. Our goal in all of this has always been premised uh or or prefaced by maintaining um programs, maintaining class sizes,
maintaining um class offerings and services so that the student um experience is preserved. So we want to make sure we adhere to that as a priority and keeping bodies in classrooms and in our offices and in our
BU buildings will make that possible. uh we also want to make sure that we to the extent possible are able to preserve our current staffing model as well. So all of the questions that you see here first begin with the question about the
base budget. So Mr. Bonacho just ask you to help uh facilitate this discussion. >> See this is why I like old lighting boards. It all sounded great and now we have now we have this and you see the money. So, I just want to make sure the board understands the questions that are
coming out, right? We have a base budget that is going to, I guess, get a cap waiver that will put us up over the 2%. So, what we would be voting on, just to kind of put it back into into voting, you know, terms, what we would be voting on in March, I guess,
when the budget was presented is is not a 2% cap, per se, cuz that's what everybody says. But because of the waivers, what we'd be voting on if we kept things the way they're presented right now is not a tax increase of 2%, but a tax increase of 6.57%. Just stop me if I'm if I'm in the wrong
spot over here. Um so our first question is are we comfortable with that even to start with right or looking at other things that we're doing and I'll phrase it in the context of our referendum of the fact that over the past few years we've done additional spending proposals
are we comfortable asking the public for that based on what we're seeing and what we're adding and what's what's staying there. Okay. The second part of the question is you know is is the red portion. And the red portion is is is the stuff we'd like to add in. And for the past few years, we have been in an
absolute position where we've been able to not just maintain but also expand. And all of that has been my opinion for very good reason, right? We don't want to be a district that runs in place. Um we've had that problem before. And certainly a lot of the things that I
hear from parents are, well, this is happening in this other district and why aren't we doing it here? And even some of the things we have quite frankly, and I I know I sit on curriculum, you know, Dr. Dr. Bolton talks about some of the technology that we have. Some of the stuff is new to us, but some of that stuff has not been new around our other
school districts. You know, we're, you know, I don't want to make it sound like we're in in dire straits here. It's not like Fred Flintstone versus the Jetson, so to speak. See, I'm really dating myself, right? Old lighting boards and that, right? Um, but we are talking about not the cutting edge per se that
other districts are seeing. Now, we have great staff. We have great teachers. We have great custodians. all of whom are making this stuff work. All right? And our mindset has been over the last few years, let's not just make it work, let's make it better. Okay? But we're seeing here make it better cost a lot of
money. And we have just asked the public not just for the last couple of years for additional spending proposals, but we do have a referendum coming up and that those dollars are going to start to hit. I don't think it's this year, but it'll be the next tax cycle, I think. Um, so, you know, I don't envy the fact
that we're put in this position. Um, I think there are a number of systemic things that that are forcing us and and and again, we're not alone in all these other districts here. Um, I I think that we cannot continue to have the um the
requirements that our state continues to put on us, the limitations that our state continues to put on our budgeting. I'll give you an example. I the technology slide that you presented, I'm seeing upgrades to computers, upgrades to security systems. If in this day and
age computer technical computers security if these are not capital expenses by now I can't imagine what else anybody would consider them but to my knowledge we can't include them in capital reserve why would you not want to budget for regular computer replacement why would you not want to
budget for regular security if I need walls in my building I surely certainly after today need as much technology as I possibly can to ensure security but unfortunately we're not going to I mean look those are election for another day. Um, you know, and I'm going to leave
certainly my political stripes out of this, but I'm getting real tired of great ideas perhaps at times being thought of and the figure it out and how to spend it being pushed down to to school boards and school districts and folks like us. That's not the way this ought to be. But
that's what our boards and our districts are facing. And that puts us in a position where we're not talking about cutting fluff. We did that. That was many years a couple years ago. We were in a position that none of us wanted to be in when we were making some significant staffing cuts. And look, you know, I could justify a couple of those
cuts as as like to haves. You know, would have been nice to keeps, but you know, and I think most of us have looked at this. I'm certainly on finance as well. You know, when we looked at this, we're not in a position where, you know, people are going on nice vacations and things like that and we're we're
budgeting in fluff. We're talking about bone. And I have to be honest, advancing programs like this, I'm not sure how you don't consider that bone as well, right? How it's one thing to say I'm going to take away eight teachers, right? It's another thing to say I'm also we're rules going to run place for another year. But these are the decisions we
have to face. And I'm not I'm not at this point I'm not advocating one way or the other. I'm just it's kind of what's coming out and I want to make sure the public gets what this group has to figure out in addition to what we do because everyone here takes this very seriously. Everyone here would like to
vote for this and then some, right? But the question then becomes, how do we pay for it? And how do we keep continuing to ask the people who have entrusted us with a great referendum and great projects to keep well, we got more, we got more, we got more, right? And we want the public obviously to understand what it means. Now, cutting here means
these things that we've been talking about that the public has been asking us for, right, don't get to happen maybe this year or maybe have to happen next year. And look, you know, families in town do that all the time, right? You know, my air conditioning unit breaks at home and I got to replace it. That's
seven or eight grand that I didn't think I had. You know, on the one hand, I got to do it. On the other hand, I don't say, "Well, great. Now that I've wrote my $1,000 check, now's the time to, you know, take that African safari I always wanted to do, right? We got to start thinking, you know, about about things that way
and being responsible to the district, but also responsible steward." So, um, that is, I guess, my preface to the discussion. Um, I wish I had an answer to give folks, but and I'm hoping someone will throw some this way, but you know, what we're being asked for is direction, right? What what do we want to see back from this process that will
help us balance what we're doing? Um, and and and see where we are. I don't think, and correct me if I'm wrong, that this is a path and I think if we ask for certain data and you show it to us and we cringe, I think we still have a chance to talk about it. But now is
still now is the time to certainly see this discussion, have it out to the public. So, um, with that, Brendan, >> thank you, Rob. So, I I prepared some statements because I've been through a couple committees now looking at these numbers. Uh, while all the programs and
initiatives that Dr. Gonzalez presented uh are very worthwhile and truly aligned with our district's long-term goals, I believe we have a responsibility remain to remain disciplined stewards of the taxpayer dollars. Uh this year's 6.57% cap is driven almost entirely by rising
health care costs, not expanded programming. And that really means we need to tighten our belt and control spending where we absolutely can. Over the last four years, our community has supported significant investments to bring our facilities and operations to a state of good repair, uh culminating with the second largest school
referendum in state history. Uh the additional items before us now are largely enhancements to programs and expansions, things we'd really like to have, but not all of them are absolute necessities at this moment. At the same time, we know additional funding will soon be needed to support full day
kindergarten. Uh for those reasons, I do not believe we can reasonably ask taxpayers for an additional 1.5 million roughly this year. Even if that does mean reducing roughly 800,000 from what would otherwise be uh maintain the co uh maintain the course budget an amount roughly equal to about eight staffing
positions uh which I personally hope can be addressed through attrition rather than layoffs. Uh by keeping the budget within cap and avoiding the second question there is no separate budget vote required. That certainty allows the administration to be to plan staffing and programs now rather than waiting till the end of
April for election results. This provides greater stability for staff and families while positioning the district to address the significant investments we know are coming next. At the same time, we are we continue to face an endless amount of unfunded state mandates uh that place increasing
pressure on the local taxpayers. Uh for that reason, I believe we should seriously consider using the mechanisms available to us under state law and the state constitution to challenge those mandates uh with mandates that are imposed without additional funding support. uh an effort that will be
easier if we pair with neighboring districts to that are all facing the same problems. >> Thank you. >> Excellent. Thank you. Who else wants to jump in? Ila. >> So Brendan, we've been together for um almost six
years. That is the best that is the best I've ever heard you. You're here. Um so I I agree with what you're say. Oh, sorry. >> Sorry. repetition. Brendan's the best today that he's ever been. Um, so I agree with um everything that you're
saying. Um, I think of it kind of like as a as a um like a honeydew list, right? These are things that have to get done. These are this is where money has to be. And it's we have no control over the health care costs at this point. and
and it's a lot of money and we we we we have to get done the bare minimum and and and we hate to do that because we we have a wish list too. But I think right now, exactly what Brendan said, I think that we have a lot coming down the pike
with full day kindergarten and things that we've committed to in terms of the referendum. I think that we can hopefully see what state aid comes back with. See if we can um make adjustments, see that we can maintain staff, maybe give up um you know some with retire
with um people retiring or giving up certain looking at the budget through different lenses. I think that we can find something that is while still an increase in taxes is um within the cap
um and is um not asking right now for the wish list just getting done what needs to be done. We have made tremendous growth. Um I'm proud of this growth. I think that um we are on the right track. These aren't going away. I
just think now is not the time since we have so much coming down the pike. Um that's just my opinion. >> CJ, >> uh thank you. Um I um wanted to say first, thank you for the uh the uh
presentation. Uh that was an excellent way to clarify things and to present things as the must-haves that have to get adjusted or treated versus the um you know the nice to haves. But that's just looking at it from a budgetary and legal perspective. I trust in your
judgment to the extent that all these things I think are musthaves to keep our school functioning. I think uh Rob said it before, right? We don't want to run in place. What was your what was your quote? Something like that. Uh I don't think we want to be that way. I don't want to think I don't think we want to be on the back foot. I think it is a big
ask of the community. But on the other hand, these are musthaves to keep our school functioning in the modern world which is radically and rapidly changing even beyond where we started all as as board members and the acceleration is only continuing. So I would say you know
yes legally you know we have a question about the must haves and the nice to haves. We can articulate the questions. Uh I think that's not on the docket tonight right but we would talk about articulation of any propositions for voting. So we would pro we would we
would set you know we separate them carefully. I think with education I think we should at least put it to the community to say let's let's think best uh for our most important uh elements which are our children um and let's go for it. Uh you know I think we need to
thank you. >> Thank you Julie. So this has been um a little bit difficult for me as a relatively new member of the finance and facility members. I want to share my perspective of someone who's come to this board after a long career in the big foreign
and financial services and who thought they knew a lot more than they did um in joining that. Um, while I have significant experience here, learning the structure, constraints, and rules of the New Jersey school district budgeting has been a humbling and ongoing process. And I share the frustrations that our
president expressed earlier. And I share them not only in terms of what I've learned here, but as a former practitioner who saw things and how they run very differently. Not that it's so efficient in the corporate world. It's not. But um it it's really a it's just a
whole other level of difficulty when when the most basic things really just cannot be done because of the constraints whether it's an accountant accounting treatment or because of legal issues um whether they're state or federal um that are imposed upon us. And
um I want to say how impressed I am with our business administrator Patty who um and Dr. Gonzalez for hiring Patty because um I really um having spoken to other districts and having watched Patty
in action, I really think we are very fortunate to have her um doing this work and guiding us here. I I I I I I've truly come to see you as one of our strongest assets and I want to thank you all three of you, Dr. Bolt and you as
well for a very impressive and strong presentation. I'm really proud of the work that um we do on the finance and facilities committee and I'm grateful to be on it. Um, and I've developed an incredible amount of respect for all of the people
who work for these three. Um, and all of the different people who work through the administration and everything that flows through it that we have to look at and the commitment to our students and to the community. Um, and as I've worked hard over these past months, I've explored whether or not there were opportunities to think
differently differently about accounting classifications, fiscal options, um, understand the budget choices with our curriculum priorities. And I've really tried very hard um and I've seen so much effort from the administration as well
who are very thoughtful and careful and obviously much more knowledgeable because they've been doing this for a long time and they've been very patient with me as I ask my endless endless questions and I deeply appreciate that. But while I'm still learning um I really feel like I've exhausted all my
questions here. Um I mean I I've really just exhausted every single option. Can we move this line? Can we do this? Can't we do this? Etc. I I've seen it. I've seen what Patty's doing. And it's about as honest and straightforward. And now
we're starting to chip away. Um and so um the question is, you know, can we afford at this point um as as others have been saying to do more or is it time to pause as Dr. Gonzalez said um and maybe just hold off until it's the
right time. And so for those reasons and with tremendous respect for everything that's gone into this work and with great support for the types of programs that I do believe we should implement for our district and with full support to curriculum
um I do think that at this point we should pause um and we should not be moving forward with such an aggressive budget. Um I I don't think that given that the referendum bond has not hit the
taxpayers yet and also given where we are as a country financially with the wild card that we have not uh overemphasized in this debate yet which is state aid. And once we find out state
aid, which the gods were good to us last year, I don't know if they'll be good to us twice. Um, and that is a wild card that makes me very nervous that if they are not good to us that not only may we increase it, but then we would see an even larger number and that would put us
in a very difficult position. So those are the reasons why I am um in agreement with my colleagues here and that's how I will be voting. um but not without tremendous appreciation um and respect for everything that has
gone into this. Thank you. >> Thank you, Kent. >> Thank you. Does anyone else feel like you're on Shark Tank? >> And for that reason, oh my god,
>> I'm sorry. Um first I want to say I think we've made tremendous progress in the last few years under Dr. Gonzalez's leadership and his team's leadership. the programs we've introduced. Every time I sit in a curriculum meeting, I'm I think back, I wish my high school offered this program. I wish my high school did this because we're doing
wonderful things here. Um, as I try to take into everything into account and sitting on the finance committee, meeting with Brendan and others. Um, I'm trying to think of the perspective of the homeowners. They're also faced with multiple you rise in health care costs, rising utility costs, rising expenses, and to ask them for another $785 or
whatever the number was for for a property tax increase this coming year, knowing that next year we're going to have property increases for the referendum bond payments. And then the year or two after that, we're going to ask for more money for teachers to f open up the new kindergarten classes. Uh, I just think it's time to take a
pause and if we can eliminate question two where possible, I think we should look at things that maybe are nice to have but we don't have the luxury to do right now like the third grade furniture. I think if we're just fiscally prudent right now and take a little pause, I think it would serve the district best as we as as Dr. Gonzalez
said, these programs are on hold, but when the money's there, we can implement them at that time and move forward then. But I think it's time that to just take a breath. Thank you. Uh so >> um while I think it's important to be
fiscally responsible and I u listen to everything everybody's been talking about, I also feel like these are not that additional spending proposal are not nice to haves because it does include staff. Um, and we have seen so much uh we were in we were doing we were
in a situation where we had to make cuts and then we were just trying to maintain and we've finally gotten to a point where we're making progress that um I would hate to see us not be able to continue with that especially because we have these programs ready to go. Um, I noticed there were a few things that
were on a cyclical cycle of the the Chromebook refresh, the third grade furniture, even the grounds creepers for the fields. And I if we start stopping those to fund other things, then we end up where we were a few years ago when there were so many issues with the fields and our furniture and our tech is
not necessarily up to date. So, those are, you know, reasons why I would say I think we should uh, as CJ put it, go for it and let leave it up to the voters as an option. >> Thank you. So, >> who else we got? Kristen.
>> Yeah, sure. >> Just go. >> All right. >> I get >> you get the question. We already >> Okay. I have questions because I'm not, you know, fiscally savvy like Kent. Um, so,
okay, I'm going to go back to the bar graph. Can we go back to the bar graph for a sec? Okay, just one more time, Dr. Gonzalez or Patty, whoever, explain the blue.
Okay, wait. If we don't do the red, right? If we don't ask for the red, that could potentially be those are the new programs and potentially eight teachers we have to cut. >> Correct. So, as as we've currently built
the budget, that represents eight existing teachers plus those additional program expansion teachers for G&T money mindset, right? >> As well as the part-time um security officer. >> Okay. And the blue is to keep things
>> every everyone else and everything else in place >> except eight teachers. >> Except eight teachers. Okay. >> So if and again I just want to make sure that I I I don't want to suggest if you say no to the red then eight teachers are gone.
>> No. If you if the board chooses to not go out for an additional funding proposal, then we are going to go back to the blue and say how what can we reduce further? So, what of those things that we said we're going to continue
doing >> are we also going to pull out? And and I'm just going to use the the furniture as as an example. Furniture is is a few hundred,000 that could uh equate to a few teachers. >> Okay? So if that's the case, then we go back and say what are some of those
additional items that we have to re reassess further to put on hold for another day. >> Okay. >> So I I don't want anyone to think >> just saying no I just don't want anyone to think oh eight teachers are gone. No,
we will do everything we can to preserve the people who deliver instruction every day so that the experience of our students remain. What will be impacted are some of the resources that they have access to. >> Can you give examples? >> The furniture was the
>> the furniture >> that's an easy example easy way to uh to to use that as an example. Everything else if you're going to take some of our subscriptions. So take the um technology side. If you take some of those subscriptions,
you would need half of that list in order to equate to some of the staffing positions that we're talking about. So you would eliminate a whole slew of resources in return for a salary and and benefits or in the case
of Dr. Bolton's proposals for professional development or curriculum writing. Those budget lines aren't extraordinary. >> So, you would have to get rid of all curriculum writing uh and and development for the coming year in order
to again just start working towards getting those eight staff members. So, this is where I would agree uh to Miss Steinberg. This is a phenomenal uh business administrator who has her work cut out for her. But she's not alone.
>> Mr. Dr. Weissman, Dr. Greer, myself, uh Dr. Bolton uh along with Patty uh will be meeting and we'll be meeting with our school and department heads to figure out how to make that happen. That isn't a a a me conversation. that is a we
conversation because ultimately the impact will be carried by the school and uh department leaders in order to make sure we continue to maintain uh our forward progress. So again that is a long- winded response to your very
succinct answer. I also want to note that the reason why the additional spending proposal always had staff in it is because it had to be recurring expenses if you remember in order for us to raise the tax increase permanently. So if I put in furniture that's a one year and then they would bounce the the
tax impact back down the tax levy back down. So that's why when we look at it this way it's showing the eight teachers but as Dr. Gonzalez said I, you know, I will go back and go through the budget. As Leila said, reach out to the different organizations who's retiring any kind of breakage. We we will look at
everything. We'll exhaust every avenue when we go through this. And and for that reason, because we have opted to budget the way that we have each year, because we keep looking not just at the current year, but at future year budgets, we find ourselves in a position
because we've been able to build our base with that recurring um budgetary expense. That is why while this is not ideal, it is way better than unfortunately some of my colleagues uh are finding themselves in because we
have been able to invest in our schools. We have been able to invest in our in our budget in such a way that allows that investment to keep growing year after year. So that's as as the reason why Patty mentioned that's the reason why those recurring costs are built into
the additional funding proposal so that next year it then becomes part of that blue each year. >> Welcome. >> Hi. Um okay I just want I want to start by echoing Julian saying that we are very
lucky as a district to have Patty. Um, I hear what Brendan, Kent, and Leila, and Julie have said about being conservative regarding the budget. Um, and I I respect that. My concern in pausing is that with the referendum coming up and
the needs for kindergarten, that pause could easily turn into a three-year pause. And so I am definitely on the um this I'm definitely with Sonel and CJ in thinking that we need to move forward and put this out to the public and let
them decide. I'd also like to remind everyone that this is a preliminary discussion. Um thankfully in years past and maybe it'll continue in this way. We have found that this is worst case scenario and we typically are able to adjust. Um, so maybe by the end of
February, beginning of March, we're going to have a very different scenario and we might feel very comfortable asking the community for that. So I don't want to spend too much time worrying because when we worry it uh it sometimes is wasted energy. It might
actually just work out. Uh but to see to see us decide to squash the momentum is upsetting to me. I've been a I've been a resident here, student, parent, teacher since I was four years old. Um, the
level of progress that Westfield has made in the last four years is basically unheard of. And so I would like to keep that momentum going. The other thing that I'll highlight is in a totally separate scenario, I was out, you know,
in a public scenario and I had a gifted teacher come up to me seek me out and just share all this information about the gifted program. The level of enthusiasm that she had about the work that they were doing and the way that the district was supporting their
ability to uh research and restructure the program. It was unbelievable. We don't want to squash that. We don't want to make them do all this work and then wait three years or one year, whatever it is. We want to ride on that enthusiasm and get this going for our
kids. So, for me, I'm 100% let's see what the community says. >> Okay. Um I don't know if that helped. Um no, I I I guess my question is more, I guess, for for for the team. So I I mean
the the boards, you know, we we certainly have a mindset. You know, I I I think I don't think there's anyone here who would disagree that we'd want to keep the momentum. The question is is whether it's the time to do it. And I think you're you're catching that same split, which is probably the exact same discussions you're having internally.
You know, that that that the board is here. So, um if that helps anything at least, you know, that that you're not nuts that that that the struggles are are are real in figuring this out. Um I you know I guess my question now is right back is based on what you've heard
do you think you have enough to sort of start rethinking things? I I I think the one thing I guess I would add and maybe just if there's some nods on this I I I what I'm hearing is a lot of support for academic momentum like I like we'd love to see the gifted programs move. We'd love to see some of the programmatic
stuff, you know, almost before anything else if if you know, if we had our brothers of some sorts. And you use the furniture as an example, right? And I don't want to keep beating up on third grade furniture, but you know, if there's a and I don't know what else is there that's that's around there, but I
I think one of the things to look at, and again, tell me if I'm crazy or if I'm misrepresenting anything anyone's saying, if there is a way to kind of reook at some of that structural stuff, right? Like that was a very easy one to one, right? The furniture means three positions are are not going to be in an
additional funding proposal. Let's put it that way. I think that's that more fair. Um if there's stuff like that in the budget that I think, you know, we can share with the board to sort of help recover some of the more programmatic stuff, I I think regardless
of where you stood, if you were iffy about going out to the public for this or not, I think that would probably be stuff that that many of our board members would like to see. I mean, if you could tell me I could get two additional gifted teachers to expand the program and there's a different offset for that to put it in the budget, you
know, I think I might think a little bit differently for it. You know, that would keep the tax, you know, keep the tax number down, but also keep the programs moving forward. I think is that I don't know if I'm saying it well, but I I think that's at least a mindset there. Yeah, CJ, sorry. >> No, no. And I uh Rob, I I respect uh how
you're you're kind of trying to, you know, coales all of our statements into a kind of a guiding principle. And I agree with you that academics are really important here. But I'm looking at this again more holistically. This is like the broken window theory, right? Like if you have one broken window in a neighborhood, then everything goes to hell. Not that it's the same exact
thing, but even even something like furniture, having the kids have a high quality of life inside the classroom is important, right, for them to be able to learn. So, you know, again, we're beating up on the furniture here, but but the my my theory is we we can't because as Kristen as Kristen had said,
right, like a one-year pause can become a three-year pause and then we're just a community that pauses all the time. And do we want that? And so, so my my take at least it may be different from Sonel and Kristen, but my take is this is more than just academics. You know, we've created a a a profound institution here,
a palace of sorts. We want to keep building it up, right? We don't want it to fall into a decrepitude even on the small things. And again, if the voters say no, the voters say no. But at least let's try to articulate this in a nice way. Let's try to get the messaging out um so that people can see that this is
the this is where it's at, right? Our community is about this uh as a whole. But but anyway, that's my just my one clarification as to what you said. >> No, I think that's fine, Lea. Sorry. >> So, um I absolutely hear what you're saying. I
I think it this is the reason why we're having this discussion. Um, ultimately there is no harm in sending this out to the community and having them be the voice of the community. The problem is
is that um, let's say this is something you just can't swing and now here we are tacking on and tacking on. And I just think we need to be cognizant of the fact that there are some things we don't have control of. And this is not to me
this is not a huge amount of difference. this small question. We're not even asking for that much. But that who am I to say that for somebody else's family? So I I that's where I have the hard time. Like yes, it's true they get a vote, but majority rules. So then their voice is silenced. That's that's just
devil's advocate. I I mean that's you know the other part is um you know the curriculum is ready to go. Like I took ASL in sign language. It was the best class I It was the class I still use to this day in my career. So I I
mean I I'm excited about a lot of these things. Um I'd like to see and and I know that this defeats the the purpose of what Brendan was saying, you know, I'd like to see what the options are when we see what the state aid is. When we see um what's the word? Ar arbitr
what was the word Brendon? >> What? >> Attrition. >> Attrition. That's not a real word. Um I'd like to see that. And you know, get some more information. I know that that that's going to happen, but then it doesn't give you a ton of time to plan, and I know that that's not fair. So,
it's it's a hard conversation. >> So, >> um I I agree, Leila, that we can't make that financial decision for any other anybody else in this town. So, as the board and as board members, we do have
to put forth the best plan of what we think should happen for this district and that would include the additional spending proposal and then we let individual homeowners, taxpayers make that decision whether they can swing it financially themselves, but we put forth
what we think should happen in the best interest of our students. Uh Kent, then Brendan, >> I think it'd be good good if we could project it out over a few years. So we're saying next year the tax increase will be $745. I think homeowners would want to know,
well, what's the following year with the bond referendum tax increase going to look like? And then two years down the line, what's the referendum tax increase going to look like? Because now we have to hire teachers. So it's not just looking the year by year. Yeah, this year might be great for $700, but what's next year's tax increase going to be on top of the 2% cap and everything else?
And now we got teachers coming on in still paying off the bond for the referendum. You know, I think if we could have a three or four year look out of what we think the tax increase will be year-over-year would be useful and uh and enlightening for the for the district and the public.
>> And and just to respond to that, I think you just pointed it out. It's each year it's going to increase, you know. So what we see this year just represents the base budget plus an additional
funding proposal but that would be in addition to a bond uh debt service payment that would have to be made the following year. So it it is going to increase for the next couple of years. So, and and I I appreciate this
conversation happening in the way that it is because I want everyone in the public watching to understand how difficult this is and and how we are not taking this lightly and how when we look at Ben and his his
fellow students, we want to give them the best opportunity possible, but we also recognize we have to do so in a f uh fiscally responsible way. and and we have up to this point always looked forward and looked ahead in order to help inform those decisions. And I I
would not ever want to sugarcoat and suggest that no, it's going to be better next year. No, it's going to be it's going to be more each year for the next few years as we reach the goal of being able to implement full day kindergarten
as long as well as the other programs that are included as part of the referendum. Um what what I if if I may, what I'm hearing from everyone is echoing that we'd love to have it
all. >> Yes, >> we there are individuals who are suggesting let's give the voters the opportunity to weigh in and then there is interest in just keeping the base budget
to be able to maintain our current offerings. We've we've structured the proposal as you see it here so that our eight current teachers and the additional staff are in one, but there is stuff in
the base budget that we may have to cut if we were to move the eight teachers in there. So what we'd like to do is just confirm that our marching orders based upon again this isn't a vote this isn't a motion no one's approving any but what
I hear is the majority are interested in uh in in trying to make sure our base budget budget covers as much as possible because once again our base budget this board has the authority to approve without a vote. When you say when you
when you say our base budget, >> the blue >> Yeah, the blue. Um, when you say our base budget and marching orders, so to speak, are you able to do that with the eight teachers and come back to us? That's what that's what I'm trying to
get from if the charges to us is try to push the eight teachers in there, see what can be done meaningfully and then see what else may then get pushed out. Then what I've heard from a few folks is
that if there's anything above that, including those additional staff, as much as we'd like to include them, at a minimum, let's keep what we currently have in the base budget, any of the extra, it sounds like there is an
interest among some members of the board to consider putting that as an additional funding proposal. So, we don't currently offer the G&T money mindset assistant principal or part-time security, but if that is something that we put to
the taxpayers, they can vote for it for or against it. If it goes forward, then it continues. If it goes down, then it's no different than if we didn't even include it in in the budget in the first
place. So, that's that's one option. But I don't want to underestimate what Kent said, which is but if we keep asking the public, is that going to at some point impact our future requests.
So I just wanted to sort of try and echo what I I've been what we've been hearing as well. >> Right. U Brendan, then Julie, then Kristen. >> Yeah. >> Uh Dr. Gonzalez, just sort of hit on my point right here. Uh we've asked every year for several years for more. The
town has supported us because we truly needed it. Things were I mean we had to cut 32 staff members. We hadn't been able to maintain the buildings in a state of good repair over three or four budget cycles. The
town has put has given us what we need to bring our operating budget up to close to where it should be. We're not fully there yet. and they've also approved a quarter billion dollar construction bond. Um,
if we keep asking, at some point they're going to say no. Whether it's this year, whether it's next year, whether it's five years from now, at some point there's we're going to hit a breaking point. The town is going to vote no on a budget. I don't want that first no to be when
we've asked and asked and asked and now we have a brand new building that we can't staff with kindergarten teachers. The worst case scenario is that we have new classrooms that we can't staff because the town says we're done. >> Uh Julie, then Kristen.
>> So, um I just want to say um first of all, thank you for framing it that way. This is a very difficult and painful conversation. And um Kristen Sonel and CJ, I I do share your angst and Kristen
in particular, I I really did hear what you were saying and um and I appreciate how graciously you expressed it and thank you for hearing what we were saying as well. Um I am very anxious, not anxious, but but
I'm concerned may might be a better way to say this. Um because it's not just the red that's got me concerned, it's also the blue. Um we have we are um
not only constrained by structural issues in terms of fiscal and accounting things that are out of our control in terms of how things are structured that we you know no matter how hard we try it's a square peg round hole to make
things the way that we'd like to. But even if we just stick to the blue, let's say even if we just go to voters, we're still asking for 6.57% more, and that is a lot of money. And I think that when you do a trend analysis,
to Kent's point, um it it's increasing no matter what, even if we don't include the red. And that does, to Leila's point, um at some point the bucket's going to drop. And I I worry about that.
I do. Not only um as a taxpayer myself, but also because we truly need support of the public in order for us to be successful as a board. And it's not just whether or not uh we don't get the vote. I mean, that
would be discouraging. Obviously, if we don't get the vote, I would not be happy about that. And I'm going to support whatever we as a board decide to do. Um and I'm going to support Dr. Gonzalez in whatever he directs us to do because I believe in Dr. Gonzalez and I believe in
this board. But I am worried as we proceed in these deliberations that we are not looking at that. Um it's not it's not a small thing. So I just want to be super clear. I'm not just concerned about the red. I am concerned
about the blue. And it's not just I realize it's not just the structural things. It's healthc care is out of control. I'm not just seeing it here. I'm seeing it on our other board as well. And I'm seeing that no matter how many times people change over, it's all across New Jersey. I'm also seeing how
far ahead we are as a district compared to other districts due to the foresight of this team um for where we are. But I'm I just want to make sure that we continue not only to grow as a district, not just in terms of our curriculum and our facilities and our abilities, but
also to maintain the goodwill of the people who support us and our students. And so I just want to put that out there as just another consideration while also completely concurring with everything that my other colleagues have said and
not diminishing the weight of their statements. Um just how realistic is it if it's going to keep going up for the next couple of years that if we put this pause this year that we could incorporate the gifted and the other
curriculum updates next year like if next year is going to be more expensive. >> So I I think the unknown variables the known variables are the the bond repayment that will be coming due uh in the coming year. Um, what we don't know
is the state of health care increases next year. We don't know the state of state aid. We don't know the state of state aid this year. Again, to the point that was made, um, if state aid comes in flat, as we've currently budgeted for,
then our scenarios are are viable. if state aid comes in lower, which is possible when you have a new governor come in uh who may have uh the desire to try to be fiscally conservative during her first term again or first first year. That that's possible and I'm not
presupposing any of that. Um or on the other hand say no let's give our schools more and if we get more then what that does is allow us to maybe reduce the blue because now we have to rely less on the taxpayers and now can offset some of
that by the the state aid. So for next year those same variables are at play but with health care really being the biggest variable. If healthc care is as crazy as it is uh next year as it is this year then we are going to find
ourselves you know facing even in more uh dire circumstances. So it it's really hard to to answer that uh more definitively than that. >> I think that helps though. So it's not impossible is the answer, but it'll
depend on all those variables. But next year the obst there's a known obstacle of additional money because of the bonds and then the following year there's known money because of kindergarten. >> Yeah. The mo the most important thing to keep in mind is in the uh the spring of
2028 when we're preparing to open for September, as Brendan pointed out, we need to make sure that there are bodies ready to welcome our students so that they can uh be educated at a full day level. It it is it is it's a requirement
because our community is going to then base their their fall based upon that. If we have families who are going to assume that they're going to have full day kindergarten who then don't enroll in uh half day in in full day programs
elsewhere or we don't have a community because we're going to be working with our early childhood centers who currently offer full day programs to let them know, hey, we're ready to open and they're going to have to make decisions structurally uh in order to be able to
uh ensure the longevity of their organizations. And as a result, if they don't staff their schools to be able to account for full day kindergarten because they assumed we were and then we can't do it because we don't have staff. Again, the
the the the problem continues to compound. So all of that is to say that spring of 28 is going to be a significant investment by this board and this community in order to fulfill that promise of full day kindergarten in September.
So, I want to let me get right to you. There's one thing I just want to I think that's a good time to take a slight breath because there's something a couple things that have just come out with this that I just want to make sure the public's understanding. So, I I am I I know we are not we are not the Olympics or or mostly college basketball. So, I
don't want to pretend there is a huge following on YouTube or anywhere else for these meetings. But this is the discussion that we're having here is exactly the discussion that our public needs to see. And I do hope that as news of the meeting gets out. You know, more
folks are going to be able to look at this and see the discussion and the debate that's that's going on here because it's it's a it's a great one and I I think it's going to show the public exactly where our board is that, you know, we may have different opinions, perspectives where it wants to go, but the idea is what's going to benefit the district and the taxpayer kind of at the
same time. Um, another thing I want to make sure the public understands is is something that's that sort of hit me as we were talking about this. when we're talking about new programs and I I'm not I don't want to say the past was or wasn't like this or not, but there should be a level of confidence in the
public as there is now in the board with our leadership here that if something is going to be put on a list, if there are if there are gifted teachers or money mindset teachers or things of that nature that are going to be put before the public, this district is not going to, you know, put the cart before the
horse here. You know, what's being presented to the board are programs ready to go, not aspirations. give me your money now and I'll tell you how it works out later. Right? And I think that is, you know, I am sure other districts do not operate that way. All right? But
I think our public needs to be confident that whether, you know, again, we'll see where it comes out. There isn't a vote today, but whether we put this stuff on the ballot or not for a vote, our public can be very confident that if the public does commit dollars to something, we're going to be ready to do it. And we're
going to be ready to do it as best as we're possibly going to do it. you my my last thing and then and I'll jump to Kent is, you know, the the I want to point out the blue sort of the big blue elephant in the room like I know a lot of our budget is focused on the salaries and benefits and we're talking about
health care. Um, so the easy response to that sometimes is, well, so just get rid of a couple teachers. So just cut the benefits. So just do this. Right? As someone who's been involved in the negotiations with our bargaining units, I want to make sure that we're not passing the struggles that aren't
necessarily of our own making onto the very teachers and staff and bargaining units who are the people who are making sure that all these things happen and happen well. Right? I can tell you having looked at some of the increases that we've seen, some of the contracts that we've seen, I did a little quick research. I think the New Jersey rate of
inflation is like 3.4%, 3.5%. That's not what we're looking at for long-term staff increases at all. But in many cases, it's tied with that or low. I mean, but for a couple of adjustments that may be necessary here and there. So, I also want the public to understand that while we're talking about these
things, we're also not only just from as a board ensuring that these expenditures stay under control, but we're getting that level of cooperation from our bargaining units as well. They are not walking into here, you know, stomping their feet and holding their breath and making demands that they know are unrealistic. They're negotiating well
for their members. I don't want to suggest otherwise, right? But we do have a group, we have a district that's a team in in all senses of the word understanding where kind of the budget is. So, I I just I think it's an important mention for the public as they think about this. And look, you know, we we're not done, right? I know Ken, I'm
just going to jump in, but now would be a great time if you're in the public watching this to sort of think this through and feel free to email any one of us about your thoughts. I mean, I'm not afraid in many ways to go to a vote because I've always seen these votes as a public partnership and sometimes the partners say yes and sometimes the
partners say no. And I don't know that it's doom and gloom if they say no. They may just say, "Hey, that's it. it doesn't mean it's it's a it's a statement that we don't trust you guys going forward ever and ever again. Um we've been lucky so far that that's where we've been at and I don't know that I I don't want to necessarily risk a no either. I'm not saying that's where
my my brain is, but I I want to frame that for the public as when we go to a question it isn't all or nothing. It's we really really want your opinion on this. And like I said, sometimes the opinion is is going to be in our favor and sometimes it's not. But I just want to make sure the public sees that there
isn't a whole lot of different ways other than going to a vote at times where you can really get that out. But I'm sorry, Kent and then Kristen. Yeah. >> Yeah. Real quick, Patty, can you refresh our memory? How many teachers were were we going to have? What was the impact to the town when we for kindergarten?
>> For kindergarten, the total cost was about $4 million we were looking at. But we're still assessing that ballpark. Yeah, that was can but again we have to assess through HVAC and >> custodial staff like now that we have the actual size of the buildings and the additions we have to look at all that
once more again >> somewhere in that ballpark >> uh I forget how many of them we have maybe about 20 teachers >> thanks >> yeah because we have some now at Lincoln but we have to add on to that >> thanks
>> I think Kristen and then I you know Kristen then let's talk we might might be we might have exhausted the discussion at this point, but Christine, go ahead. >> Um, I just want to encourage uh the board, like Rob said, to remember that the public is typically very supportive
of our education. We have an amazing record in Westfield. I don't think we've had very many budgets voted down. We've we voted for my entire childhood. Um, and so this community supports education. If for some reason we put the question out and they say no, I don't
think it's fair for the the board to assume that that would then result in them saying no to kindergarten. Our community supported that vote and it was supported by a pretty good margin. Uh so I would just ask that in in making this
decision about this question, we don't put assumptions into further future votes. It's it's unnecessary. >> So I think that helped. But I will kick it back to our presenters and hear from them. >> Uh I I'm going to ask this is a non-binding
uh request though this is not a uh an official board vote. It is a straw poll so that we have specific guidance. Um so if I could just by a show of hands uh get a sense of uh who is in favor of an additional funding proposal. That's
probably the easiest question to ask. So, it's who's in favor of the red, right? >> Going going to a vote with an additional funding proposal. >> Or I should say adding Let me not say in favor of the red. Adding the red as an additional funding. I think we all would love to see the red. Okay. >> You mean that as an amount, not
necessarily specific items. >> Correct. Correct. Correct. >> Question was, you mean that as an amount, not specific items. Okay. So, hands up if you would include the red going forward for a proposal. >> All right.
>> Okay. We have our we have our direction >> with that. If things change, I don't know that anybody here would not rush back to have the red back in. Let's put it that way. >> I'm sorry, Mary. >> Like I'm I'm still concerned about what is going to happen with the money from
the state and things like that that would you know. >> So I know we have that's March 12th you put on the slides. Correct. The reason the reason reason why we need that level >> the reason why we need that level of of guidance is because the next few weeks
are going to require a lot of work to get to that point. So in order to build a budget for next year that now subsumes all of that under just a um tax levy adjusted tax levy cap um is going to
take some time and some uh decision- making but it also is going to include the uh notification by the uh state in mid March of what state aid will look like and again at that moment we'll find
out if we have the same, we have less or we have more. If we have the same, then the work of those few weeks will have been well spent. If we have less, then in a two to three day turnaround, business day turnaround, we have to
figure out how to then balance the budget to get whatever the offset is accounted for in into a proposal that is presented to you uh in March for that preliminary uh vote. So, it's a tight timeline. What we have on on the screen
now is are the adjustments that need to be made. So we know that by March 12th, March 10th is when the budget address is tenatively set scheduled to take place. 2 days later is when we would expect state aid to be released. So that already exceeds our original March 3rd
uh board meeting. So we already have to push that date to after March 12th, which brings us to the following week. And what we'd also need tonight to find out is the board's availability for a March 16th, which is Monday, or a March
17th board meeting. So March 16th or 17th, that would be what we would need in order to be able to then have the um the official um preliminary budget approved so that
we could submit it to the county. After that then later on actually that slide has to be we have to adjust that slide. Um then we would look >> to have our final budget hearing
>> uh in early April. It says March but that would actually be early April. >> April 7th. So, April 7th would be the date of the final budget hearing in order to meet the statutory uh timelines.
So, again, ne the the first date that we have to secure is the preliminary budget hearing of March 16th or 17th. And then we've established April 7th as the final budget hearing in order to
approve the final budget because unfortunately spring break is making it impossible for us to to schedule it any other way. And then the uh the budget the regular meeting in April would take place on April 14th.
>> April 7th would be it. >> Yes. >> There's no >> Okay. I think >> so that that would include the April 7th would be the final vote on the budget. There would be nothing on the ballot. That's why it can be April 7th because there'd be nothing on the ballot as far as the budget. >> So we don't need to meet the 14th.
>> It's we have to meet on March March 16th or 17th, >> right? And then >> then we're moving then there's going to be meeting on April 7th >> and on the 14th >> and on the 14th >> and 21st we're going to get rid of because that's election day. >> Okay. Um and just just to confirm again,
so if we're not at if at this point we are not going to offer an additional question for um the voters at this point um but at this point administration is going to look to keep those eight staff
current staff members in the blue. >> That's that's we what we are going to focus on >> between now and early March. There was an informal discussion while you were talking. I think we can get everyone here. There's there's good
level availability for both dates, but I know we can get everyone here on the 16th. >> 16th. >> That's a that's a that's a unanimous Yes. >> Okay. So, we will update this slide and we'll update the uh >> the calendar to reflect. >> Our next board meeting will be on March
16th for the preliminary budget hearing. Our final budget hearing will take place on April 7th >> and then that will be that will conclude the >> budget development process for the 26 27
year and then we are also going to be revising our April regular April board meeting from the 21st to the 14th because of the school board election on the 21st. So what that means is we are moving from an April uh budget and board
vote to just an April board vote. >> Um I'm assuming also that the FNF meeting will move accordingly and also that the voter candidate night will move accordingly as well. Is that correct? >> Yes, we will we will work with the other organizations to to notify them of that
>> and we'd probably adjust the committee schedule as well. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. >> Okay. Okay, I think we're done. >> Oh, wait. >> I I just want to make sure the March 16th is replacing the March 24th. We're moving the date. >> Yes. >> Right. Not in addition.
>> Yes. >> Yes. >> So March the 3rd to the 16th and we're move the 24th to April 7th. >> Yep. >> I'll put it in email. >> Yes. >> Also maybe say the month 3rd, 16th.
>> Yeah, I know. There's a lot of I think every I'm not even gonna ask if everyone's good because we're going to come up with something else. Um, so thank you for the great discussion. Um, if anyone ever wants to see how sausage is made, you got it. Um, and thank you all for the
presentation and for the time uh that goes into the budget that goes into the planning and for giving us all these options. I think the report by district administration is good. Yes. Or do you have anything else? >> If you'd like, I could uh read a couple pages out of the telephone book. Is that
still a thing? >> That would be that would be good. >> That's still Is the telephone book still a thing? >> It's it's it might be Look, I'm I'm talking about the Flintstones and the Jetson, so believe me, if you're Telephone books are even more recent than that. Um,
so I I think we're there um uh for Ben for his high school student representative report. Ben, I don't know how you're going to follow this, but uh take your shot, my friend. While January was filled with the stress of midterms, February marks the official start of the second half of the school year and many exciting new events in the
WHS community. First though, some logistical updates. Parking privileges were recently assigned through WHS WHS's random parking lot system. Additionally, flex periods were restructured by administration to resolve previous attendance discrepancies. Rather than
having a single teacher manage attendance for a single flex location, students will be divided into smaller groups to ensure more accurate attendance taking. Just this past Saturday, the WHS choir department held their annual night of love songs event. Students performed a curated selection
of romantic favorites, modern as well as classics, soloing in duets, and in small groups. Love, it can definitely be said, was hitting all the right notes. Yesterday, student interns for the local downtown West Corporation gave their final presentation to the organization's
executive board, marking the end of their time as interns there. These were students that applied and were selected from the SGA board and the AP government classes. Through attending board and committee meetings at the Downtown West Corporation and helping out with the organization's various various
initiatives such as the new Downtown Westfield gift card program, they gained valuable experience into the inner workings of local governance. It was extremely rewarding for them to see how the downtown they've grown up in operates from the inside and for the program being newly established in the
high school. It was a success. Also, yesterday the wind ensembles children concert featuring Peter and the Wolf performed by the high school wind ensemble occurred and it was narrated by the elementary music school teacher Mr.
Tre Mr. Trevor Synindorf. The concert was designed to introduce young audiences to the instruments of the orchestra and was even nationally recognized with the advocacy and action award from music for all. Once again a testament to Westfield's vibrant and ded dedicated performing arts programs.
Tomorrow marks WHS's first annual electives fair. Spearheaded by the counseling department, it is an opportunity to view the wide range of electives WHS offers, helping students prepare for their upcoming course selections and pro scheduling meetings. David Good, a Yanomami American who has
had a long-standing relationship with the WHS humanities program as a frequent guest speaker, is previewing his new documentary about his indigenous Yanomami mother on Thursday, February 26th in the media center. This critically recognized film, Wayi, is a great opportunity for students to
immerse themselves in good's powerful story of identity and discovery. Finally, the SGA in partnership with the community service club is proud to officially announce their annual community service week running from March 23rd to the 27th. This impactful week will culminate on March 27th with
an activity period. While students and staff compete in a basketball game in the gymnasium, students at students in their classrooms will be will be packing toiletry kits and writing cards to be sent to veterans and healthcare workers. Included will also be a schoolwide spirit week as well as a book drive for
the West Memorial Library. Book donations that week will be collected in a drop off bin at the school's main entrance. And as of right now, the SJA is already seeking out community support to clear their Amazon wish list for the toiletry and card supplies. The community ser the community service club
also will be looking for volunteers to quote unquote adopt a family by collecting toiletries and cleaning supplies to help families in need. All links to sign up can be found on WHS's weekly newsletter or in parent inboxes. Thank you. >> Thank you, Ben. Um, before we move to
committee reports, I just there's something I wanted to make mention of before we get too far past the uh the superintendent's report. So, Dr. Gonzalez addressed the security concerns that we had here at the school today and I think it would be very appropriate
from a board perspective to add our thanks to the folks who did a great job maintaining student safety and doing what we're doing. And I just categorically, you know, we have in a situation like this, there are a ton of unknowns. Um, and sometimes people can
kind of brush away some of those things as well. It's 99% probably nothing but you know could be 1% whatever the consequences of that 1% are significant which is why we have to take the steps that we take and while we're doing that it's our law enforcement professionals both in Westfield our school resource
officers from we have here today and law enforcement from other town all came together to ensure that our students were safe. Um, and while we now know at least have some semblance of an idea that that things are safe now, when law enforcement comes into a building like this and they open a classroom door or
turn a hallway, they don't have any idea what's going to be behind that door or around that hallway. And these are decisions that are might not come home decisions. Um, but they do it and they do it for our students putting
themselves in harm's way before them. So I have to start with a thank you there for the people who come in and do not leave away. Um in many ways our teachers put themselves in a similar risk, right? They're here managing those same students. They're here managing those same students under a lockdown. Um
handling mental health, handling medical issues, all kinds of things like that. And and they're not terribly far off from not knowing what's going to happen when they open a door or turn a hallway. Um, so I have to thank all of our teachers because we did have some level of of uh of of lockdown at at all of our
schools, but especially here at the high school for what what they had to face. Um, another thanks to our district representatives, right? Um, you know, they're not going to thank themselves, but you know, all of this planning comes with a lot of work. Um, and while we would always hope never to have to test
these programs, um, we have unfortunately over the last now two years had to, um, which we'll talk about in a second. Um, but if not for that level of organization and support and planning ahead, we wouldn't have the successes that we have over here. I love
that our plans are successful. I'd really prefer not to have to test them ever, ever, ever again. Um, thank you to our parents as well. I want to echo that from Dr. Gonzalez. It is not easy to sit there and wonder what is going on in a building that you have no control over. I would love to tell you that all nine of us as board members were just had
knew every single thing that was going on while it was happening. But the fact is we are not and we do not because we need to let the professionals handle their business and the last thing we need to do is put someone at risk because they have to write an email or make a phone call to to any one of us.
Um so very much as parents we're all sitting here many of us do have kids in the high school. So many of us are sitting here with the same concerns and worries and I want to thank our parents for sticking with the program and putting the faith in and the same for our students as well. I mean, y'all
lived it, okay? And there was nothing good or positive or fun about what was going on today. There was nothing easy to digest about what was going on today, but our students got with the program, handled themselves, I mean, almost
unequivocally, very well. Um, and I guess the last point I want to make is Dr. Gonzalez said the district certainly has its discipline rules, uh, and is cooperating with law enforcement. Um, I want to be as as clear as I can, um, that I think the board very much supports, um, that very unequivocal and
tough stance regarding whoever decided this would be a good idea. Um, and put their fellow classmates and people who whoever it was, you whether they were here now or in the past, right? You know, at some point, whoever did it is
looking around and calling people around there their friends. If this is what you think treating your friends is like, you really got to rethink where you are in life. Um, I don't want to see this again. I want to see this again here. Nobody members of this board want to see it again here. And I don't know that
there's a stronger way to state it than to say whatever the district needs to do to make sure that an example is set and that this does not happen again. I I'm fairly certain most of the members of this board would support that and I think most of the members of this community would as well. So, thank you for the good work. Um, thank you to the
whole group for what we're doing. And for those who think this is a this is a thing. Um, you know, I'd rather have a far more uh I'd rather have far more fun as an annual thing and not this. And uh, you know, again, you know, Dr. Gonzalez in particular was was here today as he
mentioned. So, we got to see all this firsthand. I want to thank you for being on site to manage it. Um, but again, um, you know, whoever you are and whoever thinks that this is a great idea, you know, knock it off. All right. This is a school. This is a district. This is a
community. All right. Start treating it like that. All right. And with that, um, you know, that was unscripted. Um, let's move to board committee reports. We'll start with curriculum instruction and programs. Kristen, >> good evening. Um, SIP met on February
2nd and received a presentation from Liz Delosandro, Katie Neshawat, and Liz Riley focused on the district's continued evolution toward a more robust data-driven instructional model. The presentation highlighted the implementation and refinement of the district's multi-tered system of
support, MTSS, and the development of the structured data teams to improve student outcomes. The presenters reviewed the district-wide MTSS frame framework, which serves as a foundation for ensuring equitable access to academic support across all schools.
Grounded in research-based practices, the MTSS model provides a consistent structure for identifying and responding to student needs through three tiers. Tier one, core classroom instruction for all students. Tier two, targeted small groupoup interventions for some
students. and tier three is individualized intensive interventions for a smaller number of students with significant learning needs. A key focus of the presentation was the growing role of the formal data team meetings in shaping instructional practice. These
structured meetings bring together administrators, general and special education teachers, interventionists, and counselors to engage in evidence-based analysis of student data. Rather than relying on anecdotal observations, teams review beginning of
the year plans and flagged students to determine the effectiveness of current instructional strategies and identify necessary adjustments. Case examples illustrated how specific data points such as lit literacy fluency measures or
targeted math skill proficiency are used to inform lesson planning, instructional grouping, and intervention decisions. Looking ahead, the presenters outline several next steps to dis to sustain and strengthen this work. These include continued PD to build the capacity of
the data teams, deeper use of data to inform targeted lesson plan and student grouping, exploration of a new mathematics diagnostic assessment to further individualized support, and a review of the instructional resources to ensure alignment with identified student
needs. Um, and then the SIP's next meeting is scheduled for March 9th. >> Excellent. Thank you. Uh, next, uh, finance and facilities. Uh, Brendan, >> we talked about the budget. I'm done.
>> Fair enough. Also concise. I will take it. Um, finally, policies, personnel, and governance. I think uh, Mary. >> Okay. Thanks. The policy personnel and governance committee met on February 5th from 4:00 to 5:30 in we went to
Roosevelt in the newly designed Fab Lab. Um it was very impressive b um it was myself uh Sonel Patel Brennan Gallagghan and Leila Morel Morelli um along with Dr. Gonzalez and Dr. Greer. The committee began with a discussion on
the annual non-tenure review process. Dr. Greer presented the annual review of non-tenured employees, including the administrative feedback that is provided through this process. The committee noted that this review is for information only and that there is no
action before the board at this time. The annual staff appointment occurs each spring in advance of May 15th. All staff to be recommended for renewal will appear on the board agenda. Any employee who will not be renewed will not appear on the list.
The committee then discussed ongoing policy work. While no policies were reviewed at this meeting, the superintendent shared that an administrative working group is actively examining the student attendance and student code of conduct policies and regulations with the expectation that
proposed revisions will be brought forward for committee consideration in the near future. The committee also continued to review its review of the 2027, 2028, and 2028, 2029 school calendars, following up on
last month's discussion. Drafts under development include an option for students to begin school the day after Labor Day for each of the two years reviewed. The committee discussed how the scheduling of holidays and cultural observances can create challenges,
particularly when observances overlap with scheduled staff professional development days or occur intermittently during the week, disrupting instructional continuity. As next steps, the committee will review calendar options with the administration
and the association to better understand the impact on students and staff. looking at historical attendance data. The committee also recommends exploring options to end the school year as early as possible. The committee noted the importance of considering the most
recently added observances and affirm and affirmed that instructional considerations would be made whenever school may be in session on cultural or religious observances. The committee concluded with a review of the district's budget status in light of
the most recent draft. Significant time was devoted to the impact of health care cost. I feel like I don't have to read this over again. Increases and the constraints these increases place on the district's ability to contain costs while maintaining progress and
continuing to expand programs. The con the discussion also considered future budgetary needs associated with staffing for full day kindergarten and other programs expected to come online over the next few budget years.
Due to the priority of the aforementioned time-sensitive budget discussion, we were unable to continue work on an action plan for the board goals. This remains on the agenda and will be addressed at a future meeting. The next policy, personnel, and governance committee meeting is
scheduled for March 19th, 2026. >> Any I have a question. >> Sure. >> So, first of all, thank you guys for all the hard work you guys are doing. Um, I see there's a lot on the agenda and I know there's a lot going on. Um, I feel like we should get together in FNF to discuss all the budgeting stuff that's
uh going on between, you know, and look at both sides of the issue um through each other's eyes. Um I did see also that you know that that the um the board goals for the second month weren't done and um and I know it's because there's just a lot on
the agenda right now. Um and I'm a little worried because of you know timing going by and also that next month and the month after we're going to be crushed by budget and it's going to be not that different from this meeting in terms of the uh us to being subsumed in
discussions about it. So, I just wanted to ask if um there's any assistance or if there's a need for additional committee assistance from either additional people or for an additional committee to look at this stuff because it's an it's an important thing that we
want to get done by the end of the year. The end of the year is going to be in April when the election comes. So, I'm just kind of looking at that and you know, I I'm personally happy to happy to help. Um, I don't know who else is, but I just want to put it out there that, you know, there's it's I know it's an
important thing that needs to get done. This is not meant as a criticism. It is meant as an offer to genuinely try to move this forward um in any way that you can understanding that there's just so much going on right now. and knowing that we are just not going to have time in the next two board meetings to
discuss this fully in a way where everybody gets a chance to give their input to whatever rises in that very important document. So, I just wanted to ask if that's something you guys would consider. I know it's it's uh your committee, but I just think it's a board
document and I just wanted to see if there's any openness to considering that. >> Thank you. It's noted. I'll bring it to the committee. >> Yeah. Um, can I can I have a second? >> Oh, we're not voting. >> You don't have to vote yet. >> Okay. I'm I'm way ahead of you. >> Yeah, there you go. You're we'll get you
there. That's that's good. No, I I I think I think it's a I think it's a a sound point. I I think it's probably worth a discussion even a little bit sooner, you know, maybe among chairs, myself and Dr. Gonzalez about, you know, maybe a special meeting or adding to it to see and I I definitely appreciate not just the ask but as well
as the offer for action because it it helps. But let me let's let's see what we can do to push it along. I I don't disagree with you at all. I think we need to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time on that one. Um, all right. Uh, before I come up with any more sayings, um, now it is time to
recognize the public. During this portion of the meeting, district residents and staff are invited to address the board of education on agenda action items only. These are the items identified in color on the board agenda at sections 10 to 14. There will be a second public comment period at the end of the meeting for items not up for
board action today. Uh, as a courtesy, please allow current students and staff of the Westfield Public Schools to speak first. The board requests that individuals sign in and state their name, municipality of residents, and group affiliation if applicable for the record, the specific action items they're commenting on, and ask that all
remarks be directed to the board president or designate and not to individual members or staff. The um the board asks that members be of the public be courteous and mindful of the rights of other individuals when speaking. Specifically, comments regarding personnel matters are discouraged and
cannot be responded to by the board. Students and employees have specific legal rights afforded by the laws of New Jersey. The board bears no responsibility, nor will it be liable for any comments made by members of the public. If a matter concerning a district staff member is of interest or concern to a resident, the matter should
be referred to the responsible building principal, superintendent of schools, or the board of education either by telephone, letter, or email. Although the board may not respond to items raised during the public forum, all public comments will be considered. Please note that if any member of the public becomes disruptive during the
meeting, the board president may terminate the participants statement. Uh although the board may not respond to items raised during the public forum, all public comments will be considered. Um I said that part already. Sorry about that. Um continued disruptions may result in rule from the meeting or
adjournment to the meeting. Each speaker statement will be limited to three minutes in duration. Sorry about that. All right, seeing no member of the public rushing up, I will close public comment uh and move to board action. Uh I would like to make a motion to approve
the minutes of the January 20 20th, 2026 regular board meeting. I have a second. Uh Kent, we can do this by voice vote. All in favor? Any opposed? Any abstensions? Uh CJ and Leila on abstensions. Other than that,
we pass. Uh move to governance. Kristen Nope. I'd like to ask the board to approve um a under governance. >> Can I have a second? Mary, >> can we vote? >> Rob Bonaccia, >> yes. >> Kent Diamond,
>> yes. >> Brendan Gallagghan, >> yes. >> Charles Galinus, >> no. >> Leila Morelli, >> yes. >> Sonol Patel, >> yes. Kristen Sonic Schmeltz, >> yes. Julie Steinberg, >> no.
>> I'm sorry. No. Okay. Mary Wickens. Yes. >> All right. Uh, that motion carries and we'll move to personnel. I think that's Mary. >> Thank you. I'd like to move items A to R under the personnel section of tonight's
agend agenda. Um, is there a second? Sonal, she's quick like Kent tonight. >> Okay. Dr. Gonzalez, do you have any words for us to say? >> I do. I do. I have three retirements that I'd like to celebrate this evening. Beginning with Jennifer Buchino, a
fizzed teacher from Tmacquis. Uh she has dedicated 38 years to teaching physical education with 37 of those years in the Westfield Public School District. She began her career at McKinley and Westfield High School, but spent the past 35 years at Tmacquis, a place she
lovingly described as her second home, a warm blanket on a cold night. Jennifer led 35 field days and countless Halloween hoowns, creating joyful memories for generations of Tamakqua students. She also made a tremendous impact as a coach working with thousands
of student athletes in girls outdoor track, indoor track, and cross country from the late 1980s through 2024. One of the most cherished moments of her career came in 2002 when she served as an honorary torchbearer for the Salt Lake City Olympics, an honor made possible by
a former uh WHS student athlete. Jennifer leaves Westfield with a full heart and a lifetime of memories. Her energy, spirit, and dedication will be deeply missed. Karen Gettis. Karen Gettis has been a beloved member of the Washington School
community for the past 25 years, where her impact has been both joyful and lasting. Known for her energy and creativity, Karen danced her way through 25 Washington school shows, often performing in all three weekend performances. A highlight of her
classroom each year was the women's tea where students presented research on famous women to special guests including the commissioner of education. Karen also expanded her impact beyond the classroom in 2019 using her masters in counseling to lead character education
lessons, social skills groups, and individual student sessions. at Washington. She is affectionately known as the child whisperer for her extraordinary gift of understanding and connecting with children. One student put it best, "If I had a choice to go back to one teacher's classroom for a
day, I wouldn't even let them finish their sentence. I'd say you." Karen leaves with ad admiration of her colleagues, the lover of her students, and a career full of moments that truly mattered. Last but not least, Melissa Casmmeer.
Melissa has been teaching in the Westfield public schools since 2004, beginning her career as a basic skills teacher before moving into first grade in 2008 and then to second grade in 2016. Throughout her time at Wilson, she has been known as a remarkable teacher
who encourages children to do their best, make them feel safe, and ensures they feel deeply cared for. Her classroom balances high expectations with warmth and structure, creating a space where routines are clear, relationships are strong, and students
feel seen, valued, and capable. Equally important has been her commitment to families and to the Wilson community as she welcomes parents into her classroom and brings learning to life through experiences such as Colonial Day, Young Author's Tea, Wonders of the Earth, and
the End of the Year Show. Families trust her knowing their children are not only learning but truly nurtured. Mrs. Casemier leaves with gratitude of families, students, and colleagues and a record of devoted service to the Wilson school community. We extend our
heartfelt thanks to all of this year's retirees and wish them good health, happiness, and fulfillment in the years ahead. >> Thank you, Dr. G. >> Rob Bacio, >> yes. Kent Diamonds, >> yes. >> Brendan Gallagghan, >> yes. >> Charles Galinus,
>> yes. >> Leila Morelli, >> Sonel Patel, >> yes. >> Kristen Sonic Schmeltz, >> yes. >> Julie Steinberg, >> yes. Mary Wickens, >> yes. >> Uh, now we'll move to finance and facilities and the always anticipated
and rarely equaled diamond donation report. >> Thank you, Rob. I'd like to move items A through J in the finance and facilities agenda. Before I do, I'd like to highlight $78,000 worth of uh donations we have today. Uh bringing our total for this year, $286,000.
So, special thank you to Ted Rufiner and Danielle Reno for donating a Yizpi Mexi M4254 cello estimated value $1,782 for the Edison Orchestra program.
Second, I'd like to thank the Franklin PTO for a donation of $4,223.32 to replace the playground slide. Hopefully, it's not one of those aluminum ones we had when we were kids. That's I'd like to thank the Wilson PTO
for donating $71,484.40 40 cents for playground site prep to include borders and stonework along with the purchase and installation of rubber surfacing and orbit spinner and orb rocker. Next, I'd like to thank Westfield Correalation for the Arts for
donating $500 for a workshop on the 2018 Broadway musical The Prom, held by Tony Award winner Beth Levelville for the W High School cast of this spring's musical. And next, I'd like to thank Kenneth McGritie for donating $100 to
fund the annual Walton Burus Music Award and Ian McGritie Information Technology Award awarded to a Westfield High School senior at awards night. Thank you to those individuals and organizations. And that is it. That's it. >> We need a second first.
>> May I have a second? Thank you, Kristen. >> All right, go for it. >> All right. Rob Bonacio, >> yes. >> Kent Diamonds, >> yes. >> Brendan Gallagghan, >> yes. Charles Galinus, >> yes. >> Leila Morali, >> yes. Sonel Patel, >> yes. Kristen Sonic Schmeltz, >> Julie Steinberg,
>> yes. >> Mary Wickens, >> yes. >> All right, next policies. I think Mary, you're up again or I'm sorry. >> No. >> Okay. Forgot about them. I'd like to move items A and B in the
policy section of tonight's agenda. Can I say no? That was record time. >> All right. Rob Bonacio, >> yes. >> Kent Diamonds, >> yes. >> Brendan Gallagghan, >> yes. >> Charles Galinus, >> yes.
>> Leila Morelli, >> Sonel Patel, >> yes. >> Kristen Sonic Schmeltz, >> yes. >> Julie Steinberg, >> yes. >> Mary Wickens, >> yes. Okay. And last, curriculum instruction and programs. Kristen, >> I'd like to move items A and B under the
curriculum section of the agenda. Can I have a second? Kent >> Rob Bacio. >> Yes. >> Kent Diamonds. >> Yes. >> Renid Gallagghan. >> Yes. >> Charles Galinus. >> Yes. >> Leila Morelli. >> Sonel Patel.
>> Yes. >> Kristen Sonic Schmeltz. >> Yes. >> Julie Steinberg. >> Yes. >> Mary Wicens. Yes. >> One budget discussion. We're all punching. We got Ben telling dad jokes. So, that's good. We're ready to go here. That's good. Um, I want to call the board's attention to the notes for the
record. Uh, there is no unfinished or new business presented for the uh for this meeting. Uh, we'll move then to liaison reports. Anyone? Oh, Kristen, I know has one. The January PTC meeting was held on January 21st in person to discuss
district-wide initiatives, committee updates, and upcoming school events. The PTC also provided a beautiful breakfast and invited the principles to join in honoring Dr. Gonzalez for the New Jersey Superintendent of the Year award. It was
quite the breakfast, right? Dr. Bolton attended the meeting to discuss block scheduling at the high school and the overall feedback gathered so far. He also provided an overview of the new courses that are in development. And then some um important announcements
from the meeting include the tenative date for the PTC board of education candidates night is April 15th with the election scheduled for April 21st. The crossing guard breakfast for their the appreciation of the of the crossing guards um that's hosted by the PTC
breaks committee will take place in April. I don't have an exact date yet. Uh the PTC's gifted and talented committee steam night event for K through 8 is actually tomorrow night on February 11th at Edison. And then the next PTC general meeting will be held virtually on February 18th at 10:30 a.m.
That's it. >> Any others? >> Just wanted to save the date for the UCSC gala which will be on May 21st. Um and invitations will go out shortly to join us to celebrate uh all the
accomplishments and uh contributions uh UC ESC makes for our community. >> Excellent. Thank you. Uh we'll now move to our second public comment period. Seeing as our meeting has not been inundated with a a run of members of the
public, um I will open the public comment. I will say that the same rules from our initial public uh comment apply to this session. And seeing no one running up to speak, I will close the second public comment and make a motion to adjurnn. Do I have a
second, please? I'll take Kristen on that one. Uh all in favor? Any opposed? Good luck if you did. Any abstensions? Okay, we are adjourned.