All right, we'll have the uh the conservation commission meeting October 28th. This meeting is being recorded. We stand and salute the flag, please. >> To the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty, justice for all. >> All right. First hearing tonight is septic system Derek Rivera 82 and 84 O drive. >> Are you Mr. Vers? >> No the engineer.
>> Okay. >> Whenever you're ready, sir. Go ahead. >> You ready for me? >> We're ready. >> We're ready for you. Um, for the record, my name is Kevin Silva, SK Engineering. I'm here on behalf of Derek Pavveris,
governor of West LC. Uh, he bought this two family. Uh, there is a border investigating Redland uh, along over here on the west side. It crosses my subject system
to keep the 10 buffer off of the right property line. And this portion of the septic system falls within the 100t buffer zone to the welllands. And my two tanks where I have the tank situated also
falls within the buffer zone. There's going to be some minor grading around the septic and they've knocked down the piece to put in the septic as well as grading over the tanks to make it work with the backyard that's there.
has minimal room because there's a well up here and I even throws off a radius. So I have an oblong shaped septic system to try to keep it out of the well radius which forces any into the zone.
>> Oh, so that's it. >> That's Chris will read his report and then we can discuss it after. Okay, Chris, >> Mr. Chairman, members, Derek Beveres, uh 82840 Drive is a request in termination of applicability by Kevin Silva from SNK Engineering.
Report date is October 23rd, 2025. I believe this is board of health approved. >> Uh I pretty sure it is. I tried to call. I didn't get an answer today. >> There you go. Uh description of the work. The applicant is filed to repair
the septic system on the property located at 82840 drive. Proposed septic system will be installed within the buffer zone to a bordering vegetated wetland. The wetland line is located on the left side of the home and within the existing wooded area. The wetland line
is accurately shown. Some trees will need to be removed to allow the septic leeching field to be installed. Leeching field will be 90 ft at its closest point to the wetland edge. The septic tank and pump chamber will be installed in the rear of the yard and they will be 62
feet from that BVW. Erosion controls will be installed and will be the limit of all work for the project. Resource areas to be impacted. This is just buffer zone. Uh recommendations. The West Conservation Commission should approve the proposed septic system
repair 82840 drive with a negative box 3 determination. That is all, Mr. Chairman. >> All right. Thank you, Phil. Do you know if this has been approved? >> It wasn't on last night's meeting, but um but I'm not sure. >> I would just put pending then, Mr.
Chairman, just to cover it >> cuz but not all the cases come before the board if they're um >> understood. >> If you know >> variances aren't required and >> Right. Exactly. If they're >> cut and dry. >> Right.
>> I believe this is director approved, Mr. chairman because I did sign a set of plans and return them to the board of health today. >> All right. Is it uh do you have anybody do you have any questions? >> I don't have any questions.
>> No. Any questions from the table? Does anybody in the audience have a question? No. All right. If no questions, then I'm looking for a motion. >> Motion to approve. Second. >> Okay. Jake and Phil. >> All in favor? >> Opposed? No. All right. That's
unanimously. >> Okay. Uh first hearing uh another next I'm sorry. Mass >> mass dot RDA rule 195 resurfacing and related work. [Applause] Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members of the
commission. Uh for the record, my name is David Bashette, representing the Mass Department of Transportation, District 5 on this project, which involves uh maintenance, pre-trimming, and cutting work along Route I 195 and the Route 88 ramps. Um some of which is in the buffer
zone to border and vegetated wetland and riverfront areas. Um this is associated with a project to resurface Route I 195 in parts of Westport and in Dartmouth. Um project basically starts here at mile
marker 15.8 uh in Westport just west of the Route 88 interchange and runs all the way to the Westport Dartmouth town line. Now this project does continue into Dartmouth uh as well and Dartmouth Concom is going to
be reviewing this through their own hearing for their portion of the work. Um so the milling and resurfacing work that is going to be done is on route uh I 195 that is not going to extend onto the route 88 ramps. Um but there is
going to be vegetation work um along that ramp system as well and there will also be some crack sealing work to be done within that ramp system. Uh other associated work with the project involves repairing guardrail uh and resetting catch facing grates within
the existing roadway. Um there is no road widening or changes to the footprint of the road as part of the project. Um and so really it's uh maintenance work, vegetation cutting for road safety maintenance uh to maintain sight distances on the roads and the
exit ramps. uh to maintain sight distances for signage uh to keep vegetation away from the guardrails and um to provide space in case there's any other maintenance activities that might need to occur along the stretch of road. So um this work is being done all up and
down Route I 195 and this particular segment just encompasses this piece of Westport and Dart. >> All right. Thank you. >> Thank you. U members, Mr. Chair, this is Mass DOT group I 95. Uh requested a termination of
applicability file for the reservicing project and tree removal. The engineer record is mass DOT with plans provided. Report date is October 24th, 2025. Site visit was also on the 24th of October. Description of the work. The
Mass Department of Transportation has filed a request for determination of applicability to conduct resurfacing and maintenance within the existing highway of Route I95. The work will be conducted along the shoulders of the layout, removing and trimming of woody
vegetation as needed uh for the resurfacing of the highway as well as for safety and sight line requirements. The activity falls under the exemption for working within a public way under 10.02B 02B 2N vegetation removal for road safety
maintenance. So the state is typically always files uh to get a negative determination in order for them to proceed. So again this is basic clearing as Dave mentioned within that road layout with no expansions beyond
resource areas to be impacted as buffer zone and riverfront area recommendations. The Westport Conservation Commission should approve the proposed safety tree uh proposed tree safety maintenance for I 195 with a
negative box 3 determination. >> All right. Anybody have any questions? Is that a motion? >> Motion to approve with negative box 3 determination. >> Second. >> Okay. All in favor? >> Boss. All right. That's unanimous. There's Jake and Tom.
>> Thank you, Dave. >> Appreciate your time. Thank you Dave. Nice meeting you all. >> Next we have Vanessa Carvalo Anrad 38 CI system lane to determine if resource areas depicted on the plan are accurate.
Oh, good. Good question. >> Yeah. >> Whenever you're ready, Greg, South Coast Engineering, representing Vanessa Balo, property 38 lane. She's actually owned by her grandfather, I
guess. Um, so what we have here today is delineation run from wetland flag 101, WF 101 to WF 119. The end, we have delineated the wetland line using soil lock. You can see over here locations of
these borings take shown on the plan. I also did some vegetation analysis that's included in the ANR red and you can see contour lines a very steep slope over here. This area here is all filled holes pushed in I guess they built the road and the slope becomes more gradual as you move to the south. Anyway, roughly
at the bottom of the slope you see over here was the wetland line the soils uh for the area show this is being free town mark. So the line actually pretty much within the soils you find online. That's pretty much what I have chairman.
>> All right. Thank you >> chairman and members. Vanessa Cavalo, 38 Sison Farm Lane. This is abbreviated notice of resource area delineation filed by South Coast Engineering with Greg Nicholas here this evening. Report
date is October 24th, 2025. The file number for this project, no adverse comments is SE 802817. Site visit uh and review of the wetland line was on October 24th, 2025.
Description of the work. The app is filed to determine the wetland line located on the property at 38 System Farm Lane. The site has an existing home and the property slopes steeply toward the east. The wetland is located along the base of that slope and extends
across the entire lot. The uh the mass Data forms are provided supporting and documenting the soils and the vegetation to support that delineation uh which I agree with. The line was walked and determined to be accurately represented. Um, no natural heritage
endangered species habitat is located on or near this site as well. Um, so this would be the only resource area uh currently on the property would be BVW. Recommendations. The West Park Conservation Commission should approve the wetland delineation and issue an
order of resource area delineation or ORAD file number SE802817 as shown on the plan dated October 7th 2025 for the property located at 38 Sison Palm Lane.
>> Any questions? Any questions from the audience? You could just step up here. State your name, please, sir. My name is Don Dufalt and I'm the trustee of uh the adjacent property there. Just question. So this uh as a
process here. So you're just delineating the wetlands at this point. So as far as the the design of the uh leeching field and the septic system that comes at a separate hearing or >> right all this is to say where the wetlands are then they have to go back and figure out what they can do if
anything okay that's where the wetlands are now there's certain criteria they have to know to design to make sure that that's >> not if they stay out of the 100 foot buffer zone then they don't they they don't have to come back to us whether they can do that I don't know you know so really you know it it comes comes down
>> planning board Mr. chair and they have to go through for the division of the property if that's their proposal. >> So there's several well not several but there more iterations here that are going to go on as correct as this project progresses >> and as an imparter you would be further notified of those other hearings as
well. >> Okay board of health most likely too for the septic all that kind of stuff. Okay, great. And you were only uh that's the you're only delineating the wetlands on that pro on their property, right? So you didn't go on you didn't do anything in the in the common
>> No, we did not. No. >> Yeah. Cuz this does wasn't necessary, right? >> Absolutely correct. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. >> Have a good night, sir. Anybody else have a question? All right. Anything from the table? All right. Looking for a motion. If someone wants to make a motion. Well,
I'll move to approve the wetland delineation and to issue over an order of resource area delineation consistent with the plan uh dated 10725 for the property. >> Right. Phil, do we have a second?
Second. >> All those in favor? >> I posted. All right. That's unanimously on. >> Thank you. >> Good evening. >> Thank you. >> All right. Next, we have a continuence for Nicholas Leairard notice of intent
200 Atlantic Avenue res uh renovations to a single family dwelling and associated septic upgrade with grading in the buffer zone and lamb subject to coastal storm flowage. Did we get the green? They're in the filing itself.
>> Okay. Whenever you're ready, you can start. [Applause] >> Good evening. For the record, my name is Abby Smile for Prince Company on behalf of the applicants, the layers. Um so since the last meeting um we have
reviewed um more of the adjacent grades at the site and we identified these four representative trans lines throughout the site um and reviewed those for grades as it relates to the postal bank definitions that were in question. Um so
I would like to highlight this site profile one which is along this lower line. Um and this is with north oriented this way. So um this is Beach Avenue running this way. So this is the profile
line um where our proposed leech field is closest to the wetland resource area uh setback and you can see that here um this hatch zone is um the com combination of the wetland resource and
buffer zones. So um I did that to just identify that that goes up to here. So that's about here on the site, the 100 foot step back from this empoundment wetland identified in the lower lawn. >> Um and that it was still the furthest
point um that we were getting. And you can see the additional coastal bank that was identified further down the lawn. Um that setback only comes to about here. So our proposed leaked field location is still well outside of that. Um and I can
put up the other site profiles or I also have a smaller copy to hand out. Um there were there was another area of coastal bank identified in this analysis. So uh you can see this grouping of contours here uh that was
another location but again that setback was um not getting any closer to the proposed leech field than this one was. Um so with that uh we um
we are outside the wetland resource areas in the buffer zones um and that's after the uh additional coastal bank analysis completed. >> All right. Thank you Chris. >> Thank you for that. Um Mr. Chairman,
this is a continuence of Nicholas Blair 200 Atlantic A. This is a notice of intent request for a sewage disposal system upgrade or increase in flow of that septic. Um, Principy Engineering would be here tonight. Uh, the date of
the um, report is October 24th, 2025. Um, file number for this project is SE 802816. Um, this is board of health approved as well. Um, from me returning it to them today. um description of the work. The
activity falls under the new construction with an added bedroom capacity and must meet the minimum set tax under the weapons protection act. The applicant has revised the plan showing the cross-section of slope for the coastal bank identification using
the mass D policy 92-1. No coastal banks are within 100 ft of the leeching area and are closer toward the beach ab section. slope in this area is less than 10 to one with the upper yard and therefore no coastal bank
exists under the definition. Um exposed ledge outcrops on this site make locating of the septic system limited to the current design location. Um they basically have an existing system just just to the um east of where they are
opposing this one. So they know they have suitable coverage. Um but other than that there are ledge outcrops within uh the lawn area. This is totally going to be within the flood zone though. So the work is within the flood zone a velocity zone elevation 19 and
all the other activities are outside the 100 foot buffet zone to the impounded wetland. This is pond meadow as we all remember. There's a pond that creates itself along Beach A and the lower sections of these lawns during the um
wet season and could be quite significant into spring. So that is the only wetland resource area. It's much lower on the property. The actually other bank they define there is actually the septic system of the neighbors
raised bed. So I wouldn't really call that a true coastal bank but none unless they did correctly identify the change in elevation per that policy. So um I thank them for that. So I think they have met all the concerns I had for this
project. The resource areas are very clearly identified and um I have no further issues. So I recommend the Westport Conservation should approve the new construction septic design for 200 Atlantic A file number SCE802816
withstanding conditions and I'm going to say pending board of health, but I'm I'm pretty sure they were uh >> we approved him last night. >> There you go. >> Yesterday afternoon. >> There you go. >> All right. >> Thank you. >> Do you have any questions? >> No. Anybody else have any questions in
the audience >> table? If not, a motion. Motion to approve. >> Sick. >> Okay, >> that was Jake and uh who's that? Tom. Jake and Tom. All in favor? >> Opposed? All right, that's unanimous. So, thank you.
>> Thank you for your cooperation. >> I know. Just I've got some focus, please. Can't even get a pen. All right. But um >> Well, you got a nice new truck. >> That didn't come from this place. >> Did it come with a pen >> from the dealership?
>> No, they don't give me those. >> Um on you want to have um riick them up? >> Yeah. Rick. >> Oh, you just need a microphone. Take my microphone.
>> I'm not going to question you. This is just basically a work location. >> Mr. Chairman, this is unanticipated discussion for uh proposed activities within the overflow boat trailer parking location
on Cherryman Web Lane. Um the highway department had come before me and discussed after speaking with hab master Rick Smith here for his consideration to try to get a better handle on the
parking within this area. They're noticing a big increase in traffic. It's causing some backlogs. So what they're considering within this existing disturbed area, they're asking to remove this island of
vegetation. Um that is it. Um at this present time that will allow them to have a better configuration for trailers and sighting of those trailers. This vegetation would be removed. It's mostly uh junipers and then they will be
stumped and the area will be graded uh to be compatible with the current area that is a loop fashion. Uh there's one catch basin over towards the uh southerntherly end of this island uh where that turnaround comes through and
the highway department was going to reset that basin and most likely they believe that whatever it drains through may be need to be exposed. So they may need to just come across the other side of that access and expose that pipe to allow it to have daylight for any flow,
but they're not changing anything else within this. So they're not generating it'll be graveled just like it is now. There's actually madam on some of this parking lot now, which it kind of dies out as you get towards the real far end of the parking lot. This property is
owned by DCR and there was or there was a thought that there was some mutual agreement between the town and DCR to maintain this area. Apparently, that doesn't seem to be a document that
anyone can to find. So, this is still pending DCR's final approvals, but they did recommend um them come to the commission and get some input. I don't believe a request of
determination is needed because it's within this previously they're not expanding. They're only removing this small little island area. Um so that's where I'm leaving it to the board. I don't know if you would like to just
express a written letter to the hover master and DCR stating that the work is contained um by limit of the parking lot and within the interior and would not cause any adverse effects to the current coastal barrier beach and coastal
forest. >> All right. Anybody have any comments? So out it's outside of the commission's uh perview, but um how is this going to be kind of delineated or you know marked
because it's if you take this island out, >> is it going to turn into a free-for-all? Cuz right now you see a lot of the boats and the trailers obviously use that as a circle and and and park around the exterior of that. If you open that up, what what's the course of action or plan to address? Uh, and you're going to
increase capacity, which I think will impact if it's not monitored correctly. Horsene neck, Baker's Beach, Bridge Road, Caring Web. So, what's the plan? >> The plan the plan is to line it. It can
be lined. Um, it doesn't have to be an academy as you know. Um, but we can line pack gravel. The other thing is adequate signage. So, that you know, one of the biggest issues, believe it or not, are cars with kayaks down. So, we want to make sure that they're put in the right area and the trailers are able to pretty
much park across um this area where we we'll delineate one spot for single axle trailers, another spot for triple double axle trailers, and an area for cars that show any type of indication that they have a kayak and that will eliminate anyone outside of that would be subject
to enforcement by the police department. The reason being is we don't want people parking there like they are now to access other beaches, whatever beach, town beach. Um as it is now, we're trying to bring um we're trying to bring some type of water to Chaos down there.
Um these trailers now, these boats are getting bigger. They're double axle trailers and we really need the room. Now, we have spoken with DCRI and we're in conversation with DCR's attorney, uh, attorney Galvin, who may ask the town for anou so that we're all on the same
page down there. >> And if you get that, will it still allow enforcement for you guys to do the enforcement? Because in the past has always been kind of who enforces what, who does what. Environmental police don't go in there. Town didn't go in
there. And fortunately for you guys when you took this over you, you know made enforcement a high priority. Is that still made sure that that continues? I think you could word that I'm sorry through the chair in that m uh man memorandum of understanding to word it
accordance with how uh DCR wants no responsibility for it in some regards I would say and the town pretty much utilizes the very rear end of it for storage of some of their trailers and other things that they have associated in the past your uh buoy markers and
stuff get stored there. So there is a use the town has had exclusively in um those certain areas, but and you all know it gets utilized by people in an effort to hide and be discouraging for
paying or trying not to get a ticket to go to Baker's Beach free because they don't want to pay for parking. >> Well, that's to the chair to you, Jake. Um historically we've had a great relationship with Wakefield. I'm going back in time here with
Westport PD going in there and tagging for us. Um, you know, the environmental police are always here to help us out, but Westport has always been the one that has gone in there. So, that agreement has been, although not official, has been the practice of what's been going on. So, like Chris
says, we would put that in the MOU that enforcement would be on local feed in addition to his joint jurisdiction. So anyone can tag in with priority. The priority would uh be the local police department west. >> They've done a great job by the way this
summer. They helped us out immensely. >> Um trying to bring again order to chaos. >> Is there any discussion on like a parking pass system like the automated one >> as opposed to like cashing box? >> That's a they're in the works. >> They're in the works. Um we went to we
upgraded the system um with the tag system this year. This hopefully by this time next year, we're going to have a kiosk and it will work like most of the kiosk you see in in the real world out there. Um for instance, like there's a couple that we're looking at. One is like they used at the MBTA
where it's just an app. >> Uh the other one would be an actual physical um kiosk on site. The app is better because there's no vandalism. Um everything is electronic. uh there's no maintenance or up upkeep or at risk of
flooding. So on the flip side, you have the mechanical um electronic kiosk which can be monitored basically from your phone or laptop and police car one of our vehicles or DC out. So yeah, that's
another we've actually budgeted for that whether it gets there or not. That's what that's another thing. I mean through the correct that revenue does go towards the town from some of those fees associated with that use. >> That's correct. The revenue goes into
the waterway fund. >> Perfect. >> One more question. All right. I have two more questions. >> Well, I'm I'm going to get one in the middle. >> Oh, you can go. >> No, I'm just asking. >> Why Why don't you guys clear all the way in the the back island, too? Yeah. >> I mean, if it's I've seen what it's like
in some of there. Well, as as chair, as you get go into the back end of that, which would be the south end of that, it narrows and narrows and narrows. So, there's really not a lot of room to put trailers in there. No. >> Um, >> you put the kayaks back. >> So, theoretically, you can make a swing here, but that could be like depending
on how far this goes, that could be a spot for those kayak >> people, you know. >> That's what I was thinking. Well, I'm not an engineer, but you know. >> Yeah. I mean, that to me that's a perfect spot for them. Um, and then this is all, you know, for the dual axle on the single axle trailers.
>> Yeah. >> All right. Thank you. Um, J, another question >> on that kiosk plan that you're talking about with an app. How would enforcement work on that given that the other options where you have a printed ticket
that stays on the dashboard so you can actually see and visually see that, you know, with an app situation? How is that how would that work from the enforcement for the town? >> The enforcing agency just have will have the ability to download those who have
paid from up there from the what from whatever the app the other end of the app they can download that information into their laptops or their phones and then they can just ride to the parking lot and see who's paying hasn't paid
>> based on their license plate. I think that cross reference is a lot more difficult than an actual physical tag. >> The physical tag works great. I mean, you see it everywhere. >> Yeah. Plymouth, I know, has it for all their parking and stuff and you just put it on the attach. >> So, yeah, it works. They have it in um Swansea. They have it down at the
physical attach. >> I think Swans might have one at their boat ramp, right? >> Yeah. They have it down Sandwich. Works great. I would lean towards that just because what we've seen at Horseneck where you're lucky if you're probably getting 50% of the people paying for
parking and there's zero enforcement cuz oh yeah I paid at the the key I paid on my app don't worry about it you know >> well this way they may be purposely going around with you know the download the sheet of who's paid that past two hours and just >> go through the lot
>> you know the key the key is I'm sorry the key is a partnership with police department which we have >> which you have done tremendously this year. >> And then just the last thing is if you do move forward with that clearing, if we could do like a clear messaging because you know a lot of the people
that would see that occurring >> come come to conclusions that may not be conclusions as to what that is. >> Oh, for sure. >> Meaning >> we're landing offshore cables through that parking lot and various other things. So >> well, especially after work DCR the DCR
work last year on their own property. >> Yes. >> They don't have they don't have the best reputation for I think you guys have a Facebook page, right? Or >> we're on a web. I mean, we're on a website. We have we have both the hot master and shellfish side of the website and >> just a posting of that to alert the
neighborhood because that >> absolutely. >> Even if you just notify Paula in this office and she can maybe put something on the front page of the town's site. >> That' make it easier for everyone. >> It' save a lot of phone calls. >> Yeah. >> Well, yeah. >> No, they're on Facebook, too. I've seen Kevin or somebody post on Facebook
before. I think helped you guys out a lot with some of your computerized >> Yeah. >> lately. >> Getting it up to snow. >> All right. Any other questions? >> That's it. J. Thank you. >> Jeez. >> I I just not I just circling back to the
question that you asked in the beginning, which is, you know, uh who are we communicating? What are conditions? Is that the right way to characterize them? you know, because they're not really getting uh
wetlands jurisdictional approval from us, >> right? >> So, I don't know who that should go to, like if you're actually going to end up with a memorandum of understanding. >> Well, again, it probably should be
through DCR with with the town as as part of that because it's still DCR's land. So, >> Right. Right. DC was getting upset that they have a they have a department that does drainage work. So when we said there was a little maybe a catch base and we got
to unplug, they were like, "Oh, wait a minute. You know, we're going to have to check with our engineering department." So there was and then they asked about the agreement when that didn't come to play. I think they're softening up a little bit and again we're not looking to recreate the wheel here. It's been
established for many, many years. And the only other person I was thinking about, Richie Earl, if he can still rem I didn't know if he could. >> He's actually the guy that I went and spoke with him about the issue of >> theou back then
>> because that was done under the um state C grant. So that has to be open to everybody when they did the >> and that was back in 199 something. It was in the '9s because Richie >> he he knew exactly how that worked and
and how this came to pass and he even knew the amount of money spent back then. >> You spoke to the right man and that's why I was going to try the game. >> So he was he was very familiar with it and um you know he talked about the agreement and he told me he's the one that told me about an agreement and so I
came back to him. I said Richie where am I going to find this? And he said it start here. Well, everything everywhere we went was a dead end, including the MD, I mean the DCRI, >> right? >> Um, so we asked for some uh of our legislative
staff to help us and they ran into it and and then we got a call after we placed the call, we got a call from attorney Galvin, who was the attorney for DCR, who wants to come up with an ordinance. >> Perfect. Perfect. So, Phil, in your question, I think we should just write a general letter to mass DCR.
>> Okay. with the conditions that the work >> right >> stays within the existing disturbed area and that the area is graded and remain gravel and if any drainage repairs are needed they still stay within the currently disturbed location.
>> Yeah. >> Maybe send a copy to the town administrators or so. >> Yep. Yeah. >> Yeah. Well hopefully that memorandum gets put in the right spot. Right. Exactly. Anything else? Do we need a motion for that or
>> I would make a motion, Mr. Chairman, just to make it all official and uh agree to send a letter to DCR allowing the town through its highway department to initiate removal of that island of vegetation within the DCR boat overlow
overload area. >> So moved. Do you have a second? >> Second. >> All right. All in favor? Opposed? All right. All set, sir. >> Thank you. >> Have a good evening. >> Thanks for coming, Rick. I appreciate it. >> All right, bills and minutes.
I >> think I'll lose. >> It's not playoff time. They only move in playoffs. >> We have baseball. >> No, it's Bruins baseball. >> They might ask you to play.
>> They might ask you to play in that. All right. Thank you, too. >> East Bay Media 123. >> $123. >> Second. >> All right. Who's Jake? Phil. >> All in favor? Post. >> Didn't matter what the number was.
>> Stipen check for the chairman. $100,000. >> I like this guy. All right, we have minutes. Let's see who's here for the minutes. >> No way. Never. Not going to happen. >> Jake. myself, Jason, Kevin, Burton, and Phil.
>> No. All right. The one night that Tom actually comes, you don't need him. >> We didn't need him. >> We didn't need him for minutes. All right. Last one is uh W Mason office supplies. $5128. Need a motion to pay. >> The motion from Jake. >> Second. >> Second from Phil. All in favor? Opposed?
Okay. That's unanimous. Yeah. Yeah. Sign. All right. All right. Anything else, gentlemen? Chris? >> No. >> All right. Motion to adjurnn. Somebody >> move to. >> All right. Do you have a second? Let's see. >> Second from Tom. All in favor? Of
course, I've seen out of itself.