Okay, I hope everybody join me in the pledge of allegiance. >> I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all. >> Thank you. Uh I'd like to open the the meeting of April 7th. It is 603 or 4 and uh we are being recorded and we
may be going out live as well. Uh first up is approval not required for ANR for S's way file number 26-3615A request by applicant to combine lot one
and two combine lot one and lot two into partial A proposed proposed to convey approximately 1850 square ft from parcel B to parcel A located at zero SS way assessor's map 57
lot 18D 1954. >> Yep. Hi, my name is Asa Smith representing Atlantic Design Engineers on behalf of the applicant Sunrise on Sools Way LLC. Um the subject property consists of multiple parcels located along Su's Way identified as assessor's
map 57 lots 19 24 and 18D with a combined area of approximately 36.1 acres following the proposed lot adjustments. The property is located within the town's residential agricultural zoning district and was previously approved under a special permit for a large-scale solar energy
system issued by the busport planning board in February 2021. The proposed plan is submitted as approval not required plan under the Mass General law chapter 41 section 18 um 81L and does not constitute a subdivision of land as all resulting parcels maintain the
required frontage along ST's way. The ANR was prepared to comply with condition 20 of the previously approved special permit which requires the SO facility to be located on a single parcel with a minimum of 50 ft of frontage on SU's way and that a plan be recorded showing the revised lot
configuration. The proposed lot line adjustment consolidates the parcels into a single compliant lot with the required frontage and provides a plan suitable for recording. The plan represents a minor administrative adjustment to the existing lot lines to satisfy the condition of the previously approved special permit. In Atlantic's opinion,
the plan does not constitute a subdivision maintains required frontage and access and is appropriate for endorsement as an approval not required plan under the subdivision control bylaw. If you have uh any questions, I'll be happy to answer them. Could you just point on the map the lot uh that
you are bringing together? Yeah. I guess here it's this lot here, this lot here, and then the portion or Oh, sorry. It's actually the portion here that's being added. And then this is maintaining as a right of leg. um that's currently in the
>> So you're combining them because you say that the for large scale solar array requires it to be a single lot. Yeah, for this particular project, um condition 20 of the special permit required that it um be on its own contiguous lot and have frontage on
schools way and as well have a 50ft right away um going to the parcel where the panels are going to be located. And so through discussions with the um building inspector, we basically were able to um you know come up with this you know configuration which uh you know
basically goes with the uh with what's required >> cuz we approved this what how many years ago? >> 21. >> Yeah. four years ago. >> Sorry. >> And and it butts on the
solar farm that's on the house. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Can you point out where the solar is that? >> So this the solar to be um developed or the solar that's already existing? >> Well, both >> both. >> So the solar that's already existing is
down in this lot down here. >> Yeah. And the solar field is um to be built as part of this is going to be in this lot right here >> as part of the same solar array. >> No, different solar race >> which hasn't been before us yet. >> Uh no, this project has been approved in
2021. The one to the south was built I think in 2021. >> Yep. >> Yeah. >> Right. So you're altering our solar uh approval. >> Is that right? >> No, we're trying to comply with your solar approval.
Okay. Well, I must be I'm confused. >> No, it was a requirement to have the bylaw requires a 50ft frontage and they had a 50ft right of way. They didn't actually. Now it's they're they're
transferring a parcel from that long narrow parcel up on SSway. They're cutting the end of it off so that they now have a compliant parcel >> per our permit requirement. >> And they're also combining though into one lot.
>> Yeah. >> So, was that in the special conditions? >> Yes. Original approval. >> Can can I ask a question? You've got I see where the 50oot right away is, but you're also adding that little notch. >> Mhm.
>> Uh why are you adding that? So the notch is to create the frontage and the 50 foot right away is to create the 50 foot right of way. Um we're kind of parsing this requirement of the bylaw or of the approval into two >> um you know paths forward
>> and is the will the right of way be used for access? >> Yeah, that's that's going to be the access and it's um utilizing existing ancient way um that goes across the parcel 18. is a that 50ft right away wraps around an existing cop path that runs into the woods.
>> Yep. >> Okay. So, the access is off towards you on the map. >> Yep. The access um continues along is from school's way. >> All right. Motion, Mr. Chair.
>> Sure. I move to a >> I'd like to hear from the planners. >> Oh, yeah. >> Sure. So, per the town solar bylaws, access to a solar development maybe through a minimum lot frontage of 50 ft on a street or easement. But, uh, this
project was approved um in February 2021 in condition of approval number 20 stated that all solar panels be located on one continuous parcel held in single own single ownership with a minimum of 50 feet of frontage on Souls Wave. So it um asked for frontage not just um
through an easement. So the purpose of this ANR is to one combine those lots on that the solar array sits on into one parcel and then conveyed that 50 ft of frontage via about 1.8K square feet of parcel conveyance from that abuing parcel to the main
and we can zoom in on it here. staff found out that this met the ANR requirements and so here's their 50 that they're gaining for frontage and then their access would be through here and the parcels of course meet the minimum intensity requirements.
>> Can can you explain how soul's way it seems to get interrupted by uh uh lot 20? >> Yep. So, um, actually, you know, the the road continues on, um, over that portion of the Westport Land Conservation, um,
own parcel. >> Um, so that that right away does continue over it. It's not like it gets cut in half. >> Okay. >> And that isn't a problem. The land trust knows there's an easement
over their property. >> Yeah. um those houses out back currently use that road um to access their their properties. So, you know, there are cars going down there as we speak. >> But they understand I'm sure they understand that there's a solar break
there and they're going to use the same >> Mhm. >> basement over their property. >> I know that, you know, some of the neighbors had contacted me when we were doing the solar array of approval. So I know they're aware of it
>> and and they the comments were to use the existing cut path that goes in the woods. So we'll stay just out of interest. Do you know the status of this solar array? Is it going to proceed?
>> Yeah. Well, it's in the stages. Um, I think the problem was with the interconnection from the utility um that was holding it up. And so, I believe there's a light at the end of the tunnel in that regard. And so, this would be a first step to uh, you know, actually getting this built um, starting to comply with these, you know, conditions
of approval before we can issue or request a building permit. >> And they're on extension now. We granted an extension, right? >> Yeah. I was actually here last uh I think it was last summer um and asked for the extension.
>> Okay. >> Okay. I would entertain a motion. >> Uh Mr. Chair, I move to endorse the ANR plan to Soul's Way as presented finding that it does not require subdivision approval under Mass General Laws Chapter
41 section 81P. >> Second. >> All those in favor? I >> I >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Next is the approval not that required
ANR for 528 American Legion Highway file number 26-3796A. Request by the applicant to convey parcel A from 528 American Legion Highway to 522 American Legion Highway.
Assessors map 30 blocks 23 A and C and 24 C. Do we have anybody here for that? >> Doesn't seem like it. >> Uh being an ANR, uh I guess we should
consider it even if there's no applicant here. Otherwise, by default, we'd have to >> deny it. So, can somebody explain it? >> Sure. >> So, about 59,000 square ft of land called parcel A is being convey
conveyed, pardon, from map 30, lot 24 C at 528 American Legion Highway. That's that long kind of funky parcel in the back here. um to map 30 lot 23 A and C which is if you see on the right hand side of this plan this more conformant
lot which is kind of in this trapezoidal shape um both lots have over 150 ft of frontage to and meet the minimum intensity regulations um staff doesn't find an issue with this ANR and um recommends approval
the purpose of the ANR was um not clear I'm not sure what the applicant is intending to do But good friends. >> So tell me again what they're doing and maybe you can highlight on the plan >> the cursor.
>> So first I'll show you the main lot in question. See this big lot with this back extension. >> Yes. >> So it's shaped like this. It comes and has frontage here where my cursor is and then here as well. And now zooming on to the right hand side. This these are the existing lot lines.
There's one trapezoidal parcel here. This is map um 30, lot 23 A and C. And then here is the parcel that's conveyed from the original funky parcel to the new one. So
they're just kind of taking this rectangle out of that major parcel here >> and just getting it to the side. >> What are they taking out again? >> This cutting they're cutting the thing she's tracing right now out of that great big lot that goes way to the rear. >> Mhm. Mhm.
>> And they're attaching it to the lot of the house on it >> right here. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> So then the new lot line will be >> like that. >> I got you. >> Yeah. >> So the blow up is this tiny little thing down there.
>> This confuses of a piece that runs way back up. >> Yeah. >> Right. >> So that's >> Yeah. The blow up is on the lower left corner. You can see is that a bond or
>> Yeah, they're giving that to that bond. >> So you guys it's compliant. I don't I don't know what this reason is, but it's compliant. >> It's a a land swap and doesn't constitute a subdivision. >> Want a motion, Mr. Chair?
I move uh to endorse the NR plan for 528 American Legion Highway to 522 American Legion Highway uh as presented finding it does not require subdivision approval under
chapter 41 section 81B. >> Second. >> All those in favor? >> I I thank you. >> Okay. Next. Um, it is 6:15 is the
continuation of public hearing for 854 State Road file number 26-3302 SBA Miner continued from 32426. >> Thank you. Good evening. For the record, my name is Peter Celino. I'm a lawyer.
My address is 550 Locust Street in Fall River. I represent the applicant, Christopher Midto. As the board will recall, we were here two weeks ago and uh spent a great deal of time analyzing the plan. I submit to you that I think my client has made some significant
concessions in the site design to address the board's concerns. Uh I'd happy to be or I would be happy to highlight them. Namely, one of the big discussions we had was this curve cut here along Washington Street, which is now proposed to be eliminated, meaning we're not asking for it.
>> Yeah. Uh, additionally, we talked about the well and the proximity of the well to the storm water and how that would be a problem. So, my client's conceded there and he's willing to tie into town water to obviate that issue. Uh, furthermore, the plan as presented
eliminates a bunch more impervious area such that the uh existing driveway would be the sole access point again eliminating that curb cut. Um, so I think that this is a reasonable concession and is responsive to the
board's concerns. Um, obviously Kevin Silva from SK is here, Christopher Mito is here. We're happy to answer any specific questions as opposed to from the long edge. >> Correct. Mr. B, I think your point, if I remember, was why can't we use this
driveway and back in and so that is the proposal. >> Okay. >> Um, and it's designed in that manner. Thank you. >> So, you'll be able to uh drive in and drive out as opposed to backing out. >> That is correct. >> Yeah.
>> I think those are good changes. >> Me, too. >> And so, you're only going to have one uh door bay. >> I think there are multiple doors, right? >> Multiple doors. >> There still three doors. So, the intent is still to have the doors facing
Washington Street, >> but the access point to the yard, if you will, is through here as opposed to through here with no curb cut, utilizing the existing curb opening. >> So, but the the square where the the
curb cut used to be. >> Yes. >> What is I can't read it from here. >> Uh, it's proposed to be stone. >> Stone. >> Crush stone. >> So, you can you can drive on it and back up. >> Yeah. The proposal here is that there would be a paved 10ft apron right here >> which would enable him to access the
garage doors but not from Washington Street as was discussed last time. >> Right. >> So is there going to be some mechanism to keep people from driving across the stone to the road?
>> Um I'm certainly obviously we're subject to your conditions. Uh, we hadn't contemplated that issue, but I'm certain we can address concerns if the board has them. >> I can just say that it may be easier if you're there. Well, I'll just go that
way. >> Okay. >> I think it would be better to have some kind of barrier from doing that. >> Would a planting a row of plantings satisfy that? >> Yeah. Or a wooden guard rail or something? >> Okay. >> Doesn't have to be fancy. that
>> just a barrier. >> Okay. That's certainly an acceptable condition. >> Absolutely. >> For Chris. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> I'm open to that idea. >> Putting some kind of wood fence or something there. >> Right. And other also it keeps a delivery person from driving by and
seeing the doors right there and the crushed rock right there. Well, I'll just go that way. >> Absolutely. That's understandable. Is there a sidewalk on Washington Street? >> No. No. >> So, all the more reason to put something
there. >> Any Well, I I think you've made a lot of concessions to uh and I hope it doesn't hamper your ability to do business as you would like it because, you know, we're not trying to discourage you. >> No, I didn't understand that. But there were certain
>> of course >> certain requirements that we're we need to uh enforce so to speak. Anyway, but thank you for uh making these adjustments. >> You want a motion, Mr. Chair?
>> Well, I'd like to hear the plan. >> Yeah, please. >> So, this is a continuence from March 24th, 2026. Um, I'll just go through my stack report just through the ending findings. Um, just to kind of highlight what I um
determined at the end of this review. Um, I misunderstood the site plan. I I thought you were still accessing um or utilizing that curb cut. So, just um bear with me as I kind of rework in my mind some of my comments.
So for summary findings, performance standards and the zoning bylaws, um staff in the highway department agree with um the chairman that there is still the potential for that public roadway to be utilized as an extension of um the permeable stone in the apron. So um
finding that a barrier to be installed would be a condition of approval. Um, number two, buffer neck protect adjoining previs premises against detrimental or offensive uses. So, the proposed structure isn't screened by plantings. I recommend shrubs to screen. You had them on the original plans and
then you took them out. Um, so just recommend if you want to put in some shrubs to screen the proposed structure and that could maybe help with the barrier um as well that um chairman mentioned. Let's see. Number three, provide adequate and functional off- streetet loading and unloading of vehicles. Um, I'm going to skip that one
because that's not the care prep. Um, again, there's no lighting plan submitted. So, fully shielded downcast lights would be installed as a condition of approval. Um, now when it comes to the recharge chambers, uh, may may I ask
a question to the applicant? What's the status of the tiein to water? Are you definitely doing that or are you considering? >> Yes. >> Okay. That's >> 100%. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. Go ahead. >> Yeah, we're going to I looked into it. We're going to tie into water. That's the contingency behind all this because
of the issue with the storm water being too close to the well, >> right? So, I'm going to modify my statement. Um, the issue is that those proposed recharge chambers, you know, can't be located in in a compliant location that's away at least 100 ft away from both the ex the well on site
and the abuing well. So, staff finds that either this project has to result in a net decrease of impervious surface or the water time actually negates the need for recharge. So a condition of approval would be that the applicant ties into water. Um
the screening again let's see two entrances. Oh and then the applicant also has to contact NASDA to determine applicable permitting. They mentioned the dishwash sorry the discharge of storm water to the state road layer not being uh
permissible. So yeah, with this um with these changes and understanding how that curb cut is not functioning as a curb cut anymore, um I would just find that the engineer needs to Oh, hang on. Oh, and with the connection to water. Yeah,
I would find that this that brings the project into compliance. Um I would just want to make sure that um the permeable surfaces used in the site plan are approved by our consulting engineer for storm water management. >> Okay. So, uh, since you're you're
accepting an order of the condition to tie into the water, >> do we have confirmation that the water is going to go by their property? >> Yes. >> There's a there's a stub for them to connect there. Y >> Yeah, it's on the plants. Yes, it's on the >> Y. Kevin, it's in the ground right now.
How you doing? >> Uh, there is a stub already there >> ready to be tied in. Um this you can see it right here. We just going to add a water shut off >> and then connect it into the building. >> Okay. >> In response to the shrubs, uh one of the
comments in the last meeting was that there are sight distance. That's why they were removed cuz you were concerned about sight distance. That's why we removed. Um, >> are you saying >> as far as the barrier >> between can he use the boulders that he
will get to make the barrier instead of a fence? >> It's Westport. So, I'm assuming >> you'll have boulders. So if he can use that and he can use that to hold back the gravel and if
that's an acceptable barrier, >> that's fine with me. >> Yeah, I'm okay with it. So, um to to be clear because Dia mentioned screening um and you reminded us that when we
talked about removing the screening, it was so people uh entering Washington Street would be able to see uh up and down uh the street. So I think that what people are getting at is if we had uh
boulders uh that prevents access uh it doesn't achieve screening but that would be okay. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. I think screening uh it's like the triangle. We shouldn't put screening close to Route Six. So because then you
can't see around the corner as you're coming. Um and we have a bylaw about the site triangle. >> Um >> not to mention there is a transformer or a cable utility thing here. So it
hinders where you can plant um with infiltration system. So screening would be would be a little difficult. It can be done if that's what the board wants, but that's why I eliminated it.
And there's no sidewalks. >> I did add screening over here. There is a there is a screen a PVC fence 6 foot brand new on this line that's already acting as a screen. And I extended the albides over here to continue the screen
a little further. >> Good. I think it's fine. So, I I think we'd like to go over the conditions of approval and then get to approval. So,
>> sorry, one second to pull them up. >> Could I just ask one more question about lighting? Do we touched on that last time and just as we don't want to uh have lighting that will affect the neighbors or anyway? So, I don't know
what the plan was. >> Yeah, I I wasn't going to even really put maybe I was maybe going to put one light out there. No different than I have in my garage. It's not going to be beaming uh you know at night.
Yeah, maybe one little light >> motion detector or something like that. >> We require down lights. So, like in a canister shooting the light shield. >> Yeah, I can do that. >> I'm absolutely open to that. >> If it were a real site plan, this is a minor. >> Yep.
>> So, if it were a real site plan, we'd ask you for a lighting plan. Um, but in any event, we'd like you to put lights that go down. You can't see the bowl, so you can see the light coming. >> That's not a problem. >> And it's one of the conditions of
approval that Dia has in in her report, which can be verified when we do a site inspection later on. >> I'm just editing these conditions of approval and then we can go over them. >> Um, is everyone able to see?
So we put >> you can see you can't read. >> Sure. Number one, the plan must include the following missing elements upon resubmission. Uh the plan shall include a planting plan for the screening indicating the plant height and location at the time of planting.
>> Now wait a minute. >> What screening are you talking about there? on Washington Street >> because we just said we didn't want planning on Washington Street, >> right? So, we take this out. >> There's proposed screening in between the subject site and the residential
property >> to the north. So, it's to indicate the number >> the precise number of plantings and the height at planting. >> Yeah. Okay. >> And I took out that second part that talks about more Washington Street. The plan must show an erosion control plan for soil exposure during construction.
Prior to a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall furnish lighting details to the approval of planning staff. Installed lighting must be downward cast and fully shielded. The applicant shall tie into the public water system. The final plans must be submitted and approved by the planning department prior to the commencement of work. I'm
going to re uh delete the recharge comments. All existing imperous surfaces to be removed must be removed prior to the building and construction of the proposed impervious surfaces. All proposed permeable surfaces shall be approved for storm water management by
the planning board's consulting engineer. And the site must be allowed to reveate and shall be permanently stabilized within 6 months of occupancy. And lastly, plantings or wooden guardrail or boulders must be installed
along Washington Street where crush stone is proposed. >> Okay. Um I'd like a motion to approve those conditions. >> Uh Mr. Chair, I move to approve the minor site plan for 854 State Road with
the conditions that the idea has just read into the record. >> That's my motion. I'll second that. Is there any discussion? Hearing none. All those in favor? >> I
>> thank you. >> Thank you. >> Looks good. >> Thank you. Thank you. >> Last is minutes. >> Last is minutes. Well, we're going to have other business, too.
>> Uh, Mr. Chair, these minutes keep getting better and better. Uh, they're well organized, comprehensive, accurate, and timely. Uh, so congratulations to all who draft them. I
would move approval of the minutes of March 18, 20.6. Uh, not 18. The minutes say 24, >> right? >> Okay. >> Second. >> Yeah. March 24th.
>> Yeah. >> Move and second. >> Move and second. Okay. All those in favor? Hi. >> Hi. >> Hi. >> I'll I'll abstain. I was in Africa. >> Okay. >> Now you're out of Africa.
>> I'll be >> Okay. Uh is there any other business? >> Michael. >> Nothing. Okay. Uh then the last one is adjournment. Well, >> before you adjourn. >> Oh, before we Okay. >> Yeah.
>> Well, that's other business. >> Okay. >> I mean, are you doing Are you killing me that I've been through all these Tuesday night meetings for two or three hours and my last meeting, it's 30 minutes. We're out of here. Jeez. Is this the Is this the new board?
>> God. Yeah. So, I do want to just read something here. I know. So, six years ago, I was elected to fill a one-year term on this planning board. A year later, I ran again, this time for
a full 5-year term. Fortunately, I was reelected, saving me the embarrassment of losing an uncontested election. Actually, here is one of my handouts. On the back, it carries my slogan,
balancing future growth with the need to preserve our farms and open space and protect our rivers and water quality resources. I still have 999 of these cards if anyone's interested.
>> Oh, when you run again. >> Um, yeah, it has been a joy to spend six years on this board. Despite having lived in Westport for 65 years, I met so many great people, old-timers and newcomers.
As the town grows, inevitably we will lose some of our scenic water views, our 200-year-old stone walls, open fields, and woodlands. This rural landscape is what attracts so many people to the area.
As the value of the land increases, so do the economic pressures to capitalize on that value. As we've witnessed tonight, the board has made progress to introduce zoning amendments,
excuse me, to that reflect the changes happening in our town. There is still much to be done. There are many challenges ahead to provide both managed growth and preservation. The planning board is fortunate to have
an exceptionally talented and dedicated staff led by Michael Burus, our town planner, assisted by Deer Wheeler, and so abley anchored by Naen Castro. >> We say as they have in sports, a deep
bench. I have never heard anyone who has come to the planning department for assistance complain about our staff. Homeowners and hardened developers alike are treated with courtesy and respect by
a knowledgeable trio of true professionals. To my fellow board members, it has been a great experience to share these sometimes long, not tonight though, but always interesting
Tuesday evenings. Jim, our chairman, your deep involvement with so many issues in this town and dedication to the planning board in particular is an example to us all. leading our meetings and public
hearings. You patiently maintain order, never fail to give every citizen an opportunity to express his or her opinion. Thank you for your leadership. Bob, our vice chairman, your knowledge
and experience in civil engineering is invaluable to the board. Your level-headed assessment of complex issues is always concise and influential. speaking infrequently but always thoughtfully, the room quiets when you
deliver your remarks. I am reminded of that TV ad from long ago which goes, "When EF Hutton talks, people listen." and John Mayor Bullard, a man of towering intellect and stature to match.
Your ability to grasp the important issue, suggest a reasonable solution, and propose a motion has consistently helped to frame our decisions. You are also the most quotable member of the board.
My personal favorite will always be, "Mr. Chairman, would you like a motion to adjourn? And to Manny, if he's watching or listening, you bring the benefit of your practical experience in site work construction to the board's deliberations.
I have always respected your opinion on such matters. It was a pleasure to be seated next to you. Finally, my thanks to the citizens of Westport who voted for me and gave me this opportunity to serve on your planning board. I have always tried to
base my decisions not on personal biases but what I but on what I felt was in the best interest of the town as we all do. And to my successor, whoever he may be, you will be joining an exceptional group
of planners and board members. Congratulations and good luck. Thank you. >> Thank you, Michael. Thank you. ELEGANTLY DONE, >> MR. CHAIR. >> Very elegant. >> I'm making some comments in a motion. My
motion is that we uh spread those remarks uh for the record on the minutes because I think they're really well done. >> All right. >> So, that would need a second. >> I second that. >> All in favor? I
>> I'd like to comment because uh >> I grew up with Mark, you know, as kids and spent a lot of time at his house with his brother and sister and parents who were close friends of my parents and grandparents
and to to serve with you, Mark, on this uh given our long history together. I know we're each approaching 50. uh 50 what?
>> Back backing up event has been such a pleasure. But it is also your service uh is an example of what uh public service should be about because you are
one of the best architects in in New England if not a bigger area and a very successful career improving the beauty of our landscapes through your architectural
And uh you have every right to uh spend your retirement years wrestling with your brother's cows, but instead uh you choose uh to come here on on
Tuesday nights. And as is the case with Jim and Bob, bringing your technical expertise to bear, you've built more buildings, more houses than I can count, and the people
coming before us are trying to do the same thing. your experience and common sense and uh understanding of beauty and character and what fits
is an incredible service uh to the people of Westport. And it it's really been uh a real personal pleasure for me to to participate with you uh as well as
Bob and Jim and Manny and and our staff and how do you make the the best decision for the future and for the people in the bedroom. So, thank you Mark for doing that. >> It's really good of you. Well, >> yes, >> that's that's very very gracious of you
and uh uh all I can say is I hope you outlive me and you can speak at my funeral. There's an Irish saying that says, "May your casket be made of 100year-old hopes
that we will plant tomorrow." Uh, thank you. Anyways, >> yeah, I I would agree with everything you said. I think that uh we've had an exceptional board for quite a few years now, and I think it's everybody has
contributed their their view to to what's going on. And I think it's great. After your first year, you called me up and said, "I'm not sure I'm going to run again." And I said, "Well,
we need you to run. We really appreciate you, and you can always resign sometime later, but please run." And he did. So, thank you. And not not only have I had the
the the joy of your uh of your you as a colleague on this board, but um also as a as a client and he designed a wonderful addition to our home in Milton that and it it made the house and the connection
to the outdoors and Blue Hills just a thing. It was really a fabulous addition and and a wonderful piece of design. >> Well, work like that is it's not even work to me when when I have people like
you to work with. So, thanks. >> A motion, Mr. >> I waited. >> I'm Mark's favored motion. I move we adjourn. >> Second. >> All those in favor? I the eyes.