Okay. All set, Val. All right. We have the uh September 2nd meeting of the Conservation Commission. Please stand and salute the flag. Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. This meeting is being recorded tonight. Oh, thank God. Thank you. That's why I got dressed up, Chris. All right, so we'll start right off the first meet hearing. I'm sorry. Dave Mendy's RDA 225 Forge Road construct
single family dwelling garage and regrading in the buffer zone and riverfront area. Anybody have Mr. Mendy's? All right. Are you Are you the representative or you Mr. Mendy's? I am the Mr. Oh, the only one and only. That's good. All right. Come on up here and um Chris, you have do you have a plan? If you have
a plan, some magnets over there and you can just give us an explanation of what you plan on doing. Mr. Mandy's side upside down like the way the writing works. Where is this forge?
I want might be right after the river on the left is set back way back. Um, so I've owned this property for 40 years or so. Uh, last year I put a barn on it, a pole barn, a 40x60 pole barn,
which is right here. Um, it's not very large. I hope you can see it. I'm on Forge Road. Uh the river there's the dam across the street from me and the river is the southern border of my property. So you're the road right after the factory that goes back.
Yeah. Right next to Macas. Matter of fact, I bought it from um the elder guy that ran Macy's day. All right. Thank you. So, uh we put the barn last year right here. And I'd like to put the house.
This is the first house on the property. The property says on the deed says 33 plus or minus acres. Uh it's at least that big. Quite a bit of it is is wooded. Uh there's fields here, here, and here. Uh when I first got it, they
were growing corn there, but I've had it as pasture. Uh we've grown a couple different things there. The drive porch road is up here. The driveway coming in here is right here. Uh the barn, I don't know, it's 1,000 ft, a little bit more from the road. I have I don't know four
or 500 feet on Forge Road and then it's so small but I have frontage on 177 also. I'm not fussing about that. But I'm going to come in from Forge Road. The driveway is existing and I want to build the house close to the barn, just a little bit closer to the road.
All right. Thank you, Chris. Mr. Chairman, David Mendy's, 225 Forge Road. This a request for a termination of applicability filed uh for Mr. Amendes by SNK Engineering. Um report date is 8 uh 25205.
There is no file number required for this. Site visit was also on August 25th, 2025. Description the work the owner has filed to conduct some work within the outer portion of the 100 foot buffer zone. The property is located off Forge Road and
is Mr. Mendy's most it is mostly fields as he mentioned. The applicant is constructing a well grading in a small section of the home and garage in the buffer zone. The corner of the garage and the home will be 85 ft. The well will be 70 ft and approximate grading is
60 ft from the edge of that wetland resource area. The single family own garage will disturb approximately 5,000 square ft of the buffer zone. I feel this is very minor in nature. Uh, as you he indicated, this is right off the edge
of the existing driveway. There's very little uh earthwork that's required to um construct this current dwelling. Recommendations to the board. The Westport Conservation Commission should approve the single family home garage and well in the buffer zone with a negative box 3 determination for 225
Forge Road. All right. Thank you. You guys have any questions? You have any questions? Do I? No. No, you're good. All right. Any questions in the audience? All right. Motion from somebody if I could. Motion from Jake. Second.
Second for Phil. All in favor? Opposed? All right. That's unanimous there. Is that easy? Sometimes easy is good. I'm not complaining. You are free to go. I mean like jail. I will be mailing this document to you,
but I know you have found filed your foundation permit. I've already proceeded to check the box off for you to proceed. Thanks. All right. Thank you guys. Have a good night. Thank you. Henry F. Notice of intent 46K bio lane
construct garage in the buffer zone. We have green cards for this. I hope. Oh yeah, we got them. Okay. Good evening. Uh Matt Pike here on behalf of the applicants. I'm here with South Coast Engineering. Um before the commissioner with a proposed order
condition plans for the property located at 46 K Lane. So 46 K my lane that's located at assessor's math 83 lots 116 and 61E. Uh the property is about 1,000 ft down
Kane which is about also 1,000 ft from the intersection road and hotel road or hotel hill rather. Uh property contains approximately 4.4 acres. A portion of it is wet. uh the wetland line shown on the
plan flags 101 to 109 that would just is part of this plan and then this portion of the flag is from an old uh ORAD plan from 2021. Uh so the purpose of this plan is to show the location of the proposed 28x 12
uh garage and a minor gravel driveway widening. So the garage is here and just a minor widening right there. Um a compost filter tube is proposed shown on the plan. Uh the tube will be placed prior to any disturbance will
remain until all the disturbed areas are restabilized and the existence of the grading of the lot will be maintained. There's no real changes in any of the grading with the proposed uh gravel driveway and uh garage will be placed. The closest
disturbance to the wetland's 5.4 ft. And with that we'll turn it over to the commissioner. So it's 5.4 ft from the wetlands. This is the closest disturbance to the wetland buffer zone or the actual wetland? The actual wetland. All right. Thank you. Y
chairman, members, Henry FR, 46K Bane. This is a notice of intent application filed by South Coast Engineering. The report date is August 26, 2025. There is a file number with no adverse comments. It's SE802810. Um, this site visit was also on August
26, 2025. Description of the work. The owner has filed a notable intent to construct an unattached 28x12 garage. The work is proposed along the edge of the driveway and within 5.4 ft of the wetland edge. The wetland line was previously proved
on an O-r as they mentioned and the extension that line has shown along the driveway. Uh the driveway will be widened slightly to allow the garage and use of the drive to access the home. So they're basically just widening the driveway closer to that edge of wetland
to allow the garage and slight passage to get to the home. Not necessarily for for vehicle access, but for anyways getting uh deliveries and stuff to this home itself. The existing property constraints again make other locations not feasible. Um and this is the only
access into the property. The driveway is farthest on the east side of the property that it can be in order to get around that wetland system. So there really is no other area that would allow uh the access for this driveway or rather the garage itself. So I think
this is considering its uh the best location. So I recommend the board for this um recommendations. Westbrook Conservation Commission should approve the proposed 28x12 garage with standard conditions with the driveway to remain gravel.
So where is So the driveway that's there now, that's the existing driveway. How do how do they get to the house? They walk down the rest of the way or does it go all the way to the house? The driveway is just about right. Yeah, right about there. Yep. So wouldn't I mean since the wetland is far away, wouldn't it make sense to put the garage down there? Closer to this. Well, there's the well.
They have a well here. There's a well pump house and all on the side here is the septic tank. So if they put the garage there, any future access because of the well and such will deter like getting you again, not delivery, but sometimes you get a fridge
or something getting it as close to the house as possible. And the Freshes have owned this property for 50 years and recently did do an addition on the backside, but um they have pretty much left the property, I could say, in its
untouched setting. So, I thought this was the best for the constraints they have of that narrow entrance. All right. Anybody have any questions? I um is is the gravel drive is that porous? Yes.
Okay. And and so and for the garage roof is run off into the wetland, you think, or not? It'll be an it'll be an asphalt roof. It will cause a slight, you know, increase in impervious area, but in total, the
the property I didn't I didn't do a takeoff of it, but it's you're probably around 2% impervious. So, it's a very small amount of of area, but the proposed garage itself, I think, is around 350 square ft in addition to what's already there. Okay. And to add to that with infiltration in
this location, this has a very high water table. Um I I don't think they would function um without taking groundwater themselves. Okay. So any other questions? Any questions from the audience?
All right. No question. No more questions. A motion. Motion to approve. Second. That was Tom. Tom and Bert. All in favor? Opposed? All right. Thank you.
Jeff and Tracy Cornell, RDA 1782 Drift Road, construct trench for utilities to dock in the flood zone and the zone. So I am actually representing Jeff and Tracy for now. Okay, it's fine. do it. I was not prepared with a full size plan
to move it up here. But I you're in trouble now. I did submit a plan to go to the proposed trench from the house. Do you want to rent one from us? All right. We lease them out. Let's see. Is this I guess these are the full size.
This is it, right? I thought I threw a full size one, but I found the one she used was the 11 by 17. Get your binoculars out. All right. Uh, so Ashley Sparks, I'm here for
representing Jeff and um I am the general contractor who we are building a new house on this lot. The dock was before my time. Um, but when we start electrical walk through the electrician said, "Hey, should we be trans to the dock for water and electric?" We thought
it made sense. So, we're here asking for permission to do that. All right. Thank you. Actually, um Jeff and Tracy Cornell, just for the record, filed a notice of intent to remove a structure on the water. They relocated their new
home 225 250 ft away from the river. So, they've made some significant improvements to what was pre-existing on the site. In turn, they're looking to get this uh trench uh for utilities to the license stock. So Jeff and Tracy
Cornell 782 Drift Road. This is a request for determination of applicability. Report was uh dated 8:26 2025 with the site visit also on 826 2025. Description of the work. The owner has
filed the requested determination to construct a trench the existing license pier for utilities to service dock. The trench will be excavated 3 to 4 feet in depth. conduit placed and the area immediately backfilled. The electrical lines will be pulled through after the
trench installation. Um the disturbed areas will be seated and stabilized. Erosion control shall remain along the edge of the river until the seed is growing. So if you're not familiar with electrical installation, it's very quick. It's it's dig the trench, place
the conduit, bury it, and move on down the line. And then the electrician comes through after that is backfilled at a later date and snakes those utilities. In this case the water line will be laid at the same time and and will be serviceable and tight in connections.
But basically it's a very quick installation. So this trench is not expected to be open for a long period of time. So I recommend to the board the Westbrook should West Conservation should approve the utility trench to the dock for Jeff and Tracy Cornell the 782
drift road with a ne negative box two determination. Most of this work is within the flood zone and with obviously the riverfront area. All right, questions or a motion? Seems pretty simple.
Submit in the plans limits of CBS CBRS area. What is that in in on the plan on the planets of CBRS area established 11690
is that you know this is Sean's you know plan that I drew on top of that's what oh that's the coastal zone barrier resource area coastal barrier resource area is the CBRS great any other any other questions thank you Thank you.
How old is that lock, Chris? It's 80 ft wide. That's all it is. What's that? 80 ft wide. It's 80 ft long. Yes. This is the old Hara property. If you ever seen it, had that long driveway. The two driveways were like side by side
and they were separate properties, but they always look like the same and they paralleled each other. I see. Yeah, I just looked at the 80 foot front. Correct. Okay. Again, these are very older properties, Arab property.
Motion to approval. Second from who was that? Kevin. Oh, Kevin. Second from Kevin. That was Jake and Kevin. Thank you. All in favor? Opposed. All right, that's unanimous. Thank you. Thanks.
Continuences. Jenna Asserly. Are we doing that one tonight? Yes. Okay. I believe someone is here. Jenna Asserly. Notice of intent zero river road construct single family dwelling with driveway garage and other site improvements in buffer zone and boarding vegetative wetlands. [Applause]
This is so these are the original green cards. Yeah, this is a contin [Applause] start. Yep. Good evening. Good evening everyone. Uh my name is Tyler Drew. I work for Bay Group. I have a representative on behalf of Jenna Asmly,
the applicant um for construction of the single family home off of River Road in Westport. Um the project um was submitted back in uh early January uh and since uh D and
commission both issued comments uh which we addressed and revised the project accordingly. Um so that is the project that I'm going to present today. Um so the the project is proposing to construct a single family home off of um
River Road. Um it includes a um single family home with a garage um a driveway which connects to an existing shared driveway off of River Road. Um it also includes a terrace with a pool um and a septic system, a well and a detention
basin. Uh there's also some wetland application areas. Um so in order to access the property uh the project is proposing to construct a a portion of the driveway through BBW. Um it was also later determined that there is an
intermittent stream that crosses this area. So u a culvert was added uh a stream crossing was added as part of this uh driveway structure. Um so the driveway uh the stream crossing I should say is designed to
meet the Massachusetts uh stream crossing standards fully. Um additionally the weapon replication areas um here and here uh they're proposing 9,000 ft of new BBW to offset the 4200 square ft of permanent impact
here. Uh let's see. Uh so the project was filed under the limited project provision under 10533E for the driveway crossing. Um and it's also seeking a waiver for for work within the 25 ft and all no alteration zone for the driveway.
Obviously um the driveway uh um several alternatives were discussed as far as site access. It's a very challenging site um because there's wetlands on all sides um and obviously the topography is
very challenging. It's a very large hill. Um so it was determined that this was the um most feasible option was to access road least amount of uh impacts to the u yeah the driveway has been constructed
to minimum width for um emergency vehicle access. uh requirements. Uh and again, that was the alternative that was, you know, decided on that would be least impactful to access the site. Um does anybody have any questions? We'll let Chris read the report and then
we can we'll get some questions for you. Thank you, Todd. This is generous ceremony, uh River Road, lot 26G. Um again, it doesn't really have an address at this time. It's a notice of intent. Chris, what is it near? I was just trying to look up the address.
I'm like, J, do you know? Is there a local another address nearby? Get an address to It's right before the fork. Before the fork. Okay. Right before the fork, right? What is it? Is it right before the fork? No, it's south of the fork. I'd say 280.
Okay. I'm just looking on the JS map. Okay. I don't know what side thes are on, but it's on the not the river side. Okay. It's right at the old hotel. Okay. River Road. Thank you. Um, this is a notice intent filed uh by Northeast Engineers and Consultants as
well as the Beta Group uh which Tyler represents. The report date is August 29th, 2025. The file number for this project is SE802783. The site visit was also on August 27th,
2025. Description of the work. Yan has provided a revised plan to construct a driveway access crossing a bordering vegetated wetland. This site is located on a steep slope that will require design to not cause any adverse flooding to the abuing sites. The applicant has
addressed the agent concerns with a box culvert installed at the intermittent stream crossing within the access. The box cover has been designed to meet the 1.5 width ratio which is the stream crossing standards. The driveway will
alter uh 4,300 square ft of BVW. This will be replicated in two separate replication areas. Um this was another concern I had. They had this large replication and I thought it would be better suited to smaller and come in with two areas which this addresses.
These two areas again will be up to a total of 9,000 square ft which is in excess of 2:1 which is uh well above what the requirements of the regulations regulations require 1 one a detailed cross-sections provided showing the existing elevation with finish
elevations. They also have incorporated soil testing data to know what the actual water table elevation is within the sites. plantings shown are native plants and and all are acceptable as they have shown. The wetland replica
wetland replication areas um areas address one concern for downslope flooding by placing a weir in the proposed outflow to slow any potential flow during the fall and spring seasons. These drainage basins which they almost
become on a slope I felt that would be intercepting groundwater may have at times the capacity to overflood and when you get this you'll get a ripping up a scouring effect down in the soil. So I had asked in my initial comments for them to circumvent that by trying to
maintain and and lessen that um wanting to peak and flow out in a deluge of water. So they've constructed we to try to uh minimize that uh heavy flow. And last one please drain calculations
also provided show the design per their calculation will not increase runoff from preconditions to post conditions uh for this proposed site construction. They have uh constructed this basin as well as uh diverting water in a manner
that will lessen any downsite impacts. The location of the single family home has not changed or the amount of the proposed site alteration um for this extensive rear lawn, pool, and patio. As I mentioned, conditions of
sites usually dictate the size of a home. This is a 5,000 ft plus dwelling. I I think for the conditions of this site and on the slope I I think the home is excessive but that is something the
applicant wants to propose. Um so I am only relaying that to you for the site's conditions itself. Uh I previously suggest limiting the amount of site alteration in light of the difficult soil conditions. Um the site work is not
maintaining on that westerly side of the house the 25 ft no activity which the commission prefers. There is room to slide the home easterly and eliminate this grading in the 25 no activity area. A storm water basin is designed in help
site runoff. The water will enter the basin by three pre-cast catch basins installed in strategic locations. The roof runoff should also be designed to be directed into the storm water basin if it isn't already. And the plan is
stamped by a PE um as I mentioned, but I still have reservations that this design will function under all circumstances. Um but for the design standards, they have met everything that is required. Um, it's recommended again that on new
construction that they eliminate any work for the single family home that extends into the 25 ft no activity area. I think this can easily be slid um I did ask them to consider moving things northerly, but uh again, if this house
can be slid down slope just um 15 ft, it may give them that setback that they need. But um that's something the commission urges especially with new construction and the design is causing them to be close not necessarily the
wetland itself. So recommendations for the board. I didn't get the second page but it was I recommend a continuence. Um I am in favor of all things that they have made for the changes to date. I think they've addressed all my concerns.
Um, but I still believe that they have ability to eliminate any work in that 25 ft area associated with the house, not the associated driveway access or the wetland access. No, I I'm only referring
to that location there on the westerly side of the home. So, I suggest we continue the hearing for 2 weeks if the applicant agrees. Didn't you say you're out of the 25 ft in the house? Was it the only 25T incursion was the driveway? one location where there's grading
proposed within the 25T no alteration zone to the the location of the house I did just want to bring up um shifting the house uh to the north would put it within the 25 foot no alteration zone up here um and shifting it south um because
it's on such a steep grade it creates uh difficulties for the driveway um so that was why that was the location that was decided on um uh I will say in the the no alteration zone here. All that's proposed is grading. Um the house itself
won't be placed in that. I think it still provides about 15 ft between that. I again that's up to the commission, but I I I think you can move it. I mean, you keep saying you can't, but you're proposing an extremely large structure
and say that that structure can't be eliminated in a small manner to accommodate. Um I find that hard to believe. They're creating a 250 foot rear yard that requires quite a amount of grading in order to accomplish that.
So, I don't see why things can't be slid um proportionately to what the work associated with this project is. That's just my suggestion. If you feel you can't meet that, that that's I guess something that you can discuss with the commission.
Can we point out that work zone we're talking about here? Is that right? Uh right here. Okay. uh along the back of the garage. So, okay. So, yes. So, what are we looking at? That's a back of a garage. What does that have? So, the driveway comes up here from River Road. Thank you. Then there's also um this
turnaround. I'm not it's not my area of expertise, but for vehicle turnaround and that sort of thing requirement. Um so, the the buffer zone extension this time. Okay. Any other questions? Well, could you can
you expand a little bit more about the difficulties that you're the construction difficulties? It's feasible, but it just what is it about that that uh if you So, I guess there are two scenarios. One
is that you would reduce the size of the house in the area. the others if you don't want to do that you you I think you were saying you could shift it but it would there be more engineering challenges can you give us a little detail about what those would be and what the degree of infeasibility is
yeah um so as to um as to the size of the house I can't speak to that know you know they would have to redesign that um my job is just the permitting side but um just it's the u like I said the ch the site is very challenging uh it's a very steep slope and to the driveway.
That's one of the reasons it needs this sneaking course up the hill. Um, and in order to in like to shift the house, you'd also need to shift the driveway, which puts it directly uphill. Um, so I know that was one of the design challenges when when uh planning this out. Uh, and like I said before, there's
also no alteration zones, you know, to consider on all sides of of the, you know, proposed building. Chris, did you just say shift the house down the hill, down the driveway? I I don't see why there the 25 foot on
the driveway side is you're well away from it with your driveway. Go across right there. You go you again, I'm not going to design this for you, but like I said, it's 55 to 6,000T house with you don't have to have a yard that big. So,
you could slide the house suddenly and you'd be 25 ft away. You could I I don't see why you can't just slide this down. I mean, even if you get 5 ft, that's all you got to do. You don't have to shrink anything. You're going to slide it. So, if you got to grade, look how much grading you're doing in here now. What
is that little amount of movement? I don't feel it affects your project in the dramatic sense that you're making it. So, what is 10 ft? You said I would say yeah, that would approximately they're at 15. So, no. Yeah, 10 ft would give them if they
could get us something, it would be better than not saying you can't get. So, I think there is the ability a retaining wall maybe. Um, again, um, I've been very critical of the site cuz I'm very concerned by it
and and this is a dramatically the snake like driveway has to be done so that you don't have a delusion water going straight down the hill. It's a way of designed to break up that flow which most people with a long driveway understand. So, um I still again if the
board feels it's fine then you guys could come to a consideration tonight and I could design an order conditions based for uh the project. If I might, we also did discuss uh the possibility of doing some restoration on
this in this area after the um ing is done. The building is built, doing some restoration in the new alteration zone. Like I said, the building will be located outside of it. So, the area will be our experience is people encroach within that area. No matter whether we
you claim it's going to be something, the landscapers get in there and the next thing you know, it's a maintained area. So, if that was the case, we're going to ask for something that's a permanent barrier that you can't go beyond, but obviously you don't want it
right up against I don't know what they're going to do for the back of the garage. You still want access to the gutters and and other use. So, um again, um that's just my concern. We'd like to see this especially on new construction.
You're designing a project that needs to meet that setback. I know you can't meet it for access in the driveway. That's not what it's meant for. It's meant for the permanent use that continues to again our experience
is always that encroachment. So, it's just a way of us trying to protect the wetland as much as we can. Any other questions? Okay. And we're relying on a we system to make sure that the water does what it's supposed to do.
Yeah. I mean, it's the best it's the best scenario for where the replications are going in that rear. They're kind of going in in the finger of two wetland systems on either side. So, it's just a measure to they all at one time had it all in the
upper section and I thought it was too much. So, they kind of broke they kind of broke it up cuz this is all wetland. This sounds like this is a property that you have to see to actually visualize it. I'm having trouble like the elevation and yeah, I know it's a it's just one giant
hill all the way down the river road. Yes, there is no a slight flat to it, but it it then it climbs as you get to the house location. Even if the house is smaller, you have the same exact concerns about the property. The property has a perch water table at
about 12 to 18 in. So water boils out of this hill when it rains. It's very So it's not that what they're doing, it's what's happening around them and above them. So they're collecting this site takes all the water from Old Harbor Road and now they're building an obstruction
in the middle of that. So now they're pushing the water left and right of of that development in order to save their structure. So before there would be seeps and stuff. So when we got real heavy rain that wetland may flow out of
it and down slope and so again it didn't qualify as wetland but this is a very tricky area. So I have a just a process question um which is that
um so one is that you would agree to continuence and go back and uh you know speak to the appropriate people about this and the question is whether or not we could approve this with the condition
that the 25 foot setback would be established and we wouldn't really care and and that they would have to submit a final plan consistent with that before and then I guess it could be up to them if they
don't like the order that we issued to decide whether or not they wanted to appeal the order. That is correct. And it seems I'm suggesting it because I think you
know uh maybe that's the that if the consensus is that we want the um that we want the setback
um but we're not really prepared to decide exactly what it is that has to happen. You could leave that decision to the applicant, but make it clear that no alterations can occur until a plan
either until a plan was submitted that complied with that condition or the applicant was uh you know chose to to appeal it and in which case that would run its own
course. So what it's not clear to me is that the formality of the policy that we have it's a policy correct it's not a Bible it's a recommendation
with this new construction right having that in my opinion the ability to design to try to that respectfully yeah so I make that proposal without
fully understanding how it would play out in the event that there was an appeal. Just to say that understood. So if the board wishes to to close the hearing and and and make vote with the condition that you have mentioned as
well as either that or we just have to deny it if we're that can be I mean but I don't I don't think in that case it would trigger a denial because they have met Right. Right. The majority of our concerns this I
don't mean to be petty by this. No, I agree. Um but I just feel with so that so um let me let me put it to the engine. Would you prefer to take a um uh
have us issue an order saying you can't go within 25 ft and then you figure out where the house is going to move forward 10 ft or to the side 10 ft, however you're going to do it, and then come back to Chris and present the plan showing that or do you just want a continuence so you can come back in two weeks and present a plan or you can take
a denial and and appeal it? Um, uh, I think it doesn't sound like there's going to be support to pass with the 25 foot incursion. That's that that that's my my feeling by listening to the members. And my concern is you have a 15 acre lot
and we're dealing with 5T. There's there's a lot of land there I think we can make use of if we were arguing over 5T. It's 15 acres. So, I'll leave it for this spot to go. So the best route would be a continuence to try to figure
this out. Well, that or they could just take it like Phil said, you can approve it with no encouragement into no activities and then they present a plan to Chris that meets that and then that way they don't have to come back to another hearing and pay another fee.
I mean I I I mean it wouldn't I guess it wouldn't them. Um so the advantage of the conditional one is that you know so a decision is made I guess it wouldn't prevent you from
coming back and have and really making a clear case as to why it is infeasible to do that and I think that the response that you're getting is here about it is that you is that you haven't made a case that
it's not feasible to do it that I don't mean to say Maybe it is infeasible, but based on the information that we're getting now, it's very hard for the commission to decide it's not feasible. Which leads me to think that,
you know, the condition is a progress. You've got an order, then only if you really are prepared to come back and make the a very convincing case that it is in feasible. And um
then you got a solution. You can walk away with it with with with you know a solution. It's 10 ft. I mean I think your septic line's going through there too, isn't it? Where? Oh, through um to get to the back. Oh yeah, I think you're right. Yeah. Yeah.
If that's the case, then then maybe continue best ideally. Yeah, I I would imagine they can move the house forward 10 feet. I mean, that would probably be the easiest thing and maybe you get better support from the members at that point. All right. So, um motion to continue for
two weeks. Oh, I don't know if the applicant is prepared to do that. Otherwise, I would No, that that's what he just asked for. Said he was. He just asked. Great. All right. We have a we have a second. Okay. Who said that? Tom. Kevin. Who said that? I said Phil and Tom.
Phil and Tom. either Phil and Tom. All in favor? Opposed. All right. So, two weeks you can come back and hopefully we can figure this out for you. All right. But thank you. Thank you. Thanks.
All right. Next, we have certificate of compliance for Peter Petrazic SE8 2030 34 David Ro. [Applause] Peter Patrazic. This is an old order that's been on record. Um mostly we'll wait for people finding
them cuz we got a few. So disputed tragic 34 David Road certificate of compliance requested for file number SE82030. The report date is August 26, 2025. Site visit was also on August 26, 2025.
The owner had filed for a certificate compliance for an old order condition still uh still recorded at the registry. The work was completed on the dock and seaw wall many years ago when he had it licensed. Uh all work appears to have met the plan of record for the project
seeing that it took place um 12 years ago. Um so recommendations for the board. The Westport Conservation should issue a certificate of compliance for file number SC802030 Peter Petrazic 34 David Road as all work
has been completed according to the plan of record. Motion to approve. Second. All in favor? I. That passes. All right. Next we have uh Sydney Sunnimr. Sydney Sunnenheimr.
Sunnheim. Yeah. SE80 20 uh SE82601 135K Cadmin Road. This is again a request for a certificate compliance um for filing SC802601. Mr. Senheimmer demolished a previous
existing structure um that was on an adjacent small lot and converted it into a new ADU that was constructed in its place. Uh all work has been completed according to the plan of record and
again this is now about six 8 years old. All disturbed areas are stabilized. Recommendations for the board. The Westport Conservation Commission should issue a certificate compliance filing SC802601 as all work has been completed according
to the plan of record. Sydney, we have a motion. Motion to approve. Second. Jake and Tom. All in favor? Opposed? All right. Unanimous. Next one is be Matt Doyle SC 20 11 2028 Main Road. I'm going
to abstain from this and Jake's going to just uh I'm going to take care of it. So, Mr. Chairman, Matt Doyle, 2028 Main Road. This is certificate compliance engineer of record with Scitec. This is for file number SE80211
um August 26, 2025 is the date of the report. The owner is in the process of selling the property at 2028 Mill Road and the outstanding order conditions was located during the title search. The
work was completed back in 2014 to 2016 to replace the previous stock with a new design. Uh this has subsequently been licensed and all workers completed according to that plan of record. Um so recommendations to the board to clear
the title of the property and remove the blemish. The Westport Conservation Commission should issue a full certificate of compliance with file number SC80211 for Mac Doyle 2028 Main Road as all work has been completed according to the plan
of record. That is all. Thanks Chris. Do we have a motion? Second make a motion to approve second. That is Kevin and Tom. All in favor? Opposed? unanimous, man.
All right. Next, we uh that's it for hearings. So, we're going to go with some uh bills. New purchase order system, huh? This is high tech. All right. Postage. Sign all those again. You signed them,
but when it was put into the computer, it gave out numbers that they didn't want it to know. So, we got to sign it on. That was from the last meeting, which is Yeah. last meeting. Mr. So we we already voted on this. So we did. Yes. So this is just a
request for new signatures for a revised. All right. Purchase order with the correct ending number of 01 02 03 04 05. I don't think they trusted Jason.
Jason signature. That's probably what it is. Yeah. Motion to approve. I think he's just sign for the record. It is. It's like I never see anything on here with my name on it. I mean, it's amazing. Never payments to me. I see, you know,
Jake's hair. Everybody's hair but me. I'm just kidding. Well, you get on another board, Mr. Chairman. No, I don't want to take Phil's. I don't I don't compete with Phil. I think it's profitable. You should run on my ticket. No, I'm good. You got two members here that do very well.
I don't have enough time. All right. So, we do have one bill for East Bay Media for $184.50 that needs to be paid. This is for advertising. Motion to approve. Second. Jake, Bill. All in favor? Pos. All right. That's unanimous. And then we
have minutes. Present. Myself, Jason, Phil, Burton, Chris Capone. Absent where Tom, Kevin, and Jake. Unbelievable. The one night that the one night Jason messed this up. the one night that Tom
actually shows up and we have nothing for him. You will not be here at the next meeting. You won't be I have nothing for you tonight, Mr. Chairman. All right. Does anybody else have anything they want to discuss, complain about? We don't have enough time for that.
All right. And if not, we'll take a motion to adjurnn. Move to adjourn. All right. Second. Phil Jake. All in favor? Opposed? That's unanimous. Thank you very much. [Applause] We need your thinking caps at the next meeting because we're going to have another challenging one. So,
everybody has challenges. Mic off. All right. Everything's challenging. We're hearing out road one we did. We're talking about this 25 ft setback.
I can't I can't help couldn't help but think earlier in the evening we approved 5.4 4 ft. That's a hell of a lot different than 25. But that was a that was repair. Oh, I see what you're saying. It was on the I
understand what you're saying. That was for a new garage. Right. Right. Right. Right. So, I do agree with you. But that's a pre-existing lot of record that has existing established use. This lock is brand