This is definitely different. Longest minute. All right. >> All right. We will call the uh November 3rd, 2025 meeting of the uh City of Winter Haven Planning Commission to order. Jordan, if you would please take role.
>> Kevin Tyson, Mario Mano, Bob Laner, Lorena Cado >> here, >> Wendy Venttor, Colin Wells >> here, >> Ed Smith >> here, >> Tina Summerland >> here, and Craig Fuller >> here. >> We have a quorum. >> All right. if you would please uh stand
and join us for the invocation and pledge. >> Heavenly Father, we thank you for this day uh for this beautiful weather. We thank you for the opportunity to serve the city of Winter Haven and her residents. We ask that you be with us and guide us. We ask these things in your name. Amen. >> Amen.
>> I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> Right. Has everyone had an opportunity
to review the minutes of the previous meeting? >> Yes. >> I make a motion we approve the minutes. >> Second. >> All right. We have a second. All those in favor of approving the minutes say I. >> I. All oppose. Same sign. Okay. Minutes are approved. Okay. I will move into a brief explanation of how the hearing
will go. uh cases will be read into the record and city staff will provide a presentation. Uh at that time, commissioners will have an opportunity to ask questions of staff. Um once those questions have been answered, we will close the planning portion of the hearing and reopen the public portion of
the hearing. Anyone wishing to speak for or against a case may do so. We ask that you limit your uh comments to five minutes. Um once everyone from p the public has had an opportunity to ask questions, we will close the public portion of the hearing and reopen the
planning portion of the hearing. At that time, we will have an opportunity to ask additional questions or entertain a motion or approval and a vote. Um anyone uh here tonight that thinks they may speak for or against a case, if you would please stand and Jordan will swear
you in. Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give in this case shall be the truth? >> Yes, ma'am. >> All right. Moving on to uh new business. Case number P-25-07-S
request by Cypress 3 LLC for a standalone parking lot in the commercial downtown C1 zoning district. General location 129 Bates Avenue Southwest. The area covered by this request is 66 plus or minus acres.
>> All right. So staff uh received a request from the applicant u to continue this item to the December 2nd, 2025 planning commission meeting. So staff would uh recommend the planning commission make an action to do so. >> Okay. Um, I'll make a motion to move the
the item number P- sorry about that. 25-07-S to the December 2nd uh planning commission for a hearing. >> Second. >> All right, we have a second. All those in favor say I.
>> I. All oppose, same sign. All right, moving on. Case number P-25-8-S, request by Yakler Properties LLC for a standalone parking lot in the mixeduse MX zoning district. General location uh
112 Avenue D Southeast. The area covered by this request is 31 plus or minus acres. >> All right, Heather, for the record, uh before you on the screen is the zoning map. The subject property there is um in the hatched it is MX zoning. Um it is
one parcel off from the frontage of First Street South which is immediately adjacent there to that C3 zoning. Um as you look at the aerial you can see that there is a a vacant building on the property um that at one time was residential and then did serve in an
office capacity and is currently vacant and then a uh non-conforming parking area on the property. This is a view of the subject property as you stand on Avenue D and look back at it. Then this is a view to the west out there to First
Street South. As you look to the north, the applicants um office uses are across the street and then to the east there is residential uses. Yakler Properties LLC is the petitioner and they do request special use approval
for a standalone parking lot located in the MX zoning district. The property subject to this request is located at 112 Avenue D Southeast. The subject property consists of a vacant building and a non-conforming paved driveway and gravel area. The petitioner intends to
use the standalone parking lot for additional parking for the Florida Water Analysis Office located to the north across Avenue D Southeast. Standalone parking lots in the MX zoning district require special use approval by the planning commission. as the subject property has been used for parking prior
to receiving special use approval, the property is subject to a code compliance case started May 13, 2025. Additionally, if special use approval is granted, the property will require site plan approval prior to construction of the required improvements. Uh based on the
petitioner's request, an approximate scent space parking lot would be created on the subject property. The demand for additional parking is to accommodate their office located across um Avenue D to the north. Minimal off-site impacts are expected. Therefore, staff does
recommend the planning commission approve this case subject to the conditions that are located in your agenda packet. Um there's again the aerial and then this is the conceptual plan that was provided. Again, it will have to go through a full site plan um to make sure that it meets, but this is
kind of a conceptual to what they think they may be able to um fit on the property. I stand for any questions that you may have. >> One uh what is the minimum uh parking uh parking space width >> that >> 20 20 by 9?
>> No, the width 9T it is nine. Okay. Yeah, I knew that was close. That was why I was bringing it up. Usually they're 10 I think, right? >> Nine standard in the city. >> Okay. >> All right, that's it.
>> Any other questions? >> All right, we will close the planning portion of the hearing and open the public portion of the hearing. Anyone wishing to speak for against this case may do so? No. All right, we will close the public portion of the hearing and reopen the planning portion of the hearing. Any
additional questions? All right. I will go ahead and make a motion uh in favor of case number P-25-8-S request by Yakler Properties LLC for a standalone parking lot in the mixeduse
MX zoning district. General location 112 Avenue D Southeast. The area covered by this request is 33 31 plus or minus acres as presented uh in the fact sheet with um the conditions uh by staff. All
right, we have a a second. All those in favor say I. >> I. >> All oppose, same sign. All right, moving on to case number P-25-9-S, request by First Missionary Baptist Church, uh, WHFL, Inc. for special use
approval for the construction of a new fellowship hall and classrooms facility with associated paved and unpaved parking uh area unpaved parking areas located in the multif family residential low density R3 zoning district general
location 200 Avenue R northwest the area covered by this request is 5.06 06 plus or minus acres. >> Good evening, Chris Young, senior planner for the record. Um, so here we can see the property and it does include five approximately five acres. It's
several parcels, excuse me, several parcels. The larger uh T at the bottom is the church facility and the parcel up above is uh the unpaved parking area. So here we can kind of see where the the paved parking area is. Uh we have the
church facility, the fellowship hall. Uh we also have the a community center to the north. Um as well as some uh just unpaved uh parking spaces. Uh here is the building that they're
looking to uh redevelop the property. This is looking north. So here again, we can see the the unpaid parking spaces that they currently have. This is looking uh west across the front of it. And this this is looking back towards the neighborhood uh south. And here to
the right uh you can see the image of the building's uh rear. First Missionary Baptist Church uh uh WHFL, Inc. petitioner request planning commission grant special use approval for the constructions of a new fellowship hall and classrooms facility
with the associated paved and unpaid parking areas in the multif family residential R3 zoning district. The subject property totaling 5.06 06 acres is located at 200 Avenue R north Northwest. The property contains a 13,396 ft sanctuary building, two Sunday school
buildings totaling 7,40 square ft, a 6,370 ft community center, several single family and multif family residential units, and associated paved and unpaid parking areas. Uh the church currently has a seating capacity of approximately
uh uh 1,310 people uh and provides approximately 400 parking spaces across the entirety of the property. The church proposes to replace one of the existing Sunday school buildings with a new 10,465 ft fellowship hall and classroom facility. The building will be utilized
by parishioners and staff for meetings during normal church hours. The church is considered uh legal non-conforming as it's uh was constructed prior to the special use approval requirement of the current R3 zillian district. Uh much of the church was developed between the 50s
and the 80s uh predating this code. Uh special use approval is now required to allow expansion of the church facilities in the R3 residential zoning district. Approval of the special use request will bring the uh entire property into compliance with zoning and allow for the ex expansion.
Uh staff review of this request yields the following conclusions. Existing parking areas can accommodate the increased parking demand. Based on the existing use and proposed new building, minimal impacts to supporting infrastructure are expected. And due to the nature of the church's days and hours of operations, minimal peak hour
traffic impacts are expected. Uh and staff's re recommends approval uh as outlined in uh your agenda packets. And here again is the aerial. And I'll stand for any questions that you may have. And here's a concept plan. Sorry.
>> Okay. Any questions? >> No. All right. We will close the planning portion of the hearing and open the public portion of the hearing. Anyone wishing to speak for or against this case?
No. All right. We will close the public portion of the hearing and reopen the planning portion. Any additional questions? No. I'll make a motion to approve case number P-25-09-S request by First Missionary Baptist
Church, Winter Haven, Florida, Inc. for special use approval for the construction of a new fellowship hall and classrooms facility with associated paved and unpaved parking areas located in the multif family residential lowdensity R3 zoning district, general
location, 200 Avenue, R Northwest. The area covered by this request is 5.06 plus or minus acres. >> Second. >> Right. We have a second. All those in favor say I. >> I. >> I. All oppose. Same sign. >> All right. Moving on to case number
P-25-36 and P-25-37. Request by VimarDev LLC and Cunningham Investors LLC to amend the future land use on a parcel and a portion of another parcel from neighborhood suburban future
land use to neighborhood support future land use and to reszone a parcel and a portion of another parcel from planned unit development PD zoning district to commercial highway C3 zoning district. General location. The subject property is generally located at the northeast
corner of the intersection of Thompson Nursery Road and Cunningham Road and south of Thompson Nursery Road, approximately 330 ft east of Cunningham Road. The area covered by these requests is 46.21 plus or minus acres.
>> All right. Um before you is the future land use map. You can see the subject property there is in the hash. This is a part of the um Villimar subdivision area and the newly created um Thompson Nursery Road has that is will eventually
connect uh to the west. Um as you can see it is all neighborhood suburban in that area and then there are some nodes of conservation. As you look at the zoning uh it is a part of the Villar PUB um and then the residential that is in this area is
either R2 or R3. This is the aerial. It is a dated aerial um as there are homes on the majority of those lots that you can see outlined out. Um and then this this property is um cleared right now um if you were to drive out there as we'll see here in the
photos. Uh this is a view to the subject area on the north side of Thompson Nursery Road. Um this is looking across back at home on the south side to the southside subject area. Here's a little bit more of that. As you can see, there are those homes um that have been built.
This is some more of that area is a very long narrow um or not narrow but has a lot of frontage along Thompson Nursery Road. This again is that um four-lane Thompson Nursery Road that's located there to the east. Um it will tie in
with um what is Eloise Loop Road now as you know, but this is part of the Thompson Nursery Road realignment. It will eventually go to the west and connect all the way to 17. So, uh, the petitioners do request the city amend the 2035 future land use map on a parcel
and a portion of another parcel from neighborhood suburban future land use to neighborhood support future land use and then reszone the same parcel and portion of the other parcel from PUB to C3. The subject property totals 46.21 21 acres and is generally located to the
northeast corner of the intersection of Thompson Nursery Road and Cunningham Road and south of Thompson Nursing Road, approximately 330 ft east of Cunningham Road. The subject property is currently subject to PUD ordinance 02172. The parcel located north of Thompson Rush
Road is an open space tract in Villimar phase 7. And the portion of a parcel located south of Thompson Road was intended to be Villimar phase 8 and consists of 219 single family homes. The petitioners proposed to develop the property with commercial uses based on
the requested neighborhood support future land use designation. Theoretically, a maximum of 53,118 square feet based on the F of commercial could be developed on the site. Um, this is a smallcale amendment, so
there is no review by Florida Commerce or other local agencies. And staff's review of these requests yields the following conclusions. The proposed neighborhood support future land use in C3 zoning district is consistent with the subject properties frontage on an arterial road and close proximity to
intersections with collector roads. The city's 2035 comprehensive plan encourages commercial uses to focus into nodes centered around key intersections within the city. Further supporting this request is the presence of 1,792 residential units in the Villimar
subdivision alone and the presence of a thousand plus additional housing units within a short distance. The close proximity of these neighborhoods to this proposed development has the ability to reduce the number and the length of vehicle trips onto the surrounding roadway network through a more compact
development pattern as advocated in the comprehensive plans transportation element objective 2.1 and there is sufficient public infrastructure capacity to accommodate um the maximum theorem of development under C3 as you see in the summary in your agenda packet
of course as it goes through site plan official um concurrency would be given At that time, staff does recommend that the planning commission recommend approval of these requests and their foring to the city commission for final action. I stand for any questions that you may have.
>> Any questions? >> Just to be clear, Heather, um I think it would benefit everyone here. This this still has to come back for site plan approval. This is strictly a use change, right? We don't know exactly what will be built or where it will be positioned. >> That's correct. So, this is the the um
land use and zoning stage of it to to get those entitlements of what could be developed. It would have to go through site plan, meet all the requirements of the code for both um uses as well as square footages and setbacks and and all of that. >> Okay. >> Thank you.
>> Um I do have a question. So, the proposed road, the Thompson Nursery, that portion's already done. Th this co um section has been built, but it it only ties back into Eloise's um loop road there to the east, just around
where you see um Lake Reed is kind of ties in there and then it deads in to the west. It will eventually, and it's I think within six months in the county's timeline to be um working and and building the rest of it to make the full connection. It'll eventually connect all
the way to US 27 and all the way to the east and to US7 to the west. >> But currently in front of this property, the width that is that is what it is. >> Yeah, it's it's already built as it was in the pictures. So, it's four laned um divided highway and along the front edge
here. >> Okay. Okay. Any additional questions? >> Just a a quick one. Um the you've got the water wastewater demands. Was that I'm just trying to make sure which one's
the delta because it looks like the projected demands but there was already a proposed demand that was on it, right? Is it decreasing? That's what I was trying to figure out because this this was already part of the PUB, right? >> Yeah. So it it's so it is taking out 219
residential units and would replace it with commercial. Um the you'll there's more capacity for water and wastewater and transportation for the commercial than those 219 units but you also lose the demand that would be on school um
for the for the residential. >> Again it's just a snapshot in time on the maximum theoretical. So there is availability for that but in until we have actual site plans in with exact um uses and square footages we can't you
know say whether it'd be less or more per se >> right but it's it's somewhat similar but a slight increase probably okay that's that's kind of what I thought based on the there was a lot of units that were there I knew that any additional questions no all right we
will close the planning portion of the hearing and open the public portion of the hearing. Anyone from the public wishing to speak for against this case? If you would step up um to the microphone, if you state your name and address and Jordan will swear you in.
>> Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you're about to give in this case shall be the truth? >> Yes. My name is David Kasheski. I'm a homeowner at 226 Tteranova. I'm also the HOA president of Terteranova. If you look at the area that we're talking
about, it backs up to Terteranova. They had some pictures that you just looked at that were really nice that showed a complete empty space. Now, let me explain that the empty space against Pteranova is 10-ft tall weeds. The
reason they're weeds is because there's an overflow of water. If you look at the two lakes that are there up front, they overflow. When we get any kind of water, especially when if you get a hurricane, if you get large amounts of water, that area overflows approximately 100 yards
into that. We also have an overflow. If you look at the space on where it says Terteranova Boulevard, you'll notice there's one space in between. That's an overflow. That overflows also into that area. When there used to be a cow pasture there, the water was
approximately two to three feet deep because it got up to the bottom of the stomachs of the cows when they were walking in it. So, question number one is what are they going to do with all that water with their development? Question number two is
back about four or five years ago when I first came to this meeting, they were talking about housing and they were going to do housing residential. Then they switched it. Well, first of all, it was going to be senior care living. Then you approved that it wasn't going to be
senior care and it went to residential. Then a couple years later, they came back and said, "No, let's change the lots from size 60 foot lots to 50 foot lots." You then approve that. Now we're changing it again to commercial. My question is when your committee gets
these things and you get it, all these changes end up changing from what the original plan was that the developer was developing in the first place. So you approved it thinking this was going to be the way it is and now we have a completely different development.
That is my problem. So this other area that you're talking about that you're saying this road's going to be taken care of with Elway's Loop and it's going to connect in 6 months. I've had a committee member on the Eloise Loop Road construction area for the last year and
a half. And let me tell you, it's not going to be working until 2029, 2030 because there was a hold up way back on by 17. So this isn't all of a sudden going to come about in 6 months. We're looking two or three years down the road
where it actually interconnects. Secondly, I don't think anybody's taken into consideration in that road development of the road now having commercial use there. And because there's no stop signs there, there's no
stop lightss that are going to be there. The the closest stoplight's going to be at Teranova. There's no stoplight developed for this residential area at all. So, you're going to have cars flowing in and out of there. So, I mean, it's up to you guys to do what you want,
but first of all, I want to see before you approve anything, some plan of what they're going to do with the water that's all going to happen once we flood. Because if you raise all that, because you know, they've raised some of the other areas. You raise all that, it's going to flood into the community
of Teranova, and then you're going to have Terteranova not very happy. Thank you very much for your time. Have a good day. >> Thank you for your comments. Heather, do you want to touch on retention >> or what might be?
>> Yeah, I mean a part of any development and they will have to do swift mud permitting. They will have storm water retention that will retain water on site. I mean currently as it's undeveloped that it's just doing the natural flow of the land and so when something is developed that will help um
contain the water on site instead of the flow. Um and I'll leave it to the applicants engineer is here and he can speak on that much more eloquently than I just did. >> U maybe no. Um uh John Banner with Wooden Associates Engineering 1925 uh
Barto Road, Lakeland, Florida 3381. Um but yes, following up um on what Heather said, um yes, there is flood plane out there as well. So um um and storm water does have to be permitted with the water management district um as well as the city. So um those are both um both those
areas are um within 100 or there's certain areas of the site that are within um flood plane. So, um any um essentially those areas we'd have to either stay out of or we'd have to provide compensating storage for um and then we'd provide storage for um any
storm water generated by the site um on site essentially since there's essentially nowhere else for it it to go. So um I know the application is for you know 46 acres um but but again um a big chunk of that's going to go towards um storm water retention towards um
required buffering um and for uh flood plane compensation if there's any impacts within those um within those flood plane areas. So um it's so and that's required by swift mud, it's required by FEMA and it's required by the city. Um just a just a couple of the
other items um that were mentioned too. Um as far as water and wastewater usage, not really knowing the final uses of the site, kind of hard um kind of hard to kind of hard to compare at this point. Um I though um you know homes are a big
um are you know have a heavy use of water waste water. Uh I would say we'd be comparable or less probably water wastewater usage um compared to the amount of homes that were going to be developed there. Um again um traffic-wise, yes, there's
major improvements there going on with Thompson Nursery. Um and in those next stages, I I know six months um I think may start the next phase. I think the total buildouts, you know, scheduled for, you know, 20 2031, I think, but um but that will include Yeah. from 27 all
the way out to um 17 and or Snively. So um but that'll but that'll be fourlaned and there's and there's a um there's a light plan that that intersection of of Thompson Nursery and then Eloise Loop. So Eloise Loop comes in and and um and actually makes a T intersection there
with Thompson Nursery. So but we'll have to look at you know any traffic impacts too um in the develop in the uh site permitting stage. So, um, we'll look at that kind of with the future projections of what's going to be on on those roads. So, um, again, that's got to be done.
This is the uses out there are not determined yet. This is just to get the commercial, um, uh, the commercial land use and zoning in place and then, um, once we have those details, um, do the detailed engineering work for traffic impacts. And I'm happy to take any
questions or or, um, you know, any questions that come up, too. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Anyone else from the public wishing to speak? >> We'll have Jordan swear. >> Maybe. >> Do you solemnly swear or affirm that the
testimony you're about to give in this case shall be the truth? >> Yes. I'm Wendy Coutiner. I live at 214 Teranova Drive or Boulevard, sorry. And I just my question is if they put stores there, the crime that is going to come into our neighborhood and I live
directly behind there. Right now I see trees and a prairie or swamp land and people can will be able to walk into my yard and do whatever they want. if there is no fencing or is will there be some type of fencing to block if it's
commercial because I don't want somebody coming in my backyard and having a party when I'm on vacation and there is a lot of pools in that area. What if a little kid walks over there and walks into somebody's lai and drowns? Are they going to be responsible for that? Is the
city going to be responsible? Crime is my biggest fear and all the traffic now it is very congested right there and if you put a store there that's going to double the traffic and we have a new Publix going in half I
don't even think it's a mile away with a brand new 7-Eleven so I don't know why we need another commercial building there that's all I'm just worried about crime and the children that are in that neighborhood >> thank you for your comments
>> I would like to address because of um commercial abuing residential. There are requirements for landscape buffers that do include a six-foot opaque fence and then um a wide buffer there of of trees and so forth. So there will be separation because then you know and
setbacks as well for many property lines. >> I think other than we estimate less trips and less traffic with commercial versus 219 single family or is it about equal? uh it it's going to become down to what the final uses are. So the
analysis that is um you know within here on the water and the wastewater um is based on if that was all retail commercial which may not be the final use on that but we kind of use what the highest maximum could be just kind of
get worst case scenario kind of numbers but there could be a mixture of different stuff that could go there that would be lower trip um than than a single family home. So until we have that final, it's hard to know. >> Right. Okay. >> And I can if I can jump in real quick
too on the on the traffic generation side. Again, as Heather indicated, we we don't know the end user. So, you know, we're kind of guessing at at what the end result's going to be, but um there was over 200 homes that were already
permitted to go onto this property. That's going to be somewhere around Sean 4 to 600 p.m. peak hour trips. 200 homes. >> Um be about 200 >> about 200 peak hour peak hour trips. >> Um you know a typical thousand foot
retail um shop um generates a a fraction of that. It's going to be probably in the range of 25 to 30 PM peak hour trips. Um and so you know just kind of give perspective. Um again we're we
don't know the end users. Um the other thing to consider though is that um while we have some of these improvements in place when they come in or these plans in place for Thompson Nursery Road that includes a light at this um
intersection with Eloise Loop um if when they come in if it's a heavier traffic user than what was anticipated um they still have to get a driveway connection permit with from Pole County. It could be an opportunity to expedite
some of the improvements from 2028, 2029, 2030 quicker as part of a condition for that driveway access permit. The developer could be required to make some of those improvements. >> Okay. Thank you, Eric. Anybody else from the public wishing to speak for against this
case? Yeah, please. >> Thank you. Um, and just one more point on the on the on the traffic too. Um, you know, I I think something that staff pointed out too that's important to note is um, you know, all these commercial use, you know, everybody who lives out
there now has to essentially travel um, to the, you know, to the nearest commercial nodes here. So, you're talking about a mile, mile and a half away. So real point of this is to or real goal here is to um you know you're going to have a lot of internal capture
of trips too that that you know that previously headed out on these roads you know so you're going to try to reduce trip lengths too um by having this here really one of the last areas u at this future intersection that you could actually do commercial. So um I think
staff pointed that out too but that's a but that's a goal here is to reduce the lengths of trips on on those roads now too. So, >> okay. >> Thank you. >> Yes, sir. >> You can please. >> May I ask the people that are developing
this when are they looking that they would have some development there? What year? >> The question is are you are you looking developing it now obviously 2026 2027 because when you look at the road and we
know the roads are keep getting pushed back uh the the this the where it's going to totally interconnect and be not a problem anymore. You're looking at 2030. So if you're looking to put in a a development there in 2027,
you've got three years where you don't have the infrastructure to handle it. That's my question. >> Um I I I don't know if we have an actual time frame on when it would be developed. Um this is kind of step one.
Um and again I we we would look it we we at the time of at the time of site permitting um we'd have to get um we'd have to have concurrency approved. So we'd have essentially the roadway infrastructure would have to be in place or the improvements would have to be
made um to make the roadway network um viable for the improvement that's going there. So um we kind of can't put the you know we can't put the oh we can't put the cart in front of the horse. I mean, those things have to be in place essentially. I But I I wish I we're kind
of at step one and and but I don't have an actual time frame. >> Yeah. >> So, what I'm trying here is the fact that you may have commercial use but without the infrastructure to handle it. >> And that that's the point that I was
getting at was we will not issue a permit for development unless there is the infrastructure in place. That's what concurrency is. That's what I was getting at was if the developer proposes a project that generates enough trips that now warrants a signal or additional
turn lanes at this at this intersection, then the developer would be required to put those improvements in. Um, we would not issue a development permit until the he can meet the concurrency requirements, which means there is capacity for the project. Right now
where you're looking is just a your road isn't even open yet because people are just coming to one side of it and until Eloise Loop is built con with that which is looking now from what I understand about three years from now at least
that's going to be that way and so you're saying that that's not going to be developed for another three years that way. What I'm saying is if the developer comes in with a site plan for a project that generates enough trips to warrant a traffic signal, the developer will have to put it in and make those
improvements so it could come earlier. >> We wouldn't issue a >> just so that let me try and yeah help clarify right this this is step one. So this is just the zoning and use change. So this is not in any way, shape or form an approval for them to build anything starting tomorrow.
>> Okay. No, I I understand that. I also I have one more question. Sure. Is what is the height restriction on what they're asking in whatever the >> the C3 zoning district allows a maximum height of 65 ft. >> 65 ft. So that's what a sixoot building
six foot uh six building >> five to six depends on the ceiling heights. >> Okay. So you're Wow. Okay. That's quite a bit for a residential area, but thank you.
>> Thank you for your comments. >> All right. Anyone else from the public? >> No. All right. We will close the public portion of the hearing and open the planning portion of the hearing. Any additional questions? >> Motion to approve. Motion to approve case numbers P2536
and P2537 requested by VMR Dev LLC and Cunningham Investors LLC to amend the future land use on parcel and a portion of another parcel from neighborhood suburban future land use to neighborhood support future
land use and to reszone a parcel and a portion of another parcel from a planned unit development PD zoning district to commercial highway C3. 3 zoning district. General location. The subject property is located generally located at
the northeast corner of the intersection of Thompson Nursery Road and Cunningham Road and south of Thompson Nursery Road. Approximately 330 ft east of Cunningham Road. The area covered by these request is this request is 46.21 plus or minus
acres. >> Second. >> We have a second. All those in favor say I. I. >> All oppose, same sign. Okay, moving on to other business comments from staff. >> Uh just a couple items. Um update update
you on past cases. The items we heard in October, the uh two city parcels and the little small parcel on US7 just north of Home Depot there, those are moving forward to the city commission for final action this month. And then the last thing is I want to just bring to your
attention our December meeting is December 2nd. Just to let you know that is the Tuesday immediately following the Thanksgiving holiday. So just be mindful of that. So >> it is Tuesday. >> It is Tuesday. >> Tuesday. >> Today was only Monday due to the bylaws
because tomorrow is the city election. >> So >> okay comments from planning commissioners. >> No comments from the public. All right. We are adjourned.